Claude AI Adoption in High School Learning: An Extended UTAUT Model of Students’ Behavioral Intention and Use Behavior
Abstract
The integration of generative artificial intelligence (AI) into secondary education is creating new opportunities for advanced, adaptive, and student-centered learning, while its educational value depends partly on students' acceptance and actual use of the technology. Therefore, this study examines the acceptance and use of Claude AI in high school economics learning through the UTAUT model, with particular attention to its implications for AI-supported learning innovation and the design of more responsive learning environments. A quantitative survey was carried out among 139 high school students from SMAN 18 Surabaya, and the proposed research model was evaluated by applying PLS-SEM. The measurement model proved the construct validity and reliability in all constructs. The structural model showed that both Performance Expectancy and Social Influence affected Behavioral Intention, whereas Effort Expectancy did not show any statistically significant effect on it. Facilitating Conditions and Behavioral Intention had a significant impact on Use Behavior. The model accounted for 59.3% of the variance of Behavioral Intention and 41.4% of the variance of Use Behavior. Moreover, no moderating effect of age, gender, and experience with Claude AI was observed on the examined relationships in the model. The findings indicate that students' acceptance of Claude AI is primarily associated with perceived learning benefits and social influence, whereas actual use is associated with behavioral intention and facilitating conditions. These findings highlight the importance of integrating generative AI through pedagogically meaningful, student-centered, and context-sensitive learning strategies rather than treating it solely as a technological tool.
Full text article
References
Abrar, M., Aboraya, W., Khaliq, R. A., Subramanian, K. P., Husaini, Y. A., & Hussaini, M. A. (2025). AI-Powered Learning Pathways: Personalized Learning and Dynamic Assessments. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 16(1), 454–462. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2025.0160145
Acosta-Enriquez, B. G., Ramos Farroñan, E. V, Villena Zapata, L. I., Mogollon Garcia, F. S., Rabanal-León, H. C., Morales Angaspilco, J. E., & Bocanegra, J. C. S. (2024). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in university contexts: A conceptual analysis based on UTAUT2 theory. Heliyon, 10(19). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38315
Aideed, H., Elbayoumi Salem, I., Magdy, A., AlAmri, T. K., Alzubaidi, A. S., & Mohamed Elbaz, A. (2025). Beyond reality: Harnessing the metaverse for transformative education through UTAUT-2 and task-technology synergy. The International Journal of Management Education, 23(2), 101169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2025.101169
Akavova, A., Temirkhanova, Z., & Lorsanova, Z. (2023). Adaptive learning and artificial intelligence in the educational space. E3S Web of Conferences, 451. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345106011
Alkhwaldi, A. F. (2024). Understanding learners’ intention toward Metaverse in higher education institutions from a developing country perspective: UTAUT and ISS integrated model. Kybernetes, 53(12), 6008–6035.
Asha, V., Reddy, G. P., Nithya, B., Tungal, K., Durgaprasad, V., & Kruthik, T. N. (2023). Implication and Advantages of Machine Learning-based Chatbots in Diverse Disciplines. 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Computing and Data Communication Systems, ICSCDS 2023 - Proceedings, 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSCDS56580.2023.10104649
Azzam, A., & Tendai, C. (2025). K-12 STEM Teachers’ Experiences with Artificial Intelligence. TEM Journal, 14(1), 463.
Basco, R., Hair Jr, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). Advancing family business research through modeling nonlinear relationships: Comparing PLS-SEM and multiple regression. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(3), 100457.
Baskara, F. R., Puri, A. D., & Wardhani, A. R. (2023). ChatGPT and the Pedagogical Challenge: Unveiling the impact on early-Career academics in Higher Education. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 311-322.
Bharathyuvaraj, R., & Masilamani, V. (2024). Prospective Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Enhance Consistent Attention in First-Year Undergraduate Students in the Education Sector. IET Conference Proceedings, 2024(23), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2024.4414
Bhat, M. A., Tiwari, C. K., Bhaskar, P., & Khan, S. T. (2024). Examining ChatGPT adoption among educators in higher educational institutions using extended UTAUT model. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 22(3), 331–353.
Cabero-Almenara, J., Palacios-Rodríguez, A., Loaiza-Aguirre, M. I., & Andrade-Abarca, P. S. (2024). The impact of pedagogical beliefs on the adoption of generative AI in higher education: predictive model from UTAUT2. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1497705
Cao, Z., & Peng, L. (2024). An empirical study of factors influencing usage intention for generative artificial intelligence products: A case study of China. Journal of Information Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515241297329
Dewanda, F., Suroso, A. I., & Hasanah, N. (2025). Students’ adoption of educational technology platforms for nonformal education in Indonesia. Information Development. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669241312161
Du, L., & Lv, B. (2024). Factors influencing students’ acceptance and use generative artificial intelligence in elementary education: an expansion of the UTAUT model. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 24715–24734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12835-4
El Azhari, K., Hilal, I., Daoudi, N., & Ajhoun, R. (2022). “AskBot”: The AI Chatbot that Enhances the Learning Process. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 454 LNNS, 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01942-5_39
Farooq, S., & Mishra, P. (2024). Future trends and innovations in artificial intelligence. In Artificial Intelligence: A Multidisciplinary Approach towards Teaching and Learning (pp. 265–287). https://doi.org/10.2174/9789815305180124010015
Foroughi, B., Iranmanesh, M., Asadi, S., Al-Emran, M., Ghobakhloo, M., & Batouei, A. (2025). Extending UTAUT2 to explore intention to use ChatGPT for travel planning: a hybrid PLS-ANN approach. J Tour Futures.
Fortuna, A., Prasetya, F., Samala, A. D., Rawas, S., Criollo-C, S., Kaya, D., Raihan, M., Andriani, W., Safitri, D., & Nabawi, R. A. (2025). Artificial intelligence in personalized learning: A global systematic review of current advancements and shaping future opportunities. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 102114.
Grassini, S., Aasen, M. L., & Møgelvang, A. (2024). Understanding university students’ acceptance of ChatGPT: Insights from the UTAUT2 model. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 38(1), 2371168.
Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 100027.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Sharma, P. N., & Liengaard, B. D. (2024). Going beyond the untold facts in PLS–SEM and moving forward. European Journal of Marketing, 58(13), 81–106.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Evaluation of reflective measurement models. In Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook (pp. 75–90). Springer.
Harmadi, F., Maryani, I., Sukirman, S., & Montano, E. C. N. (2025). Digital transformation: Exploring the relationship between literacy, motivation, and TPACK in elementary education. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 295-311.
Hsieh, C.-C., & Chiu, F.-Y. (2020). The UTAUT Model Applied to Examine the STEM in Hight School Robot Subject Instruction BT - Education and Technology in Sciences (K. O. Villalba-Condori, A. Aduríz-Bravo, J. Lavonen, L.-H. Wong, & T.-H. Wang (eds.); pp. 36–46). Springer International Publishing.
Isnaini, S., & Muslimin, A. I. (2024). The Role of AI in Enhancing Marketing Communication: Implications for Policy and Development in Indonesian Higher Education. Studies in Media and Communication, 12(4), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v12i4.7013
Jen, S. L., & Salam, A. R. (2025). Revolutionising Essay Writing Using Artificial Intelligence. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(4), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.52783/jisem.v10i4s.495
Ke, Q., Gong, Y., & Ke, C. (2025). Bridging AI literacy and UTAUT constructs: structural equation modeling of AI adoption among Chinese university students. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1452. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05775-y
Kim, Y., Blazquez, V., & Oh, T. (2024). Determinants of Generative AI System Adoption and Usage Behavior in Korean Companies: Applying the UTAUT Model. In Behavioral Sciences (Vol. 14, Issue 11, p. 1035). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14111035
Kurniawan, R. Y., Mahfudhoh, A. I., Rohayati, S., Dewi, R. M., Kamalia, P. U., & Majid, M. Z. A. (2025). The Use of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology to Analyze Students’ Behavioral Interests in Utilizing Gemini AI. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 15(7), 1496–1511.
Kusumaningtyas, D. A., Manyunu, M., Kurniasari, E., Awalin, A. N., Rahmaniati, R., & Febriyanti, A. (2024). Enhancing learning outcomes: A study on the development of higher order thinking skills based evaluation instruments for work and energy in high school physics. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 14-31.
Makwana, D., Engineer, P., Dabhi, A., & Chudasama, H. (2023). Sampling methods in research: A review. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 7(3), 762–768.
Martins, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence-assisted classification of library resources: The case of Claude AI. Artificial Intelligence, 2, 27.
Matthes, J., Reinhardt, A., Hodzic, S., Kaňková, J., Binder, A., Bojic, L., Maindal, H. T., Paraschiv, C., & Ryom, K. (2026). Predicting the Intention to Use Generative Artificial Intelligence for Health Information: Comparative Survey Study. J Med Internet Res, 28, e75648. https://doi.org/10.2196/75648
Mcintyre, M. M., Cui, G., & Hou, Y. (2025). Virtual avoidance: Examining STEM students’ lower interest in online courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 65, 100995.
Mollick, E., Mollick, L., Bach, N., Ciccarelli, L. J., Przystanski, B., & Ravipinto, D. (2024). AI agents and education: Simulated practice at scale. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:2407.12796.
Mustafa, F., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Gao, X. (Andy). (2024). The challenges and solutions of technology integration in rural schools: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research, 126(May), 102380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2024.102380
Nguyen, T. T., Baker, J. R., & Le, T. Q. (2024). A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling Exploration of EFL Learners’ Perceptions of What Contributes to the Readability of Model Paragraphs. SAGE Open, 14(2), 21582440231211800.
Nikolic, S., Wentworth, I., Sheridan, L., Moss, S., Duursma, E., Jones, R. A., Ros, M., & Middleton, R. (2024). A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: An analysis of GenAI adoption using the UTAUT framework. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(6), 56–75.
Obenza, B. N., Caballo, J. H. S., Caangay, R. B. R., Makigod, T. E. C., Almocera, S. M., Bayno, J. L. M., Camposano, J. J. R., Cena, S. J. G., Garcia, J. A. K., Labajo, B. F. M., & Tua, A. G. (2024). Analyzing University Students’ Attitude and Behavior Toward AI Using the Extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Model. American Journal of Applied Statistics and Economics, 3(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajase.v3i1.2510
Paraskevi, G., Saprikis, V., & Avlogiaris, G. (2023). Modeling Nonusers’ Behavioral Intention towards Mobile Chatbot Adoption: An Extension of the UTAUT2 Model with Mobile Service Quality Determinants. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023(1), 8859989. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/8859989
Pavan Kumar, P., Likhita, V., & Pranav, U. S. (2023). I-LAA: An Education Chabot. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, 361, 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3982-4_28
Promma, W., Imjai, N., Usman, B., & Aujirapongpan, S. (2025). The influence of AI literacy on complex problem-solving skills through systematic thinking skills and intuition thinking skills: An empirical study in Thai gen Z accounting students. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8(October 2024), 100382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100382
Rathika, P., Yamunadevi, S., Ponni, P., Parthipan, V., & Anju, P. (2024). Developing an AI-Powered Interactive Virtual Tutor for Enhanced Learning Experiences. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering, 10(4), 1594–1600. https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.782
Sabol, M., Hair, J., Cepeda, G., Roldán, J. L., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2023). PLS-SEM in information systems: seizing the opportunity and marching ahead full speed to adopt methodological updates. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 123(12), 2997–3017.
Sharma, S., & Singh, G. (2024). Adoption of artificial intelligence in higher education: an empirical study of the UTAUT model in Indian universities. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 1–27.
Shehata, S. M., Abdeljawad, A. M., Mazouz, L. A., Aldossary, L. Y. K., Alsaeed, M. Y., & Noureldin Sayed, M. (2021). The moderating role of perceived risks in the relationship between financial knowledge and the intention to invest in the Saudi Arabian stock market. International Journal of Financial Studies, 9(1), 9.
Shete, S. G., Koshti, P., & Pujari, V. I. (2024). The Impact of AI-Powered Personalization on Academic Performance in Students. 5th International Conference on Recent Trends in Computer Science and Technology, ICRTCST 2024 - Proceedings, 295–301. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRTCST61793.2024.10578480
Sparkman, M., & Witt, A. (2025). Claude AI and literature reviews: An experiment in utility and ethical use. Library Trends, 73(3), 355–380.
Strzelecki, A. (2024). Students’ acceptance of ChatGPT in higher education: An extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Innovative Higher Education, 49(2), 223–245.
Sumandya, I. W., Widana, I. W., Mirah Dharmadewi, A. A. I., Setiawan, G. I., Habibi, A., & Hendra, R. (2026). Extending the UTAUT Model with External Variables in Inclusive Schools: An Analysis of Teacher Satisfaction and AI-STEM Use Using SEM and ANN Models. Open Education Studies, 8(1), 20250126.
Tanmay, T., Bhardwaj, A., & Sharma, S. (2020). E-Health Bot to change the Face of Medicare. Proceedings of International Conference on Research, Innovation, Knowledge Management and Technology Application for Business Sustainability, INBUSH 2020, 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1109/INBUSH46973.2020.9392125
Tapalova, O., & Zhiyenbayeva, N. (2022). Artificial intelligence in education: AIEd for personalised learning pathways. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 20(5), 639–653.
Teng, Z., Cai, Y., Gao, Y., Zhang, X., & Li, X. (2022). Factors Affecting Learners’ Adoption of an Educational Metaverse Platform: An Empirical Study Based on an Extended UTAUT Model. Mobile Information Systems, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5479215
Usman, O., Agita, G., Murti, A. K., Aslamah, A. N., & Wibisono, I. (2025). The metaverse technology adoption process using UTAUT in digital business education. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(6 SE-Articles), 2650–2658. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i6.10190
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 157–178.
Wahdah, S. I., Kurniawan, R. Y., & Irawan, N. (2025). Adoption of ChatGPT in higher education: Insights from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology model. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 312-327.
Weis, L., Bele, J. L., & Erčulj, V. (2026). Acceptance and Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A UTAUT-Based Model Integrating Trust and Privacy. Education Sciences, 16(2), 173.
Wu, X., Radloff, J. D., Yeter, I. H., Wang, L., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). Designing artificial intelligence chatbots for self-regulated learning from a systematic review based on Habermas’s three interests. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–24.
Xu, S., Chen, P., & Zhang, G. (2024). Exploring Chinese university educators’ acceptance and intention to use AI tools: An application of the UTAUT2 model. Sage Open, 14(4), 21582440241290012.
Yilmaz, F. G. K., Yilmaz, R., & Ceylan, M. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence Acceptance Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(24), 8703–8715. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2288730
Zhao, J., Wijaya, T. T., Mailizar, M., & Habibi, A. (2022). Factors influencing student satisfaction toward STEM education: Exploratory study using structural equation modeling. Applied Sciences, 12(19), 9717.
Zhao, X., Liu, W., Yue, S., Chen, J., Xia, D., Bing, K., Xia, X., & Wang, K. (2025). Factors influencing medical students’ adoption of AI educational agents: an extended UTAUT model. BMC Medical Education, 25(1), 1678. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-08234-z
Authors
Copyright (c) 2026 Alayya Izza Mahfudhoh, Riza Yonisa Kurniawan, Heni Purwa Pamungkas, Retno Mustika Dewi, Mohamad Zuber Abd Majid, Gisella Zhang Mei
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.