Reframing Islamic Education Through Cognitive Conflict-Based Pedagogy for Democratic Agency

Authors

  • Youssef Abdelrahim Ain Shams University
    Egypt
  • Sahmir El-Raziq Ain Shams University
    Egypt
  • Tariq Mostafa Al-Azhar University
    Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/mier.v4i1.17122

Keywords:

Cognitive Conflict-Based Pedagogy, Democratic Agency, Progressive Islamic Education, Fiqh Learning, Dialogic Pedagogy

Abstract

The growing challenges of democratic fragility, ideological polarization, and declining dialogic engagement in contemporary societies have intensified the need for transformative approaches within Islamic education. However, fiqh instruction in many Islamic educational contexts continues to be dominated by transmission-oriented pedagogies emphasizing memorization, doctrinal conformity, and passive learning, thereby limiting students’ opportunities to develop democratic agency and reflective reasoning. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of Cognitive Conflict-Based Pedagogy (CCBP) in fostering democratic agency among students in fiqh learning at Ma’had Al-Azhar Cairo. Employing a quasi-experimental design with a non-equivalent control group pretest–posttest approach, the study involved 44 students divided into an experimental group (n = 23) and a control group (n = 21). Data were collected through the Democratic Agency Scale, classroom observations, and reflective learning journals, and were analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired sample t-tests, independent sample t-tests, N-gain analysis, and effect size calculation. The findings revealed that students exposed to Cognitive Conflict-Based Pedagogy demonstrated significantly higher levels of democratic agency compared to those receiving conventional instruction. The intervention effectively enhanced students’ critical deliberation, dialogic engagement, reflective judgment, and openness toward differing perspectives within fiqh learning contexts. The study further indicates that cognitive conflict functions not merely as a cognitive strategy but as a transformative pedagogical mechanism capable of recontextualizing Islamic education for democratic and pluralistic societies. These findings contribute to contemporary discussions on Islamic educational reform, democratic pedagogy, and dialogic learning by highlighting the compatibility between Islamic intellectual traditions and democratic educational principles

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] A. Nakissa, “Cognitive science of religion and the study of islam: Rethinking islamic theology, law, education, and mysticism using the works of al-ghazālī,” Method Theory Study Relig., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 205–232, 2020, doi: 10.1163/15700682-12341474.

[2] M. Ali, F. Al Anshori, S. A. Aryani, A. N. An, and M. Elbanna, “The Effectiveness of Boarding School-Based Principals Social Competence on School Environment Welfare at Islamic Junior High Schools,” J. Manag. World, vol. 2024, no. 4, pp. 777–784, 2024, doi: 10.53935/jomw.v2024i4.527.

[3] G. W. Oesterdiekhoff, “Divergent worlds of political consciousness and behavior in contemporary societies. The contribution of the cognitive-developmental approach to the foundation of the political sciences,” J. Eur. Hist. Law, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 77–86, 2020.

[4] E. Huber, J. Gunderson, and J. D. Stephens, “Private education and inequality in the knowledge economy,” Policy Soc., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 171–188, 2020, doi: 10.1080/14494035.2019.1636603.

[5] E. Vinokur, A. Yomtovian, and G. Itzchakov, “Education toward cosmopolitanism as a pathway to reducing polarisation,” Glob. Soc. Educ., 2025, doi: 10.1080/14767724.2025.2520949.

[6] H. A. Al Kuhayli, K. El Alaoui, and M. A. E. Pilotti, “Critical minds in Arabic and Islamic studies courses: A whiff of change,” Teach. Theol. Relig., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 152–164, 2021, doi: 10.1111/teth.12591.

[7] J. B. Holbein, D. S. Hillygus, M. A. Lenard, C. Gibson-Davis, and D. V Hill, “The Development of Students’ Engagement in School, Community and Democracy,” Br. J. Polit. Sci., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 1439–1457, 2020, doi: 10.1017/S000712341800025X.

[8] D. Mardiana, “Does University Students’ Adversity Quotient Influence the Constructiveness of Islamic Education Program (PAI) Online Learning? Evidence from COVID-19,” Asia Pacific J. Educ. Educ., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 273–290, 2024, doi: 10.21315/apjee2024.39.2.14.

[9] I. Janković, “Epistemic feature of democracy: The role of expert in democratic decision making,” Filoz. i Drus., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 37–42, 2020, doi: 10.2298/FID2001037J.

[10] A. Alharbi, “Primary school teachers’ perceptions of integrating Islamic education into science education,” J. Educ. e-Learning Res., vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 664–674, 2025, doi: 10.20448/jeelr.v12i4.7861.

[11] S. M. Nawaf and H. M. Nasief, “The role of the Al-Abdari family in the flourishing of the scientific move-ment in Al-Andalus,” Res. J. Adv. Humanit., vol. 6, no. 3, 2025, doi: 10.58256/3p9dmm97.

[12] V. Vakulenko, A. Bourmistrov, and G. Grossi, “Through the prism of cognition: exploration of local political leaders’ behaviour during incented voluntary municipal amalgamation,” Local Gov. Stud., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 975–999, 2023, doi: 10.1080/03003930.2022.2106222.

[13] F. Piedade, T. Neves, M. Loff, and I. Menezes, “Emotional and critical citizens: Portuguese students’ engagement with wicked issues in contemporary EU policy,” Educ. Rev., vol. 77, no. 2, pp. 406–426, 2025, doi: 10.1080/00131911.2023.2203391.

[14] U. Sahid, I. Wasliman, H. S. Muchtar, and H. S. Insan, “Management of Student Characteristics Through Extracurricular Activities in The School Environment Based on Islamic Boarding Schools,” Munaddhomah, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 116–125, 2021, doi: 10.31538/munaddhomah.v2i2.97.

[15] E. Sant, J. McDonnell, K. Pashby, and D. Menendez Alvarez-Hevia, “Pedagogies of agonistic democracy and citizenship education,” Educ. Citizsh. Soc. Justice, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 227–244, 2021, doi: 10.1177/1746197920962373.

[16] N. Aflisia, N. Ahmad E.Q, and A. Suhartini, “The Urgency of Theological Foundations in Islamic Education in the Industry Era 4.0 towards the Society Era 5.0,” Int. J. Educ. Res. Dev., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 60–77, 2021, doi: 10.52760/ijerd.v1i1.4.

[17] S. Ikhwan, S. Sugiarti, D. Hidayati, J. Slamet, and Y. Hidayat, “A Gamification-Based Reading Comprehension Course in Learning Management System: Enhancing Learning Outcomes, Critical Thinking, and Self-Directed Learning Skills for Islamic Undergraduate Students,” Appl. Res. English Lang., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 211–238, 2025, doi: 10.22108/are.2025.146587.2609.

[18] A. Khanif, “Islamic Religious Education Learning Strategy for Alpha Generation: A Case Study at Darul Qur’an School Elementary School Semarang City,” Ascarya J. Islam. Sci. Cult. Soc. Stud., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2023, doi: 10.53754/iscs.v3i1.461.

[19] I. Warsah, R. Morganna, M. Uyun, H. Hamengkubuwono, and M. Afandi, “The Impact of Collaborative Learning on Learners’ Critical Thinking Skills,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 443–460, 2021.

[20] Y. M. Sari, E. B. Rahaju, A. H. Rosyidi, N. R. Prihartiwi, H. Purnomo, and T. A. Putri, “Teacher Collaboration in Designing Context-Based Numeracy Tasks,” Math. Educ. J., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 71–96, 2026, doi: 10.22342/mej.v20i1.pp71-96.

[21] S. Nur Alim, “Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Multimedia Menggunakan Macromedia Flash Dalam Fiqih Islam Materi Pokok Sholat Dan Zakat,” Munaddhomah, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 38–59, 2021, doi: 10.31538/munaddhomah.v2i1.66.

[22] C. Layyina, “The Role of Fiqh Teachers to Improve Students’ Learning Motivation and Discipline of Worship through Online Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2022, doi: 10.14421/jpai.2022.191-01.

[23] R. F. Tanjung and A. A. Ritonga, “The Effect of Using Edmodo Learning Media and Learning Motivation on Fiqih Learning Outcomes,” Munaddhomah, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 203–211, 2022, doi: 10.31538/munaddhomah.v3i2.266.

[24] M. A. M. Rani et al., “Online Mode of Teaching in Revert Studies: Student’s Self Efficacy and Performance,” J. Fatwa Manag. Res., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 89–106, 2022, doi: 10.33102/jfatwa.vol27no2.442.

[25] I. N. Marzuki, A. A. M. Azaini, T. T. Guan, A. K. Fadhli, and A. Md Ariff, “The Exploration of Interactive Islamic Visual Storytelling Illustration through Surah Luqman,” Glob. J. Al-Thaqafah, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 148–164, 2025, doi: 10.7187/GJAT072025-10.

[26] S. F. N. Husna, R. R. Prasanti, N. Amaliah, F. N. Husniyah, and N. Qameer, “Assessing Digital Technology Integration in Islamic Religious Education: A CIPP Model Evaluation,” Islam. Pedagog. Eval. J., vol. 1, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 17–32, Mar. 2026.

[27] A. Koç, “Using Media News in Religious Education as a Teaching Material,” Cumhur. Ilah. Derg., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 520–545, 2021, doi: 10.18505/CUID.871575.

[28] C. Alkouatli, N. Memon, D. Chown, and Y. Sai, “Something more beautiful: educational and epistemic integrations beyond inequities in Muslim-minority contexts,” J. Multicult. Educ., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 406–418, 2023, doi: 10.1108/JME-05-2022-0062.

[29] S. Abdul Khalil, N. F. Mohd Razif, and M. I. Rosele, “Developing Ijtihad Skills for Undergraduate Students Through Problem-based Learning in Fiqh Subjects: Present Practices and The Way Forward,” Asia Pacific J. Educ. Educ., vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 197–217, 2024, doi: 10.21315/apjee2024.39.2.11.

[30] E. A. C. Barón, M. A. G. Gutiérrez, M. S. Sierra, and E. R. Á. Calderón, “Bibliometric Analysis of International Scientific Production on Education for Peace and Citizenship: Years 2000-2020,” Int. J. Sociol. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 72–95, 2022, doi: 10.17583/rise.7335.

[31] D. Mohammed, Q. Aini, D. Supriyanti, and M. Anggraeni, “Assimilate The Qur’an’s View with Science and Technology Perspectives,” APTISI Trans. Technopreneursh., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 42–47, 2021, doi: 10.34306/att.v3i1.141.

[32] A. Fakhruddin, S. Anwar, and M. R. Fajar Islamy, “Enhancing academic self-concept and historical literacy in Islamic studies through collaborative learning: a study on prospective Islamic Education teachers in Indonesia,” Cogent Educ., vol. 12, no. 1, 2025, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2025.2491871.

[33] N. L. Inayati, F. U. Al Mubarok, and A. F. Rohmani, “Enhancing Critical Thinking and Self Directed Learning through Integration of Digital Competence and Didactic Strategy in Higher Education,” J. Interdiscip. Stud. Educ., vol. 15, no. 2 SE-Education, Technology, and Scientific Innovation, pp. 85–108, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.32674/whffna77.

[34] H. Huttunen, “Education for deliberative democracy through the long-term view,” Theory Res. Educ., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 77–97, 2025, doi: 10.1177/14778785241264497.

[35] P. Setyosari, S. Utaya, and R. W. Ery Tri Djatmika, “Adversity quotient among students at traditional moslem school,” Kasetsart J. Soc. Sci., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 191–196, 2021, doi: 10.34044/j.kjss.2021.42.1.30.

[36] J. Matthes, M. Hirsch, S. Noetzel, and A. Binder, “The cognitive benefits of online microtargeted political ads: explaining attitudes, political interest, and campaign knowledge,” Inf. Commun. Soc., 2026, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2026.2642841.

[37] F. Kiil, “Looking for relief: Developing and testing the emotion-regulation explanation of selective exposure to political information,” Polit. Psychol., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 279–297, 2024, doi: 10.1111/pops.12929.

[38] S. Jazil et al., “Enhancing critical thinking in fiqh learning: The role of strategies and media integration in islamic higher education,” Malaysian J. Learn. Instr., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 51–81, 2025, doi: 10.32890/mjli2025.22.2.3.

[39] Y. Xing, J. Z. Zhang, V. C. Storey, and A. Koohang, “Diving into the divide: a systematic review of cognitive bias-based polarization on social media,” J. Enterp. Inf. Manag., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 259–287, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2023-0459.

[40] E. Alva, M. Urcia, and V. Vivas, “Civic Engagement of Future Citizens: An Insight from Peruvian Students’ Attitudes towards Relevant Societal Issues as Predictors of Expected Conventional Political Participation,” Child Indic. Res., vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 2187–2221, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12187-023-10049-7.

[41] M. Żerkowska-Balas and M. Wenzel, “Education through democracy – Civic activation of the youth: Self-reflection on program evaluation methodology,” J. Soc. Sci. Educ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 60–74, 2020, doi: 10.4119/jsse-2353.

[42] R. M. Nawi, M. Abdullah, N. M. Zhaffar, and U. H. Yusop, “Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Usul al-Fiqh in the Islamic Syariah Education Subject (KSSM) in Malaysia: A Literature Review,” Glob. J. Al-Thaqafah, pp. 175–187, 2025, doi: 10.7187/GJATSI112025-11.

[43] M. H. Mubarok, “Critical Pedagogy and Dialogic Learning in Classical Islamic Boarding Schools: An Analysis of Discussion Practices in Madrasah Diniyyah Al-Munawwir Krapyak,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 255–274, 2025, doi: 10.14421/jpai.v22i1.10801.

[44] L. O. Algavi and N. E. Rastorgueva, “Cognitive Subversion and the Transformation of Ideological Narratives: Perestroika and The Woke Movement,” Chang. Soc. Personal., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 914–936, 2025, doi: 10.15826/csp.2025.9.4.359.

[45] S. Sapiudin, N. L. R. Herianingtyas, Y. Herlanti, S. Hudaa, M. B. N. Wajdi, and L. Ying, “Transforming Fiqh Instruction Through the Cyber Scientific Approach: Enhancing Critical Thinking in Islamic Education,” J. Ilm. Peuradeun, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 299–322, 2026, doi: 10.26811/peuradeun.v14i1.2198.

[46] E. Rubinson, “Flexible democratic conditionality? The role of democracy and human rights adherence in NATO enlargement decisions,” J. Int. Relations Dev., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 696–725, 2021, doi: 10.1057/s41268-021-00209-z.

[47] E. F. Rusydiyah, “Social education through digital literacy among Indonesian female muslim activists the experience of Abdurrahman Wahid’s daughters,” J. Indones. Islam, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 210–247, 2020, doi: 10.15642/jiis.2020.14.1.210-247.

Downloads

Submitted

2026-04-23

Accepted

2026-05-11

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Abdelrahim, Y., El-Raziq, S., & Mostafa, T. (2026). Reframing Islamic Education Through Cognitive Conflict-Based Pedagogy for Democratic Agency. Multicultural Islamic Education Review, 4(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.23917/mier.v4i1.17122

Issue

Section

Articles