Place Process in Space with Territorial Ambivalence Case Study: Suronatan, Yogyakarta

Authors

  • Tika Ainunnisa Fitria Architecture Program, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Aisyiyah Yogyakarta
    Indonesia
  • Indah Pujiyanti Architecture Program, Faculty of Science and Technology, Universitas Aisyiyah Yogyakarta
    Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.v23i1.12198

Keywords:

Place Process, Territorial Ambivalence, Transitional Space Village

Abstract

The existence of the Village is closely related to the morphology, history, and philosophy of the city of Yogyakarta and is related to the socio-spatial life and its people. Kampung Suronatan experiences intersections of activities that have an impact on the formation of spontaneous spaces along its transitional space. Physical changes in the transitional space and the phenomenon of utilization and territorial claims. This research question refers to how the place process occurs in Kampung Suronatan, as a space with territorial ambivalence. This research was conducted qualitatively, focusing on spatiality and its behavior as a space former. Data were obtained through snapshot observations and short questions which were then analyzed using a behavioral approach. ArcGIS was used to map the location of spontaneous spaces formed in the transitional space. Place process in the transitional space in Suronatan is influenced by spatial tolerance and spatial conceptions influenced by local norms related to spatial territoriality. Place process is defined as a process of spatialization that is spontaneous and temporal. Enriching the theory of place process that has not been linked to territoriality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, C., & Crookes, L. (2009). Fables of the reconstruction: A phenomenology of “place shaping” in the North of England. Town Planning Review, 80(4), 455. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2009.7

Bukit, E. S., Hanan, H., & Wibowo, A. S. (2012). Aplikasi Metode N . J . Habraken pada Studi Transformasi. Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia, 1(1), 51–62.

Can, I., & Heath, T. (2015). In-between spaces and social interaction: a morphological analysis of Izmir using space syntax. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-015-9442-9

Fitria, T. A., Rasidi, M. H., Said, I., & Firdaus, R. (2022). Local Elements Defining Transitional Spaces as a Territorial Strategy at an Urban Village in the City of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 17(6), 1821–1829.

Fitria, T. A., Said, I., & Rasidi, M. H. (2022). The Social Movement : Redefining Meaning of Transitional Space in Kampung Urban Neighbourhood. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 671(International Webinar on Digital Architecture 2021), 206–209. Yogyakarta: Atlantis Press.

Hargreaves, A. (2004). Building communities of place: Habitual movement around significant places. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 19(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOHO.0000017706.38123.43

Hickman, P. (2013). “Third places” and social interaction in deprived neighbourhoods in Great Britain. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 28(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-012-9306-5

Hutama. (2018). The Hidden Structure of Organic Informal-like Settlements in Jogjakarta City : An Investigation of Socio-Spatial Relationship in an Urban Kampung. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, (May). Research Gate. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/158/1/012003

Hwang, D., Stewart, W. P., & Ko, D. wan. (2012). Community behavior and sustainable rural tourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 51(3), 328–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287511410350

Ikaputra. (2008). Core House: A Structural Expandability For Living Study Case of Yogyakarta Post Earthquake 2006. DIMENSI: Journal of Architecture and Built Environment, 36(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.9744/dimensi.36.1.pp

Kochan, D. (2015). Placing the Urban Village: A Spatial Perspective on the Development Process of Urban Villages in Contemporary China. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(5), 927–947. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12287

Korpilo, S., Virtanen, T., Saukkonen, T., & Lehvävirta, S. (2018). More than A to B: Understanding and managing visitor spatial behaviour in urban forests using public participation GIS. Journal of Environmental Management, 207, 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.11.020

Larsen, T. (2020). Life Takes Place:Phenomenology, Lifeworlds and Place Making. The AAG Review of Books, 8(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/2325548x.2020.1689070

Li, X., Ratti, C., & Seiferling, I. (2017). Mapping Urban Landscapes Along Streets Using Google Street View. In M. P. Peterson (Ed.), Advances in Cartography and GIScience (Vol. 1, pp. 91–107). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57336-6

Madanipour, A. (2003). Public and private spaces of the city. In Public and Private Spaces of the City. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203402856

Mannarini, T., Tartaglia, S., Fedi, A., & Greganti, K. (2006). Image of Neighborhood, Self-Image and Sense of Community. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(3), 202–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.07.008

McCunn, L. J., & Gifford, R. (2018). Spatial navigation and place imageability in sense of place. Cities, 74, 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.12.006

Middleton, J. (2018). The socialities of everyday urban walking and the ‘right to the city.’ Urban Studies, 55(2), 296–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016649325

Obst, P., Smith, S. G., & Zinkiewicz, L. (2002). An Exploration of Sense of Community, Part 3: Dimensions and Predictors of Psychological Sense of Community in Geographical Communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 30(1), 119–133.

Osti, G. (2015). Socio-spatial Relations: An Attempt to Move Space Near Society. Poliarchie/Polyarchies., 4(April). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282442154

Pendola, R., & Gen, S. (2008). Does “main street” promote sense of community?: A comparison of San Francisco neighborhoods. Environment and Behavior, 40(4), 545–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916507301399

Prayitno, B. (2013). An Analysis on Spatial Permeability and Fluid Dynamics of Wind and Thermal in Tropical Riverside Residential Areas of Banjarmasin City, Indonesia. Manusia Dan Lingkungan, 20(2), 199–212.

Pretty, G. H., Chipuer, H. M., & Bramston, P. (2003). Sense of place amongst adolescents and adults in two rural Australian towns: The discriminating features of place attachment, sense of community and place dependence in relation to place identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 273–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00079-8

Puddifoot, J. E. (2003). Exploring “Personal” and “Shared” Sense of Community Identity in Durham City, England. Journal of Community Psychology, 31(1), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.10039

Rahim, Z., & Hashim, A. H. (2018). Behavioural Adaptation of Malay Families and Housing Modification of Terrace Houses in Malaysia. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies, 3(6), 49. https://doi.org/10.21834/aje-bs.v3i6.235

Rahmi, D. H., Wibisono, B. H., & Setiawan, B. (2001a). Rukun and Gotong Royong: Managing Public Places in an Indonesian Kampung. In Pu Miao (Ed.), Public Places in Asia Pacific Cities (pp. 119–134). Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2815-7_6

Rahmi, D. H., Wibisono, B. H., & Setiawan, B. (2001b). Rukun and Gotong Royong: Managing Public Places in an Indonesian Kampung. 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2815-7_6

Ramadhani, A. N., Faqih, M., & Hayati, A. (2018). Inhabitant ’ S Sense Of Place In The Context Of Tourism Kampung. Architecture & Environment, 17(2), 151–168.

Ratna, N. D., & Ikaputra. (2019). Teritorialitas Dalam Tinjauan Ilmu Arsitektur. INERSIA, 15(1), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.21831/inersia.v15i1.24860

Sargolini, M. (2013). Urban Landscapes: Environmental Networks and Quality of Life. Milan: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118384466.ch25

Seamon, D., & Gill, H. K. (2015). Qualitative approaches to environment-behavior research: Understanding Environmental and Place Experiences, Meanings, and Actions. Research Methods for Environmental Psychology, (April 2016), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119162124.ch7

Utami, W. N., Indradjati, P. N., & Poerbo, H. W. (2018). Kebutuhan Ruang Transisi di Kawasan CBD Kota Bandung Berdasarkan Preferensi dan Persepsi Pejalan Kaki. Tataloka, 20(4), 344. https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.20.4.344-361

Wood, L. & Giles-Corti, B. (2008). Is there a place for social capital in the psychology of health and place?. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(2), 154-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.11.003

Downloads

Submitted

2025-07-29

Accepted

2025-12-24

Published

2026-01-22

How to Cite

Fitria, T. A., & Pujiyanti, I. (2026). Place Process in Space with Territorial Ambivalence Case Study: Suronatan, Yogyakarta . Sinektika: Jurnal Arsitektur, 23(1), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.v23i1.12198

Issue

Section

Articles