Contemporary Implications of Ibn Sina's Epistemology for Islamic Political Leadership in the Indonesian Context

Authors

  • Ushansyah Department of Islamic Studies, State Islamic University Palangka Raya
    Indonesia
  • Normuslim Department of Islamic Studies, State Islamic University Palangka Raya
    Indonesia
  • Muhammad Taufiq International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilisation
    Malaysia
  • Olis Islamic College of Kuala Kapuas, Kapuas Regency
    Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v27i03.14745

Keywords:

ibn sina's political epistemology, rational-prophetic leadership, islamic political leadership, active intellect, indonesian political context

Abstract

Objective: This article aims to examine Ibn Sina's epistemological and metaphysical foundations in constructing the concept of political authority within the Islamic intellectual tradition, with particular emphasis on al-Raʾīs al-Awwal as the ideal model of prophetic leadership. Theoretical framework: The study is grounded in Ibn Sina's theory of knowledge, metaphysics, and political philosophy, emphasizing the interaction between reason, revelation, and ethical governance. Literature review: Previous studies have predominantly discussed Ibn Sina's epistemology from philosophical and theological perspectives, whereas limited attention has been given to its political implications and its application to modern Islamic leadership, particularly within Indonesia's democratic and pluralistic society. Method: This study employs qualitative library research using a hermeneutical and interpretive analytical approach. Classical and contemporary sources are critically examined to reconstruct Ibn Sina's political epistemology and evaluate its contemporary significance. Results: The study demonstrates that genuine knowledge is attained through the illumination of the human intellect by the Active Intellect. Prophets possess the highest degree of intellectual and spiritual perfection, enabling them to receive comprehensive knowledge and establish legitimate authority. This epistemological foundation generates a rational-prophetic leadership model characterized by intellectual excellence, ethical integrity, independent reasoning, justice, public accountability, and unwavering commitment to people-centered governance. Such leadership provides a philosophical response to challenges including identity politics, abuse of power, declining political ethics, and digital populism. Implications: These findings offer a normative framework for strengthening ethical political leadership, governance, and public trust within contemporary Indonesian Islamic politics. Novelty: This article reconstructs Ibn Sina's epistemological and metaphysical thought into a contemporary rational-prophetic leadership model centered on al-Raʾīs al-Awwal, integrating philosophical principles with practical political ethics and authentic personal leadership for democratic governance.

References

[1] A. Bostani, “The Status of Imagination in,” vol. 1, no. 1, 2019.

[2] “Ibn Sina’s Political Philosophy: A Study of the Relationship between Prophecy and Civil Science,” Jordan J. Soc. Sci., vol. 16, no. 1, hal. 1–13, 2023, doi: 10.35516/jjss.v16i1.1263.

[3] M. Yousefirad, “The Efficiency of the State in Avicenna’s Political Philosophy”, doi: 10.30497/ap.2023.244025.1612.

[4] B. Negmatov, “Ibn sinoning ijtimoiy-siyosiy ta’limotida idеal davlat konsеpsiyasi,” Tamaddun nuri., vol. 5, no. 68, hal. 426–429, 2025, doi: 10.69691/d3zh6503.

[5] D. H. Arioli, “The First Ruler and the Prophet: On the Identity-in-Difference of Politics, Religion, and Philosophy in the Thought of Alfarabi and Ibn Sina,” Polity, vol. 46, no. 4, hal. 547–561, 2014, doi: 10.1057/pol.2014.23.

[6] P. Adamson, “Logic and knowledge,” Oxford University Press, 2023, hal. 18-C2B2. doi: 10.1093/actrade/9780192846983.003.0002.

[7] T. Kamalizadeh, “Al-Farabi and Ibn Sina on the Relationship Between Philosophy and Jurisprudence in the Classification of Sciences”, doi: 10.30497/ap.2024.245815.1661.

[8] A. Tina, “Revolusi etika politik teori filsafat kontemporer terhadap konsep etika ibn sina,” J. Siginjai, 2023, doi: 10.22437/js.v3i1.24880.

[9] A. Jahaninasab, “Role of Active Intellect in Competence of Prophet for Leadership from Avecinna’s viewpoint”, doi: 10.30497/ap.2023.244318.1619.

[10] B. Hennig, “Avicenna’s Agent Intellect as a Completing Cause,” Hist. Philos. Q., 2024, doi: 10.5406/21521026.41.1.03.

[11] H. Aghazadeh, E. B. J. Abadi, dan F. Zandi, “Branding advantage of agri-food companies in competitive export markets: a resource-based theory,” Br. Food J., 2022, doi: 10.1108/BFJ-08-2021-0952.

[12] A. H. Hakim dan A. Ahmad, “Tafsir Falsafi: Pemetaan Tipologi, Epistemologi dan Implementasi,” Mutawatir J. Keilmuan Tafsir Hadith, 2022, doi: 10.15642/mutawatir.2022.12.2.191-214.

[13] M. A. Herman, M. Amri, dan I. Santalia, “Pemikiran Filosof Al-Farabi dan Ibnu Sina,” vol. 1, hal. 195–202, 2024.

[14] penrj. Syihabul Furqon, Ibn sina, kitab penyembuhan ilahiah, no. December. 2023.

[15] A. B. Handayani, “Relevansi konsep akal bertingkat Ibnu Sina dalam pendidikan Islam di era milenial,” vol. 8, no. 2, hal. 222–240, 2019, doi: 10.32832/tadibuna.v8i2.2034.

[16] S. Baran, “İbn Sînâ’da İdrak Mertebeleri ve İkinci Felsefî Ma’kûller,” vol. 6, no. 1, hal. 291–312, 2020, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1170631

[17] Z. Cai, “Avicenna on representation: towards an existential-relational account of intentionality,” Br. J. Hist. Philos., vol. 33, no. 3, hal. 415–434, 2025, doi: 10.1080/09608788.2024.2325384.

[18] I. Kurun, “Avicenna’s Intuitionist Rationalism,” Hist. Philos. Q., vol. 38, no. 4, hal. 317–336, 2021, doi: 10.5406/21521026.38.4.02.

[19] Н. В. Ефремова, “Philosophy of Religion and Religious Studies Философия религии и религиоведение Об авиценновской реформе « Метафизики » Аристотеля : базисные ориентиры On Avicennian Reform of Aristotle ’ s Metaphysics : basic attitudes,” hal. 615–633, 2019, doi: 10.31696/2618-7043-2019-2-3-615-633.

[20] J. McGinnis, “‘No’ing That You Don’t Know: Ibn Sīnā on Meno’s Paradox and Its Implications for the Sciences,” Monist, vol. 108, no. 3, hal. 229–245, 2025, doi: 10.1093/monist/onaf011.

[21] T. Khan, “Human Nature and Divine Purpose: Contrasting Ontologies in Islamic and Western Philosophy,” vol. 4, no. 3, hal. 90–97, 2025, doi: 10.63544/ijss.v4i3.147.

[22] A. Jahaninasab, K. Poladi, dan S. Eslami, “Theory of State in the Political Philosophy of Avicenna Relying on Spragens ’ Methodology 1”.

[23] Zandi, “The Relationship Between Knowledge And Leadership In Ibn Sina’s Thought,” vol. 2, no. 3, hal. 143–168, 2020, doi: 10.22081/JIPS.2020.69406.

[24] R. Adabiyah, “Kenabian perspektif ibnu sina,” vol. 17, no. 1, hal. 61–78, 2017.

[25] CNN Indoensia, “Partai Ummat Bicara Lantang: Kami Adalah Politik Identitas Baca artikel CNN Indonesia ‘Partai Ummat Bicara Lantang: Kami Adalah Politik Identitas’ selengkapnya di sini: https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20230213182337-617-912521/partai-ummat-bicara-la,”https://app.cnnindonesia.com/.

[26] Nur Amalia Abbas, “Putusan Politik Uang Pilkada Barito Utara: Pendekatan Berbeda bagi Pemberi dan Penerima,” marinews.com. Diakses: 12 Oktober 2025. [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://marinews.mahkamahagung.go.id/berita/putusan-politik-uang-pilkada-barito-utara-0hh

[27] S. P. Muzahid Akbar Hayat, Muhammad Wafi Rahman, Norkhalifah, Deby Nuriadini, “KOMUNIKASI POLITIK PERSONAL BRANDING IBNU SINA MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL INSTAGRAM @IBNUSINA,” vol. 9, no. 8, 2024.

[28] S. Rahmah, “Personal Branding Ganjar Pranowo untuk Membangun Komunikasi Politik di Media Sosial Instagram,” vol. 5, no. 1, hal. 94–101, 2021, doi: 10.30596/interaksi.v5i1.5584.

[29] kaya, “ان ی س نبا ی سا ی س ۀ فسلف رد تسا ی س و ناسنا 1402 / 4 / 13 :,” hal. 51–74.

[30] A. Ginannafsih, “Sejarah Etika Politik dan Hubungannya dengan Islam The History of Political Ethics and its Relationship with Islam,” vol. 2, no. 2, hal. 1–5, 2024.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-12-16

Accepted

2026-06-30

Published

2026-06-30