The effectiveness of goal-free problems for studying triangle similarity in collaborative groups

Authors

  • Pratama Wahyu Purnama Department of Mathematics Education, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
    Indonesia
  • Endah Retnowati Department of Mathematics Education, Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
    Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i1.11198

Keywords:

Geometry, goal-free problems, cognitive load, collaborative learning

Abstract

Similarity is a topic in Geometry which investigates similar elements of a plane. This topic has a high complexity that generates cognitive load in working memory. A deep understanding of the concept is needed to solve similarity problems. Based on cognitive load theory, learning by goal-free problems is suggested since it can minimize cognitive load. This research examined the effectiveness of presenting similarity inquiries using goalfree problems for learning by collaboration. Using a factorial design: 2 presentation techniques (goal-free vs. goal-given problems) x 2 groupings (collaborative vs. individual) in authentic classrooms, the experiment consisted of four consecutive phases: introductory, learning phase, retention test, and transfer test. One-hundred eleven eighth-graders from four classrooms in a junior high school in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, served as research participants. The findings showed that students who were learning using goal-free problems possessed significantly higher scores of retention and transfer tests, as well as experience lower cognitive load during both tests. On the contrary, it was found that studying individually yielded a significantly higher transfer score than studying collaboratively. Since there was no interaction effect, it may be concluded that goal-free problems can be effective for either collaborative or individual learning.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-03-21

Published

2020-12-16

How to Cite

Purnama, P. W., & Retnowati, E. (2020). The effectiveness of goal-free problems for studying triangle similarity in collaborative groups. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(1), 32–45. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i1.11198

Issue

Section

Articles