From Signs to Stigma: Enregisterment and Platformed Racism in TikTok Comments

Authors

  • Moh Ramadhan Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
    Indonesia
  • Muziatun Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
    Indonesia
  • Fahria Malabar Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
    Indonesia

Keywords:

enregisterment; language ideologies; platformed racism; moral boundary making; digital vigilantism; TikTok; critical sociolinguistics; ELT media literacy

Abstract

This article investigates how stigma around so-called “gang hand signs” is produced, circulated, and
negotiated in TikTok comments. Drawing on a case-bounded corpus of 675 comments posted under five
videos from the account TopNotch Idiots (posted in 2023; comments captured in 2025), the analysis
integrates critical sociolinguistics and language-ideological perspectives with the concepts of
enregisterment and platformed racism. We operationalize a two-layer coding scheme: stigma processes
(labeling, stereotyping, separation/status loss, discrimination) and sociolinguistic lenses (indexicals of
risk, digital gatekeeping, platformed racism cues, moral-panic rhetoric). Findings show that gestures are
enregistered as a default “danger register,” normalizing punitive discourse (“deserve to get hurt”);
commenters perform outsider exclusion and moral boundary-making; and racialized/locational cues
align with platformed racism, intensified by platform affordances and virality. We discuss implications
for critical media literacy and English language pedagogy in Indonesia, arguing that user-generated
discourse not only mainstream media now participates in the production of stigma and public moralities.
The study contributes to research on indexicality, platform governance, and digital vigilantism, and
suggests ethics-oriented classroom practices for interrogating harmful registers online.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Y.-H. Hung, A. Miles, Z. Trevino, and C. DAniello, “BIPOC Experiences of Racial Trauma on

TikTok: A Qualitative Content Analysis,” Contemp. Fam. Ther., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 298–308,

2023, doi: DOI:10.1007/s10591-023-09669-6.

[2] E. T. Jacques, C. H. Basch, J. Fera, and V. J. II, “#StopAsianHate: A Content Analysis of TikTok

Videos Focused on Racial Discrimination Against Asians/Asian Americans During the

COVID-19 Pandemic,” Dialogues Heal., vol. 2, no. 2023, pp. 1–4, 2023, doi:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dialog.2022.100089.

[3] Daniela Zuzunaga Zegarra, “Racism in the Platformized Cultural Industries,” Int. J.

Commun., vol. 18, no. 2024, pp. 1–21, 2024, [Online]. Available:

https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/22989

[4] E. L. Ungless, N. Markl, and B. Ross, “Experiences of Censorship on TikTok Across

Marginalised Identities,” Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 1952–

1965, 2025, doi: 10.1609/icwsm.v19i1.35912.

[5] S. Galleguillos, “Digilantism, Discrimination, and Punitive Attitudes: A Digital Vigilantism

Model,” Crime, Media, Cult., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 353–374, 2022, doi:

https://doi.org/10.1177/17416590211017937.

[6] J. Blommaert, Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,

2012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845307.

[7] S. Johnson and T. Milani, “Language Ideologies and Sociolinguistic Inequalities in the Digital

Age,” Lang. Soc., vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 689–713, 2020.

[8] A. Jaffe, “Language Ideology and Social Inequality,” Annu. Rev. Anthropol., vol. 51, pp. 123–

140, 2022.

[9] A. Pennycook, “Critical Applied Linguistics,” Appl. Linguist. Rev., vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 325–

343, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.1022.

[10] S. Canagarajah, Translingual Practice and Global Englishes: Sociolinguistic Implications for

ELT. London: Routledge, 2021.

[11] A. Agha, Registers of Identity: Language, Culture, and Social Meaning. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 2021.

[12] C. Tagg, The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on the Internet. London:

Routledge, 2023.

[13] J. Rosa and N. Flores, “Unsettling Race and Language: Toward a Raciolinguistic

Perspective,” Lang. Soc., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 621–647, 2017, doi: DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000562.

[14] T. Gillespie, Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden

Decisions that Shape Social Media. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2018.

[15] T. Bucher, If... Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001.

[16] J. van Dijck, The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. Oxford: Oxford

University Press, 2018.

[17] R. Gorwa and T. G. Ash, Democratic Transparency in the Platform Society. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 2020. doi: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108890960.

[18] A. Matamoros-Fernández and J. Farkas, “Racism, Hate Speech, and Social Media: A

Systematic Review and Critique,” Telev. New Media, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 205–224, 2021, doi:

https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420982230.

[19] C. Abidin, Internet Celebrity and Moral Panic in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge, 2022.

[20] D. Trottier, “Digital Vigilantism as Online Harm,” Information, Commun. Soc., vol. 26, no.

4, pp. 501–520, 2023.

[21] S. Udupa, “Digital Hate: Platformed Hostility and Everyday Nationalism,” Media, Cult. Soc.,

vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 933–950, 2021.

[22] D. Z. Zegarra, “Platform Power and Algorithmic Publics,” Media, Cult. Soc., vol. 12, no. 1,

pp. 15–34, 2023.

[23] M. Lestari, “Developing Critical Digital Literacy in Indonesian EFL Classrooms,” Indones. J.

Appl. Linguist., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 501–512, 2022.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-10-30

Accepted

2025-12-18

Published

2025-12-18

How to Cite

Ramadhan, M., Muziatun, & Malabar, F. (2025). From Signs to Stigma: Enregisterment and Platformed Racism in TikTok Comments. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 10(2), 178–195. Retrieved from https://journals2.ums.ac.id/kls/article/view/13568

Issue

Section

Articles