Quantification of Aesthetic Composition on Architecture

Authors

  • Vijar Galax Putra Jagat Paryoko Architecture Departmen, Faculty of Architecture and Design National Development, University "Veteran" of East Java
    Indonesia
  • Nadhila Widyanti Interior Design Department, Faculty of Architecture and Design National Development, University "Veteran" of East Java
    Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.v23i1.10703

Keywords:

Aesthetic Measurement, Architectural Aesthetic, Composition Aesthetic

Abstract

Subjectivity in assessing the aesthetics of a composition in architecture and interior design industry and even education is commonplace today. A less objective assessment can blurry a person's ability of designing building’s aesthetic. In fact, there were quantitative rules for judging the beauty of building appearance in Classical Architecture era. Therefore, the aim of this study is getting quantitative measurement for composition’s aesthetics of building. To achieve that, qualitative research method is used with grounded theory approach. The result shows that aesthetic value can be calculated using a quantitative formula. Despite the formula founded by this study has several weaknesses, this formula was generated from and modestly tested using the questionnaires distributed to various categories of respondents, from public to those who involved in architecture and design education and industry, showing quite high suitability and reliability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ching, F. D. K. (2014). Architecture, Form, Space, and Order (4th ed.). Wiley.

Das, P. G., & Cithra, A. (2015). Aesthetics Evaluation of Buildings - A Methodological Framework. International Conference on Reinventing Design Pedagogy and Contextual Aesthetics.

Douchová, V. (2015). Birkhoff’s aesthetic measure. Auc Philosophica Et Historica, 2015(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.14712/24647055.2016.8

Garip, E., & Garip, B. (2012). Aesthetic Evaluation Differences between two Interrelated Disciplines: A Comparative Study on Architecture and Civil Engineering Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 51, 533–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.202

Groat, L. N., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural Research Methods (Second). John Wiley & Sons.

Hu, H., Liu, Y., Lu, W. F., & Guo, X. (2022). A quantitative aesthetic measurement method for product appearance design. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 53(June), 101644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2022.101644

Jennath, K. A., & Nidhish, P. J. (2016). Aesthetic Judgement and Visual Impact of Architectural Forms: A Study of Library Buildings. Procedia Technology, 24, 1808–1818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.226

Jin, X., Deng, Q., Lou, H., Li, X., & Xiao, C. (2022). Fine-grained regression for image aesthetic scoring. Cognitive Robotics, 2(June), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogr.2022.07.003

Kamurahan, S. R., Waani, J. O., & Rogi, O. H. A. (2014). Studi persepsi masyarakat terhadap estetika desain fasade bangunaan dengan pendekatan teori subyektif. Media Matrasain, 11(2), 68–82.

Larasati, A. (2023). Guru Besar UI: Pentingnya Memahami Arsitektur Berspektif Pengguna. Universitas Indonesia. https://www.ui.ac.id/guru-besar-ui-pentingnya-memahami-arsitektur-berspektif-pengguna/

Mshelia, HyeladziraGarba., Ibrahim, RakiyaHaruna., & Lawan, AlhajiKasir. (2017). Philosophical Assumption in Measuring Aesthetics of a Building. International Journal of Advanced Research, 5(1), 1649–1651. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/2931

Paryoko, V. G. P. J., & Zakariya, A. F. (2023). Strategi Arsitektur Efisien pada Perancangan Unit Perumahan Berskala Kecil. Arsir, 7(1), 60–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.32502/arsir.v7i1.5265

Raharja, I. G. M. (2020). Estetika Matematis Arsitektur dan Desain Interior. Institut Seni Indonesia Denpasar. https://www.isi-dps.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Mugi-orasi-ilmiah-share.pdf

Ramli, S., Santosa, H., & Antariksa. (2020). Penilaian kualitas estetika elemen arsitektural bangunan Kolonialdi Jalan Basuki Rahmat,Malang. ARTEKS : Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur, 5(1), 93–106.

Šafárová, K., Pírko, M., Juřík, V., Pavlica, T., & Németh, O. (2019). Differences between young architects’ and non-architects’ aesthetic evaluation of buildings. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 8(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2019.04.001

Salvan, G. S. (1999). Architectural Theory of Design. JMC Press.

Saputro, D. M., & Rito, B. B. R. (2020). Evaluasi Kualitas Estetika Fasade Bangunan Dengan Pendekatan Birkhoff Aesthetic Measure. Journal of Approriate Technology for Community Services, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.20885/jattec.vol1.iss1.art1

Sebestyen, G. (2003). New Architecture and Technology. Architectural Press.

Wijaya, B. T., Ernawati, J., & Santosa, H. (2019). PERSEPSI MASYARAKAT TERHADAP ESTETIKA VISUAL KORIDOR BERSEJARAH STUDI KASUS : JALAN PANGLIMA SUDIRMAN KOTA BATU ( Perceptions of Visual Aesthetics Historic Corridor Case Study : Panglima Sudriman Street , City of Batu ). Jurnal Arsitektur, Manusia, Dan Lingkungan, 1(1), 29–33.

Yammiyavar, A. P., & Roy, M. (2021). An Index for Measuring Aesthetic Perception of Shopping Building Frontages. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, 15(4), 198–207. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2021.04.005

Downloads

Submitted

2025-05-30

Accepted

2025-12-24

Published

2026-01-22

How to Cite

Paryoko, V. G. P. J., & Widyanti, N. (2026). Quantification of Aesthetic Composition on Architecture. Sinektika: Jurnal Arsitektur, 23(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.v23i1.10703

Issue

Section

Articles