Rajo Alim Rajo Disambah, Rajo Zalim Rajo Disanggah: Religious and Cultural Capital for SDGs in Agam's Civil Disobedience Movement

Authors

  • Muhammad Taufik Departemen of Constitutional Law, Universitas Islam Negeri Imam Bonjol Padang
    Indonesia
  • Alfan Miko Departement of Sociology, Universitas Andalas, Padang
    Indonesia
  • Indraddin Departement of Sociology, Universitas Andalas, Padang
    Indonesia
  • Bob Alfiandi Departement of Sociology, Universitas Andalas, Padang
    Indonesia
  • Abdul Halim Global and Public Law Departement, University of New South Wales
    Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v27i01.15258

Keywords:

civil disobedience, cultural capital, maqashid syariah, sdgs, living law

Abstract

Abstract: This study aims to examine in depth the role of religion and culture as primary capital in the civil disobedience movement of the Agam Regency community against Government Regulation (GR) No. 84 of 1999 on the territorial expansion of Bukittinggi City. This policy triggered sustained collective resistance for over two decades, perceived as a form of administrative tyranny that threatened social ideology, the integrity of the nagari, and the community's religious existence. Theoretical framework: Theologically, this resistance is legitimized through the doctrine of al-isyan al-madani and the principle of critical obedience, aimed at protecting the dharuriyyāt (essential) dimensions: religion (hifz al-din), communal customary property (hifz al-mal), and social identity (hifz al-nasl). This theological defense fundamentally aligns with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 16 (Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions). Method: Employing an Islamic legal sociology approach within a qualitative case study design, this research analyzes data from in-depth interviews with customary elites (niniak mamak) and religious leaders (alim ulama), as well as historical conflict documents. Results: The findings reveal that civil disobedience in Agam is deeply rooted in the philosophical doctrine of rajo alim rajo disambah, rajo zalim rajo disanggah (a just ruler is revered, an unjust ruler is resisted). Implications: This study underscores the urgent need to reorient national law-making processes toward deliberative values and the recognition of local sociocultural authority to ensure the sustainable achievement of the SDGs. Novelty: The novelty of this study lies in uncovering the mechanism of theo-cultural civil disobedience, which effectively rendered the state's positive law dormant (statutory dormancy) for 25 years through the superior legitimacy of living law. The ultimate success of this movement, culminating in the enactment of Law No. 53 of 2024, demonstrates that Islamic and cultural modalities can effectively neutralize policies lacking moral legitimacy and actively drive the realization of SDGs.

References

[1] L. M. Friedman, ‘The Law and Society Movement’, Stanford Law Rev., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 763–780, 1986, doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1228563.

[2] L. M. Friedman, Sistem Hukum : Perspektif Ilmu Sosial. Bandung: Nusamedia, 2017.

[3] S. Rahardjo, Menggagas Hukum Progresif Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.

[4] S. Soekanto, Kesadaran Hukum dan Kepatuhan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali, 1982.

[5] L. J. Chua and D. M. Engel, Legal Consciousness. Inggris: Routledge, 2021.

[6] M. M. Selepe, ‘The Evaluation of Public Policy Implementation Failures and Possible Solutions’, EUREKA Soc. Humanit., no. 1, pp. 43–53, 2023, doi: 10.21303/2504-5571.2023.002736.

[7] Shidarta, Karakteristik Penalaran Hukum Dalam Konteks Keindonesiaan. Bandung: CV. UTOMO, 2006.

[8] O. Berglund, ‘Disruptive Protest, Civil Disobedience & Direct Action’, Politics, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: 10.1177/02633957231176999.

[9] M. M. Kellner, ‘Democracy and Civil Disobedience’, J. Polit., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 899–911, 1975, doi: 10.2307/2129181.

[10] S. Passini and D. Morselli, ‘Authority Relationships Between Obedience and Disobedience’, New Ideas Psychol., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 96–106, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2008.06.001.

[11] E. R. Pineda, ‘Civil Disobedience, and What Else? Making Space For Uncivil Forms of Resistance’, Eur. J. Polit. Theory, vol. 0, no. 0, pp. 1–8, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1474885119845063.

[12] L. Thomassen, ‘Within the Limits of Deliberative Reason Alone’, Eur. J. Polit. Theory, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 200–218, 2007, doi: 10.1177/1474885107074350.

[13] H. D. Thoreau, Civil Disobedience: Resistance to Civil Government. Amerika Serikat: Duke Classics and its licensors, 2012.

[14] Z. M. Zain and M. A. Yusoff, ‘Civil Disobedience: Concept and Practice’, Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 13, no. 8, p. 129, 2017, doi: 10.5539/ass.v13n8p129.

[15] D. Chong, Political Protest and Civil Disobedience, Second Edi., vol. 18. Elsevier, 2015. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.93098-8.

[16] P. Ewick and S. S. Silbey, The Common Place of Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014.

[17] J. Habermas, ‘Civil Disobedience : Litmus Test for the Democratic Constitutional State’, Berkeley J. Sociol., vol. 30, pp. 95–116, 1985.

[18] P. Bocchiaro and A. Zamperini, ‘Conformity, Obedience, Disobedience: The Power of the Situation’, Psychology, 2012, doi: https://doi.org/10.5772/36483.

[19] S. Movements, Social Movements, 1768-2004. New York: Routledge, 2004.

[20] E. Aspinall, Opposing Suharto : Compromise, Resistance, and Regime Change in Indonesia. California: Stanford University Press, 2005.

[21] Sulistyaningsih, Muryanti, and A. Saputro, ‘Community Resistance Citizens Refuse Hotel Development in The Special Region of Yogyakarta’, J. Pemberdaya. Masy. Media Pemikir. dan Dakwah Pembang., vol. 6, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.14421/jpm.2022.062-04.

[22] Haluan, ‘Generasi Muda Kab. Agam Tolak Perluasan Kota Bukittinggi’, Haluan, 2000.

[23] Haluan, ‘Bukittinggi Jangan Coba-coba Ambil Wilayah Agam’, Haluan, 2006.

[24] P. Ekspres, ‘PP 84/99, Membunuh Agam Secara Berlahan’, Padang Ekspres, 2021.

[25] P. Ekspres, ‘Warga Kurai Tolak Perluasaan Wilayah’, Padang Ekspres, 2003.

[26] Singgalang, ‘DPRD Agama Tolak PP tentang Perluasan Bukittinggi’, Singgalang, 1999.

[27] J. M. Jasper, The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. London: The University of Chicago Press, 1997.

[28] Suteki, Desain Hukum di Ruang Sosial. Yogyakarta: Thafa Media, 2013.

[29] A. Afsaruddin, ‘Obedience to Political Authority: An Evolutionary Concept’.

[30] O. Taştan, ‘Civil Disobedience in Islamic Politico-Legal Theory: A Challenging Balance between Justice and Stability’, in Religion and Violence: Muslim and Christian Theological and Pedagogical Reflections, Germany: Springer.

[31] T. R. Valentina, ‘Kontroversi PP 84/1999 : Konflik Elite dengan Masyarakat Adat tentang Batas Wilayah antara Kabupaten Agam dan Kota Bukittinggi’, Demokrasi, vol. VI, no. 1, 2007.

[32] M. I. Soejoeti, A. Khairunnisa, and Y. Andreansyah, ‘Analyzing Potential Role of Advancing SDGs 16 Through Religious Moderation: Creating Social Harmony and Upholding Human Rights in the Contemporary World’, in The 6th International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, 2024, pp. 283–303. doi: 10.18502/kss.v9i18.16358.

[33] F. Khan and M. A. Haneef, ‘Religious Responses to Sustainable Development Goals: An Islamic Perspective’, J. Islam. Monet. Econ. Financ., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 161–180, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v8i2.1453.

[34] A. Syaichoni, Q. Huda, N. Pangestu, and R. W. Sampurno, ‘Integrating Maqasid al-Shariah and Sustainable Development Goals Islamic Financial Planning: A Framework for Ethical Wealth Distribution’, Int. J. Islam. Financ., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.14421/ijif.v3i1.2595.

[35] D. R. Anwar, A. Wahab, and Waris, ‘Maqasid Syariah and Sustainable Development: Integrating Islamic Objectives into Economic Planning’, Formosa J. Multidiscip. Res., vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 2601–2618, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.55927/fjmr.v4i6.269.

[36] K. Yasmeen, K. Yasmin, and S. Al Abri, ‘Islamic Framework For Sustainable Development’, Int. J. Islam. Financ. Sustain. Dev., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 136–160, 2024.

[37] M. A. F. Anwar, K. Rizky, and A. Lazuardi, ‘Konsep Kesejahteraan (Al-Rifa’iyyah) Al-Ghazali dalam Pembangunan Berkelanjutan (Sdgs): Integrasi Maqasid Syariah Dengan Agenda Pembangunan Global’, An Nawawi J. Huk. dan Ekon. Islam, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 129–142, 2025, doi: 10.55252/annawawi.v5i2.79.

[38] E. Sadly, ‘Integrating Maqashid Syariah in Sustainable Development Goals ( SDGs ): A Conceptual Framework for Green Economic Policy’, IJEC Int. J. Econ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–28, 2026, doi: 10.55299/ijec.v5i1.1758.

[39] F. A. M. Zain, S. F. Muhamad, H. Abdullah, S. A. F. S. A. Tajuddin, and W. A. W. Abdullah, ‘Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Principles with Maqasid al-Shariah: A Blueprint for Sustainable Takaful Operations’, Int. J. Islam. Middle East. Financ. Manag., vol. 17, no. 3, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-11-2023-0422.

[40] S. S. Ahmed, ‘The Evolving Role of Sustainable Development in Shaping Political Progress: A Contemporary Islamic Perspective on Human Rights and Civil Institution’, MILRev Metro Islam. Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–30, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10128.

[41] A. Rochim, L. Sennakyz, N. Kholis, and A. A. Arifin, ‘Integration of ESG and SDGS Principles in Sustainable Sharia Trade Governance in the Global Digital Era’, Int. J. Econ. Res. Financ. Account., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 169–180, 2026.

[42] H. Alvi, ‘The Islamic Principles of Social Justice: Maulana Abul Kalam Azad and Nonviolent Civil Disobedience’, Contemp. Rev. Middle East, vol. 2, no. 1, 2015, doi: 10.1177/2347798915577716.

[43] F. von Benda-Beckmann and K. von Benda-Beckmann, Political and Legal Transformations of an Indonesian Polity: The Nagari from Colonization to Decentralization. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

[44] D. Khairunnisa, Suhel, and I. Asngari, ‘Integrating ESG and Maqashid Syariah for Sustainable Islamic Finance in Indonesia’, J. Ilm. Manaj. Kesatuan, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 4525–4538, 2025, doi: 10.37641/jimkes.v13i6.4025.

[45] L. Muthmainnah, ‘Analisis Filsafat Hukum Atas Gerakan Pembangkangan Sipil Dalam Konteks Masyarakat Demokrasi Modern’, J. Filsafat Indones., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 316–327, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jfi.v6i3.55610.

Downloads

Submitted

2026-01-01

Accepted

2026-06-01

Published

2026-06-01