Evaluation of ANN Training Methods: A Comparative Study of Back Propagation, Genetic Algorithm, and Particle Swarm Optimization for Predicting Electrical Energy Consumption

Authors

  • Giovanni Dimas Prenata Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
    Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/emitor.v25i3.12719

Keywords:

path planning, Backpropagation, Genetic Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization, Electrical Energy Prediction

Abstract

This study compares the performance of ANN with three training methods: Backpropagation (BP), Genetic Algorithm (GA), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) in a simple classification case. The results show that ANN GA has the smallest average error (0.0308), followed by ANN BP (0.0569), while ANN PSO is much larger (0.7559). Thus, ANN GA proved to be the most stable and accurate, ANN BP still performed quite well, while ANN PSO had the weakest performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Submitted

2025-09-02

Accepted

2025-10-13

Published

2025-11-09

How to Cite

Prenata, G. D. (2025). Evaluation of ANN Training Methods: A Comparative Study of Back Propagation, Genetic Algorithm, and Particle Swarm Optimization for Predicting Electrical Energy Consumption. Emitor: Jurnal Teknik Elektro, 25(3), 245–256. https://doi.org/10.23917/emitor.v25i3.12719

Issue

Section

Articles