This is an outdated version published on 05/15/2025. Read the most recent version.

Integrating the Eco Explorers Game to Enhance Elementary Students’ Problem-Solving Skills in Ecosystem Learning

Authors

  • Intan Meifilindati Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
    Indonesia
  • Ika Maryani
  • Okimustava Okimustava Universitas Ahmad Dahlan
    Indonesia
  • Muhammad Kristiawan Universitas Bengkulu
    Indonesia
  • Josephine Magay Salmo Western Philippines University
    Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v37i2.10638

Keywords:

Ecosystem, Eco Explorers Game, Problem Solving Skills

Abstract

Science education at the primary level plays a critical role in fostering students’ higher-order thinking skills, particularly their problem-solving abilities. However, many elementary students continue to face challenges in developing these competencies, leading to generally low levels of performance. This study investigates the effectiveness of the Eco Explorers educational game in enhancing the problem-solving skills of fifth-grade students within the topic of ecosystems. A pre-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design was employed, involving 25 participants selected through a non-probability sampling technique. Data were collected using observation sheets and standardized problem-solving tests, and analyzed using descriptive statistics, paired sample t-tests, and effect size calculations (Cohen’s d) with SPSS version 26. The results revealed a statistically significant improvement in students’ problem-solving abilities (p = 0.000 < 0.05), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 2.55). These findings reinforce previous studies highlighting the benefits of game-based learning for cognitive development. In conclusion, the Eco Explorers game is a highly effective instructional tool for improving students’ problem-solving skills in science education, particularly within ecological contexts. The study implies that incorporating interactive digital games into science instruction can significantly enhance student engagement and higher-order thinking, ultimately supporting more meaningful and effective learning experiences in primary education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, A. H., Ali, M., Liyana, N., & Abidin, Z. (2015). Analysis of students’ errors in solving higher order thinking skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133

Antonenko, P., Jahanzad, F., & Greenwood, C. (2014). Research and Teaching: Fostering Collaborative Problem Solving and 21st Century Skills Using the DEEPER Scaffolding Framework. Journal of College Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst14_043_06_79

Ayotte-Beaudet, J.-P., Pierre, C., Marie-Claude, B., Kassandra, L., Michael, G., Jonathan, S., Estelle, D., & and Paquette, A. (2023). Exploring the impacts of contextualised outdoor science education on learning: the case of primary school students learning about ecosystem relationships. Journal of Biological Education, 57(2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1909634

Bybee, R. W. (2008). Scientific literacy, environmental issues, and PISA 2006. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 566–585.

Campbell, B., & and Lubben, F. (2000). Learning science through contexts: helping pupils make sense of everyday situations. International Journal of Science Education, 22(3), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289859

Chalkiadaki, A. (2018). A systematic literature review of 21st century skills and competencies in primary education. International Journal of Instruction. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1131a

Checa-Romero, M., & Gimenez-Lozano, J. M. (2024). Video games and metacognition in the classroom for the development of 21st century skills: a systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 9(January). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1485098

Czerkawski, B. C., & Lyman, E. W. (2016). An Instructional Design Framework for Fostering Student Engagement in Online Learning Environments. TechTrends, 60(6), 532–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z

Dada, D., Laseinde, O. T., & Tartibu, L. (2023). Student-Centered Learning Tool for Cognitive Enhancement in the Learning Environment. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 507–512. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.246

González‐pérez, L. I., & Ramírez‐montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(3), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031493

Hadi, S., & Novaliyosi. (2019). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). The Language of Science Education, 108–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-497-0_97

Huang, T.-C., Chen, C.-C., & Chou, Y.-W. (2016). Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Computers & Education, 96, 72–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.008

Hussein, M. H., Ow, S. H., Cheong, L. S., & Thong, M.-K. (2019). A Digital Game-Based Learning Method to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Elementary Science. IEEE Access, 7, 96309–96318. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2929089

Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02300500

Lee, E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2016). A design framework for enhancing engagement in student-centered learning: own it, learn it, and share it. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(4), 707–734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-015-9422-5

Li, S., Lajoie, S. P., Zheng, J., Wu, H., & Cheng, H. (2021). Automated detection of cognitive engagement to inform the art of staying engaged in problem-solving. Computers & Education, 163, 104114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104114

Maryani, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., Wilujeng, I., Purwanti, S., & Fitrianawati, M. (2021). HOTs Multiple Choice and Essay Questions: A Validated Instrument to Measure Higher Order Thinking Skills of Prospective Teachers. The Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(3), 1–20.

Maryani, I., Suyatno, S., Arfiani, I., Nizaar, M., Astuti, I. A. D., & Sulisworo, D. (2025). Gamified Mobile-Based Learning Approach: Efforts to Improve Students’ Engagement and Learning Quality in Remote Schools in Indonesia. Educational Process: International Journal, 15(e2025179), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.15.179

Mitsea, E., Drigas, A., & Skianis, C. (2023). VR Gaming for Meta-Skills Training in Special Education: The Role of Metacognition, Motivations, and Emotional Intelligence. In Education Sciences (Vol. 13, Issue 7). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13070639

Mitsea, E., Drigas, A., & Skianis, C. (2025). A Systematic Review of Serious Games in the Era of Artificial Intelligence, Immersive Technologies, the Metaverse, and Neurotechnologies: Transformation Through Meta-Skills Training. In Electronics (Vol. 14, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics14040649

Neo, T., & Neo, M. (2004). Classroom innovation: engaging students in interactive multimedia learning. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 21(3), 118–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650740410544018

OECD. (2019). PISA 2015 (Coutry Overview). http://www.compareyourcountry.org/pisa/country/IDN?lg=en

Pickering, J. D. (2017). Cognitive Engagement: a More Reliable Proxy for Learning? Medical Science Educator, 27(4), 821–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-017-0447-8

Sari, A. D., Maryani, I., & Islahuddin. (2023). Science Learning Model in Indonesian Elementary Schools during Pandemic. International Journal of Learning Reformation in Elementary Education, 2(01), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.56741/ijlree.v2i01.73

Sipayung, H. D., Sani, R. A., & Bunawan, W. (2018). Collaborative Inquiry For 4C Skills. 440–445. https://doi.org/10.2991/aisteel-18.2018.95

Sulaiman, J., & Ismail, S. N. (2020). Teacher competence and 21st century skills in transformation schools 2025 (TS25). Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(8), 3536–3544. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080829

Sun, C., Shute, V., Stewart, A. E. B., & D’Mello, S. K. (2025). The Relationship between Collaborative Problem-Solving Skills and Group-to-Individual Learning Transfer in a Game-based Learning Environment. 15th International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK 2025, level 4, 680–689. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706468.3706560

Tan, C. K. W., & Nurul-Asna, H. (2023). Serious games for environmental education. Integrative Conservation, 2(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/inc3.18

Tang, K. H. D. (2023). Student-centered Approach in Teaching and Learning: What Does It Really Mean? Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 2(2 SE-Review), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v2i2.218

Teng, M. F. (2024). Metacognition and autonomy in building a community for language learning through VR digital gaming. Computers & Education: X Reality, 4, 100060. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2024.100060

Woo, J.-C. (2014). Digital Game-Based Learning Supports Student Motivation, Cognitive Success, and Performance Outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(3), 291–307. http://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.17.3.291

Effect Size Visualization (Cohen’s d = 2.55)

Submitted

05/27/2025

Accepted

06/12/2025

Published

05/15/2025

Versions

Issue

Section

Articles