Exploring the Global Development of Artificial Intelligence in Educational Practices

Authors

  • Miranti Merliana Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
    Indonesia
  • Muhammad Tanzil Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Raudhatul Ulum
    Indonesia
  • Nadzir Qaylan International Islamic University Malaysia
    Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/mier.v3i2.12364

Keywords:

Education, Technology, E-learning, Generative AI, Bibliometrics

Abstract

The rapid integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into global education systems has transformed learning processes, yet the existing literature remains fragmented, lacking a comprehensive understanding of its global research dynamics . This study aims to determine the mapping of the development and direction of education and technology research in publications indexed by Scopus. This research uses bibliometric analysis techniques to explore all publications indexed in the Scopus database on education and technology from 2014 to 2024. Data analyzed using Excel and R/R-Studio. VOSviewer is used to perform visual analysis of the simultaneous occurrence of keywords and document quotes. The author found 381 publications that matched the function, subject and criteria specified. The results of this research show an annual growth rate of 6.25% with the most publications about technology in 2013. Taiwan is the country that contributes the most publications with affiliation from education technology University Taiwan. Hwang G.J is the most productive writer on the theme of education relevant to technology. The bibliometric analysis carried out was limited to Scopus data. Other national and international databases were not taken into account in this study. This research presents a brief overview of the literature accessible to researchers working in the fields of Education and technology that provides recommendations for future research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] G.-D. Petrescu, A.-L. Preda, A.-C. Radu, L.-A. Ulmet, and A.-V. Radu, “Evaluating Medical Students’ Satisfaction with E-Learning Platforms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis Within a Multimodal Educational Framework,” Soc. Sci., vol. 14, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.3390/socsci14030160.

[2] Á. Halász and Z. Kenesei, “Cross-cohort analysis of how COVID has changed the online learning experience of business students,” Int. J. Manag. Educ., vol. 23, no. 2, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2024.101121.

[3] B. Mojumder, M. J. Uddin, and K. Dey, “Perspectives, preparedness and challenges of the abrupt transition of emergency online learning to traditional methods in higher education of Bangladesh in the post-pandemic era,” Discov. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s44217-025-00417-6.

[4] J. Gómez-Galán, E. López-Meneses, and D. Cobos-Sanchiz, “Diachronic research on the time of internet use for academic tasks by Spanish-speaking university students in the pre-COVID era,” Discov. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44217-024-00116-8.

[5] S. W. M. Groeneveld et al., “Essential competencies of nurses working with AI-driven lifestyle monitoring in long-term care: A modified Delphi study,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 149, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106659.

[6] C. Li, W. Xing, Y. Song, and B. Lyu, “RICE AlgebraBot: Lessons learned from designing and developing responsible conversational AI using induction, concretization, and exemplification to support algebra learning,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 8, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100338.

[7] L. Guan, J. C.-K. Lee, Y. Zhang, and M. M. Gu, “Investigating the tripartite interaction among teachers, students, and generative AI in EFL education: A mixed-methods study,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 8, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100384.

[8] B. W. Stone, “Generative AI in Higher Education: Uncertain Students, Ambiguous Use Cases, and Mercenary Perspectives,” Teach. Psychol., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 347–356, 2025, doi: 10.1177/00986283241305398.

[9] A. S. Espartinez, “Exploring student and teacher perceptions of ChatGPT use in higher education: A Q-Methodology study,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100264.

[10] H. Wang, A. Dang, Z. Wu, and S. Mac, “Generative AI in higher education: Seeing ChatGPT through universities’ policies, resources, and guidelines,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100326.

[11] A. Altamimi, “Harnessing the integration of chat GPT in higher education: the evaluation of stakeholders sentiments using NLP techniques,” Discov. Sustain., vol. 5, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00774-6.

[12] M. Bikanga Ada, “It Helps with Crap Lecturers and Their Low Effort: Investigating Computer Science Students’ Perceptions of Using ChatGPT for Learning,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 10, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14101106.

[13] A. Nirwana, “Parenting problems in the digital age and their solution development in the frame of value education,” Multidiscip. Rev., vol. 7, no. 8, 2024, doi: 10.31893/multirev.2024163.

[14] T. A. Mustofa, N. L. Inayati, S. Hidayat, and V. N. Vambudi, “Pelatihan membaca Al-Quran menggunakan metode Tsaqifa,” SELAPARANG J. Pengabdi. Masy. Berkemajuan, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 3274–3281, 2024.

[15] M. Merliana, M. W. Shohib, and N. L. Inayati, The Influence of Panca Jiwa Values in Forming the Character of International Boarding School KH Mas Mansur Mahasanri, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. Atlantis Press SARL, 2024. doi: 10.2991/978-2-38476-102-9_62.

[16] A. Shata and K. Hartley, “Artificial intelligence and communication technologies in academia: faculty perceptions and the adoption of generative AI,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 22, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s41239-025-00511-7.

[17] J. Shi, X. Xia, H. Zhuang, Z. Li, and K. Xu, “Empowering individuals to adopt artificial intelligence for health information seeking: A latent profile analysis among users in Hong Kong,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 375, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118059.

[18] E. H. H. Rincón, D. Jimenez, L. A. C. Aguilar, J. M. P. Flórez, Á. E. R. Tapia, and C. L. J. Peñuela, “Mapping the use of artificial intelligence in medical education: a scoping review,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 25, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07089-8.

[19] H. Aldreabi, N. K. S. Dahdoul, M. Alhur, N. Alzboun, and N. R. Alsalhi, “Determinants of Student Adoption of Generative AI in Higher Education,” Electron. J. e-Learning, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 15–33, 2025, doi: 10.34190/ejel.23.1.3599.

[20] Mahmudulhassan, W. Waston, A. Nirwana, S. Amini, M. M. A. Sholeh, and M. Muthoifin, “A moral-based curriculum to improve civilization and human resource development in Bangladesh,” Multidiscip. Rev., vol. 7, no. 8, p. 2024137, May 2024, doi: 10.31893/multirev.2024137.

[21] A. A. N. Nirwana, “Bibliometric Analysis of Islamic Education and Character Development in Religious Education Practices in Indonesia,” Pakistan J. Life Soc. Sci., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1231–1245, 2024, doi: 10.57239/PJLSS-2024-22.2.0086.

[22] M. Abuzar, “University Students’ Trust in AI: Examining Reliance and Strategies for Critical Engagement,” Int. J. Interact. Mob. Technol. , vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 70–82, 2025, doi: 10.3991/ijim.v19i07.52875.

[23] X. Zhang and K. O. Umeanowai, “Exploring the transformative influence of artificial intelligence in EFL context: A comprehensive bibliometric analysis,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 3183–3198, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10639-024-12937-z.

[24] H. Amiri et al., “Medical, dental, and nursing students’ attitudes and knowledge towards artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 24, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05406-1.

[25] A. C. N. Ayala, D. A. O. Valenzuela Narváez, G. A. Manes Cangana, S. L. C. Orbe, A. J. Torres Anaya, and E. Ayala Huaynatte, “Blended learning research: Identifying research output patterns in Scopus (2000-2023),” Iberoam. J. Sci. Meas. Commun., vol. 4, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.47909/ijsmc.124.4.

[26] H. Darif and M. A. Lafraxo, “Teaching and Learning in Health Sciences in the Era of Educational Technologies: A Bibliometric Analysis,” Educ. Process Int. J., vol. 14, 2025, doi: 10.22521/edupij.2025.14.84.

[27] I. García-Martínez, J. M. Fernández-Batanero, J. Fernández-Cerero, and S. P. León, “Analysing the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Computational Sciences on Student Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis,” J. New Approaches Educ. Res., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 171–197, 2023, doi: 10.7821/naer.2023.1.1240.

[28] M. Perkins et al., “Simple techniques to bypass GenAI text detectors: implications for inclusive education,” Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., vol. 21, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s41239-024-00487-w.

[29] M. Parviz, “AI in education: Comparative perspectives from STEM and Non-STEM instructors,” Comput. Educ. Open, vol. 6, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100190.

[30] J. Roa González, N. Sánchez Sánchez, I. Seoane Pujol, and J. L. Díaz Palencia, “Challenges and perspectives in the evolution of distance and online education towards higher technological environments,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2024.2447168.

[31] R. Sibisanu, S. Cseminschi, A. Ionica, M. Leba, A. Draghici, and Y. Nassar, “Investigating School Principals’ Burnout: A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Stress, Sustainability, and Organizational Climate,” Sustain., vol. 16, no. 16, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16167016.

[32] A. Nguyen, H. N. Ngo, Y. Hong, B. Dang, and B.-P. T. Nguyen, “Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 4221–4241, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w.

[33] N. Wu, “Study on the Effectiveness of English Teaching in Universities Based on 5G Mobile Internet,” Int. J. Web-Based Learn. Teach. Technol., vol. 19, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.4018/IJWLTT.349221.

[34] B. G. Acosta-Enriquez, C. G. Arbulú Pérez Vargas, O. Huamaní Jordan, M. A. Arbulú Ballesteros, and A. E. Paredes Morales, “Exploring attitudes toward ChatGPT among college students: An empirical analysis of cognitive, affective, and behavioral components using path analysis,” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 7, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100320.

[35] A. O. Ifelebuegu, “Rise of the robots: What it means for educators,” J. Appl. Learn. Teach., vol. 7, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.16.

[36] C. Linderoth, M. Hultén, and L. Stenliden, “Competing visions of artificial intelligence in education—A heuristic analysis on sociotechnical imaginaries and problematizations in policy guidelines,” Policy Futur. Educ., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1662–1678, 2024, doi: 10.1177/14782103241228900.

[37] G. Ozkaya and A. Demirhan, “Analysis of Countries in Terms of Artificial Intelligence Technologies: PROMETHEE and GAIA Method Approach,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15054604.

[38] A. D. Samala, S. Rawas, C.-C. Santiago, O. Bondarenko, A. G. Samala, and D. Novaliendry, “Harmony in Education: An In-Depth Exploration of Indonesian Academic Landscape, Challenges, and Prospects Towards the Golden Generation 2045 Vision,” TEM J., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2436–2456, 2024, doi: 10.18421/TEM133-71.

[39] K. Barnes et al., “Education in times of restriction: an examination of refugee girls’ and young women’s access to learning during COVID-19 school closures in Pakistan,” Educ. Res. Policy Pract., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 115–133, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10671-023-09353-4.

[40] N. Mutovkina and Z. Pan, “Modeling Interaction in the Educational Process is a Tool for Improving its Effectiveness,” Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci., vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 72–85, 2024, doi: 10.5815/ijmecs.2024.03.06.

[41] M. Li, “A Model to Predict and Analyze Students’ Learning Preferences and their Cognitive Development through Educational Big Data,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 18, no. 16, pp. 182–197, 2023, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v18i16.42701.

[42] N. N. Zakaria, “Distance Learning through the Grand Egyptian Museum: Leveraging Modern Technology to Teach about Ancient Egypt among Schools and National Museums,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 7, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14070714.

[43] Y. Niu, “Integrated physical education and medicine in general physical education at universities in the age of educational technologies,” BMC Med. Educ., vol. 23, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04440-9.

[44] E. Sviridova, E. Yastrebova, G. Bakirova, and F. Rebrina, “Immersive technologies as an innovative tool to increase academic success and motivation in higher education,” Front. Educ., vol. 8, 2023, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2023.1192760.

[45] J. Luong et al., “Exploring Artificial Intelligence Readiness in Medical Students: Analysis of a Global Survey,” Med. Sci. Educ., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 331–341, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02190-x.

[46] R. Kaliisa and J. A. Dolonen, “CADA: a teacher-facing learning analytics dashboard to foster teachers’ awareness of students’ participation and discourse patterns in online discussions,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 937–958, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10758-022-09598-7.

[47] M. Bahari, I. Arpaci, N. F. M. Azmi, and L. Shuib, “Predicting the Intention to Use Learning Analytics for Academic Advising in Higher Education,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 21, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su152115190.

[48] A. G. Qazi and N. Pachler, “Conceptualising a data analytics framework to support targeted teacher professional development,” Prof. Dev. Educ., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 495–518, 2025, doi: 10.1080/19415257.2024.2422066.

[49] B. Jugembayeva and A. Murzagaliyeva, “Physics Students’ Innovation Readiness for Digital Learning within the University 4.0 Model: Essential Scientific and Pedagogical Elements That Cause the Educational Format to Evolve in the Context of Advanced Technology Trends,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15010233.

[50] J. Zapata-Paulini and M. Cabanillas-Carbonell, “5G Technology for Innovation Education (Sustainable Development Goals 4): A Systematic Review,” Int. J. Eng. Pedagog., vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 149–169, 2024, doi: 10.3991/ijep.v14i5.48063.

[51] G. Riofrío-Calderón and M.-S. Ramírez-Montoya, “Mediation Models for Online Learning and Perspectives for Open Innovation: Systematic Review of the Literature,” Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn., vol. 18, no. 18, pp. 102–120, 2023, doi: 10.3991/ijet.v18i18.37721.

[52] A. Kaban, “Artificial Intelligence in Education: A Science Mapping Approach,” Int. J. Educ. Math. Sci. Technol., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 844–861, 2023, doi: 10.46328/ijemst.3368.

[53] M. A. Ayanwale, R. R. Molefi, and S. Oyeniran, “Analyzing the evolution of machine learning integration in educational research: a bibliometric perspective,” Discov. Educ., vol. 3, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s44217-024-00119-5.

[54] H. Yaseen, A. S. Mohammad, N. Ashal, H. Abusaimeh, A. Ali, and A.-A. A. Sharabati, “The Impact of Adaptive Learning Technologies, Personalized Feedback, and Interactive AI Tools on Student Engagement: The Moderating Role of Digital Literacy,” Sustain., vol. 17, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.3390/su17031133.

[55] A. M. Lazăr, A. Repanovici, D. Popa, D. G. Ionas, and A. I. Dobrescu, “Ethical Principles in AI Use for Assessment: Exploring Students’ Perspectives on Ethical Principles in Academic Publishing,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 11, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14111239.

[56] Y. Wang and S. Yang, “Constructing and Testing AI International Legal Education Coupling-Enabling Model,” Sustain., vol. 16, no. 4, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16041524.

[57] N. van der Stap, T. van den Bogaart, S. van Ginkel, E. Rahimi, and J. Versendaal, “Towards teaching strategies addressing online learning in blended learning courses for adult-learners,” Comput. Educ., vol. 219, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105103.

[58] E. Perez, S. Manca, R. Fernández-Pascual, and C. Mc Guckin, “A systematic review of social media as a teaching and learning tool in higher education: A theoretical grounding perspective,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 11921–11950, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10639-023-11647-2.

[59] M. P.-C. Lin, A. L. Liu, E. Poitras, M. Chang, and D. H. Chang, “An Exploratory Study on the Efficacy and Inclusivity of AI Technologies in Diverse Learning Environments,” Sustain., vol. 16, no. 20, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16208992.

[60] M. van Haastrecht, M. Haas, M. Brinkhuis, and M. Spruit, “Understanding validity criteria in technology-enhanced learning: A systematic literature review,” Comput. Educ., vol. 220, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105128.

[61] S. M. Almalki, “Exploring Students’ Perspectives on the Implementation of a Self-Organised Learning Environment: SOLE via Mobile Devices,” Int. J. Mob. Blended Learn., vol. 16, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.4018/IJMBL.336473.

[62] A. Kumi-Yeboah, Y. Kim, B. Yankson, S. Aikins, and Y. A. Dadson, “Diverse students’ perspectives on privacy and technology integration in higher education,” Br. J. Educ. Technol., vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 1671–1692, 2023, doi: 10.1111/bjet.13386.

[63] M. A. Almulla, “Investigating Students’ Intention to Use M-Learning: The Mediating Role of Mobile Usefulness and Intention to Use,” Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ., vol. 20, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.4018/IJICTE.337136.

[64] M. Griffith and C. Lechuga-Jimenez, “Design Thinking in Higher Education Case Studies: Disciplinary Contrasts between Cultural Heritage and Language and Technology,” Educ. Sci., vol. 14, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.3390/educsci14010090.

[65] A. C. Alves-Noreña, M.-J. Rodríguez-Conde, J. P. Hernández-Ramos, and J. W. Castro-Salgado, “Technology and Emotions: AI-Driven Software Prototyping for the Analysis of Emotional States and Early Detection of Risky Behaviors in University Students,” Educ. Sci., vol. 15, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.3390/educsci15030350.

[66] S. Hosseini, C. Camacho, K. Donjuan, L. Pego, and J. Escamilla, “Unplugging for Student Success: Examining the Benefits of Disconnecting from Technology during COVID-19 Education for Emergency Planning,” Educ. Sci., vol. 13, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.3390/educsci13050446.

[67] M. Dimeli and A. Kostas, “The Role of ChatGPT in Education: Applications, Challenges: Insights From a Systematic Review,” J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., vol. 24, pp. 1–30, 2025, doi: 10.28945/5422.

[68] K. Kanont et al., “Generative-AI, a Learning Assistant? Factors Influencing Higher-Ed Students’ Technology Acceptance,” Electron. J. e-Learning, vol. 22, no. 6 Special Issue, pp. 18–33, 2024, doi: 10.34190/ejel.22.6.3196.

[69] E. Pacheco-Velazquez, V. Rodes-Paragarino, and A. Marquez-Uribe, “Exploring educational simulation platform features for addressing complexity in Industry 4.0: a qualitative analysis of insights from logistics experts,” Front. Educ., vol. 9, 2024, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1331911.

[70] Mukhtar Imam, “The Threats of Ai and Disinformation in Times of Global Crises,” Bull. Islam. Res., 2025.

[71] M. kasheem Mohieddin Masoud, Abdulnasir Alsayd, “Global Trends and Challenges in Teacher Training: A Bibliometric Analysis (2019–2024),” Bull. Islam. Res., vol. Vol.3,No.4, 2025.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-08-08

Accepted

2025-10-20

Published

2025-10-23

How to Cite

Merliana, M., Tanzil, M., & Qaylan, N. (2025). Exploring the Global Development of Artificial Intelligence in Educational Practices. Multicultural Islamic Education Review, 3(2), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.23917/mier.v3i2.12364

Issue

Section

Articles