Arabic Language and Islamic Epistemology in Muhammadiyah Education: A Bayani Burhani and ‘Irfani Approach to the SDGs

Authors

  • Ahmadi Fakulty of Tarbiyah, Institut Studi Islam Muhammadiyah Pacitan
    Indonesia
  • Ismail Fakulty of Tarbiyah, Institut Studi Islam Muhammadiyah Pacitan
    Indonesia
  • Septyana Tentiasih Fakulty of Tarbiyah, Institut Studi Islam Muhammadiyah Pacitan
    Indonesia
  • Hanip Hidayatulloh Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO University)
    Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v26i02.13517

Keywords:

arabic language, islamic epistemology, bayani burhani, muhammadiyah, sdgs

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to reconceptualize the Arabic language as the epistemological axis of Islamic education within the Muhammadiyah educational system, positioning it as a strategic medium for integrating revelation (wahy), reason (ʿaql), and spiritual intuition (dzauq) in response to contemporary educational challenges and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Theoretical framework: The theoretical framework is grounded in the triadic epistemology of bayani, burhani, and ‘irfani, as articulated by al-Jābirī and recontextualized in Islamic educational thought, wherein Arabic functions not merely as a linguistic tool but as a unifying epistemic structure. Literature review:  The literature review reveals that most existing studies approach Arabic instruction from pedagogical, grammatical, or communicative perspectives, while its epistemological role in shaping Islamic knowledge and ethical reasoning remains underexplored. Recent scholarly debates highlight the urgency of repositioning Arabic as a living epistemology capable of sustaining intellectual depth, and ethical responsibility. Methods: This research adopts a qualitative philosophical approach, drawing on Muhammadiyah institutional documents, curricular guidelines, and classical as well as contemporary Islamic scholarship. Data are analyzed through conceptual triangulation by integrating textual (bayani), rational (burhani), and intuitive (‘irfani) modes of reasoning. Results: The findings demonstrate that Arabic, when framed as an epistemic medium, enables integrative learning, bridges the dichotomy between religious and scientific knowledge, and cultivates ethical consciousness aligned with sustainable educational development. This epistemological integration supports Muhammadiyah’s vision of Islam berkemajuan by promoting inclusive, reflective, and values-based education. Implications: The implications of this study suggest that repositioning Arabic within Islamic education can contribute to sustainable knowledge formation, moral reasoning, and intercultural understanding, reinforcing the ethical foundations of the SDGs. Novelty: The novelty of this research lies in introducing the concept of Arabic as an epistemological ecology, offering a transformative framework that advances Islamic educational renewal beyond linguistic and technical boundaries.

References

[1] A. Rosowsky, “To what extent are sacred language practices ultralingual? The experience of British Muslim children learning Qur’anic Arabic,” Int. J. Biling., Oct. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069231203080.

[2] H. Husni and W. Hayden, “The Epistemology of Ta’dib in Islamic Civilizational Discourse: Reviving and Reconstructing Contemporary Muslim Scholars’ Views,” J. Al-Tamaddun, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 181–197, Jun. 2024, https://doi.org/10.22452/JAT.vol19no1.14.

[3] A. O. Alsuhaymi and F. A. Atallah, “Reason and Revelation in Ibn Taymiyyah’s Critique of Philosophical Theology: A Contribution to Contemporary Islamic Philosophy of Religion,” Religions, vol. 16, no. 7, p. 809, Jun. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16070809.

[4] T. Hamami and Z. Nuryana, “A holistic–integrative approach of the Muhammadiyah education system in Indonesia,” HTS Teol. Stud. / Theol. Stud., vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 1–10, 2022, https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v78i4.7607.

[5] O. Darwish et al., “LinguTimeX: A Framework for Multilingual CTC Detection Using Explainable AI and Natural Language Processing,” Comput. Mater. Contin., vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2026, https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2025.068266.

[6] A. Muttaqin, U. Hamsah, and R. H. Abror, “Muhammadiyah, Sufism, and the quest for ‘authentic’ Islamic spirituality,” Indones. J. Islam Muslim Soc., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 199–226, Jun. 2023, https://doi.org/10.18326/ijims.v13i1.199-226.

[7] J. E. B. Lumbard, “Islam and the Challenge of Epistemic Sovereignty,” Religions, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 406, Mar. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040406.

[8] A. Smirnov, “Reason, Language, and Culture: Reading Al-Jābirī’s ‘Arab Reason’ Concept Today,” Vopr. Filos., no. 7, pp. 51–58, Jul. 2024, https://doi.org/10.21146/0042-8744-2024-7-51-58.

[9] M. Laabdi and A. Elbittioui, “From Aslamat al-Maᶜrifa to al-Takāmul al-Maᶜrifī: A Study of the Shift from Islamization to Integration of Knowledge,” Religions, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 342, Mar. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030342.

[10] B. Marie, F. AlSwaiti, A. Ghanem, J. Suliman, and Y. S. Natour, “Speech Rate in Adult Syrian Arabic Speakers: Preliminary Data,” J. Lang. Teach. Res., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 12–21, 2026, https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1701.02.

[11] K. Alshehri, A. Alhothali, and N. Alowidi, “Arabic tweet act: a weighted ensemble pre-trained transformer model for classifying Arabic speech acts on Twitter,” Cogent Eng., vol. 13, no. 1, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2025.2608518.

[12] M. Dandash and M. Asadpour, “Personality analysis for social media users using Arabic language and its effect on sentiment analysis,” Soc. Netw. Anal. Min., vol. 15, no. 1, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-025-01413-2.

[13] A. Mostfa, “Redefining Qurʾānic Hermeneutics: Muḥammad ʿĀbid al-Jābrī and Nasr Ḥāmid Abū Zayd’s Humanistic Interpretations,” Religions, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 278, Feb. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030278.

[14] J. Lumbard, “Decolonizing Qurʾanic Studies,” Religions, vol. 13, no. 2, p. 176, Feb. 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13020176.

[15] W. Waston, “Pemikiran Epistemologi Amin Abdullah Dan Relevansinya Bagi Pendidikan Tinggi Di Indonesia,” Profetika J. Stud. Islam, vol. 17, no. 01, pp. 80–89, 2016, https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v17i01.2102.

[16] A. H. Alotaibi, A. A. AlJahlan, G. F. AlHarbi, and T. M. Alghizzi, “The impact of English as a medium of instruction in international education on Arabic language preservation and cultural identity: Parents’ perspectives and strategies,” Ampersand, vol. 15, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2025.100240.

[17] R. Ghazawi and E. Simpson, “How well can LLMs grade essays in Arabic?” Comput. Educ. Artif. Intell., vol. 9, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100449.

[18] Karwadi, A. R. Bin Zakaria, A. Setiyawan, and M. Ferdi Hasan, “Integration of critical pedagogy in Islamic education: a case study of pre-service teacher training,” Br. J. Relig. Educ., pp. 1–22, Sep. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2025.2560905.

[19] Supriyono, B. Sumintono, and L. N. Hakim, “Critical Islamic educational leadership: investigating how Islamic pedagogic models shape leadership practices,” Br. J. Relig. Educ., pp. 1–18, Aug. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2025.2542225.

[20] R. Ali, “‘We are still British or American colony, we are still a colony, we are not free’: language ideologies, policies in education in Pakistan,” Curr. Issues Lang. Plan, pp. 1–24, Jan. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2024.2447972.

[21] R. Girós Calpe, M. Bertràn Tarrés, and J. Pàmies Rovira, “La enseñanza comunitaria del árabe y la educación islámica en la diáspora marroquí: prácticas urbanas cotidianas e inclusión,” Migr. Publicación del Inst. Univ. Estud. sobre Migr., pp. 1–24, May 2025, https://doi.org/10.14422/mig.21992.012.

[22] J. E. Dodgson, “Reflexivity in Qualitative Research,” J. Hum. Lact., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 220–222, May 2019, https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334419830990.

[23] H. Noble and R. Heale, “Triangulation in research, with examples,” Evid. Based Nurs., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 67–68, Jul. 2019, https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145.

[24] A. S. Kvia and K. Aukland, “What is reflexivity? A scoping review of reflexivity and related concepts in Religious Education,” Br. J. Relig. Educ., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 314–334, Jul. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2024.2423351.

[25] H. Engward and S. Goldspink, “Lodgers in the house: living with the data in interpretive phenomenological analysis research,” Reflective Pract., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 41–53, Jan. 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1708305.

[26] H. Pallathadka, S. I. S. Al-Hawary, I. Muda, S. H. Surahman, A. A. A. Al-Salami, and Z. Nasimova, “The study of Islamic teachings in education: With an emphasis on behavioural gentleness,” HTS Teol. Stud. / Theol. Stud., vol. 79, no. 1, Feb. 2023, https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8193.

[27] M. Z. F. Nordin, “Bahasa Agama dalam Falsafah Melayu: Faktor Pengabaian dan Kepentingan,” Kemanus. Asian J. Humanit., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 149–172, 2023, https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2023.30.1.8.

[28] I. Alshaygy et al., “Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Toronto extremity salvage score system into Arabic and its validity,” J. Orthop. Surg. Res., vol. 20, no. 1, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05980-0.

[29] M. G. Almalki and A. A. Abdel-Aziem, “Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of an Arabic version of the chronic pain self-efficacy scale,” Hong Kong Physiother. J., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 143–155, 2025, https://doi.org/10.1142/S101370252550012X.

[30] M. R. Rozikin, “al-Farāʾiḍ is half of knowledge: a critical hadith analysis and its juridical implications in Islamic inheritance discourse,” Cogent Arts Humanit., vol. 13, no. 1, 2026, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2598289.

[31] A. Khoirudin, M. S. Effendi, M. L. Arqam, H. Darmawan, H. Bachtiar, and M. I. Anshori, “Noeng Muhadjir’s Islamic Educational Philosophy and Its Paradigmatic Impact: A Case Study from Universitas Ahmad Dahlan, Indonesia,” J. Pendidik. Agama Islam, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 295–316, 2025, https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v22i2.11004.

[32] Jasafat, N. S. M. Akhir, I. Iskandar, A. N. Jasmine, and S. Balqis, “Da’Wah As Civilizational Infrastructure: Rethinking the Aceh–Türkiye Knowledge Network in Islamic Education and Scientific Exchange,” J. Ilm. Peuradeun, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 2073–2096, 2025, https://doi.org/10.26811/peuradeun.v13i3.1912.

[33] I. Peta, “Aḥmad Amīn’s Rationalist Approach to the Qur’ān and Sunnah,” Religions, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 234, Mar. 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13030234.

[34] M. I. Mokhtar, N. N. M. A. Fadzilah, A. Baharuddin, and A. A. Rekan, “Rabbatu al-Bayt (Guardians of the Home): The Role of Mothers in Fostering Planetary Health Education from an Islamic Family Perspective,” El-Usrah, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 768–792, 2025, https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v8i2.30610.

[35] I. Felsenthal and A. Agbaria, “How to Read the Quran in Religious Islamic Education: What Educators Can Learn from the Work of Mohammed Arkoun,” Religions, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 129, Jan. 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010129.

[36] Z. Lessy, “Al-Jabiri’s Quranic Hermeneutics and Its Significance for Religious Education,” Kemanus. Asian J. Humanit., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 34–56, 2023, https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2023.30.1.3.

[37] Y. Rahman, K. Al Walid, and H. Humaidi, “Critical Thinking And Religious Moderation: Instilling Religiously Moderate Values through the Teaching of Islamic Philosophy in Indonesia,” J. Indones. Islam, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 49, Jun. 2022, https://doi.org/10.15642/JIIS.2022.16.1.49-74.

[38] Miftahudin, “Islamization Of Science Or Scientification Of Islam? Bridging The Dichotomy Of Science,” Eur. J. Philos. Relig., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 105–130, Mar. 2023, https://doi.org/10.24204/ejpr.2023.4113.

[39] D. Holman and E. Švejdarová, “The 21st-Century Empowering Wholeness Adaptive (EWA) Educational Model Transforming Learning Capacity and Human Capital through Wholeness Systems Thinking towards a Sustainable Future,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 1301, Jan. 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021301.

[40] İ. H. Erdoğan and S. Eryücel, “The Concept of Divine Revelation According to Ibn Sînâ and Al-Ghazālī: A Comparative Analysis,” Religions, vol. 15, no. 11, p. 1383, Nov. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111383.

[41] I. Surya et al., “Reconstructing the epistemology of classical Islamic dream interpretation: A critical examination of Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī’s Thought in the Book of Mafātīḥ al-Ghayb,” Res. J. Adv. Humanit., vol. 6, no. 3, 2025, https://doi.org/10.58256/h704fk63.

[42] S. A. Malik, “Science as Divine Signs: Al-Sanūsī’s Framework of Legal (sharʿī), Nomic (ʿādī), and Rational (ʿaqlī) Judgements,” Religions, vol. 16, no. 5, 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16050549.

[43] N. Muhtaroğlu, “Guided Theistic Rationalism: al-Ashʿarī’s View on Faith and Reason,” Philos. East West, Jan. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1353/pew.2025.a949968.

[44] M. Daulay, I. Siregar, and S. Akhyar, “The Role of Scientific Integration in Contemporary Ijtihād: Researchers’ Perspectives in State Islamic Universities,” J. Ilm. Mizani, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 322–344, 2025, https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i1.4887.

[45] A. Agbaria, “Education for Religion: An Islamic Perspective,” Religions, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 309, Feb. 2024, https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15030309.

[46] H. R’boul and O. Z. Barnawi, “Islamic Emancipation as alternative Maarifa in education: decoloniality as a holy mission,” Br. J. Relig. Educ., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 242–252, Jul. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2024.2393176.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-10-27

Accepted

2026-02-04

Published

2026-02-09