Submissions

Author Guidelines

General Information

The submitted manuscript for publication to MIER should be original research work that high academic merit. The article should not be published previously and not under consideration for publication in the other publisher elsewhere and free from plagiarism. All submission will be undergone similarity check using Turnitin. The manuscript that does not meet those requirements will be automatically rejected.

Please prepare your manuscript following the journal template prior the submission (Download Template).

Submission criteria

Manuscript submitted for publication in MIER should appropriate with the following criteria:

1. Written in good English.
2. Suitable to the scope of the journal.
3. Original article that has not been published elsewhere, and will not be submitted to any journal during the review process.
4. Well-formatted following the journal template and style.

Preparing manuscript file

MIER accepts manuscript of both Research and Review article. The article should be between 4000- 8000 words length. The manuscript must be prepared using word processing software, e.g., Microsoft Word, Open Office, Libre Office, with document format doc, or docx.

Types of Articles

1. Original Research Paper: An original research paper is a primary literature article that provides a detailed report on research. The paper should include the following sections: introduction, research methods, results and discussion, and conclusion. The word count for this type of paper generally ranges from 4000 to 8000 words.
2. Review Paper: In the context of educational study, a review paper is a scholarly article that critically examines and synthesizes existing research on a specific Educational topic. It serves as a comprehensive summary and evaluation of the current state of knowledge within the field of Education. Unlike original research papers that generate new data, review papers analyze and interpret a wide range of sources, including primary research studies, literature reviews, and other relevant publications. By systematically reviewing and synthesizing these sources, review papers identify key themes, trends, and knowledge gaps in the Education literature. They provide a valuable resource for educators by offering a consolidated understanding of the subject, highlighting areas of consensus or debate, and suggesting future research directions to advance the field of Education. Review papers in education contribute to the advancement of knowledge, help researchers navigate the existing literature, and promote informed discussions and critical thinking within the discipline. The word count for this type of paper generally ranges from 4000 to 7000 words. The structure is more flexible, but if possible use introduction, research methods, results and discussion, and conclusion.

General Structure

1. Paper Identity

The title of a research paper should be concise and clear, accurately reflecting the content and focus of the study. It should capture the main idea or objective of the research. Additionally, it is important to include the names of all authors who have contributed to the paper and their respective affiliations. This information helps establish the credentials and affiliations of the researchers, providing context for their work. Furthermore, it is crucial to provide complete contact information for the corresponding author, including their email address. This allows readers, editors, and reviewers to easily contact the corresponding author for any inquiries, collaborations, or further discussions related to the research. Including this information promotes transparency and facilitates effective communication within the scientific community.

2. Abstract

The abstract of a research paper serves as a concise summary that provides an overview of the entire study. In this paragraph, the purpose of the experiment or research is briefly described, highlighting the specific objectives and aims of the study. It also includes a summary of the research methodology employed, outlining the approach, techniques, and data collection methods used to conduct the study. Furthermore, the abstract highlights the main findings and results obtained from the research, emphasizing their significance and implications in the field of study. This Abstract should be written within 150-250 words. Lastly, it is important to include 3-5 keywords that represent the main concepts and themes addressed in the research, facilitating easy indexing and searchability of the paper in academic databases and literature searches. These keywords should accurately reflect the core elements of the study and enable researchers to find relevant articles related to the topic.

3. Introduction

The introduction section of a research paper begins with a broad overview of the topic, setting the context and providing background information to familiarize the readers. It gradually narrows down the focus to the specific work being done, highlighting the research gap or knowledge deficiency in the existing literature. This can be achieved by conducting a thorough literature review and identifying areas that require further investigation. The introduction should clearly state the research questions or objectives that the study aims to address. These research questions serve as guiding principles for the entire research process and provide a clear direction for the study. Additionally, it is important to explain the approach or methodology that will be employed to answer these research questions. This may include describing the research design, data collection methods, and analytical techniques that will be utilized. By providing a comprehensive overview, the introduction section establishes the relevance and significance of the research study and helps readers understand the research's scope and purpose.

4. Literature Review

The Literature Review section should present a concise yet critical synthesis of relevant previous studies, highlighting key theories, findings, and research gaps that support the current study. Authors are expected to analyze—not merely summarize—prior works, demonstrating how their research fits within the existing body of knowledge. Sources should be recent, relevant, and primarily peer-reviewed, with proper citations following the required style. The review should be well-organized and logically structured to build a clear rationale for the study.

5. Methodology

The method section of a research paper provides a detailed description of the research methods employed in the study. It begins by specifying the educational setting in which the research was conducted, offering contextual information about the institution, grade level, or learning environment relevant to the study. This includes details such as the type of school (e.g., public, private, or charter), the demographics of the student population, and any pertinent institutional characteristics. The materials used in the study, such as data sources, assessment instruments, surveys, interview protocols, or educational tools, are also described. The procedures followed during data collection, including sampling strategies, participant recruitment, administration of instruments, and classroom observations or interviews, are outlined to ensure transparency and reproducibility. Additionally, the data collection techniques, such as structured interviews, focus groups, questionnaires, or archival data analysis, are explained to provide insight into the data-gathering process. If the study involves an experimental or quasi-experimental design, the method section should clearly explain the design framework. This includes the formulation of research hypotheses, the assignment of participants to control and treatment groups, the implementation of instructional interventions or pedagogical strategies, and the manipulation of independent variables. Such a design provides a systematic and controlled approach to investigating the research questions and enables rigorous analysis and interpretation of results. In the case of qualitative or theoretical research, the method section should highlight any conceptual or analytical frameworks employed. This includes the use of educational theories, coding schemes, thematic analysis approaches, or interpretive models used to analyze and synthesize the data. By describing the research methods comprehensively, the method section enables other researchers to understand and replicate the study. It ensures transparency and rigor in the research process, allowing readers to evaluate the validity and reliability of the findings

6. Results and Discussion

The results and discussion section presents the study's findings using clear tables, charts, or figures, each accompanied by explanations that highlight key insights to aid interpretation. Findings are discussed in relation to existing educational literature, identifying similarities, differences, or emerging patterns. This contextualization demonstrates how the study contributes to theory, practice, or policy in education. The section also addresses the study’s limitations, such as methodological constraints or contextual factors, to ensure transparency and acknowledge factors that may influence the interpretation of results. Finally, suggestions for future research are provided, highlighting areas for further investigation or ways to build upon the current study to advance knowledge in the field of education.

7. Conclusion

The conclusion section of a research paper serves to summarize the key research findings and provide a concise overview of the main points discussed throughout the paper. It provides a final opportunity to highlight the significance and contributions of the research to the field of study. In this section, the researcher should succinctly summarize the main findings, emphasizing the most important results and their implications. By doing so, readers can quickly grasp the essence of the research and its major outcomes.

The conclusion should highlight the main points discussed in the paper, effectively summarizing the key arguments and insights presented throughout the study. This may include a brief recapitulation of the research questions, the research methodology employed, and the key findings that support or refute the initial hypotheses. By reiterating these main points, the conclusion reinforces the central message of the research and ensures that readers grasp the core content.

The conclusion should explicitly state how the research contributes to the field of study. This involves reflecting on the broader implications and significance of the findings. The researcher should articulate how their research adds to the existing knowledge base, addresses gaps in the literature, or provides novel insights into the subject matter. By clearly articulating the research's contribution, the conclusion solidifies the value and relevance of the study within the field of education.

8. Acknowledgment

The acknowledgment section of a research paper provides an opportunity for the authors to express gratitude to individuals or organizations that have contributed to the research and preparation of the manuscript. It serves as a gesture of appreciation and recognition for those who have provided support, guidance, or assistance throughout the research process. In this section, the authors can acknowledge the contributions of individuals such as mentors, advisors, colleagues, or collaborators who have provided valuable insights, feedback, or assistance in data collection, analysis, or writing. It is important to acknowledge their specific contributions and the impact they have had on the research. The acknowledgment section is an appropriate place to acknowledge funding sources that have supported the research. This may include grants, scholarships, or fellowships provided by governmental agencies, research institutions, foundations, or other funding bodies. It is important to acknowledge the financial support received, as it enables the researchers to carry out the study and disseminate their findings. Providing transparency about the funding sources also adds credibility to the research and demonstrates the researchers' commitment to ethical practices. When acknowledging individuals or organizations, it is important to be specific and provide enough detail to properly recognize their contributions. This may include mentioning their names, affiliations, and the specific ways in which they have contributed to the research. It is also considerate to seek permission from individuals before acknowledging them, particularly if they are not co-authors of the paper. This ensures that their contributions are properly recognized and appreciated.

9. Author Contribution Statement

In accordance with the guidelines set by MIER, all authors are required to take public responsibility for the content of the work submitted to the journal

10. References

References must follow the IEEE citation style, which uses bracketed numerical references [x] within the body text, corresponding to a numerically ordered reference list at the end of the paper. References are listed in the order they appear in the text, not alphabetically. References must use the Mendeley, Zotero, Endnote, etc. system. With the numerical system, references are arranged in the reference list so that they match the order in which they are cited in the text.

Each reference entry should include the following (as applicable):
Author’s initials and last name, Title of Book or Article, edition (if any), city of publication: publisher, year of publication, and page numbers (if relevant).

Examples of in-text citation:

As explained in previous research [1], the political identity of Islam in Southeast Asia is complex.
This ideological approach is also supported by earlier research [2].

Examples in the reference list:

[1] S. S. Islam, The Politics of Islamic Identity in Southeast Asia, Singapore: Thomson Learning, 2005, p. 99.

[2] A. Syafii, "The Ideological Orientation of the Islamic Movement in Surakarta," Journal of Religious Literature, vol. II, no. 02, pp. 75–82, Dec. 2010.

[3] B. Effendy, Islam and the State: Transformation of Islamic Political Thought and Practice in Indonesia, Jakarta: Paramadina, 1998.

[4] J. Funston, "Thailand Reform Politics," in Government and Politics in Southeast Asia, J. Funston, Ed. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2001, pp. 113–136.

[5] S. A. Belhaj, Re-establishing the Khilafah State, the Greatest Obligation in Islam, M. S. al-Jawi, Trans. Bogor: Tariqul Izzah Library, 2008.

The Harvard (name–year) citation system is not used in IEEE style. Footnotes are also not used for bibliographic references, except for explanatory or supplementary notes.

Article Process

Manuscripts sent to the editorial board will then be selected through an editing session. Manuscripts that are eligible to be published in the MIER based on the evaluation of the editorial board will be sent to Mitra Bestari (Reviewer) who has expertise per the theme of the manuscript for correction. Manuscripts that require revision will be returned to the author for correction. After correction, the manuscript is sent back to the editorial board. Manuscripts that do not qualify for publication will be notified to the author, and manuscripts will not be returned, except at the request of the author.