Important for Authors

We recommend that you check the section policies of the journals About the Journal article and the author's guidelines. Authors must register with the journal before submitting or can sign in and start the five-step process if they are already registered.


How to strengthen a research paper

In order to minimise the likelihood of a desk rejection, it is imperative to possess a comprehensive understanding of the targeted academic publication. Before submitting your paper, it is advisable to familiarise yourself with the standards and expectations set by each publisher. Before submitting your work for evaluation, it is imperative to adhere to the specific rules provided by the publication meticulously.

You can also make general enhancements to your manuscript to prevent a desk rejection:

  • Novelty: When the methodology of a research study is novel, it has a greater chance of being published in a scientific journal. Include a "statement of novelty" in the introduction whenever possible, and if applicable, also mention this innovation in the abstract and conclusion. Examine other articles published by the journal and in your field to assist you in writing your statement.
  • No plagiarism: This is an obvious fact. If you have intentionally or unintentionally duplicated the work of other researchers, you may be accused of plagiarism. Publications submit manuscripts to various plagiarism detection software.
  • Appropriate scope: This pertains to comprehending the scope and focus of the journal and determining the alignment between your study and the journal's publication criteria. The scope of a journal may also encompass a "regional" focus. In essence, does your submission's content align with the publication's specific geographical region and scientific scope? Various academic journals possess distinct scopes, which are often characterised by their high level of specificity. It is imperative to ensure that the content of your manuscript aligns appropriately with the scope and focus of the publication you have selected.
  • Conform to publication requirements: This wouldn't be the only reason for a desk reject, but it can add to other problems editors find in a work.
  • Excellent quality of the writing: This statement is self-evident and requires no more explanation. However, let us now get into the precise definition of this particular facet of enhancing the quality of your research work. In addition to a research project of superior quality and marked by innovation, the submission must also have sections that conform to the standard requirements of the respective journal category. For example, a typical academic research paper consists of several essential sections, including an introduction, a section detailing the materials and technique employed, a presentation of the research results, a discussion section for analysing and interpreting the findings, and finally, a conclusion to summarise the key points and implications of the study. The publication should also go into the broader implications of the research, beyond presenting specific findings and conclusions, by examining its potential applications in a more general context. For example, the broader ramifications and implications of individual discoveries are elucidated.
  • Outstanding methodology: In connection with the mentioned matter, should the methods employed in the research be deemed inadequate, the article may be summarily declined. Its simplicity may characterise the methods used, lack of attention to crucial elements, or absence of justification within the framework of well-established approaches.
  • Language utilisation: Numerous scholarly journals possess an international scope, hence necessitating the submission of manuscripts in the English language. It is not unusual for a request to be declined based solely on the inadequate quality of English language usage within the paper, so it falls short of the standards expected by a prestigious international publication. It is imperative to engage the services of a proficient English speaker with native fluency and a comprehensive understanding of the subject matter to review and revise your document meticulously.