Pre-service secondary teachers’ knowledge of the function concept: A cluster analysis approach

José María Marbán (1), Edgar John Sintema (2)
(1) Department of Experimental, Social and Mathematical Sciences Teaching, University of Valladolid, Spain, Spain,
(2) PhD candidate, School of Doctoral Studies, University of Valladolid, Spain, Spain

Abstract

Teacher training is a key aspect for the success of any educational system and it is a prior challenge to face in-depth in Zambia. This study explores some dimensions of prospective secondary mathematics teachers’ subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge restricted to the topic of the function concept. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire that was administered to a sample of 150 prospective teachers enrolled at two public universities in Copperbelt, Zambia. A two step cluster analysis was used to reveal natural grouping within the data set obtained. As a result, a two-cluster solution was revealed as the solution that best profiled the data, with participants within both clusters scoring low in the knowledge domains under consideration. To further understand the results a one-way between-subjects multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and a follow-up discriminant function analysis (DFA) were also conducted. Common content knowledge was shown to be the most important factor in discriminating between prospective teachers in Cluster 1 and those in Cluster 2. The knowledge inadequacies identified are certainly worrisome and are likely to be transferred to young learners at secondary schools. Consequently, it is necessary to address with some urgency certain reforms in educational policies for teacher training programs in Zambia.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

Authors

José María Marbán
josemaria.marban@uva.es (Primary Contact)
Edgar John Sintema
Marbán, J. M., & Sintema, E. J. (2020). Pre-service secondary teachers’ knowledge of the function concept: A cluster analysis approach. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 5(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i1.9703

Article Details