Memimpin Dengan Narasi Populis Analisis Peran dan Tindak Komunikasi Publik Presiden Indonesia

Authors

  • Mochamad Taufiq Hidayat Universitas Gadjah Mada
    Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/komuniti.v17i2.10213

Keywords:

populisme, kepemimpinan, komunikasi publik, inovasi kolaboratif, joko widodo, prabowo subianto

Abstract

Fenomena populisme semakin menonjol sebagai gaya kepemimpinan politik, termasuk di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis bagaimana populisme memengaruhi strategi komunikasi publik dan peran kepemimpinan dalam membangun legitimasi serta mengelola ruang publik. Kajian ini menggunakan pendekatan literatur dengan analisis interpretatif berbasis hermeneutik dan kerangka meta-governance serta inovasi kolaboratif. Data dikumpulkan dari 34 artikel jurnal terindeks dan dianalisis menggunakan teknik pengkodean serta kategorisasi tematik. Fokus utama diarahkan pada dua figur populis, Joko Widodo dan Prabowo Subianto, dengan periode analisis 2014–2024. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa Jokowi menekankan komunikasi emosional berbasis kedekatan melalui bblusukan dan media sosial untuk memperkuat citra wong cilik, sedangkan Prabowo lebih menonjolkan narasi konfrontatif "rakyat versus elite" dengan basis nasionalisme dan agama konservatif. Strategi ini sama-sama efektif membangun dukungan elektoral, tetapi berisiko mempersempit ruang deliberatif memperkuat polarisasi, dan melemahkan tata kelola kolaboratif. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa komunikasi populis dalam kepemimpinan Indonesia bersifat ambivalen: memperkuat legitimasi sekaligus berpotensi mengikis prinsip demokrasi partisipatif di era digital.

Populism has increasingly emerged as a dominant leadership style in contemporary politics, including in Indonesia. This study aims to analyze how populist ideologies shape public communication strategies and leadership roles in building legitimacy and managing the public sphere. The research employs a literature-based interpretive approach using hermeneutics  and applies the meta-governance and collaborative innovation framework. The analysis focuses on two key populist figures, Joko Widodo and Prabowo Subianto, within the 2014–2024 period. Findings indicate that Jokowi emphasizes emotional communication and proximity through blusukan and social media to reinforce his image as wong cilik, while Prabowo advances a confrontational “people versus elite” narrative grounded in nationalism and conservative Islam. Both strategies effectively consolidate electoral support but simultaneously risk narrowing deliberative spaces, reinforcing polarization, and weakening collaborative governance. The study concludes that populist communication in Indonesian leadership is ambivalent: strengthening legitimacy on one hand while potentially eroding participatory democratic principles in the digital era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Annisa, Firly; Frizki Yulianti, Ayu Amalia, Muhammad Raqib Bin Mohd Sofian dan Safiyyah Ahmad Sabri (2023). “Analyzing Joko Widodo's Pandemic Rhetoric on Instagram: Insights into Political Communication, Populism, and Crisis Management” E3S Web Conf. Volume 440, 2023. International Conference on Environment and Smart Society (ICEnSO 2023). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202344003009

Ansell, C. & Gash, A. (2018). "Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice". Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543-571.

Aspinall, E. (2016) The New Nationalism in Indonesia. Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, 3: 72–82. doi: 10.1002/app5.111.

Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Indonesia’s democratic paradox: Competitive elections amidst rising illiberalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(3), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1690412

Boell, S. K., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2015). A Hermeneutic Approach for Conducting Literature Reviews and Literature Searches. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37(1), 257–286.

Deha, D. (2021). Retorika populisme dalam kontestasi politik di Indonesia: Respons generasi milenial terhadap post-truth. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JISIP), 4(1), 67–78. https://jisip.jurnaliisipjakarta.id/index.php/jisip/article/view/45

Engesser, S., Ernst, N., Esser, F., & Büchel, F. (2016). "Populism and social media: how politicians spread a fragmented ideology". Information, Communication & Society, 20(8), 1109–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1207697

Grunig, J. E., & Hunt, T. (1984). Managing public relations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press.

Hadiz, V. R. (2016). Islamic Populism in Indonesia and the Middle East. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316402382

Hawkins, K. A., Carlin, R. E., Littvay, L., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (Eds.). (2019). The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis. Routledge.

Heath, R. L., & O’Hair, H. D. (2020). Handbook of risk and crisis communication. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003070726

Huda, R. I., Dimyati, I., & Muldi, A. (2025). "Propaganda ancaman politik identitas dalam teks pidato Jokowi". Komuniti: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Teknologi Informasi, 17(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.23917/komuniti.v17i1.7304

Laclau, E. (2005). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.

Lim, M. (2017). "Freedom to Hate: Social Media, Algorithmic Enclaves, and the Rise of Tribal Nationalism in Indonesia." Critical Asian Studies, 49(3), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2017.1341188

Mahy P. (2022). "Indonesia’s Omnibus Law on Job Creation: Legal Hierarchy and Responses to Judicial Review in the Labour Cluster of Amendments". Asian Journal of Comparative Law. 2022;17(1):51-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2022.7

McNair, B. (2011). An introduction to political communication. Routledge.

Mergel, I. (2017). Open innovation in the public sector: Drivers and barriers for the adoption of open government. Government Information Quarterly, 34(4), 398–407. DOI:10.1080/14719037.2017.1320044

Mietzner, M. (2015). Reinventing Asian populism: Jokowi’s rise, democracy, and political contestation in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 72. East-West Center. https://www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/reinventing-asian-populism-jokowis-rise-democracy-and-political-contestation-in-indonesia

Mietzner, M. (2019). Authoritarian innovations in Indonesia: electoral narrowing, identity politics and executive illiberalism. Democratization, 27(6), 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1704266

Mietzner, M. (2020). Rival populisms and the democratic crisis in Indonesia: chauvinists, Islamists and technocrats. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 74(4), 420–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1725426

Morissan. (2013). Teori Komunikasi: Individu Hingga Massa. Jakarta: Kencana.

Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x

Muhtadi, B., & Muslim, K. (2020). Populism, Islamism, and democratic decline in Indonesia. The Middle East Institute, 4. https://www.mei.edu/publications/populism-islamism-and-democratic-decline-indonesia

Müller, J. (2016). What Is Populism?. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812293784

Nugroho, SS dan Yandes, Jufri. (2020). "Digital Faces of Political Party In Local Governance: A Case Study of Partai Solidaritas Indonesia Jakarta". Jurnal Dinamika Pemerintahan Vol.8, No. 1 (Januari 2025) Hal.47-69. DOI:10.36341/jdp.v8i01.5351

Mahaphan, Kanyavee. (2025). Digital Transformation In Public Services: Challenges And Opportunities. Proceeding of International Conference on Social Science and Humanity. 2. 211-226. 10.61796/icossh.v2i2.14.

OECD. (2020). Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave. OECD Publishing Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en.

Paschoiotto, Waldemir & Cunha, Cristiano & Silva, Solange. (2024). "Leadership in the collaborative innovation process in the public sector: an integrative review". Revista de Administração Pública. 58. 10.1590/0034-761220230037x.

Power, T.P. (2018). "Jokowi’s Authoritarian Turn and Indonesia’s Democratic Decline," Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(3), pages 307-338, September.

Purdey, Jemma (2024). "Talking Indonesia: digital populism." https://indonesiaatmelbourne.unimelb.edu.au/talking-indonesia-digital-populism/

Setiawan, A., Nurmandi, A., Usman, S., & Qodir, Z. (2024). Indonesian Government Communication in Media Framing in Covid-19 Crisis Policy. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 18(5), e07035. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n5-174

Shabangu, Pay. (2024). "Public Sector Communication in the Digital Age" dalam Radebe, Mandla. (2024). Public Sector Communication in the Digital Age: Insights and Influences from the Global South. 10.36615/9781776489909-00.

Tapsell, R. (2017). Media Power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, Citizens and the Digital Revolution. (1 ed.) (Media, Culture and Communication in Asia-Pacific Societies). Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc.

Thomas, J., Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 8, 45 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Tirto.id. (2019, March 29). Prabowo adalah bagian dari elite, narasi populismenya cuma retorika. Tirto.id. https://tirto.id/prabowo-adalah-bagian-dari-elite-narasi-populismenya-cuma-retorika-eljB

Torfing, J. (2018). Collaborative innovation in the public sector: the argument. Public Management Review, 21(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1430248

Warburton, E. (2025). "The Politics of Indonesia. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics". Retrieved 1 May. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.2210

Warburton, E. (2016). "Joko Widodo and the New Developmentalism". Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(3), 297-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2016.1249262

Yanow, D. (2000). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983747

Downloads

Submitted

2025-05-01

Accepted

2025-09-13

Published

2025-09-30