Effects of Buddy system on year 9 students’ mathematical discernments and performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v10i2.7058Keywords:
Buddy system, Cooperative learning, Student discernments and performance, Secondary mathematicsAbstract
Cooperative learning is a student-centred approach that enhances engagement and understanding. This study investigates the effectiveness of the Buddy system, a cooperative learning strategy, in improving Year 9 students’ mathematical performance in converting between decimals, fractions, and percentages (DFP), and explores their perceptions of the system. Conducted in Brunei, where the Buddy system is relatively underexplored, the study employed a mixed-methods design using pre- and post-tests, questionnaires, and student reflection journals across three intervention cycles. Results showed an overall improvement in test scores, though a few students experienced slight score declines. Students generally viewed the Buddy system positively, citing peer guidance, emotional support, and collaborative learning as key benefits. While the findings support the system’s potential within this specific context, further research is needed to assess its applicability across subjects or educational levels.
References
Abdul Malak, S. S. D. (2015). Cooperative learning: Buddy system in an advanced accounting subject. International Conference on Accounting Studies (ICAS) 2015, 145–149. https://repo.uum.edu.my/id/eprint/17564/
Abd Mokmin, A. U. P. A., Bungsu, J., & Shahrill, M. (2023). Improving the performance and knowledge retention of aircraft maintenance engineering students in the theory of flight through STAD cooperative learning. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 3(2), 149-162. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajsee.v3i2.49336
Adams, D. (2016, November). The effectiveness of the buddy support system in special education in Malaysia. Conference: International Conference on Teacher Learning and Development (ICTLD) 2016. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320442550
Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010102
Al Murshidi, G. (2014). The impact of student-centred learning approach through workshops conduction on the UAE University female students’ confidence. European Journal of Business and Management Review, 2(5), 31–43.
Allan, F., Herbert, A., Peter, P., & Bridget, S. (2018). Teachers investigate their work : An introduction to action research across the professions. In Teachers Investigate Their Work (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315398822
Alqahtani, R., & Murry, F. R. (2015). High school peer buddy program: Impact on social and academic achievement for students with disabilities. European Journal of Educational Sciences, 02(01). https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v2no1a1
Balan, H. R. (2015). Using peer mentoring-buddy system as an intervention strategy to enhance Science research skills. Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 4(1), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.7828/jmds.v4i1.850
Cheng, D., & Walters, M. (2009). Peer-assisted learning in mathematics: An observational study of student success. Journal of Peer Learning, 2(1). https://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol2/iss1/3
Cruz, M. I. E., & Kwinta, A. (2013). “Buddy system”: A pedagogical innovation to promote online. PROFILE, 15(1), 207–221.
Flint, T. K. (2010). Making meaning together: Buddy reading in a first grade classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 38(4), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10643-010-0418-9
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Goodman, G., Powell, E. K., & Burke, J. E. (1989). The Buddy system: A reintegration technique. Academic Therapy, 25(2), 195-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/105345128902500207
Güvenç, H. (2010). The effects of cooperative learning and learning journals on teacher candidates’ self-regulated learning. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1477–1487.
Hong, K. L., Ramli, I. S. M., Mazlan, N. A., Rengasamy, M., Kong, H. L., & Muniandi, K. (2020). Enhancing Mathematical performance using fun teaching aids. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v9-i2/7486
Hossain, M. A., Tarmizi, R. A., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2012). Collaborative and cooperative learning in Malaysian Mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 3(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.22342/JME.3.2.569.103-114
Ismail, F. A., Bungsu, J., & Shahrill, M. (2023). Improving students’ participation and performance in building quantities through think-pair-share cooperative learning. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 3(3), 203-216. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJERT/article/view/50348
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. In Active Learning - Beyond the Future (pp. 59–70). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81086
Klima Ronen, I. (2020). Action research as a methodology for professional development in leading an educational process. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100826. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2019.100826
Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2002). The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 5(1).
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1540-4560.1946.TB02295.X
Lim, M. T. L., Shahrill, M., Mundia, L., Tengah, K. A., Tan, A., & Mahadi, M. A. (2016). An alternative approach to teaching: Implementing a cooperative learning strategy STAD at the junior college level. Advanced Science Letters, 22(5/6), 1725-1729. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.6748
Margetis, G., Ntoa, S., Bouhli, M., & Stephanidis, C. (2011). Study-buddy: Improving the learning process through technology-augmented studying environments. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 174 CCIS(PART 2), 504–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22095-1_101
Maurice, A., & Hann, A. (2015). Training in general surgery ward call: A resident-student buddy system. BMJ Open Quality, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u202587.w3786
Mohd Zahid, A. Z., Saifullizam, N. Z., Wan Chik, W. S., Khalid, N., Kamaruddin, S. F., & Mat Zin, M. (2021). Intervention programme: The implementation of buddy system programme amongst civil engineering students. Insight Journal, 8(3), 16–25.
Motzo, A. (2016). Evaluating the effects of a ‘student buddy’ initiative on student engagement and motivation. In Innovative language teaching and learning at university: enhancing participation and collaboration (pp. 19–28). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2016.000401
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86(4), 548–571. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10032
Pagni, D. (2004). Fractions and decimals. The Australian Mathematics Teacher, 60(4), 28–30. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.185652646639736
Reid, P., Chau, M., & Thalluri, J. (2016). Students’ experience and evaluation of peer-to-peer learning innovation. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-Professional Journal, 17(1), 101–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.11157/fohpe.v17i1.125
Slavin, R. E. (2011). Instruction based on cooperative learning. In R. E. Mayer, & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), The nature of learning: using research to inspire practice. OECD Publishing.
Stahl, R. J., Robert J., & VanSickle, R. L. (1992). Cooperative learning in the social studies classroom : An invitation to social study. National Council for the Social Studies.
Suleiman, Y., & Hammed, A. (2019). Perceived causes of students’ failure in mathematics in Kwara State junior secondary schools: Implication for educational managers. International Journal of Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6(1), 19–33.
Sweeney, E. S., & Quinn, R. J. (2000). Concentration: Connecting fractions, decimals & percents. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 5(5), 324–328.
Thalluri, J., O’Flaherty, J. A., & Shepherd, P. L. (2014). Classmate peer-coaching: “A study buddy support scheme.” Journal of Peer Learning, 7, 92–104. http://ro.uow.edu.au/ajplhttp://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol7/iss1/8
Tucker, P., & Irwin, J. D. (2016). Feasibility of a campus-based “buddy system” to promote physical activity: Canadian students’ perspectives. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, 3(3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.3.3.323
Ulvik, M. (2014). Student-teachers doing action research in their practicum: Why and how? Educational Action Research, 22(4), 518–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2014.918901
Wahat, N. W. A. (2020). Buddy System for students with disabilities: An action research with embedded Islamic values and perspectives. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 10(15). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v10-i15/8239
Willis, J. W., & Edwards, Claudia. (Eds.). (2014). Action research: Models, methods, and examples. Information Age Publishing.
Ziziumiza, S., Bungsu, J., & Shahrill, M. (2022). The effectiveness of cooperative learning STAD in improving mathematics skills in VTE engineering students. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v6i2.64003
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ms Siti Nur Amalina Jamil, Associate Professor Dr Masitah Shahrill, Yurizka Melia Sari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
