Students’ instrumental understanding in solving spatial mathematical problems across levels of mathematical ability
Article Sidebar
- instrumental understanding, spatial reasoning, geometry problems
Abstract
This study explores students’ instrumental understanding of spatial geometry problems, accounting for differences in initial mathematical ability. Many students tend to solve geometry problems procedurally without sufficient conceptual understanding, while research that examines explicitly instrumental understanding in spatial contexts remains limited. A qualitative case study design was employed involving 25 eighth-grade students from a public junior high school in Pagar Alam City, South Sumatra. Data were collected through written tests and in-depth interviews with six students representing high, medium, and low levels of mathematical ability. The analysis was guided by four indicators of instrumental understanding: recalling concepts, identifying concepts, selecting appropriate solution strategies, and representing concepts visually and in written form. The findings indicate apparent differences across ability levels. Students with high initial mathematical ability consistently fulfilled all four indicators across various spatial geometry problems. In contrast, students with medium and low ability demonstrated partial fulfilment of the indicators, particularly in topics such as cylinder volume and triangular prisms. These results suggest that students’ initial mathematical ability plays a crucial role in the development of instrumental understanding. Therefore, differentiated instructional strategies aligned with students' ability levels are recommended to support balanced procedural and conceptual learning in spatial geometry.
Full text article
References
Adams, J., Resnick, I., & Lowrie, T. (2023). Supporting senior high-school students' measurement and geometry performance: Does spatial training transfer to mathematics achievement? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(4), 879–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00416-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-022-00416-y
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Amalina, I. K., & Vidákovich, T. (2023). Cognitive and socioeconomic factors that influence the mathematical problem-solving skills of students. Heliyon, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19539
Amir, M. F., Wardana, M. D. K., Zannah, M., Rudyanto, H. E., & Nawafilah, N. Q. (2022). Capturing Strategies and Difficulties in Solving Negative Integers: A Case Study of Instrumental Understanding. Acta Scientiae, 24(2), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6432 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6432
Angraini, L. M., Larsari, V. N., Muhammad, I., & Kania, N. (2023). Generalizations and Analogical Reasoning of Junior High School Viewed From Bruner’S Learning Theory. Infinity Journal, 12(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p291-306 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p291-306
Awalina, A. N., & Masduki. (2025). The Difficulties of Low-Impulsive Students in Solving Geometry Problems in Terms of Spatial Reasoning. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3142(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0262119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0262119
Aziiza, Y. F., & Juandi, D. (2021). Student’s learning obstacle on understanding the concept of prism surface area. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012115 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012115
Bakker, A., & van Eerde, D. (2015). An Introduction to Design-Based Research with an Example From Statistics Education. 429–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9181-6_16
Barbieri, C., Miller‑Cotto, D., Sarah, C., & Chawla, K. (2023). A Meta ‑ analysis of the Worked Examples E ff ect on Mathematics Performance. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/1 0.1 007/s1 0648-023-09745-1
Basir, M. A., Waluya, S. B., Dwijanto, & Isnarto. (2022). How Students Use Cognitive Structures to Process Information in the Algebraic Reasoning? European Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 821–834. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.821 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.821
Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics …, 843–908.
Buteau, C., Gueudet, G., Muller, E., Mgombelo, J., & Sacristán, A. I. (2020). University students turning computer programming into an instrument for 'authentic' mathematical work. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(7), 1020–1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1648892 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1648892
Chiphambo, S. M., & Mtsi, N. (2021). Exploring Grade 8 Students’ Errors When Learning About the Surface Area of Prisms. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/10994 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10994
Choo, S., Park, S., & Nelson, N. J. (2021). Evaluating Spatial Thinking Ability Using Item Response Theory: Differential Item Functioning Across Math Learning Disabilities and Geometry Instructions. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(2), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720912417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948720912417
Fadhilah, M. N., & Masduki. (2023). Exploring students’ spatial reasoning ability in solving geometry problems based on the learning style. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2727. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141423 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0141423
Fernanda, A., & Kholid, M. N. (2023). Defragmenting the structure of mathematical thinking students in solving problems in the analytical geometry material field. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2886(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0154619 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0154619
Foong, C. C., Bashir Ghouse, N. L., Lye, A. J., Pallath, V., Hong, W. H., & Vadivelu, J. (2022). Differences between high- and low-achieving pre-clinical medical students: a qualitative instrumental case study from a theory of action perspective. Annals of Medicine, 54(1), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1967440 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2021.1967440
García-Moya, M., Marcos, S., & Fernández-Cézar, R. (2024). Non-routine mathematical problems and the strategies used by gifted students: A case study. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs , 24(4), 1175–1189. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12695
Gargrish, S., Kaur, D. P., Mantri, A., Singh, G., & Sharma, B. (2021). Measuring effectiveness of augmented reality-based geometry learning assistant on memory retention abilities of the students in 3D geometry. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(6), 1811–1824. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22424
Handayani, P. N., & Sutama. (2024). Numeracy literacy skills of socio-cultural contexts on geometry in junior high schools. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2926(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182847
Herheim, R. (2023). On the origin, characteristics, and usefulness of instrumental and relational understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 113(3), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10225-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-023-10225-0
Kahl, T., Segerer, R., Grob, A., & Möhring, W. (2022). Bidirectional associations among executive functions, visual-spatial skills, and mathematical achievement in primary school students: Insights from a longitudinal study. Cognitive Development, 62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101149 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2021.101149
Kholid, M. N. (2022). Students' metacognition in solving non-routine problems. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i1.11776 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v13i1.11776
Kholid, M. N., Imawati, A., Swastika, A., Maharani, S., & Pradana, L. N. (2021). How are Students' Conceptual Understanding for Solving Mathematical Problem? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012018
Kirkland, P. K., & McNeil, N. M. (2021). Question Design Affects Students' Sense-Making on Mathematics Word Problems. Cognitive Science, 45(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12960 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12960
Lennon-Maslin, M., Quaiser-Pohl, C., & Wickord, L. C. (2024). Beyond numbers: the role of mathematics self-concept and spatial anxiety in shaping mental rotation performance and STEM preferences in primary education. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1300598 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1300598
Mangilala, B.-L. D., & Cajandig, A. J. S. (2025). Assessing the Problem-Solving Abilities and their Difficulties in Learning Mathematics as Basis for Instructional Strategies Framework. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, IX(III), 4211–4221. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.90300336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.90300336
Masduki, M., Savitri, D., & Khotimah, R. P. (2023). Students' Visual Reasoning Ability in Solving Quadratic Functions in Terms of Learning Style. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 7(3), 576. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i3.13547 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v7i3.13547
Murtiyasa, B., Rejeki, S., Setyaningsih, R., & A, M. (2019). Students' Thinking in Solving Geometric Problems Based on PISA Levels Students' Thinking in Solving Geometric Problems B ased on PISA Levels. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012068 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1320/1/012068
Niileksela, C. R., Robbins, J., & Hajovsky, D. B. (2025). General Ability Level Moderates Cognitive–Achievement Relations for Mathematics. Journal of Intelligence, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence13060065
Nori, R., Boccia, M., Palmiero, M., & Piccardi, L. (2023). The contribution of field independence in virtual spatial updating. Current Psychology, 42(6), 4567–4576. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01788-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01788-3
Nur, Z. W., & Khotimah, R. P. (2021). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah geometri bidang ditinjau dominasi otak kiri mahasiswa. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika. 10(2), 786–796. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3482 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3482
Nurwijayanti, A., Budiyono, & Fitriana, L. (2018). The geometry ability of junior high school students in Karanganyar based on Hoffer's theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012085 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012085
Sibanda, E. (2021). Exploration Of Grade 8 Learners' Misconceptions In Learning Surface Area And Volume Of Prisms At A High School In Johannesburg East District. Doctoral Dissertation, University Of South Africa, 75(17), 399–405.
Skemp, R. (1976). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching, 77, 20–26.
Skemp, R. R. (2020). Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.5951/mtms.12.2.0088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.12.2.0088
Sorby, S. A., Duffy, G., & Yoon, S. Y. (2022). Math Instrument Development for Examining the Relationship between Spatial and Mathematical Problem-Solving Skills. Education Sciences, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110828 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110828
Wulandari, T. A., & Ishartono, N. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Representasi Matematika Siswa SMA Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Geometri Berdasarkan Level Berpikir Van Hiele. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 6(1), 97. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v6i1.5330 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v6i1.5330
Authors
Copyright (c) 2024 Berliani Ardelia Sukowati, Masduki Masduki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.