The Principle of Non-Intervention in the Age of Humanitarian Crises

Authors

  • Thomas Sheku Marah Njala University
    Sierra Leone

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v10i2.10774

Keywords:

International Law, Non-Intervention, Humanitarian Intervention, Responsibility to Protect (R2P), International Human Rights

Abstract

This research critically describes the evolving tension between the principle of non-intervention and the newly arising norm of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) under international law. While state sovereignty has long been considered the pillar of the international order, increasing numbers of mass atrocities and humanitarian crises have prompted international actors to reassess their obligation to intervene where states fail to protect their citizens. This study undertakes a doctrinal and qualitative analysis of significant international legal instruments, case studies such as Libya and Syria, and scholarly writings to ascertain the normative and legal validity of humanitarian intervention and R2P. It analyzes the legal basis of the principle of non-intervention, the ethical grounds for humanitarian intervention, and the practical application of R2P through international organizations such as the United Nations. The research also explores the issue of operationalizing R2P, including selectivity, political manipulation, and inconsistency in state practice. The research demonstrates that while R2P offers an attractive normative framework for responding to mass atrocities, its enforcement is thwarted by geopolitical interests and the lack of binding legal status. The findings of the research demonstrate a clear need for reform of the international legal system and a more robust institutional commitment to balancing state sovereignty with humanitarian obligations, thereby conducting interventions within a legal, consistent, and accountable framework.

Author Biography

Thomas Sheku Marah, Njala University

Thomas Sheku Marah is a Sierra Leonean legal scholar and international law researcher currently His academic focus encompasses public international law, human rights, and global governance, with a particular interest in statelessness and regional legal frameworks.

Marah has contributed to scholarly discourse through several publications. Notably, his article "Toward a Borderless Africa: Legal and Policy Frameworks for Implementing a Pan-African Free Visa Regime to Reduce Irregular Migration and Promote Youth Empowerment" examines the legal principles underpinning continental free movement initiatives. Additionally, his work "Youth Participation in Global Governance: Opportunities and Challenges" explores the integration of youth in international decision-making processes. Marah's research also includes analyses of post-conflict accountability mechanisms, as seen in his study on Sierra Leone's Special Court, and the protection of indigenous peoples under international environmental law.

Beyond academia, Marah is the founder of the Salone Future Leaders Foundation, an organization dedicated to promoting policy dialogue, education, and civic engagement among young people in Sierra Leone and beyond. His commitment to social justice and legal reform is further evidenced by his active participation in international academic and cultural initiatives aimed at fostering cooperation and development across borders.

Marah's contributions reflect a deep commitment to addressing complex legal challenges through research, advocacy, and community engagement.

References

Acharya, A. (2011). Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule-Making in the Third World. International Studies Quarterly, 55(1), 95–123.

Ayoob, M. (2002). Humanitarian Intervention and State Sovereignty. International Journal of Human Rights, 6(1), 81–102.

Bellamy, A. J. , & W. P. D. (2011). The new politics of protection? Côte d’Ivoire, Libya and the responsibility to protect. International Affairs, 87(4), 825–850. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2011.01006.x

Bhatt & Joshi Associates. (2024). State sovereignty and the principle of non-intervention in international law. . https://bhattandjoshiassociates.com/state-sovereignty/

Brownlie, I. (2008). Principles of public international law (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Chandler, D. (2006). From Kosovo to Kabul: Human rights and international intervention. Pluto Press.

Chesterman, S. (2001). Just war or just peace? Humanitarian intervention and international law. Oxford University Press.

Corten, O. (2005). The Controversies Over the Customary Prohibition on the Use of Force: A Methodological Debate. European Journal of International Law, 16(5), 803–822. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi147

Evans, G. (2008). The responsibility to protect: Ending mass atrocity crimes once and for all. Brookings Institution Press.

Farer, T. J. (2003). Humanitarian intervention before and after 9/11: Legality and legitimacy. Human Rights Quarterly, 25(2), 373–385. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2003.0017

Hehir, A. (2013). The Responsibility to Protect: Rhetoric, reality and the future of humanitarian intervention. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hehir, A. (2019). The permanence of inconsistency: Libya, the Security Council, and the Responsibility to Protect. International Security, 38(1), 137–159. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00141

International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). (2001). The responsibility to protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. International Development Research Centre.

Jackson. (2007). Sovereignty: Evolution of an idea. Polity Press.

Kuperman, A. J. (2013). A model humanitarian intervention? Reassessing NATO’s Libya campaign. International Security, 38(1), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.1162/ISEC_a_00130

Luck, E. C. (2012). The Responsibility to Protect: The first decade. Global Responsibility to Protect, 4(4), 355–377. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-00404001

Murithi, T. (2009). The African Union’s transition from non-intervention to non-indifference: An ad hoc approach to the Responsibility to Protect? International Politics and Society, 2, 90–106.

Murphy, S. D. (1996). Humanitarian intervention: The United Nations in an evolving world order. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Orford. (2011). International authority and the responsibility to protect. Cambridge University Press.

Paris, R. (2014). The responsibility to protect and the structural problems of preventive humanitarian intervention. International Peace Institute.

Pommier, B. (2011). The use of force to protect civilians and humanitarian action: The case of Libya and Côte d’Ivoire. International Review of the Red Cross, 93(884), 1063–1088. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383112000252

Power, S. (2002). A problem from hell: America and the age of genocide. Basic Books.

Roberts, A. (2020). Is humanitarian intervention dead? Oxford University Press.

Sharma, S. (2021). R2P and the Global South: Norm diffusion and resistance. Third World Quarterly, 42(2), 234–251. .

Shaw, M. N. (2021). International law (9th ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Tesón, F. R. (2005). Humanitarian intervention: An inquiry into law and morality (3rd ed.). Transnational Publishers.

Thakur, R. (2016). The United Nations, peace and security: From collective security to the Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819104

United Nations. (1945). United Nations. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. https://doi.org/https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter

United Nations General Assembly. (2005). 2005 World Summit Outcome (A/RES/60/1). https://undocs.org/A/RES/60/1

United Nations Security Council. (2011). Resolution 1973 (S/RES/1973). https://undocs.org/S/RES/1973(2011)

Weiss, T. G. (2020). Humanitarian intervention: Ideas in action (3rd ed.). Polity Press.

Welsh, J. M. (2019). Norm contestation and the Responsibility to Protect. Global Responsibility to Protect, 11(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984X-01101001

Wheeler, N. J. (2000). Saving strangers: Humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-06-02

Accepted

2025-10-31

Published

2025-10-31