Virtual Layer: Pepper Ghost Illusion and Digital Projection to Reinforce Place Meaning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.v23i1.12836Keywords:
Digital Placemaking, Historical Meaning, Media Architecture, Prototype, Sustainable Cities And CommunitiesAbstract
Placemaking transforms space into place by arranging form, activity, and meaning aspects. In a historical urban village context, the physical forms of historical objects are often altered due to space scarcity and growing needs. It could weaken the historical meaning of the place. Digital technologies could represent the lost historical forms or activities as digital placemaking strategies. Combining the Pepper Ghost illusion technique and digital projection produces a virtual layer to represent past events superimposed onto the site's surroundings to strengthen the place's meaning. It provides a practical digital placemaking strategy for urban village communities. This study aims to evaluate the design prototype of the virtual layer strategy by identifying factors that affect design performance and proposing design recommendations. This study was conducted by experiment and prototype testing. Testing with participants involved semi-structured interviews for data collection and content analysis to identify the factors. This study also provides schematic design implementation in Kampung Kungfu Kapasan, Surabaya. The results recommend designing the screen on a human scale, balancing environmental brightness for content clarity and visual comfort, as well as integrating installation design and surrounding elements. The overlapping strategy of past and present conditions forms a virtual layer as a layered enclosure. It affects how users perceive the surrounding environment, thereby shaping their perception of the place's meaning.
Downloads
References
Andrian, D., Soemardiono, B., & Noerwasito, T. (2021). Building facade components in a historical corridor. Case study: Karet Street, Surabaya. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 916, Issue 1). IOP Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/916/1/012011
Anggraini, L. D. (2021). Rebranding Chinatown Surabaya. Rejuvenating Chinese Indonesian Cultural Heritage, 113–128.
Azaria, S. (2022). Chinese Indonesian Youth National Identity: Description and Construction. International Conference on Chinese Diaspora in Southeast Asia Studies, 157–163.
Barcellos, E. E. I., & Junior, G. B. (2015). The Interactive Holography as Metaphor and Innovation in Optical Representation in Design. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 754–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.319
Behrens, M., Mavromichalis, K., & Schieck, A. F. (2018). The sentiment cocoon a case study of media architectural interfaces. ACM Int. Conf. Proc. Series, 95–105. https://doi.org/10.1145/3284389.3284392
Brynskov, M., Dalsgaard, P., & Halskov, K. (2013). Understanding Media Architecture (Better): One Space, Three Cases. CHI’13 Workshop on Interactive City Lighting, 1–4. http://www.mediaarchitecture.org/city-hall-tower-aarhus/
Chen, K., Guaralda, M., Kerr, J., & Turkay, S. (2022). Digital intervention in the city: a conceptual framework for digital placemaking. Urban Design International, 29(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-022-00203-y
Chen, Y., Cui, Z., & Hao, L. (2019). Virtual reality in lighting research: Comparing physical and virtual lighting environments. Lighting Research and Technology, 51(6), 820–837. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153518825387
Dalsgaard, P., & Halskov, K. (2017). Designing Media Architecture: Methods and Tools. In A. Wiethoff & H. Husmann (Eds.), Media Architecture: Using Information and Media as Construction Material (pp. 124–146). DeGruyter.
Dalsgaard, P., & Kim, H. (2011). 3D projection on physical objects: Design insights from five real life cases. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1041–1050. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979097
Downton, P. (2013). Design Research. Elizabeth James Productions.
Effendi, T. D., & Stenberg, J. (2022). Chineseness and Perception of China Among Young Chinese Indonesian. International Conference on Chinese Diaspora in Southeast Asia Studies, 165–173.
Fitria, T. N. (2023). Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) Technology in Education: Media of Teaching and Learning: A Review. International Journal of Computer and Information System (IJCIS) Peer Reviewed-International Journal, 04, 2745–9659. https://ijcis.net/index.php/ijcis/index
Foth, M. (2017). Some Thoughts on Digital Placemaking. In Media Architecture Compendium – Digital Placemaking (p. 215). Avedition.
Ghavampour, E., & Vale, B. (2019). Revisiting the “model of place”: A comparative study of placemaking and sustainability. Urban Planning, 4(2 Public Space in the New Urban Agenda: Research into Implementation), 196–206. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i2.2015
Gonsalves, K. (2023). Radical Placemaking: An Experiential Digital Placemaking Approach for Social Justice Acknowledgement of Country.
Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural research methods. John Wiley & Sons.
Haeusler, M. H. (2017). From Allopoietic Content to Autopoietic Content for Media Architecture through a Better Understanding of Architectural Typologies. In A. Wiethoff & H. Husmann (Eds.), Media Architecture Using Information and Media as Construction Material (pp. 25–41). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110453874-004
Halegoua, G., & Polson, E. (2021). Exploring ‘digital placemaking.’ Convergence, 27(3), 573–578. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211014828
Handinoto. (2015). Komunitas Cina Dan Perkembangan Kota Surabaya (Abad XVIII Sampai Pertengahan Abad XX). Ombak.
Hartanti, N. B., & Prabowo, H. (2024). Digital-Driven Public Space Design and Creative Placemaking for Enhancing Urban Resilience and Community Well-Being in Indonesia. In M. A. Tarar & L. Walambuka (Eds.), Understanding Global Digital Era Technologies and Transformations in Social, Environment, Peace & Business Development Perspectives in Society (pp. 171–190). NCM Publishing House. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384572589
Hespanhol, L. (2018). Making Meaningful Spaces: Strategies for Designing Enduring Digital Placemaking Initiatives. SAAN: The 1st Int. Conf. on Design, Innovation and Creativity, 108–117. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334780244
Kao, Y., Caldwell, G., & Donovan, J. (2021). A place-oriented approach: From field knowledge to design framework. Proceedings of the 5th Media Architecture Biennale Conference, MAB 2020, 100–110. https://doi.org/10.1145/3469410.3469420
Katkeviča, S., & Strode, A. (2022). Projection Mapping Method in Advertising Design. Human, Technologies and Quality of Education, 2022, 1004–1015. https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2022.71
Kenderdine, S., Hibberd, L., & Shaw, J. (2021). Radical Intangibles: Materializing the Ephemeral. Museum & Society, 19(2), 252–271.
Leung, H. H. S. (2023). In their riotous tracks: Screen media and placemaking in Vancouver’s chinatown. City, Culture and Society, 34, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2023.100520
Lovendianto, J., Samodra, F. T. B., Ekasiwi, S. N. N., & Kim, D. Y. (2025). Digitally Enhanced Architecture for Sustainable Placemaking: A Systematic Review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1439(1), 012025. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1439/1/012025
Luo, X., Lawrence, J., & Seitz, S. M. (2017). Pepper’s cone: An inexpensive do-it-yourself 3D display. UIST 2017 - Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126594.3126602
Maciej, G. (2024). Human–place–technology relations in the digital placemaking process. Geoforum, 149, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.103950
Morrison, J., Reid, J., & Clayton, B. (2017). The Lost Palace: Optimising digital innovation for cultural heritage institutions.
Niezabitowska, E. (2018). Research methods and techniques in architecture. Routledge.
Olivia. (2021). Study on the History and Culture of Boen Bio Temple, Surabaya. Journal of Chinese Literature and Culture, 9(1).
Ramirez, E., Perozo, J., Leung, M. Lo, & Ramírez, E. (2016). HoloMed: A Low-Cost Gesture-Based Holographic HoloMed: A Low-Cost Gesture-Based Holographic System to Learn Normal Delivery Process. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1607.05812
Razi, L., & Ziminski, D. (2022). Physical and Digital Placemaking in a Public Art Initiative in Camden, NJ. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14(2), 21–39.
Shirleyana, S., Hawken, S., & Sunindijo, R. Y. (2018). City of Kampung: risk and resilience in the urban communities of Surabaya, Indonesia. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 36(5), 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-02-2018-0025
Steiner, R. (1981). Man’s Twelve Senses in Their Relation to Imagination, Inspiration, and Intuition. Anthroposophical Review, 3(2), 12–19.
Toland, A., Christ, M. C., & Worra, J. (2020). DigitalXPlace . In D. Hes & C. Hernandez-Santin (Eds.), Placemaking Fundamentals for the Built Environment. Palgrave Macmillan.
Tomitsch, M., McArthur, I., Haeusler, M. H., & Foth, M. (2015). The Role of Digital Screens in Urban Life: New Opportunities for Placemaking. In M. Foth, M. Brynskov, & T. Ojala (Eds.), Citizen’s Right to the Digital City (pp. 37–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-919-6
Trebacz, P. (2019). Visual Perception of Architecture According to the Theory of Juliusz Żórawski. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 603(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/603/4/042006
Wiethoff, A., & Hussmann, H. (2017). Media architecture : using information and media as construction material (A. Wiethoff & H. Hussmann, Eds.). De Gruyter.
Witteborn, S. (2021). Digital placemaking and the datafication of forced migrants. Convergence, 27(3), 637–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211003876
Wouters, N., Keignaert, K., Huyghe, J., & Moere, A. Vande. (2016, June 1). Revealing the architectural quality of media architecture. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series. https://doi.org/10.1145/2946803.2946808
Wulandari, L. D. (2017). Eksistensi Kampung Kung-Fu dalam Dinamika Kawasan Multi Religi di Kembang Jepun Surabaya. Jurnal Arsitektur Dan Perkotaan “KORIDOR,” 8(2), 213–222.
Zakariya, A. A. (2023). Etnis Tionghoa di Surabaya: Kepasan sebagai Kawasan Pecinan Abad Ke-19-20. Mozaik: Kajian Ilmu Sejarah, 14(1), 1–18.
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sinektika: Jurnal Arsitektur
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
