Strengthening Social Geography Literacy through Geospatial Technology-Based Learning for High School Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23917/voc.v6i2.19761Keywords:
Social geography literacy, participatory learning, high school students, community service workshop, spatial analysisAbstract
High school geography education should help students understand social changes like population growth, urban sprawl, and unequal access to public facilities. Yet most classrooms still rely on lectures, so students memorize terms without learning spatial connections. Geospatial tools like GIS and digital maps offer a way to change that by letting students visualize data from their own neighborhoods. Our community service program addressed this gap through a hands-on workshop designed to improve social geography literacy among senior high school students. The primary goal was to see whether direct practice with simple mapping applications could sharpen spatial thinking and help relate social issues to geographic patterns. We carried out the workshop over two days with 35 students from a public high school. The methods combined interactive sessions with hands on practice using Google Maps and QGIS. Each group analyzed land use changes and mapped local facilities like health clinics and parks. We measured outcomes through pre-test and post-test scores on conceptual knowledge and map reading skills. The results showed clear improvement. The average test score rose from 62.4 to 84.7, and all students completed their mapping tasks successfully. During discussions, they noticed patterns they had overlooked before, such as how poorer areas had fewer public services. No major issues occurred, aside from minor software glitches quickly resolved. This workshop demonstrated that integrating geospatial practice into geography lessons is both feasible and impactful. More importantly, it showed that when students become active explorers of their own environment, their engagement deepens in ways traditional teaching rarely achieves.
Downloads
References
Akinyemi, F. O. (2016). Technology use in Rwandan secondary schools: An assessment of teachers attitudes towards geographic information systems (GIS). International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 25(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2015.1106848.
Aliman, M., Budijanto, Sumarmi, Astina, I. K., Putri, R. E., & Arif, M. (2019). The effect of earthcomm learning model and spatial thinking ability on geography learning outcomes. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 18(3), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/19.18.323.
Amalia, T., & Muhammad Nursa’ban, ; (2023). Assessment of geography learning process standards in the indonesian curriculum: Instrument development and quality. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 27(2), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.21831/PEP.V27I2.67434.
Hubaib, N. M., & Hadi, B. S. (2025). Integration of GIS Technology and STEM in Geography Learning to Improve Students’ Spatial Thinking Skills. J-PIPS (Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial), 12(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.18860/JPIPS.V12I1.37723.
Jumadi, J., Danardono, D., Priyono, K. D., Roziaty, E., Masruroh, H., Rohman, A., Lotfata, A. (2024). Utilizing Open Access Spatial Data for Flood Risk Mapping: A Case Study in the Upper Solo Watershed. Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, 11(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.14710/GEOPLANNING.11.2.189-204
Mukasyaf, A. A., Ramadhan, G. W., & Risqianto, H. (2026). Environmental Ecology Learning Based on Geographic Information Systems in Wonogiri Regency. Journal of Community Services and Engagement: Voice of Community (VOC), 6(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.23917/VOC.V6I1.17033.
Nguyen, N. A., Muniz-Solari, O., Tien Dang, D., & Phuong Nguyen, T. (2019). Reviewing Spatial Thinking in Geography Textbooks Questions from The Perspective of Spatial Thinking. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 338(1), 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/338/1/012042.
Nursa’ban, M., Kumaidi, K., & Mukminan, M. (2020). Factors of Critical Spatial Thinking for a Geography Metacognition Assessment in Indonesian Senior High Schools. Review of International Geographical Education (RIGEO), 10(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.686050.
Purwanto, Utaya, S., Handoyo, B., & Bachri, S. (2020). Transformation of geospatial technology knowledge in pre-service and experienced geography teachers as pedagogical tools in the technological-pedagogical-content knowledge framework. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(9), 58–76. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.19.9.4.
Putra, A. K., Sumarmi, Deffinika, I., & Islam, M. N. (2021). The effect of blended project-based learning with stem approach to spatial thinking ability and geographic skill. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 685–704. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14340A.
Rahayu, S. (Sri), Murjainah, M. (M), & Idris, M. (M). (2019). The Effect of Google Earth Utilization on Students' Spatial Thinking Ability. Geosfera Indonesia, 4(3), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.19184/GEOSI.V4I3.13350.
Ridha, S., Putri, E., Kamil, P. A., Utaya, S., Bachri, S., & Handoyo, B. (2020). The importance of designing GIS learning material based on spatial thinking. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 485(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/485/1/012027.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Adinda Deviana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








