Regulation of Incest Crimes: A Comparative Criminal Law Perspective from Indonesia, Germany, and Yemen

Authors

  • Deryasa Sunan Gunung Djati Islamic University
    Indonesia
    https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9485-0170
  • Muhammad Hasan Abdurrahman Indonesia Open University
    Indonesia
  • Muhammad Fatich Universitas al-Ahgaff
    Yemen

Keywords:

criminal law, incest, indonesia, germany, yemen

Abstract

Incest, commonly understood as sexual relations between blood relatives, remains a legal dilemma in many countries because it conflicts with moral, religious, and social values, from the family unit to society at large. This study aims to compare criminal law regulations concerning incest offenses in Indonesia, Germany, and Yemen. These three countries were selected based on theoretical considerations and differences in their legal systems: Indonesia, which emphasizes a hybrid legal system that combines civil law with religious and local values; Germany, which represents a Western secular legal system; and Yemen, which adopts a Sharia-based legal system. This study employs a normative legal research approach with a comparative perspective, and the data were collected through a literature review. The findings indicate that the criminalization of incest is not merely determined by the existence or absence of legal prohibitions but is shaped by different legal rationales that are reflected in each country's legislation, including Indonesia’s Criminal Code (KUHP), Germany’s Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch/StGB), and Yemen’s qanun regulations. This study contributes by providing a cross-legal-system analytical framework for policymakers in Indonesia in formulating contextual regulations on incest, while also enriching legal scholarship through comparative analyses of criminal law policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifah, W., & Sari, N. L. (2021). Pemberatan Pidana bagi Pelaku Pemerkosaan Hubungan Sedarah (Incest). Seminar Nasional Dan Call For Paper 2025 Dengan Tema&Quot; Inovasi Inklusif Dalam Sociopreneursh, 8(1), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.38156/gesi.v8i1.97

Aftab, S. (2024). Privacy Protection in ECHR Member States: Germany and the United Kingdom. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, 109, 171–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-45575-9_6

Aisy, M. R., & Imawan, D. H. (2025). Hukuman Hadd Pelaku Zina: Analisis Tafsir Klasik dan Kontemporer Surat An-Nur Ayat 1-3. Tahkim: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syariah, 21(1), 20–56. https://jurnal.iainambon.ac.id/index.php/THK/article/view/9184

Anjani, & Fithry, A. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Tindak Pidana Pemerkosaan Inses di indonesia. Prosiding SNAPP: Sosial Humaniora, Pertanian, Kesehatan Dan Teknologi, 2(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.24929/snapp.v2i1.3119

Arioen, R. (2023). Buku Ajar Metodologi Penelitian. CV. Eureka Media Aksara.

Ariyanti, D. O., & Ramadhan, M. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Justice Collaborator Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia dan Jerman. Jurnal Rechten: Riset Hukum Dan Asasi Manusia, 5(3), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.52005/rechten.v5i3.130

Azizih, S. N. W., & Wibowo, H. D. (2023). Analisis Viktimologi dalam Kejahatan Inses,” Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara. Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Administrasi Negara, 1(3), 106–127. https://doi.org/10.55606/eksekusi.v1i3.456

Azzahra, E. I. (2024). Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual Inses pada Anak dalam Hukum Positif Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Law Studies, 2(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.47134/lawstudies.v2i1.2128

Bimbinov, A. A. (2022). Incest and inbreeding: issues of criminal liability. SHS Conferences, 134. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202213400091

Bramberger, A. (2012). Inzestverbot. Deutscher Ethikrat. http://www.ethikrat.org/dateien/pdf/anhoerung-22-11-2012-bramberger.pdf

Cahyani, N. R. (2025). Penerapan Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Inses Terhadap Anak Kandung [Universitas Kuningan]. https://rama.uniku.ac.id/id/eprint/3051

Diyarti, S., Asasriwarni, & Zulfan. (2022). Analisis Sistem Peradilan Agama di Negara Yaman dan Pelaksanaannya. Jurnal Mediasas: Media Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah, 5(2), 148–162. https://journal.staisar.ac.id/index.php/mediasas/article/view/18

Eberle, E. J. (1997). Human Dignity, Privacy, and Personality in German and American Constitutional Law. Law Faculty Scholarship.

Fadli, W. F., Ima, I., Nggeboe, F., & Verawarty, L. (2025). Pengantar Hukum Indonesia. Yayasan Tri Edukasi Ilmiah.

German Criminal Code. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__173.html

Hamzah, A. (2022). Perbandingan Hukum Pidana di 18 Negara. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Herawaty, N. (2012). Perbandingan Pertanggungan Jawab dalam Tindak Pidana Indonesia dan Jerman. Jurnal Al-Syir’ah, 10(2), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.30984/as.v10i2.262

Husin, Z. (2023). Upaya Penanggulagan Terjadinya Kekerasan Seksual dalam Hubungan Sedarah (Incest), Dampak dan Faktor Penyebabnya: Studi Literature. Jurnal Thengkyang, 8(1), 20–29. https://jurnal.unisti.ac.id/thengkyang/article/view/169

Ilyas, A. (2012). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana Memahami Tindak Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana sebagai Syarat Pemidanaan. Mahakarya Rangkang Offset.

Irza, M. Y. (2023). Penerapan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana terhadap Pelaku Inses Anak Kandung. Jurnal Wijayakusuma Law Review, 5(2), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.51921/wlr.7wz4fr23

Kurniawan, A. T., Wardani, Y., Miftahudin, R., Jayanti, G. D., & Sinaga, R. N. (2025). Perbandingan hukum pidana dalam pelaksanaan perlindungan saksi dan korban di Indonesia dan Jerman. Jurnal Hukum Dinamika Eselensia, 7(1), 189–207. https://journalpedia.com/1/index.php/hde/index

Lisyorini. (2025). Filsafat Hukum: Menggali Landasan Etika dalam Setiap Keputusan dan Pemikiran yang Membentuk Hukum. Anak Hebat Indonesia.

Madhani, H. N., Maulina, Wildan, M., & Surya. (2024). Perbandingan Legislasi Hukum Pidana Islam di Indonesia dan Beberapa Negara Muslim Lainnya. Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, Dan Politik, 1(2), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.62383/demokrasi.v1i3.252

Manea, E. (2011). The Arab State and Women’s Rights: the trap of Authoritarian Governance. Zora: Zurich Open Repository and Archive, 1, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807583

Moeljatno. (2021). KUHP Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Bumi Aksara.

Panjaitan, A. C. (2024). Penegakan Hukum Pidana di Yaman. Jurnal Aktual Justice, 8(2), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.70358/aktualjustice.v8i2.1104

Paputungan, N., Usman, M. H., & Ridwan. (2025). Penerapan Had Zina pada Muhsan dan Gairu Muhsan Menurut Mazhab Syafii dan Hambali. Al-Mabsuth: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Bahasa Arab, 1(2), 565–584. https://doi.org/10.36701/mabsuth.v1i2.2553

Peters, R. (2005). Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law Theory and Practice from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge University Press.

Pratama, D. A., Soponyono, E., & Sulatro, R. B. (2018). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana sebagai Upaya Penanggulangan Delik Kesusilaan dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Diponegoro Law Journal, 7(4), 444–464. https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2018.41471

Rishan, I. (2024). Teori & Hukum Konstitusi. Sinar Grafika.

Rohim, M. Y. N., Supardin, & Zulhas’ari. (2024). Perkembangan dan Dinamika Peradilan Islam di Berbagai Negara Islam: Saudi, Mesin, Yaman, dan Sudan. Jurnal Hukum De’Rechtsstaat, 10(2), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.30997/jhd.v10i2.11536

Soekanto, S., & M, S. (2015). Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Rajawali Press.

Soepomo, R. (1997). Sistem Hukum di Indonesia Sebelum Perang Dunia II. PT. Pradnya Paramita.

Soeroso, R. (2010). Perbandingan Hukum Perdata. Sinar Grafika.

Tampubolon, Manotar, & Simbolon, P. G. M. (2022). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Inggris dengan Jerman (Refleksi Terhadap Sumber Hukum Dan Penerapan Hukum Indonesia). Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, 5(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v5i2.11114

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (2023). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/234935/uu-no-1-tahun-2023

Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perlindungan Anak (2016). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/37575/uu-no-17-tahun-2016

Vom, B. (2008). Criminal Liability of Sibling Incest is Constitutional. Bundesverfassungsgericht. https://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/SharedDocs/Pressemitteilungen/EN/2008/bvg08-029.html

Yemen Penal Code 1994 (Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1994 Tentang Kejahatan Dan Hukuman (1994). https://www.refworld.org/legal/decreees/natlegbod/1994/en/34402

Zaharani, H. M. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Pengaturan Pidana Pokok dan Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam KUHP 2023 Indonesia dan Strafgesetzbuch Jerman. Deposisi: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.59581/deposisi.v3i2.5064

Downloads

Submitted

2025-12-22

Accepted

2026-06-13

Published

2026-06-25

How to Cite

Deryasa, Abdurrahman, M. H., & Fatich, M. (2026). Regulation of Incest Crimes: A Comparative Criminal Law Perspective from Indonesia, Germany, and Yemen. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 7(1), 102–114. Retrieved from https://journals2.ums.ac.id/sosial/article/view/14976

Issue

Section

Articles