Enhancing Programming Logic Comprehension: A Usability Study and Learning Outcome Evaluation of an AR-Integrated Interactive Book

Authors

  • Yusri Ardhian Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
    Indonesia
  • Arie Setyaga Handika Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
    Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/ieltech.v1i2.17546

Keywords:

Augmented Reality, Programming Logic, Interactive Learning, System Usability Scale, Vocational Education

Abstract

The mastery of programming logic and algorithms is essential for vocational computer science students, yet traditional lecture-based methods often struggle to effectively convey these abstract concepts. This study aims to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of an Augmented Reality (AR)-integrated interactive book, named "LOGAM AR", designed to enhance students' comprehension of programming logic. Utilizing the Research and Development (R&D) approach with the ADDIE model, the application was developed and tested on 36 tenth-grade students. The evaluation employed the System Usability Scale (SUS) to measure user experience and a pre-test/post-test design to assess learning outcomes, comparing an experimental group using the AR tool with a control group using conventional methods. The usability evaluation yielded a SUS score of 73.2, indicating a "Good" and acceptable user experience. Furthermore, the learning outcome analysis revealed a significant disparity; the experimental group achieved a "Medium" N-Gain score of 0.60, substantially outperforming the control group's "Low" N-Gain score of 0.24. These findings demonstrate that integrating marker-based AR with physical interactive modules successfully bridges the gap between abstract theory and visual simulation, significantly improving students' algorithmic comprehension.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Yusri Ardhian, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Pendidikan Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

Arie Setyaga Handika, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Pendidikan Teknik Informatika, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan

References

Alzahrani, N. M. (2020). Augmented Reality: A Systematic Review of Its Benefits and Challenges in E-learning Contexts. Applied Sciences, 10(16), 5660–5660. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10165660

Ayeni, O. O., Hamad, N. M. A., Chisom, O. N., Osawaru, B., & Adewusi, O. E. (2024). AI in education: A review of personalized learning and educational technology. GSC Advanced Research and Reviews, 18(2), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.2.0062

Baabdullah, A. M., Alsulaimani, A. A., Allamnakhrah, A., Alalwan, A. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rana, N. P. (2021). Usage of augmented reality (AR) and development of e-learning outcomes: An empirical evaluation of students’ e-learning experience. Computers & Education, 177, 104383–104383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104383

Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24(6), 574–594.

Beschieru, M. (Mariana), Buzu, S. (Svetlana), Lupu, O. (Olga), & Fursenco, R. (Rodica). (2023). Education Through TECHNOLOGY: Challenges and Drawbacks. Neliti. https://www.neliti.com/publications/624750/education-through-technology-challenges-and-drawbacks

Brooke, J. (1996). SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry, 189(194), 4–7.

Çipiloğlu Yıldız, Z., & Doğan, S. (2024). Algo-AR: Development of an Augmented Reality-Supported Tangible Programming Tool to Improve Algorithmic Thinking Skills. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 17(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.17671/gazibtd.1398781

Criollo-C, S., Guerrero-Arias, A., Uzcátegui, J. E. C., Arif, Y. M., Fortuna, A., Prasetya, F., & Luján‐Mora, S. (2024). Improving Higher Education With the Use of Mobile Augmented Reality (MAR): A Case Study. IEEE Access, 12, 139003–139017. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2024.3465833

El-Sattar, H. K. H. A., Omar, M., & Mohamady, H. (2024). Developing a participatory research framework through serious games to promote learning for children with autism. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1453327

Ghory, S., & Ghafory, H. (2021). The impact of modern technology in the teaching and learning process. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 4(3), 168–173. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v4i3.73

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. USA.

Khasawneh, Y. J. A., Khasawneh, N. A. S., & Khasawneh, M. A. S. (2023). Exploring the long-term effects: Retention and transfer of skills in gamified learning environment. International Journal of Data and Network Science, 8(1), 195–200. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijdns.2023.10.004

Koumiti, H., Laanoui, M. D., & Selmaoui, S. (2024). The Role of Technology in Global Learning Transformation: A Comprehensive overview. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/gast60528.2024.10520745

Leon, N. D. (2023). Localized Traditional Learning Modules in the History of Mathematics its Effect to the Learning Competency of Students. Journal for Educators Teachers and Trainers, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.47750/jett.2023.14.02.050

Lewis, J. R. (2018). The System Usability Scale: Past, Present, and Future. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307

Moeis, D., & Yunarti, S. (2022). PELATIHAN LOGIKA DAN ALGORITMA PEMROGRAMAN BAGI SISWA/I SMAN 3 MAKASSAR. SELAPARANG Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan, 6(2), 1013–1013. https://doi.org/10.31764/jpmb.v6i2.8755

Putri, E. S. A. Y., Wulandari, R. W., & Anggraini, A. (2025). Eco-Anim: Animated Learning Media to Enhance Student Outcomes in Ecology and Biodiversity. PALAPA, 13(2), 176–188. https://doi.org/10.36088/palapa.v13i2.5833

Retnawati, H. (2016). Proving content validity of self-regulated learning scale (The comparison of Aiken index and expanded Gregory index). REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 2(2), 155–164. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v2i2.11029

Ribeiro, M. I. C., Silva, W., & Feitosa, E. (2023). Active Learning Methodologies for Teaching Programming in Undergraduate Courses: A Systematic Mapping Study. Informatics in Education. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2024.11

Rincón-Flores, E. G., Castano, L., Solis, S. L. G., Lopez, O. O., Rodríguez-Hernández, C. F., Lara, L. A. C., & Aldape, P. (2024). Improving the learning-teaching process through adaptive learning strategy. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00314-9

Sauro, J. (2011). A practical guide to the system usability scale: Background, benchmarks & best practices. Measuring Usability LLC.

Singh, N., -, Prof. L., & Chhavilal. (2025). Techno-pedagogical Skills: An Essential Skill for Teacher in the Twenty-First Century. International Journal on Science and Technology, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.71097/ijsat.v16.i3.6972

Solihat, D., Fadhly, F. Z., & Wihadi, M. (2023). VARIETY OF ENGLISH LEARNING MEDIA TECHNOLOGY: VOICES FROM NOVICE LEARNERS. English Review Journal of English Education, 11(1), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v11i1.7580

Tiwari, A. S., Bhagat, K. K., & Λαμπρόπουλος, Γ. (2024). Designing and evaluating an augmented reality system for an engineering drawing course. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00289-z

Tuli, N., Singh, G., Mantri, A., & Sharma, S. (2022). Augmented reality learning environment to aid engineering students in performing practical laboratory experiments in electronics engineering. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00207-9

Umar, U., Purwanto, M. B., & Firdaus, Moch. M. A. (2023). RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: AS THE PRIMARY ALTERNATIVE TO EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH DESIGN FRAMEWORKS. JELL (Journal of English Language and Literature) STIBA-IEC Jakarta, 8(1), 73–82. https://doi.org/10.37110/jell.v8i01.172

Downloads

Submitted

2026-05-15

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

Ardhian, Y., & Handika, A. S. (2025). Enhancing Programming Logic Comprehension: A Usability Study and Learning Outcome Evaluation of an AR-Integrated Interactive Book. Informatics Education and Learning Technologies, 1(2), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.23917/ieltech.v1i2.17546