Representasi Figur Suami Ideal di TikTok: Kasus Na Daehoon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23917/komuniti.v18i1.15762Keywords:
gender representation, suami ideal, TikTok, negotiated reading, caring masculinity, representasi gender, suami ideal, TikTok, pembacaan negosiasi, maskulinitas pengasuhanAbstract
TikTok telah menjadi ruang strategis dalam pembentukan dan negosiasi makna sosial terkait peran gender dan relasi domestik. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis bagaimana publik melakukan penafsiran ulang terhadap representasi figur “suami ideal” dalam kasus kontroversi viral yang melibatkan Na Daehoon di TikTok. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan metode analisis isi kualitatif. Data penelitian meliputi dua video dari akun @NaDaehoon, satu video reaksi netizen, serta komentar publik yang dipilih secara purposif pada periode Juli–November 2025. Analisis didasarkan pada teori representasi Stuart Hall dan konsep caring masculinity untuk menelaah proses produksi dan negosiasi makna di ruang digital.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa legitimasi figur “suami ideal” dibangun melalui tiga mekanisme utama: keterlibatan visual dalam pengasuhan domestik, pembingkaian naratif tentang kehadiran emosional dan konsistensi peran ayah, serta praktik negotiated reading audiens berbasis pengalaman domestik personal. Di tengah kontroversi, publik berperan aktif dalam melakukan representasi kolektif yang mempertahankan citra maskulinitas afektif dengan memprioritaskan tanggung jawab pengasuhan dibandingkan isu moral personal. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa audiens tidak bersifat pasif, melainkan berfungsi sebagai agen kunci dalam stabilisasi makna maskulinitas di budaya partisipatif digital.
TikTok has emerged as a significant platform for constructing and negotiating social meanings related to gender roles and domestic relations. This study aims to examine how audiences engage in reframing the representation of the “ideal husband” figure in a viral controversy involving Na Daehoon on TikTok. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, this research utilizes qualitative content analysis. The data consist of two videos from the @NaDaehoon account, one netizen reaction video, and purposively selected public comments collected between July and November 2025. The analysis is grounded in Stuart Hall’s theory of representation and the concept of caring masculinity to explore meaning production and negotiation in digital spaces.
The findings reveal that the legitimacy of the “ideal husband” figure is constructed through three dominant mechanisms: visual representations of domestic caregiving, narrative framing emphasizing emotional presence and consistency in fatherhood roles, and audience negotiated readings rooted in personal domestic experiences. Amid controversy, audiences actively participate in a process of collective reframing that sustains affective masculinity by prioritizing caregiving responsibility over personal moral allegations. These findings highlight the active role of audiences as key agents in stabilizing and negotiating masculine ideals within participatory digital culture.
Downloads
References
Anjarini, S., & Ningsih, R. (2024). Tindak tutur direktif pada kolom komentar TikTok Ganjar Pranowo tentang pungli. 6(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.26555/jg.v6i1.9954
Arin Mantara Anggawirya, Rosalia Floriani, Abdurrahman Shaleh Reliubun, Martha Betaubun, & Desy Eva Laila Rokhmah. (2025). Representation of Cultural Values in Digital Content Through a Grounded Theory Approach to Cultural Creators on Tiktok. MUKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 4(2), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.54259/mukasi.v4i2.4257
bate Andi. (2025). 6881+Revised+-+Exploring+Online+Student+Relationships+(1) (Vol. 17).
Castells, M. (2013). Communication Power. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=3Q8oAAAAQBAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=id&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
Cedrún, L. C., & Civila, S. (2024). The influence of TikTok use on young people’s identity formation and virtual socialisation. MLS Communication Journal, 2(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.69620/mlscj.v2i1.2531
Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity. Gender & Society. https://archive.org/details/connell-hegemonic-masculinity-rethinking-2005/mode/2up
Dhoest, A. (2025). From Manosphere to Mainstream: Representations of Masculinity on TikTok. International Journal of Communication, 19, 2201–2220.
Duffy, B. E., & Hund, E. (2019). Gendered Visibility on Social Media: Navigating Instagram’s Authenticity Bind. 13, 4983–5002. https://doi.org/10.32376/3f8575cb.3f03db0e
Fan, H., & An, J. (2024). Study on the Identity Construction of Characters in TikTok Short Videos from the Perspective of Impression Management. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 15(2), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.54097/9pb77y06
Fitriyani, N., Sadono, T. P., Fridha, M., & Palupi, T. (2025). Toxic Masculinity in the Sadfishing Phenomenon within the # LakiLakiTidakBercerita Hashtag : A Netnographic Study of TikTok Content from the Account @ bimbluess. 2(1), 1–11.
Gauntlett, D. (2008). Media , Gender and Identity by David Gauntlett.
Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. In Sage Publications. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474206013.0012
Henry Jenkins with Ravi Purushotma, Margaret Weigel, K. C. and A. J. R. (2009). Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture. https://pdfhost.io/v/3ukACWjeI_Confronting_the_Challenges_of_Participatory_Culture?utm_source=chatgpt.com
John W. Creswell, J. D. C. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications.
Jones, S., Moorlock, E., & Dempsey, E. (2025). Under the influencer : Participatory culture and the rise of the viratoid ☆. Journal of Business Research, 199(March 2024), 115547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115547
Juditha & Darmawan, 2022. (2022). Tren Stitch Tiktok Sebagai Fitur Penegasian Warganet Dalam Komunikasi Di Media Sosial. Jurnal Komunikasi, 15(2), 242–258.
Kozinets, R. V. (2019). Netnography (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://www.perlego.com/book/1431879/netnography-the-essential-guide-to-qualitative-social-media-research-pdf
Krippendorff, K. (2019). SAGE Research Methods Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology Introduction.
Lacasa, P., Rubio-lópez, N., Matsumoto, M., & Henando, A. (2025). Dimensions of Youth Interaction on TikTok : Exploring Creativity , Multimodality , and Digital Literacy. 149–157.
Matthew B. Miles, A Michael Hurbeman, J. S. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods.
Nazhifaaqila. (2025). Self-Acceptance i n Tiktok ’ s “ How I Love Being A Woman ” Trend : An Audience Reception Research Nazhifa Aqila Zahra. 13(1).
Padilah, N. N., & Juliana Kurniawati. (2025). Representasi Dan Penerimaan Audiens. Jurnal Madia, 6(1), 46–57.
Pithaloka, D., Taufiq, I., & Dini, M. (2023). Pemaknaan perempuan Generasi Z terhadap maskulinitas joget Tiktok. 0341, 69–78.
Pritchard, L. (2024). Female’s Digital Self-making on TikTok: Identity Construction Through a Framework of Postfeminist Media and Neoliberalism (2016-2024). In Senior Theses. https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/senior_theses/714
RAHMAH HASTUTI, S. (2024). KETERLIBATAN AYAH DAN KAITANNYA DENGAN EMOTIONAL WELL-BEING PADA REMAJA AKHIR. 4(3), 167–186.
Schellewald, A. (2023). Understanding the popularity and affordances of TikTok through user experiences. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221144562
Sipahutar, E. M., Safitri, D., & Sujarwo. (2025). Perspektif Gen Z terhadap Standar Pasangan Ideal di TikTok. JICN: Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendekiawan Nusantara, 2, 1734–1740. https://jicnusantara.com/index.php/jicn
Srikandi, M. B., Suparna, P., & Haes, P. E. (2023). Audiens Sebagai Gatekeeper Pada Media Sosial. Perspektif Komunikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Politik Dan Komunikasi Bisnis, 7(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.24853/pk.7.2.179-192
Starovolsky-Shitrit, A., Neduva, A., Doron, N. A., Daniel, E., & Tsur, O. (2025). The Value of Nothing: Multimodal Extraction of Human Values Expressed by TikTok Influencers. http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.11770
Tanner, S., & Gillardin, F. (2025). Toxic Communication on TikTok: Sigma Masculinities and Gendered Disinformation. Social Media and Society, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251313844
Tran, S., Lin, C., Dosono, B., & Cotter, K. (2025). TikTok as a Tool for Identity Work Among the Hoa Ethnic Community. Social Media + Society, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251363215
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Komuniti : Jurnal Komunikasi dan Teknologi Informasi

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.












