Assessing Urban Vibrancy Level of Transit-Oriented Development Area in Lempuyangan Station, Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Haya Nabila Lelono Urban Design Study Program Department of Architecture and Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada
    Indonesia
    https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4507-3594
  • Dyah Titisari Widyastuti Urban Design Study Program Department of Architecture and Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada
    Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.v23i2.16778

Keywords:

Lempuyangan Station, Spatial Analysis, Transit-Oriented Development, Urban Vibrancy, Yogyakarta

Abstract

This study assesses the level of urban vibrancy within the Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) area of Lempuyangan Station, Yogyakarta, to evaluate how transit proximity contributes to the formation of an active and integrated urban environment. A quantitative spatial analysis is applied using a 400-meter TOD radius divided into 100 × 100 m grid cells to capture street-level dynamics. Urban vibrancy is measured through a composite index combining mixed-use diversity, morphological permeability, and concentration of people, represented by the Residential–Non-Residential Ratio (RNR), Building Mix Index (BuMi), intersection density, population density, and Point of Interest (POI) distribution. All indicators are normalized using min–max scaling and equally weighted to produce a vibrancy index ranging from 0 to 1. The results show a low weighted average index of 0.31, indicating that the TOD area is dominated by border vacuums (35.5%), formed by large monofunctional infrastructure that interrupts spatial continuity, while most of the area falls into potential vibrant zones (52.97%) where transit proximity exists but lacks sufficient density and functional diversity. Only 11.53% of the area reaches the vibrant category, appearing as small and fragmented active cores, and no grid achieves a very high level of vibrancy. These findings suggest that transit accessibility alone is insufficient to generate urban vibranacy due to monofunctional land use, low mix diversity, large impermeable blocks, and the spatial separation between residential concentration and activity centers. Strengthening vibrancy in the Lempuyangan TOD area therefore requires land-use diversification, increased development density, improved block permeability, and the transformation of inactive edges into active urban seams to create a more balanced and sustainable TOD environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Botta, F., & Gutiérrez-Roig, M. (2021). Modelling urban vibrancy with mobile phone and OpenStreetMap data. PLOS ONE, 16(6), e0252015. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252015

Calthorpe, P. (1993). The Next American Metropolis. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.

Chen, Z., & Huang, B. (2024). Achieving urban vibrancy through effective city planning: A spatial and temporal perspective. Cities, 152, 105230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105230

Chorus, P., & Bertolini, L. (2011). An application of the node place model to explore the spatial development dynamics of station areas in Tokyo. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 4(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v4i1.145

Collins, T., Di Clemente, R., Gutiérrez-Roig, M., & Botta, F. (2024). Spatiotemporal gender differences in urban vibrancy. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 51(7), 1430–1446. https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231209073

Delclòs-Alió, X., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2018). Looking at Barcelona through Jane Jacobs’s eyes: Mapping the basic conditions for urban vitality in a Mediterranean conurbation. Land Use Policy, 75, 505–517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.026

Ewing, R., & Cervero, R. (2010). Travel and the Built Environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(3), 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944361003766766

Gao, C., Li, S., Sun, M., Zhao, X., & Liu, D. (2024). Exploring the Relationship between Urban Vibrancy and Built Environment Using Multi-Source Data: Case Study in Munich. Remote Sensing, 16(6), 1107. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16061107

Garvin, A. (2019). The Heart of the City. Island Press/Center for Resource Economics. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-950-0

Gehl, J. (2013). Cities for people. Island press.

Gehl, Jan., & Svarre, Birgitte. (2013). How to study public life. Island Press.

Gómez-Varo, I., Delclòs-Alió, X., & Miralles-Guasch, C. (2022). Jane Jacobs reloaded: A contemporary operationalization of urban vitality in a district in Barcelona. Cities, 123, 103565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103565

Indradjati, P. N. (2024). Walking Choice in Medium-sized and Small Cities: International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 12(3), 8. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.12.3_139

Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vintage Canada.

Jang, K. M., Suh, H., Haddad, F. G., Sun, M., Duarte, F., & Kim, Y. (2024). Urban street clusters: unraveling the associations of street characteristics on urban vibrancy dynamics in age, time, and day. Urban Informatics, 3(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44212-024-00058-4

Jia, C., Liu, Y., Du, Y., Huang, J., & Fei, T. (2021). Evaluation of Urban Vibrancy and Its Relationship with the Economic Landscape: A Case Study of Beijing. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi10020072

Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang/Kepala Badan Pertanahan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2017 tentang Pedoman Pengembangan Kawasan Berorientasi Transit.

Lang, W., Lang, H., Hui, E. C. M., Chen, T., Wu, J., & Jahre, M. (2022). Measuring urban vibrancy of neighborhood performance using social media data in Oslo, Norway. Cities, 131, 103908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103908

Lu, R., Wu, L., & Chu, D. (2023). Portraying the Influence Factor of Urban Vibrancy at Street Level Using Multisource Urban Data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(10), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12100402

Merlino, K. R. (2011). Urban grain and the vibrancy of older neighborhoods: metrics and measures. Considering Research: Reflecting upon Current Themes in Architectural Research, 477–488. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17831/rep:arcc%25y356

Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 3(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418

Peng, J., Hu, Y., Liang, C., Wan, Q., Dai, Q., & Yang, H. (2023). Understanding nonlinear and synergistic effects of the built environment on urban vibrancy in metro station areas. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 70(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-023-00182-z

Pueboobpaphan, R., Pueboobpaphan, S., & Sukhotra, S. (2022). Acceptable walking distance to transit stations in Bangkok, Thailand: Application of a stated preference technique. Journal of Transport Geography, 99, 103296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2022.103296

Rambe, A. R., & Wibisono, B. H. (2025). Urban Vibrancy Sebagai Faktor Daya Tarik Kawasan di Kecamatan Genteng, Surabaya. Sinektika: Jurnal Arsitektur. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.vi.4577

Rao, C., & Zhu, C. (2024). The impact of rail transit station construction characteristics on urban vibrancy: an integrated approach based on the node-connection-place model and the explainable machine learning. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2024.2407790

Rufia, F. R., & Diyono. (2024). Evaluasi Kesesuaian Transit Oriented Development (TOD) di Simpul Transit Kota Yogyakarta Menggunakan Analisis Spasial Multikriteria. Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Tu, W., Zhu, T., Zhong, C., Zhang, X., Xu, Y., & Li, Q. (2022). Exploring metro vibrancy and its relationship with built environment: a cross-city comparison using multi-source urban data. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 25(2), 182–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2021.1996212

Wibowo, T. W., Santosa, S. H. M. B., Susilo, B., & Purwanto, T. H. (2021). Revealing Tourist Hotspots in Yogyakarta City Based on Social Media Data Clustering. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 34(1), 218–225. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.34129-640

Xiao, L., Lo, S., Liu, J., Zhou, J., & Li, Q. (2021). Nonlinear and synergistic effects of TOD on urban vibrancy: Applying local explanations for gradient boosting decision tree. Sustainable Cities and Society, 72, 103063. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103063

Xiao, L., Wu, M., Weng, Q., & Li, Y. (2025). Unraveling Street Configuration Impacts on Urban Vibrancy: A GeoXAI Approach. Land, 14(7), 1422. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14071422

Yu, B., Cui, X., Liu, R., Luo, P., Tian, F., & Yang, T. (2022). Intergenerational differences in the urban vibrancy of TOD: Impacts of the built environment on the activities of different age groups. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 994835. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.994835

Downloads

Submitted

2026-03-25

Accepted

2026-06-22

Published

2026-07-17

How to Cite

Lelono, H. N., & Widyastuti, D. T. (2026). Assessing Urban Vibrancy Level of Transit-Oriented Development Area in Lempuyangan Station, Yogyakarta. Sinektika: Jurnal Arsitektur, 23(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.v23i2.16778

Issue

Section

Articles