A task design based review on eye-tracking studies within mathematics education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v9i4.4128Keywords:
Low demand task, eye tracking, problem solving, High demand taskAbstract
This paper presents a based review on Eye-Tracking (ET) studies in mathematical problem-solving. ET method provides a promising channel for educational researchers to connect learning outcomes to cognitive processes. Due to the advent of digital technologies, eye tracking studies are increasingly growing in different fields and in mathematics education. The main principle of eye tracking is that our gaze and our focus of attention are connected. If the task provided by the teacher is one of the ways to analyze cognitive processes, we wonder how ET studies are dealing with load cognitive on task design. We captured 39 papers, 23 of which were more specifically analyzed, based on mathematical proposed tasks in three intertwined strands: mathematical problem-solving, affective aspects and reasoning and proofs. We observed an expressive amount of low demand tasks on ET papers, the studies are still mainly based on numerical issues and focused less on geometry topics, and few of them are integrating digital technology on the provided tasks. Our didactical contribution is to claim for more high cognitive demand tasks regarding mathematical processes of thinking and geometrical learning.
References
Abrahamson, D., Shayan, S., Bakker, A., & van der Schaaf, M. (2015). Eye-Tracking Piaget: Capturing the Emergence of Attentional Anchors in the Coordination of Proportional Motor Action. Human Development, 58(4-5), 218-244. doi:10.1159/000443153
Andrà, C., Arzarello, F., Ferrara, F., Holmqvist, K., Lindström, P., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). How students read mathematical representations: an eye tracking study. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME), Thessaloniki, Greece.
Andrá, C., Lindström, P., Arzarello, F., Holmqvist, K., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2015). Reading mathematics representations: An eye-tracking study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 237-259. doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9484-y
Andrzejewska, M., & Stolińska, A. (2016). Comparing the Difficulty of Tasks Using Eye Tracking Combined with Subjective and Behavioural Criteria. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9(3). doi:10.16910/jemr.9.3.3
Assis, A. R. d., & Bairral, M. A. (2022). Touches on Screen as New Signs in Blended Ways to Think Mathematically. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 32(4), 423-441. doi:10.29275/jerm.2022.32.4.423
Bairral, M. A. (2021). Escrevendo sobre cubo e estacionando bicicletas: tarefas visando à promoção de práticas insubordinadas em educação matemática. Revista @mbienteeducação, 14(1), 244-268. doi:10.26843/ae19828632v14n12021p244a268
Beach, P., & McConnel, J. (2019). Eye tracking methodology for studying teacher learning: a review of the research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 42(5), 485-501. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2018.1496415
Campbell, S. R., Handscomb, K., Zaparyniuk, N. E., Sha, L., Cimen, O. A., & Shipulina, O. V. (2009). Investigating image-based perception and reasoning in geometry. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association: Brain, Neuroscience, and Education SIG, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
Cohen, A. L., & Staub, A. (2015). Within-subject consistency and between-subject variability in Bayesian reasoning strategies. Cognitive Psychology, 81, 26-47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.08.001
Cohors-Fresenborg, E., Kramer, S., Pundsack, F., Sjuts, J., & Sommer, N. (2010). The role of metacognitive monitoring in explaining differences in mathematics achievement. ZDM, 42(2), 231-244. doi:10.1007/s11858-010-0237-x
Crisp, R., Inglis, M., Mason, J., & Watson, A. (2011). Individual differences in generalisation strategies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics 31, London, UK. http://www.bsrlm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/BSRLM-IP-31-3-07.pdf
Deng, R., & Gao, Y. (2022). A review of eye tracking research on video-based learning. Education and Information Technologies. doi:10.1007/s10639-022-11486-7
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by collaborative learning? In Collaborative Learning-Cognitive and Computational Approaches; Dillenbourg, P., Ed.; Pergamon: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1-19.
Duijzer, C. A. C. G., Shayan, S., Bakker, A., Van der Schaaf, M. F., & Abrahamson, D. (2017). Touchscreen Tablets: Coordinating Action and Perception for Mathematical Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00144
Espino, O., Santamaría, C., Meseguer, E., & Carreiras, M. (2005). Early and late processes in syllogistic reasoning: Evidence from eye-movements. Cognition, 98(1), B1-B9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.12.010
Fleig, H., Meiser, T., Ettlin, F., & Rummel, J. (2017). Statistical numeracy as a moderator of (pseudo)contingency effects on decision behavior. Acta Psychologica, 174, 68-79. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.01.002
Garcia Moreno-Esteva, E., Kervinen, A., Hannula, M. S., & Uitto, A. (2020). Scanning Signatures: A Graph Theoretical Model to Represent Visual Scanning Processes and A Proof of Concept Study in Biology Education. Education Sciences, 10(5), 141. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/10/5/141
Glenberg, A. M. (2008). Embodiment for Education. In P. Calvo & A. Gomila (Eds.), Handbook of Cognitive Science (pp. 355-372). San Diego: Elsevier.
Gray, C. T. (1917). Types of reading ability as exhibited through tests and laboratory experiments, an investigation subsidized by the General education board. Chicago, Ill: The University of Chicago Press.
Haataja, E., Garcia Moreno-Esteva, E., Salonen, V., Laine, A., Toivanen, M., & Hannula, M. S. (2019). Teacher's visual attention when scaffolding collaborative mathematical problem solving. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102877. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102877
Haataja, E., Moreno-Esteva, E. G., Toivanen, M., & Hannula, M. S. (2018). Teacher’s gaze behaviour when scaffolding peer interaction and mathematical thinking during collaborative problem-solving activity. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Umeå.
Haataja, E., Salonen, V., Laine, A., Toivanen, M., & Hannula, M. S. (2021). The Relation Between Teacher-Student Eye Contact and Teachers’ Interpersonal Behavior During Group Work: a Multiple-Person Gaze-Tracking Case Study in Secondary Mathematics Education. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 51-67. doi:10.1007/s10648-020-09538-w
Haataja, E., Toivanen, M., Laine, A., & Hannula, M. S. (2019). Teacher-student eye contact during scaffolding collaborative mathematical problem-solving. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 7(2), 9–26. doi:10.31129/LUMAT.7.2.350
Hannula, M. S., Haataja, E., Löfström, E., Garcia Moreno-Esteva, E., Salminen-Saari, J. F. A., & Laine, A. (2022). Advancing video research methodology to capture the processes of social interaction and multimodality. zdM – Mathematics Education, 54(2), 433-443. doi:10.1007/s11858-021-01323-5
Hannula, M. S., Toivanen, M., & Garcia Moreno-Esteva, E. (2019). Eye movements during collaborative geometry problem solving lesson. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the PME and Yandex Russian conference: Technology and Psychology for Mathematics Education.
Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Haataja, E. S. H., Hannula, M. S., & Garcia Moreno-Esteva, E. (2023). What can eye-tracking, combined with discourse analysis, teach us about the ineffectiveness of a group of students solving a geometric problem? Instructional Science. doi:10.1007/s11251-023-09617-9
Hodds, M., Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2014). Self-Explanation Training Improves Proof Comprehension. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 62-101. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0062
Holmqvist, K., Örbom, S. L., Hooge, I. T. C., Niehorster, D. C., Alexander, R. G., Andersson, R., . . . Hessels, R. S. (2023). Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline. Behavior Research Methods, 55(1), 364-416. doi:10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8
Hunt, T. E., Clark-Carter, D., & Sheffield, D. (2015). Exploring the Relationship Between Mathematics Anxiety and Performance: An Eye-Tracking Approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(2), 226-231. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3099
Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2012). Expert and Novice Approaches to Reading Mathematical Proofs. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education JRME, 43(4), 358-390. doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.43.4.0358
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative Learning: Improving University Instruction by Basing Practice on Validated Theory. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(3-4), 85-118.
Kanev, K.; Kimura, S.; Orr, T. (2009). A framework for Collaborative Learning in Dynamic Group Environments. Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol., 7, 58–77.
Kim, S., Pollanen, M., Reynolds, M. G., & Burr, W. S. (2018). Identification of errors in mathematical symbolism and notation: Implications for software design. In M. K. J. H. Davenport, G. Labahn, & J. Urban (Eds.) (Ed.), Mathematical software – ICMS 2018 (pp. 297–304). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 29(7), 1000-1009. doi:10.3758/BF03195762
Kosko, K. W. (2022). Pre-service teachers’ professional noticing when viewing standard and holographic recordings of children’s mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 17(4), 1-11. doi:10.29333/iejme/12310
Kosko, K. W., Austin, C. K., & Zolfaghari, M. (2023). Exploring teacher knowledge and noticing with eye tracking and 360 video. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Research Council on Mathematics Learning 2023, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Lai, M.-L., Tsai, M.-J., Yang, F.-Y., Hsu, C.-Y., Liu, T.-C., Lee, S. W.-Y., . . . Tsai, C.-C. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review, 10, 90-115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.10.001
Lilienthal, A. J., & Schindler, M. (2019). Current Trends in Eye Tracking Research in Mathematics Education: A PME Literature Review.
Maatta, O., McIntyre, N., Palomäki, J., Hannula, M. S., Scheinin, P., & Ihantola, P. (2021). Students in sight: Using mobile eye-tracking to investigate mathematics teachers’ gaze behaviour during task instruction-giving. Frontline Learning Research, 9(4), 92 - 115. doi:10.14786/flr.v9i4.965
Mariotti, M. A. (2000). Introduction to Proof: The Mediation of a Dynamic Software Environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1-3), 25-53.
Mock, J., Huber, S., Klein, E., & Moeller, K. (2016). Insights into numerical cognition: considering eye-fixations in number processing and arithmetic. Psychological Research, 80(3), 334-359. doi:10.1007/s00426-015-0739-9
Moutsios-Rentzos, A., & Stamatis, P. J. (2015). One-step ‘change’ and ‘compare’ word problems: Focusing on eye-movements. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13(3), 503-528. doi:doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.37.14133
Nazaruk, S. K., & Marchel, J. (2019). Effectiveness in the development and acquisition of mathematical skills in children in rural and urban preschools. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 3rd International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education, BalticSTE2019.
Ott, N., Brünken, R., Vogel, M., & Malone, S. (2018). Multiple symbolic representations: The combination of formula and text supports problem solving in the mathematical field of propositional logic. Learning and Instruction, 58, 88-105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.010
Panse, A., Alcock, L., & Inglis, M. (2018). Reading Proofs for Validation and Comprehension: an Expert-Novice Eye-Movement Study. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 4(3), 357-375. doi:10.1007/s40753-018-0077-6
Perttula, A. (2017). Eye Tracking studies focusing on mathematics: A literature review. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 11th International Technology, Education and Development Conference (INTED), Valencia, Spain.
Radford, L. (2014). Towards an embodied, cultural, and material conception of mathematics cognition. ZDM – The international journal on Mathematics Education, 46(3), 349-361. doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0591-1
Randolph, J. J. (2009). A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review. Practical Assessment Research Evaluation, 14(13), 1-13. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v14n13.pdf
Rosch, J. L., & Vogel-Walcutt, J. J. (2013). A review of eye-tracking applications as tools for training. Cognition, Technology & Work, 15(3), 313-327. doi:10.1007/s10111-012-0234-7
Roy, S., Inglis, M., & Alcock, L. (2017). Multimedia resources designed to support learning from written proofs: an eye-movement study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(2), 249-266. doi:10.1007/s10649-017-9754-7
Salminen-Saari, J. F. A., Garcia Moreno-Esteva, E., Haataja, E., Toivanen, M., Hannula, M. S., & Laine, A. (2021). Phases of collaborative mathematical problem solving and joint attention: a case study utilizing mobile gaze tracking. zdM – Mathematics Education, 53(4), 771-784. doi:10.1007/s11858-021-01280-z
Shayan, S., Abrahamson, D., Bakker, A., Duijzer, C. A. C. G., & van der Schaaf, M. (2017). Eye-Tracking the Emergence of Attentional Anchors in a Mathematics Learning Tablet Activity. In C. Was, F. Sansosti, & B. Morris (Eds.), Eye-Tracking Technology Applications in Educational Research (pp. 166-194). Hershey, PA, USA: IGI Global.
Şimşek, İ., Uygun, T., & Güner, P. (2020). Problem-solving performance and mathematics achievement: The mediating role of eye tracking measurements. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 7(3), 1111-1124.
Soares, R. d. S., Lukasova, K., Carthery-Goulart, M. T., & Sato, J. R. (2021). Student’s Perspective and Teachers’ Metacognition: Applications of Eye-Tracking in Education and Scientific Research in Schools. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.673615
Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional Tasks and the Development of Student Capacity to Think and Reason: An Analysis of the Relationship between Teaching and Learning in a Reform Mathematics Project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2(1), 50-80. doi:10.1080/1380361960020103
Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical Tasks as a Framework for Reflection: From Research to Practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(4), 268-275. Retrieved from http://blog.ncue.edu.tw/sys/lib/read_attach.php?id=3954
Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.
Strohmaier, A. R., MacKay, K. J., Obersteiner, A., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). Eye-tracking methodology in mathematics education research: A systematic literature review. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(2), 147-200. doi:10.1007/s10649-020-09948-1
Strohmaier, A. R., Schiepe-Tiska, A., Müller, F., & Reiss, K. (2017). Mathematical reading patterns - The influence of self-concept and situational context. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), San Antonio, TX.
Watson, A., & Ohtani, M. (Eds.). (2021). Task Design in Mathematics Education: an ICMNI Study 22. Hamburg: Springer.
Werner, K., & Raab, M. (2014). Moving your Eyes to Solution: Effects of Movements on the Perception of a Problem-Solving Task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(8), 1571-1578. doi:10.1080/17470218.2014.889723
Xolocotzin, U., Inglis, M., & Medrano, A. (2020). Eye-tracking the effects of visual representations: Linking vision and mathematical reasoning. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Mexico. Cinvestav.
Zhou, C., Li, H., & Bian, Y. (2020). Identifying the Optimal 3D Display Technology for Hands-On Virtual Experiential Learning: A Comparison Study. IEEE, 8, 73791-73803. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988678
Wilson, A., & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied Cognition is Not What you Think it is. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marcelo Bairral, Gilles Aldon
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.