Can Artificial Intelligence Perform Ijtihad? Authority, Epistemology, and Legitimacy in Digital Islamic Jurisprudence

Authors

  • Alwy Ahmed Aga Khan Education Service Kenya
    Kenya
  • Mowafg Masuwd University of Zawia
    Libya
  • Muhammad Rehan Sabir Government College University Faisalabad
    Pakistan
  • Mahmudulhassan Mahmudulhassan Islamic Arabic University
    Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v38i1.16437

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Ijtihad , Usul al-Fiqh, Legal authority, Digital islamic jurisprudence

Abstract

The swift advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in digital fatwa platforms and legal advising systems has sparked significant debate regarding its role in Islamic jurisprudence. Objective: This study aims to determine whether AI can perform ijtihad and to evaluate its validity and authority in relation to traditional usul al-fiqh. Methodology: The research adopts a qualitative, conceptual approach and a normative-doctrinal juridical method, analysing classical Islamic legal sources alongside multidisciplinary AI scholarship to assess epistemological, ethical, and legal prerequisites, such as mastery of knowledge, moral integrity, intentionality (niyyah), and sharʿi accountability. Results: The findings reveal that although AI can enhance data-driven legal research and replicate analytical reasoning, it lacks moral agency and legal responsibility, two essential conditions for legitimate ijtihad. Conclusion: Therefore, AI cannot function as an independent mujtahid, but may serve as a supportive analytical tool. Implications: This study contributes to the development of ethically grounded and technologically informed Islamic legal governance by positioning AI as an assistive instrument under the supervision of qualified scholars.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] M. Z. Ramle, M. A. Ramli, N. F. M. Mohd Razif, and M. H. Rosidi, “Crisis Fatwa Management In Malaysia: Strategies And Challenges During The COVID-19 Pandemic,” J. Fatwa Manag. Res., vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 172–195, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol30no3.720.

[2] L. U. Marks, “A Deleuzian Ijtihad: Unfolding Deleuze’s Islamic sources occulted in the ethnic cleansing of Spain,” in Deleuze and Race, Edinburgh University Press, 2012, pp. 51–72. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84961935647&partnerID=40&md5=32560c602fa6cef5f9c9de906eabccdf

[3] M. Fareed, “Against Ijtihad,” Muslim World, vol. 91, no. 3–4, pp. 355–370, 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.2001.tb03721.x.

[4] M. Mukhtar and M.-J. Todd, “An Islamic framework for animal ethics: Widening the conversation to include Islamic ethical vegetarianism,” Crit. Res. Reli., vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 263–280, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032231174209.

[5] A. Black and N. Hosen, “FATWAS: Their role in contemporary secular Australia,” Griffith Law Rev., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 405–427, 2009, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2009.10854648.

[6] M. G. Abdelnour, “Artificial Intelligence and the Islamic Theology of Technology: From ‘Means’ to ‘Meanings’ and from ‘Minds’ to ‘Hearts,’” Religions, vol. 16, no. 6, p. 796, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16060796.

[7] B. Bakhtiar and S. Salma, “Al-Jihad al-Insani: Shumuliyat ‘al-Muhammadiyah’ fi Muḥarabat Ja’ihat COVID-19,” Stud. Islam., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 359–397, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v29i2.19452.

[8] M. F. Hasyim, “Al-Bukhary Intellectual Genealogy: Tracing the Authority of an Expert of Hadith and Fiqh,” Syariah., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 141–163, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v19i2.3358.

[9] M. Yahaya, M. Samsudin, and H. Lalulddin, “An overview of the principles of jurisprudence Vis-A-Vis legal maxim,” Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 157–165, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n2p157.

[10] K. Sirin, “Analysis of a Text and Context Approach within the Formulation of Islamic Inheritance Distributions,” Ahkam. J. Ilmu. Syariah., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 209–224, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v13i2.941.

[11] M. S. Nahdi and E. Sulistiyowati, “Bioethics and Islamic values: Assisted reproductive technology in the context of Indonesia,” Stud. Islam., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 69–98, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v24i1.2209.

[12] J. Jany, “Classical Islamic Law,” in Ius Gentium, vol. 80, Springer Science and Business Media B.V., 2020, pp. 163–230. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43728-2_7.

[13] J.-M. Landry, “Dialectic of ijtihad: Reforming family law in contemporary Lebanon,” Comp. Stud. South Asia Afr. Middle East, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 361–373, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/1089201X-7885323.

[14] F. Çinar, “An Evaluation on the Relationship Between Maqâsid and Ijtihad,” Hitit. Theol. J., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 323–352, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.14395/hid.864344.

[15] S. Eldersevi and R. Haron, “An analysis of maslaḥah based resolutions issued by Bank Negara Malaysia,” ISRA Int. J. Islam. Financ., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 89–102, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-09-2018-0103.

[16] J. Lowe, “Breaking the Silence: An Islamic Legal Approach to Facilitating Reporting and Testimony by Muslim Victims and Witnesses of Sexual Crimes,” Religions, vol. 13, no. 11, p. 1017, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13111017.

[17] A. A. Mohamed, M. Ndow, and M. Masuwd, “Reconstructing Madrasa Education through Critical Pedagogy: A Freirean Framework for Islamic Educational Reform,” lectures, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 97–114, 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.58355/lectures.v5i1.207.

[18] N. F. Mahadi, “An Analysis of Waqf, Zakat, Qarḍ and Takaful as Islamic Social Finance Instruments: Juristic Views,” IIUM Law J., vol. 30, no. S2, pp. 37–56, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumlj.v30iS2.762.

[19] I. Bouhaouliane, “Ahmed El Khamlichi’s Views for Islamic Juridical Renewal,” in Handbook of Oriental Studies Section Near Middle East, vol. 186, M. Hashas, Ed., Brill Academic Publishers, 2025, pp. 460–475. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004519534_018.

[20] A. F. S. Hassan, Y. Karbhari, and H. Ahmed, “Central bank regulation, religious governance and standardisation: evidence from Malaysian Islamic banks,” Int. J. Bus. Gov. Ethics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 61–80, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBGE.2021.112332.

[21] A. M. Chishti, “Sociopolitical and Cultural Influence of Two Prominent Sufis in Early Eighteenth-century Shahjahanabad: A Critical Analysis,” Indian Hist. Rev., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 344–361, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/03769836251381495.

[22] F. E. Ahmed, “Empire, subalternity, and Ijtihad: Two Muslim women’s leadership models in the post-9/11 US,” Muslim World, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 494–510, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-1913.2011.01392.x.

[23] Awalia Rina Rahmawati, Risfita Wulandari, M. A. S. Sadaruddin, T. A. Mustofa, and H. Chedimae, “Optimization of Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Religious Education: Opportunities and Challenges in Learning Evaluation,” Suhuf, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 274–287, Nov. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v37i2.11015.

[24] A. Lanani, “Aspects of Maqasid-Based Renewal and Its Impact on Fatwas Involving Women and the Family by Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaraḍawi,” J. Coll. Sharia Islam. Stud., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 81–105, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.29117/jcsis.2025.0400.

[25] Y. Paltore, D. Kokeyeva, A. Mustafayeva, K. Kassimbayev, and K. Aubakirova, “Digital transformation of education: The legacy of Arab-Muslim pedagogy in the development of modern learning platforms,” Period. eng. nat. sci., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 757–770, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v13.i3.676.

[26] A. A. Mohamed, M. W. Shohib, and L. E. Rahmawati, “The Contribution of KH Ahmad Dahlan’s Thought to the Advancement of the Muslim Community in Indonesia,” J. World Thinkers, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 153–164, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://journal.walideminstitute.com/index.php/jwt/article/view/234

[27] Y. L. Soufi, “‘Why study usul al-fiqh?’: The problem of Taqlid and tough cases in 4th-5th /10th-11th century Iraq,” Islam. Law Soc., vol. 28, no. 1–2, pp. 1–31, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685195-BJA10006.

[28] M. Y. Al-Deek, “Liquidity Risk in Islamic Banking: Structural Challenges and Shariah-Compliant Mitigation Strategies,” suhuf, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 250–262, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v37i2.13223.

[29] M. A. Kayapinar, “Centralization of Power in Classical Mainstream Islamic Political Thought,” Darulf. Ilahiyat., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 317–352, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.26650/di.2024.35.1.1409970.

[30] M. S.-A. Ong and C.-P. Jeong, “Commodity futures trading: Its permissibility according to sunni traditionalist ijtihãd and ijtihãd maqasidi,” Int. J. Bus. Soc., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 93–106, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://www.ijbs.unimas.my/repository/pdf/Vol13No2-paper1.pdf

[31] A. Galadari, “The Taqlid al-Ijtihad Paradox: Challenges to Quranic Hermeneutics,” AlBayan, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 145–167, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/22321969-12340023.

[32] D. C. Azoitei, “Critical analysis of the contemporary application of riba in Islamic banking,” Manch. J. Transnatl. Islam. Law. Pr., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 76–94, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345503127_Critical_Analysis_of_the_Contemporary_Application_of_Riba_in_Islamic_Banking

[33] L. Ali Khan and H. M. Ramadan, Contemporary Ijtihad: Limits and Controversies. Edinburgh University Press, 2011. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84882108034&partnerID=40&md5=89920696f6cfe84bf7e89c2198f5b054

[34] Y. M. Fauzin and A. A. Mohamed, “Optimizing Teacher Student Dynamics through the Nash Principle: Towards Academic Excellence and SDG 4 on Quality Education,” in Maktabah Reviews on Sustainable Development Goals, 2024, pp. 29–44. [Online]. Available: https://journal.walideminstitute.com/index.php/mrsdgs/article/view/131

[35] M. M. Roslan and A. O. Zainuri, “Arguments In Applying Maqasid Syariʻah In The Fatwa Issuance: An Ijtihad Maqasidi Analysis,” J. Fatwa Manag. Res., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 132–148, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.33102/jfatwa.vol28no1.464.

[36] A. A. Mohamed, M. R. Haque, and A. Alkhateeb, “Islamic Law in Plural Legal Systems and the SDGs: A Comparative Analysis of Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Kenya,” in Demak Universal Journal of Islam and Sharia, 2025, pp. 303–318. doi: https://doi.org/10.61455/deujis.v3i02.412.

[37] M. M. Islam, “Ontology, Epistemology and Axiology in Halal Research: Empirical Evidence from Hajj Pilgrimage,” Int. J. Relig. Tour. Pilgr., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 34–49, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.21427/5jph-kc64.

[38] R. Adsa and Z. Azwar, “Ratib Saman: Tradition, Faith, and Law In Pulau Tengah, Kerinci,” suhuf, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 230–240, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v37i2.11300.

[39] n. Rozihan, “Construction of Prosperity in Future Islamic Legal Thinking in a Progressive Legal Perspective,” Rev. Gest. Soc. Ambient., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 1–16, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n2-105.

[40] B. R. Hakim, M. Nafi, and N. Nasrullah, “Reactualization of Maslahat and Social Justice Principles in the Contextualization of Fiqh Zakat,” Syariah., vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 102–118, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v24i1.12909.

[41] M. Fatimah, E. Muslimin, A. Sayidah, and A. A. Mohamed, “Technological mastery and competence development of Islamic religious education teachers in Wonogiri: Supporting SDG 4 on quality education,” Profetika J. Stud. Islam, vol. 26, no. 01, pp. 245–258, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v26i01.11744.

[42] B. Ibrahim and E. Al., “Ijtihad in the contemporary fiqh of medicine from Malaysian experience,” Soc. Sci., vol. 11, no. 23, pp. 5732–5742, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.3923/sscience.2016.5732.5742.

[43] N. H. Tumadi et al., “Contextualizing Islamic Legal Perspectives on Fruit Theft in Perenggan (Borderlands): A Case Study in Kuala Tungkal, Indonesia,” J. Ilm. Mizani Wacana Hukum, Ekon. Dan Keagamaan, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 29, Jul. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8381.

[44] J. Tarantang and J. Tarantang, “Teori Dan Aplikasi Pemikiran Kontemporer Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Keluarga Islam [Theory and Application of Contemporary Thought in the Reform of Islamic Family Law],” J. Transform. (Islamic Stud., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 27–46, (Indonesia), Sep. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.23971/tf.v2i1.882.

[45] A. H. Usman, M. F. R. Abdullah, M. N. Abdul Kadir, and A. Iskandar, “The Concept of an Ideal Society: A Review of Fazlur Rahman’s Perspective,” Int. J. Islam. Thought, vol. 6, pp. 1–12, Jun. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.21.2022.220.

Downloads

Submitted

2026-02-25

Accepted

2026-05-04

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Ahmed, A., Masuwd, M., Sabir, M. R., & Mahmudulhassan, M. (2026). Can Artificial Intelligence Perform Ijtihad? Authority, Epistemology, and Legitimacy in Digital Islamic Jurisprudence. Suhuf: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 38(1), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v38i1.16437

Issue

Section

Articles