Bibliometric Analysis of Research Trends in Islamic Multiculturalism: Evidence from the Scopus Database
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v27i03.13149Keywords:
bibliometric analysis, islamic multiculturalism, scopus database, vosviewer, research trendsAbstract
Objective: This study aims to examine the intellectual structure and research trends of Islamic multiculturalism published in the Scopus database between 1991 and 2024 through a comprehensive bibliometric analysis. Theoretical framework: The study is grounded in the theoretical framework of multiculturalism, intercultural dialogue, and knowledge mapping, which explains how scholarly networks, thematic evolution, and citation patterns shape the development of academic knowledge. Literature review: Previous studies have extensively discussed Islamic multiculturalism from theological, educational, and sociopolitical perspectives. However, few investigations have systematically mapped the global scientific landscape, influential contributors, institutional collaboration, and thematic evolution of this field using bibliometric techniques, leaving an important gap in understanding its intellectual development. Method: This study employs a quantitative bibliometric approach by analyzing 223 Scopus-indexed publications using VOSviewer and RStudio. The analysis covers publication growth, authorship patterns, institutional productivity, country contributions, citation performance, co-occurrence of keywords, and thematic visualization through network, overlay, and density analyses. Results: The findings indicate a consistent increase in scholarly interest, with publication peaks recorded in 2014, 2019, and 2021, although a slight decline occurred in recent years. Modood T. emerged as the most productive author, while Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, the University of Bristol, and Swinburne University of Technology were identified as the leading institutions. The United Kingdom, the United States, and Australia dominated research productivity. Keyword mapping demonstrates that multiculturalism, Islam, and religion constitute the principal research clusters, whereas overlay visualization reveals an evolution from studies emphasizing Islam and multiculturalism toward broader discussions of religion and social diversity. Citation analysis identifies Mepschen (2010) as the most globally cited publication and Niyozov (2009) as the most influential locally cited work. Implications: The findings imply that future studies should expand interdisciplinary collaboration and investigate underexplored themes, including cultural anthropology, liberalism, diversity education, and social inclusion. Novelty: The novelty of this study lies in providing a comprehensive bibliometric mapping that integrates publication performance, intellectual structure, thematic evolution, and research gaps, offering a strategic reference for future scholarship and policy development in Islamic multiculturalism.
References
[1] Abdallah-Pretceille, M. (2020). Intercultural education in the 21st century: Learning to live together. Prospects, 49(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09471-5
[2] Ahmad, T., Alvi, A., & Ittefaq, M. (2021). The use of bibliometric analysis in education research: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7437–7466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10596-y
[3] Anwar, S., Fakhruddin, Faqihuddin, Sudirman, & Romli. (2024). Understanding tolerance: Student perceptions of Islamic religious education in public universities. ResearchGate.
[4] Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informatics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
[5] Banks, J. A. (2020). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X20903305
[6] Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2021). Research collaboration in the social sciences: What, why, and how. Policy Studies Journal, 49(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12358
[7] Bozeman, B., & Rogers, J. (2021). Knowledge fragmentation and the limits of interdisciplinarity: The case of research collaboration. Research Policy, 50(7), 104–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2021.104255
[8] Chen, C., Song, M., & Heo, G. E. (2022). Mapping knowledge domains: Emerging trends and new developments. Scientometrics, 127(2), 1175–1199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04060-0
[9] Dervis, H. (2019). Bibliometric analysis using Biblioshiny for bibliometrix. Journal of Scientometric Research, 8(3), 156–160. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.8.3.32
[10] Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
[11] Heifetz, R. (2020). Leadership in times of crisis: Adaptive strategies for complex challenges. Harvard University Press.
[12] Hennemann, S., & Liefner, I. (2021). Global science networks: Collaboration and the role of key players. Research Policy, 50(2), 104–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104122
[13] Kwiek, M. (2020). International research collaboration and international research orientation: Comparative findings about European academics. Journal of Studies in International Education, 24(5), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315318778133
[14] Marginson, S. (2022). The multipolar world of higher education: Emerging knowledge hubs beyond the West. Higher Education Quarterly, 76(2), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12300
[15] Meer, N., & Modood, T. (2022). Interculturalism and multiculturalism: A critical dialogue. Ethnicities, 22(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687968211070215
[16] Modood, T., & Uberoi, V. (2021). Multiculturalism and interculturalism: Debating the dividing lines. Comparative Migration Studies, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-020-00211-9
[17] Mohrman, K. (2021). Universities in the Global South: Rethinking knowledge production and international collaboration. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 19(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2020.1829964
[18] Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A., & Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. The Information Professional, 29(1), e290103. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
[19] Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
[20] Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Prentice-Hall.
[21] Paul-Binyamin, I., & Reingold, R. (2018). Multiculturalism in teacher education programs: A critical review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.001
[22] Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C. M., McInerney, P., Baldini Soares, C., Khalil, H., & Parker, D. (2023). The PRISMA 2020 flow diagram explained. JBI Evidence Synthesis, 21(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-21-1-23
[23] Rahmat, R., & Yahya, M. (2022). The impact of inclusive Islamic education teaching materials model on religious tolerance of Indonesian students. E-IJI (Educational International Journal of Innovation).
[24] Rahmat, R., Supriadi, E., Fakhruddin, F., & Nurjanah, N. (2022). Religiosity and interfaith tolerance among students in Indonesian Islamic and general junior secondary schools. ResearchGate.
[25] Rizvi, F. (2019). Globalisation and education: Changing conditions. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 17(2), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2019.1567296
[26] Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2020). Globalization and education after COVID-19: The renewal of critical research. Educational Theory, 70(5), 645–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/edth.12477
[27] Surip, N., Razak, A., Tamuri, A., & Abdul Fatah, H. (2019). The practice of tolerance among Islamic education teachers through shura in the management of da'wah activities in schools. Semantic Scholar.
[28] UNESCO. (2020). Education for sustainable development: A roadmap. UNESCO Publishing.
[29] UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO science report: The race against time for smarter development. UNESCO Publishing.
[30] Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2020). VOSviewer manual. Leiden: CWTS.
[31] Verkuyten, M., & Yogeeswaran, K. (2020). The social psychology of intergroup tolerance. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.003
[32] Wagner, C. S., Whetsell, T. A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2021). Growth of international collaboration in science: Revisiting six specialties. Scientometrics, 126(1), 368–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03715-x
[33] Wahid, A., & Pratama, R. (2022). Government incentives and the rise of Indonesian research output: A bibliometric perspective. Scientometrics, 127(3), 1723–1745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04183-4
[34] Yusuf, M., Gunawan, H., & Nasir, M. (2021). Value-based education in the pandemic era: Rebuilding tolerance and harmony. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 11(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.5590/JERAP.2021.11.2.04
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Lismawati, M. Arifin Rahmanto, Siti Nurhalimatussadiyah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
