Corporate Social Responsibility as a Strategic Instrument for Environmental Health in Indonesia: Comparative Lessons From India and the European Union

Authors

  • Diana Setiawati Faculty of Law and Political Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
    Indonesia
  • Hary Abdul Hakim Faculty of Law, Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang
    Indonesia
  • Indah Maulani Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
    Indonesia
  • Hanifah Febriani Faculty of Law and Political Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
    Indonesia
  • Dewi Novitasari Faculty of Geography, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
    Indonesia
  • Lelya Cahya Mufidati Faculty of Law and Political Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
    Indonesia
  • Muhammad Haidar Aufa Faculty of Law and Political Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
    Indonesia
  • Rizki Apriansah Faculty of Law and Political Science, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
    Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v11i1.18866

Keywords:

corporate social responsibility, environmental health, legal reform, corporate accountability, environmental justice, tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan perusahaan, kesehatan lingkungan, reformasi hukum, pertanggungjawaban korporasi, keadilan lingkungan

Abstract

ABSTRACT

This study examines the legal framework governing corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Indonesia and explores how CSR can be repositioned as a strategic instrument for advancing environmental health. The purposes of this research are to identify the legal foundations of CSR relevant to environmental protection, to assess the contribution of corporate CSR initiatives to environmental health outcomes, and to formulate a regulatory framework that transforms CSR from symbolic compliance into a measurable public health strategy. This research employs a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, supported by qualitative content analysis of CSR reports and sustainability disclosures published by companies operating in environmentally sensitive sectors between 2021 and 2025. The findings reveal that although Article 74 of Law No. 40 of 2007 makes CSR mandatory, the framework operates as lex imperfecta: it lacks enforceable standards, health-oriented performance indicators, and integration with environmental health regulation, so corporate practice remains dominated by visibility-driven programs whose health impacts cannot be verified. The results provide policymakers with a four-pillar reform framework covering normative standards, health impact assessment, state supervision, and incentives, and offer corporations practical guidance for aligning CSR with national health priorities. The novelty of this study lies in bridging corporate law and environmental health law within a single analytical framework and in drawing comparative lessons from India and the European Union, dimensions that previous Indonesian CSR scholarship has largely examined separately.

Keywords: corporate social responsibility; environmental health; legal reform; corporate accountability; environmental justice

 

ABSTRAK

Penelitian ini menganalisis kerangka hukum yang mengatur tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan perusahaan (Corporate Social Responsibility atau CSR) di Indonesia serta mengkaji reposisi CSR sebagai instrumen strategis dalam mendukung peningkatan kesehatan lingkungan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi landasan hukum CSR yang berkaitan dengan perlindungan lingkungan, menganalisis kontribusi implementasi CSR perusahaan terhadap peningkatan kualitas kesehatan lingkungan, serta merumuskan model regulasi yang mampu mentransformasikan CSR dari sekadar pemenuhan kewajiban normatif menjadi instrumen kebijakan kesehatan masyarakat yang terukur. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan komparatif. Analisis didukung oleh analisis isi (content analysis) secara kualitatif terhadap laporan CSR dan laporan keberlanjutan (sustainability reports) yang diterbitkan oleh perusahaan-perusahaan yang beroperasi pada sektor-sektor yang memiliki dampak signifikan terhadap lingkungan selama periode 2021–2025. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Pasal 74 Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas mewajibkan pelaksanaan CSR, pengaturannya masih bersifat lex imperfecta karena belum dilengkapi dengan standar pelaksanaan yang dapat ditegakkan, indikator kinerja yang berorientasi pada kesehatan lingkungan, maupun integrasi dengan regulasi di bidang kesehatan lingkungan. Kondisi tersebut menyebabkan implementasi CSR masih didominasi oleh program-program yang berorientasi pada pencitraan (visibility-driven programs), sementara dampaknya terhadap kesehatan lingkungan belum dapat diukur maupun diverifikasi secara objektif. Penelitian ini menawarkan model reformasi regulasi yang bertumpu pada empat pilar utama, yaitu penguatan standar normatif, penerapan mekanisme penilaian dampak kesehatan (Health Impact Assessment), penguatan fungsi pengawasan oleh negara, serta penyediaan skema insentif bagi perusahaan yang menunjukkan kinerja CSR yang efektif. Selain memberikan kontribusi bagi pembentukan kebijakan publik, penelitian ini juga menawarkan pedoman praktis bagi dunia usaha untuk menyelaraskan implementasi CSR dengan prioritas pembangunan kesehatan nasional. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada integrasi perspektif hukum perusahaan dan hukum kesehatan lingkungan dalam satu kerangka analisis yang komprehensif, serta penyajian pembelajaran komparatif dari India dan Uni Eropa sebagai rujukan bagi reformasi regulasi CSR di Indonesia.

 

Kata Kunci: tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan perusahaan; kesehatan lingkungan; reformasi hukum; pertanggungjawaban korporasi; keadilan lingkungan.

References

Balzarova, M., & Castka, P. (2018). Social responsibility: Experts’ viewpoints on adoption of the ISO 26000 standard. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 819–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1497

Behringer, K., & Szegedi, K. (2016). The Role Of CSR In Achieving Sustainable Development – Theoretical Approach. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(22), 10. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n22p10

Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64–87. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64

Fajar, Mukti. (2015). The Administration of Corporate Social Responsibility in the District Regulation in Indonesia. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 5(1), 207. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v5i1.p207-217

Fajar, Mukti. (2018). Corporate social responsibility in Indonesia: Regulation and implementation issues. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 21(3), 1–12.

Gatti, L., Vishwanath, B., Seele, P., & Cottier, B. (2019). Are we moving beyond voluntary CSR? Exploring theoretical and managerial implications of mandatory CSR resulting from the new Indian Companies Act. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(4), 961–972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3783-8

Marzuki, P. M. (2021). Penelitian Hukum (Revised Edition). Jakarta: Kencana.

Mukti Fajar, A. N. D. (2013). Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Organization, W. H. (2016). Preventing disease through healthy environments: A global assessment of the burden of disease from environmental risks. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Organization, W. H. (2021). Health impact assessment: A tool for policy and decision-making. Geneva: World Health Organization.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Corporate social responsibility Creating Shared Value.

Prihatiningsih, W, Syaebani, M. I., & Devina, M. (2017). Impact analysis on corporate social responsibility towards job pursuit intention with socio-environmental consciousness as a moderating variable. Benefit: Jurnal Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 2(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.23917/benefit.v2i2.5476

Rehman, S. U., Bresciani, S., Yahiaoui, D., & Giacosa, E. (2022). Environmental Sustainability Orientation and Corporate Social Responsibility Influence on Environmental Performance of Small and Medium Enterprises: The Mediating Effect of Green Capability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2293

Retnaningsih, H. (2015). Permasalahan Corporate Social Responsibillity (CSR) dalam Rangka Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Journal DPR, 6(2), 177–188.

Rosser, A., & Edwin, D. (2010). The politics of corporate social responsibility in Indonesia. The Pacific Review, 23(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740903398314

Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., & Hughes, E. (2016). The Private Sector and the SDGs: The Need to Move Beyond ‘Business as Usual.’ Sustainable Development, 24(6), 371–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1623

Schlosberg, D. (2007). Defining environmental justice: Theories, movements, and nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Setiawati, D, Ayu Astutik, Z., Soepatini, S., Alfateh, H., & Gladya Naranta, E. H. (2022). Corporate social responsibility supervisors in Indonesia: Analysis of local government regulation in 10 provinces in Indonesia. Varia Justicia, 18(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v18i2.7022

Setiawati, Diana. (2023). The Conceptual Framework of Corporate Social Responsibility for Indonesia: Learning Study of CSR in Vietnam. Proceedings of the 3rd Borobudur International Symposium on Humanities and Social Science 2021 (BIS-HSS 2021), (1998), 616–622. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-49-7_101

Setiawati, Diana, Ayu Astutik, Z., Soepatini, S., Alfateh, H., & Gladya Naranta, E. H. (2022). Corporate Social Responsibility Supervisors in Indonesia: Analysis of Local Government Regulation in 10 Provinces in Indonesia. Varia Justicia, 18(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.31603/variajusticia.v18i2.7022

Sukarja, D. (2019a). Kewenangan Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Tentang Corporate Social Responsibility Oleh Pemerintah Daerah Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Iklim Penanaman …. Seminar Nasional Hukum Dan Ilmu Sosial, 30–42. Retrieved from https://eproceeding.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/SENAHIS/article/view/1608

Waagstein, P. R. (2011). The mandatory corporate social responsibility in Indonesia: Problems and implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(3), 455–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0587-x

Wahyuni, D., & Zumaroh. (2019). Problematika Implementatif Corporate Social Responsibility Pada Bank Syariah Di Indonesia. MIZANI : Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan, 6(2), 93–105.

Waris, I., Suki, N. M., Ahmed, A., & Barkat, W. (2024). Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives and Green Customer Citizenship Behavior in Tourism Industry: The Mediating Roles of Green Trust, Customer-Company Identification and Green Corporate Image. Social Responsibility Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-07-2023-0378

Widyastuti, S., Said, M., Siswono, S., & Dian, D. (2019). Customer Trust Through Green Corporate Image, Green Marketing Strategy, and Social Responsibility: A Case Study. European Research Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1427

Downloads

Submitted

2026-07-04

Accepted

2026-08-07

Published

2026-08-08 — Updated on 2026-08-10

Versions