Institutional Authority Reconstruction in Anti-Corruption Enforcement: An Islamic Legal Approach to SDG 16

Authors

  • Muhammad Fadly Hasibuan Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University
    Indonesia
  • Febrian Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University
    Indonesia
  • Iza Rumesten RS Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University
    Indonesia
  • Saifudin Amin Muhammadiyah Islamic College (MIC)
    Singapore

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v26i03.14362

Keywords:

corruption, law enforcement, reconstruction of authority, islamic law, sdgs

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to analyze the authority of law enforcement agencies in handling corruption crimes in Indonesia and its relationship with efforts to realize the effectiveness of law enforcement that supports the achievement of SDG 16 on justice and transparent governance. Theoretical framework: The theoretical framework of this research is based on the concept of the authority of law enforcement agencies in the eradication of corruption by examining the applicable legal basis and the idea of reconstructing the ideal law enforcement system, including the perspective of national criminal law and Islamic criminal law. Literature review: A literature review discusses the regulations governing the authority of investigation, investigation, and prosecution by law enforcement agencies in corruption cases, as well as the ideal concept of law enforcement in the eradication of corruption. Methods: This study uses a normative juridical method through a literature study of laws and regulations and legal references to analyze the insynchronization of authority between law enforcement agencies. Results: The results of the study show that there is an overlap of authority between law enforcement agencies that causes institutional conflicts, delays in handling cases, as well as potential political intervention and legal uncertainty, especially after the enactment of Law No. 19 of 2019 related to the CEC. Implications: This study emphasizes the importance of reconstructing authority through the revision of corruption eradication regulations and strengthening coordination and division of authority between law enforcement agencies so that the handling of corruption cases is more effective and synergistic. Novelty: The novelty of this research lies in the analysis of the imbalance of the authority of law enforcement agencies and the proposal of a model for the reconstruction of the authority of corruption law enforcement that supports the achievement of SDG 16.

References

[1] Anak Agung Bagus Adhita Mahendra Putra, “Efektivitas Hukuman Pidana dalam Menanggulangi Tindak Pidana Korupsi,” Terang J. Kaji. Ilmu Sos. Polit. dan Huk., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 284–296, 2025, https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v2i2.1147.

[2] M. Yusuf DM et al., “Persinggungan Kewenangan Polri Dan CEC Dalam Penanganan Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Analisis Yuridis,” J. Ilm. Advokasi, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 752–762, 2025, https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v13i2.6374.

[3] F. Andriansyah and A. W. Asmorojati, “Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi dalam Dinamika Politik Hukum Ketatanegaraan Pasca Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2019,” Lex Renaiss., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 249–273, 2025, https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol10.iss1.art10.

[4] A. K. Syafa’at, “Potensi Zakat, Infaq, Shodaqoh Pada Badan Amil Zakat Nasional (BAZNAS) Di Kabupaten Banyuwangi Abdul,” J. Chem. Inf. Model., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1689–1699, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

[5] A. Dadatashzadeh, A. B. Mehr, and M. Afshari, “Good governance and anti-corruption based on patterns of ombudsman management,” Public Adm. Issues, vol. 2019, no. 6, pp. 41–60, 2019, https://doi.org/10.17323/1999-5431-2019-0-6-41-60.

[6] Muhammad AR, N. AR, Hayati, Nurbayani, Masrizal, and Sulaiman, “The Indonesian Journal of the Social Sciences Integrating Anti-Corruption Education in Acehnese Dayahs : A Moral- Pedagogical Model for Character Formation,” J. Ilm. Peuradeun, vol. 13, no. 2, 2025, https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i2.1086

[7] Irman Syahriar, Indera Dewi, Fifi Loanardy, Jamil Khairunnisah, and Bilal Hussain, “Judicial Neutrality in Corruption Trials: A Contemporary Islamic Law Perspective on Independence in Transitional Legal Systems,” MILRev Metro Islam. Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1471–1488, 2025, https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11425.

[8] R. Susmayanti and F. Hidayat, “Supreme and Constitutional Court’S Decisions on Permission of Former Corruption Convicts To Be Parliamentary Candidates: Whose Rights Should Be Protected?,” Brawijaya Law J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 394–416, 2025, https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.blj.2025.012.02.09.

[9] H. Sauni, Z. J. Fernando, D. A. Putra, S. Virdaus, and A. Hardianto, “Beyond Borders: Shedding Light on Foreign Bribery through an Islamic Legal Lens,” Al-Istinbath J. Huk. Islam, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 649–678, 2024, https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v9i2.9752.

[10] J. Hafidz, A. Noviyansyah, M. D. Saktiawan, A. P. Wiranto, and A. K. Osman, “Contemporary Legal Accountability Reform in Public Procurement: A Framework Integrating Ethical Norms and Anti-Corruption Mechanisms,” MILRev Metro Islam. Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 517–538, 2025, https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i1.10664.

[11] M. A. Rahman, “The Discursive Construction of Strategies for Implementing Anti-Corruption Education At State Islamic Higher Educational Institutions,” J. Ilm. Peuradeun, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 555–578, 2022, https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v10i3.737.

[12] H. Rajab, R. Paee, Thalhah, and R. Nurdin, “Ethical Governance in Public Service: A Comparative Study of Hadaya al-‘Ummal in Islamic Law and Gratification in Indonesian Law,” Int. J. Law Soc., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 206–216, 2024, https://doi.org/10.59683/ijls.v3i3.120.

[13] A. Akhmad, Z. J. Fernando, and P. Teeraphan, “Unmasking Illicit Enrichment: A Comparative Analysis of Wealth Acquisition Under Indonesian, Thai, and Islamic Law,” J. Indones. Leg. Stud., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 899–934, 2023, https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i2.69332.

[14] A. Karim, O. Fathurrohman, Muhammadun, W. Saripudin, D. Rahmat, and F. Mansir, “Altruistic works, religion, and corruption: Kiais’ leadership to shape anti-corruption values in pesantren,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2238968.

[15] T. Riskawati, W. Salim, H. P. Hidayat Putro, and H. Ginting, “Faith-driven leaders in a non-theocratic country: internalizing Muhammadiyah values in local governance,” Asia Pacific J. Public Adm., vol. 00, no. 00, pp. 1–24, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2025.2571898.

[16] Suparno, Rusli, and I. Hidaya, “A New Restorative Justice Paradigm in the Sociology of Islamic Law in Indonesia: Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah’s Responses to Corruption Cases,” Syariah J. Huk. dan Pemikir., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 480–502, 2024, https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v24i2.16221.

[17] Yasid, “The Islamic perspective of changes in government administration and law: With special reference to the development of legal political system in post-reformasi Indonesia,” J. Indones. Islam, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 76–92, 2012, https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2012.6.1.76-92.

[18] Suyadi, Z. Nuryana, A. W. Asmorojati, and A. Yudhana, “Driving school program to strengthen anti-corruption education within the integrity zone policy,” Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 2722–2731, 2025, https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v14i4.28773.

[19] K. Baehaki, “Public Participation in the Law-Making Process in Indonesia,” J. Media Huk., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2025.

[20] D. A. Yustia and F. Arifin, “Bureaucratic reform as an effort to prevent corruption in Indonesia,” Cogent Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 1, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2166196.

[21] A. D. Nuryanto and A. K. Jaelani, “The Role of State Official Wealth Report in Realizing the Principles of Maqashid Sharia,” Leg. J. Ilm. Huk., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 155–181, 2024, https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v32i1.32879.

[22] M. H. Tobing, N. N. Sirait, and M. Siregar, “Contiguity of Law Violations in the Context of Business Competition and Corruption in Bid Rigging Cases,” J. Ecohumanism, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 476–483, 2024, https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i8.4748.

[23] M. R. Bima and R. Ramadani, “Position of Supervisory Board Organ and Its Implications for the Institutional Corruption Eradication Commission,” Law Reform J. Pembaharuan Huk., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 179–197, 2020, https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i2.33770.

[24] T. D. Cahyani, M. H. Muhamad, and M. S. Hassan, “Comparative Analysis of The Effectiveness of Punishment Over Corruption in Indonesia and Hong Kong,” J. Educ. Soc. Res., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 328–339, 2023, https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0140.

[25] D. Kadewandana, A. Paranata, and V. Endrődi-Kovács, “The aid-corruption paradox in development: An examination of provinces in Indonesia,” J. Infrastructure, Policy Dev., vol. 8, no. 10, 2024, https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i10.5356.

[26] S. Wahyudi, “Penal Policy on Assets Recovery on Corruption Cases in Indonesia,” JILS ( J. Indones. Leg. Stud. ), vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 104–115, 2019, https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jils/article/view/29176/13314

[27] S. Sumartias, D. A. T. Pulubuhu, Sudarmono, A. N. Adi, and E. Ratnasari, “Democracy in the Indonesian Digital Public Sphere: Social Network Analysis of Twitter Users’ Responses to the Issue of Nationalism Knowledge Test at the Corruption Eradication Commission (TWK-CEC),” J. Ilmu Sos. dan Ilmu Polit., vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 240–257, 2023, https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.70896.

[28] M. S. Ummah, “Legal Reform Against the Conflict of Norms in the Corruption,” Sustain., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2019, http://scioteca.caf.com/bitstream/handle/123456789/1091/RED2017-Eng-8ene.pdf?sequence=12&isAllowed=y%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.06.005%0Ahttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/305320484_

[29] J. M. Monteiro, “Amendment of the Corruption Eradication Commission Act and Its Impact on the Constitution,” J. Media Huk., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 184–193, 2021, https://doi.org/10.18196/jmh.v28i2.10941.

[30] A. Alfada, “Does Fiscal Decentralization Encourage Corruption in Local Governments? Evidence from Indonesia,” J. Risk Financ. Manag., vol. 12, no. 3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm12030118.

[31] M. Shoaib et al., “Prevalence of Ixodidae Ticks and Their Association With Different Risk Factors in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan,” J. Anim. Plant Sci., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 413–420, 2022, https://doi.org/10.36899/JAPS.2022.2.0438.

[32] T. Jamil et al., “Revisiting brucellosis in small ruminants of western border areas in Pakistan,” Pathogens, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1–10, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9110929.

[33] M. Y. Idy and A. A. Sahabuddin, “Justice sector corruption: Will Indonesia neutralize it?” Int. J. Criminol. Sociol., vol. 10, no. 0411, pp. 39–44, 2021, https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.06.

[34] Z. Qathrunnada, C. Nugroho, F. Yusanto, A. Wulandari, and R. R. Wulan, “Ideology, resistance, and sociopolitical dynamics in Indonesia: media narratives and resistance discourses on the chairman of the corruption eradication commission’s corruption case,” Front. Commun., vol. 10, no. February, pp. 1–11, 2025, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2025.1552110.

[35] A. Khoiri, W. Hidayat, D. Chalidyanto, and F. Suhariadi, “Disposition of policy implementers: Study on the hospitals payment system change in the Indonesian national health insurance era,” Indian J. Forensic Med. Toxicol., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 689–696, 2020, https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.11568.

[36] R. Juwita, “A Human Rights-Based Approach to Combating Corruption in the Education Sector in Indonesia,” Asia Pacific J. Hum. Rights Law, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 230–265, 2023, https://doi.org/10.1163/15718158-24020002.

[37] A. W. Qureshi, Z. Ullah Khan, L. Khan, A. Mansoor, and R. Minhas, “Prevalence of malaria, typhoid and co-infection in district Dir (lower), Pakistan,” Biosci. J., vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 317–325, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v35n1a2019-42250.

[38] Ramiyanto, “Presidential permit to summon suspect of corruption of the member of the house of representatives,” Sriwijaya. Law Rev., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 203–214, 2018, https://doi.org/10.28946/slrev.vol2.iss2.128.pp203-214.

[39] Sukmareni, E. Danil, Ismansyah, and Z. Daulay, “Implication of regulation authorities on the efforts to accelerate the eradication of corruption,” Hasanuddin Law Rev., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 356–365, 2018, https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v4i3.1078.

[40] B. D. Anggono and R. Wahanisa, “Corruption Prevention in Legislative Drafting in Indonesia,” WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev., vol. 18, pp. 172–181, 2022, https://doi.org/10.37394/232015.2022.18.19.

[41] R. Achwan, “Reconceptualising political corruption in democratising societies,” Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 201–209, 2014, https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n11p201.

[42] S. A. Schütte, “Keeping the New Broom Clean: Lessons in Human Resource Management from the CEC,” Bijdr. tot Taal-, Land- en Volkenkd., vol. 171, no. 4, pp. 423–454, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17104001.

[43] Abdullah et al., “Dengue outbreaks in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (CEC), Pakistan in 2017: An integrated disease surveillance and response system (IDSRS)-based report,” Polish J. Microbiol., vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 115–119, 2019, https://doi.org/10.21307/pjm-2019-013.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-12-06

Accepted

2025-12-06

Published

2025-12-30