State Authority and Public Interest: Reinterpreting Age Restriction Policy through the Doctrine of Tassaruf al-imam bi al-Maslahah

Authors

  • Dinda Kusuma Rajni Universitas Airlangga
    Indonesia
  • Izza Zahrotun Nafisah Universitas Airlangga
    Indonesia
  • Frilia Shafitri Hardi Universitas Brawijaya
    Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v38i1.16234

Keywords:

Age Restriction , Child Protection , Digital Platforms , Parental Consent , Maslahah

Abstract

Background: This study examines the facultative age restriction model for digital platform users under Government Regulation Number 17 of 2025 (PP Tunas) within Indonesia’s socio-digital context. The regulation adopts a parental consent–based framework inspired by the GDPR, positioning parents as primary decision-makers in children’s digital access. Objective: This research aims to evaluate the effectiveness of this model and its compatibility with Indonesia’s socio-digital conditions through the Islamic legal principle of Tasarruf al-Imam ʿala al-Raʿiyyah Manutun bi al-Maslahah. Method: This study employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches to assess the delegation of child protection responsibilities to parents. Result: The findings indicate that low parental digital literacy, unequal access to digital infrastructure, and socio economic disparities significantly weaken the implementation of the model, undermining effective child protection and rendering it socially ineffective despite its formal validity. Conclusion: The parental consent–based model is inadequate to ensure optimal child protection in Indonesia’s current context. This study proposes a reconstruction toward a more restrictive, state-imposed age regulatory model grounded in maqasid al-shari‘ah, particularly the protection of lineage hifz al-nasl and intellect hifz al-‘aql, to better align legal norms with socio-economic realities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Komdigi, “Komdigi Strengthens Digital Literacy and Child Protection to Face the Threat of Deepfakes [Hadapi Ancaman Deepfake, Komdigi Perkuat Literasi Digital dan Perlindungan Anak],” portal.komdigi.go.id. [Online]. Available: https://portal.komdigi.go.id/kanal-publik/berita-kini/9498

[2] UNICEF, “Generatif AI: Risks and Opportunities for Children,” unicef.org. [Online]. Available: https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/generative-ai-risks-and-opportunities-children

[3] S. H. Sinombor, “National Children’s Day 2025: Indonesian Children Surrounded by Digital Dangers,” kompas.id. [Online]. Available: https://www.kompas.id/artikel/en-hari-anak-nasional-2025-anak-anak-indonesia-dalam-kepungan-bahaya-digital

[4] J. I. Ndun, C. O. Lada, Syahrir, and E. M. B. Damanik, “The Effect of Screen Time Duration on Fine Motor Development in Children Aged 2–5 Years in Kupang, East Nusa Tenggara,” Int. J. Curr. Sci. Res. Rev., vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 6669–6672, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V8-i12-76.

[5] A. E. Ashfahany, M. Subhi, and A. Ma, “Fiqh for Minority ( Fiqh al- Aqalliyyat ): Principle and Current Practice on Food and Mortgage Finance,” Suhuf Int. J. Islam. Stud, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 264–274, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v37i2.11207.

[6] R. Rif’ah, M. Jailani, and M. Huda, “Artificial Intelligence ( AI ): An Opportunity and Challenge for Achieving Success in Islamic Education in the Era of Digital Transformation,” SUHUF Int. J. Islam. Stud., vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 200–215, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v36i2.6273.

[7] K. Essaura, R. Saputra, and A. Rochim, “Review of the Principles of Tasharruf Al-Imam ’Ala Ar-Ra’iyyah Manuthun Bi Al-Maslahah in Determining Hajj Costs (Analytical Study of Presidential Decree Number 7 of 2023) [Tinjauan Kaidah Tasharruf Al-Imam ’Ala Ar-Ra’iyyah Manuthun Bi Al-Maslahah Dalam P,” J. Inov. Huk. dan Kebijak., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 304–322, 2024, [Online]. Available: https://ijcsrr.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/76-3112-2025.pdf.

[8] A. Y. Abdillah, A. Madjid, and P. A. Ruslijanto, “The Urgency of Establishing Regulations on the Minimum Age Limit for Children in Operating Social Media as an Effort to Legally Protect Children in Indonesia [Urgensi Pembentukan Regulasi Batas Usia Minimum Anak Dalam Mengoperasikan Media Sosial Sebagai U,” Begawan Abioso, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 87–96, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.37893/abioso.v14i2.779.

[9] R. Wahyuda and E. K. Tarigan, “The Urgency of Determining Age Limits for Children in Using Social Media Based on Child Protection Law Number 35 of 2014 [Urgensi Penetapan Batas Usia Anak dalam Penggunaan Media Sosial Berdasarkan Undang Undang Perlindungan Anak Nomor 35 Tahun 2014],” Pros. Semin. Nas. Multi Disiplin Ilmu, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 71–86, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://senadimu.potensi-utama.org/index.php/home/article/view/325

[10] A. Wowor, “Legal Protection for Minors in Accessing Information and Electronic Transactions Based on Law I, the ITE Law and the TE Law and the Child Protection Law [Perlindungan Hukum Anak Dibawah Umur Dalam Mengakses Informasi Dan T Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektr a,” Indones. Notary, vol. 4, no. 16, pp. 1259–1278, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1233&context=notary

[11] E. Nurhikmah, N. Djaja, and L. Luna, “Proportionality and Accountability in Digital Governance of Internet Access Restrictions for Children in Indonesia [Proporsionalitas dan Akuntabilitas dalam Tata Kelola Digital Atas Pembatasan Akses Internet Bagi Anak di Indonesia],” USM Law Rev., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 2014–2037, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i3.12924.

[12] COSL Team, “Beyond the Filter: Australia’s Under 16 Social Media Ban,” c4os.org. [Online]. Available: https://c4osl.org/beyond-the-filter-australias-under-16-social-media-ban/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22471476694&gbraid=0AAAAADs_sHUQXPBVKIJm-YIvmEUlpEwa7&gclid=CjwKCAjwwpDQBhAuEiwAa-4WozhHwLscGGC-fbieuePBy0AvZ9C1jQKHmjSGAX-2nJDRsyVANATrRBoCfzcQAvD_BwE

[13] I. I. for M. Development, “IMD World Digital Competitiveness Ranking Reconfiguring digital strategies amid trade fragmentation,” Lausanne, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://productivity.gov.ng/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/WDCR_Report_2025-3.pdf

[14] B. W. Pudjianto et al., “Indonesia Digital Society Index 2025 [Indeks Masyarakat Digital Indonesia 2025],” Jakarta Pusat, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://bpsdm.komdigi.go.id/satker/pusbangesdmk/publikasi-indeks-masyarakat-digital-indonesia-2025-17-6

[15] D. Mancino, “Digital literacy in the EU: An Overview,” data.europa.eu. [Online]. Available: https://data.europa.eu/en/publications/datastories/digital-literacy-eu-overview

[16] EU, “Skills for the Digital Age,” ec.europa.eu. [Online]. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Skills_for_the_digital_age

[17] A. I. I. Digital, “Digital Ability Comparison,” dashboard.digitalinclusionindex.org.au. [Online]. Available: https://dashboard.digitalinclusionindex.org.au/Digital.aspx

[18] D. W. Nugraha and A. Theodora, “BPS-World Bank, Two Stories of Indonesian Poverty,” kompas.id. [Online]. Available: https://www.kompas.id/artikel/en-dua-angka-bps-bank-dunia-dua-cerita-kemiskinan-indonesia

[19] B. P. S. (BPS), “Population 15 Years To Top Who Worked by Main Industry 1986-2024,” bps.go.id. [Online]. Available: https://www.kompas.id/artikel/en-dua-angka-bps-bank-dunia-dua-cerita-kemiskinan-indonesia

[20] H. Rea et al., “Measuring Australia ’ s Digital Divide,” Victoria St, 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.60836/mtsq-at22.

[21] A. Gunawan, “Critical Legal Studies: Concepts and Implications in the Formation of Regional Autonomy Law [Studi Hukum Kritis: Konsep dan Implikasi Dalam Pembentukan Hukum Otonomi Daerah],” ADIL J. Huk., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 177–189, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v15i2.4634.

[22] M. A. Safa’at and M. Istiqomah, “Critical Legal Studies (CLS): An Alternative For Critical Legal Thinking in Indonesia,” PETITA J. Kaji. Ilmu Huk. dan Syariah, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 11–20, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v1i1.112.

[23] A. M. Idrus, “The Policy of State Leaders in the Perspective of Fictional Principles: Tassaruf Al-Imam Manutun Bil Maslahah [Kebijakan Pemimpin Negara Dalam Perspektif Kaidah Fiktif: Tassaruf Al-Imam Manutun Bil Maslahah],” J. Huk. Pidana dan Ketatanegaraan, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 123–137, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.24252/ad.v1i1.26278.

[24] Z. Habib, “Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Maqasid Al-Sharia’s Perspective,” KARSA J. Soc. Islam. Cult., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 105–134, 2025, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.iainmadura.ac.id/index.php/karsa/article/view/19617.

[25] S. Malby, T. Jesrani, T. Banuelos, A. Holterhof, and M. Hahn, “Study on the Effects of New Information Technologies on the Abuse and Exploitation of Children,” Vienna, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.unodc.org/documents/Cybercrime/Study_on_the_Effects.pdf

[26] R. Pranawati and M. A. Maimunah, “Children’s Digital Literacy: Parental Role in Protection Amid Pandemic and Digital Shift,” Informasi, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 116–133, 2025, doi: http://doi.org/10.21831/informasi.v55i1.77910. 115-132.

[27] H. Kurniawan, “The Concept of Legal Protection for Children Victims of Sexual Crimes in The Perspective of Islamic Law,” Teunuleh Sci. J. Int. J. Soc. Sci., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 253–268, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.51612/teunuleh.v6i3.212.

[28] A. Sarif, “The concept of Maslahat and Mafsadah according to Imam al-Ghazali [Konsep Maslahat dan Mafsadah menurut Imam al-Ghazali],” TSAQAFAH J. Perad. Islam, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 353–368, 2017, doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.21111/tsaqafah.v13i2.1183.

[29] A. A. F. Mishkini, “The Meaning Of Wilayat And Its Corollaries,” Al-islam.org. [Online]. Available: https://al-islam.org/al-tawhid/vol-3-n-1/wilayat-al-faqih-its-meaning-scope-mishkini/meaning-wilayat-its-corollaries

[30] M. H. M. Amin, “The Development of Muslim Military Thought to the Liberation of Jerusalem in 1187 AD,” J. Al-Tamaddun, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 211–223, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol20no2.15.

[31] A. I. S. Muchtar, R. Zihad, and I. Puspitasari, “Imam Syafi’i’s Opinion on the Rights of Ijbar Wali: A Study with a Gender Perspective [Pendapat Imam Syafi’i tentang Hak Ijbar Wali: Suatu Kajian Berperspektif Gender],” ISTINBATH, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 59–86, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.36667/istinbath.v16i1.280.

[32] UNICEF, Children’s Rights and Protection in Islam: The Islamic Perspective on Protecting Children from Violence and Harmful Acts. [Hak dan Perlindungan Anak Dalam Islam: Pandangan Islam tentang Perlindungan Anak dari Kekerasan dan Tindakan-Tindakan Berbahaya]. Jakarta, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://surl.li/jjnvrq

Downloads

Submitted

2026-02-14

Accepted

2026-04-20

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Rajni, D. K., Nafisah, I. Z., & Hardi, F. S. (2026). State Authority and Public Interest: Reinterpreting Age Restriction Policy through the Doctrine of Tassaruf al-imam bi al-Maslahah . Suhuf: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 38(1), 54–76. https://doi.org/10.23917/suhuf.v38i1.16234

Issue

Section

Articles