The current mode of communication requires more skill and capability in coping of technically information and digital technology driven communication that changes overtime in day to day development of digital era. The world has transformed and became much more complicated, people found many more disruptions in every single of life parts including the way of human communication [1] . Effective communication has become increasingly important in today's digital era [2] . With the rapid development of digital technology, communication has become more complex and disrupted in various aspects of life. Digitalized communication between communicator and communican transmissed in meta data, codes, signs or texts created the algorythm of messages, people, interests, and communities. The cyberworld is now assumed as main reality to some people who engage almost whole their life in it. Digital communication involves the transmission of metadata, codes, signs, and texts, creating algorithms of messages, people, interests, and communities. But many people do not recognize even do not realize what is precisely going on in the cyberworld due to lack of digital literacy [3] . It resulted the miscommunication, misperception, misunderstanding and misinformation that often make disinformation. The messages eventually corrupt that may create disharmony between parties who engage in communication.Some individuals engage almost all of their life in the cyberworld, which is considered the main reality for them [4] . However, many people lack digital literacy, resulting in miscommunication, misperception, misunderstanding, and misinformation. These issues can create disharmony between communicating parties [5] .

Communication problems have gotten increasingly difficult to solve in this age of digital technology. Especially when taking into account the existence of the metaverse, telemedicine, teleportation, and other technological developments in communication based on AI, DL, and ML [5][6], . In order to generate communication patterns that are Islamic, respectful, open, productive, ethical, and cultural, the digital society calls for a strategy that is all-encompassing and interdisciplinary. One of the "soft talents" that is essential in today's world is the ability to communicate effectively. There are five types of soft skills that are absolutely necessary in this day and age [7][8], . To start, skills in interpersonal and group communication. Second, a disposition toward acting with ethics and integrity in one's behaviour. Third, the ability to manage change in the environment (diversity). The fourth quality is the ability to motivate others. Fifth, hone your abilities in management that are strategic and visionary. In this essay, we will investigate the art of healthy Neurophilocommunication (NPC) 5.0 for philosophers, neuroscientists, academicians, physicians, other medical professionals, and other scholars, students, and community members living in the digital age for day-to-day life. The advancements in AI, DL, and ML have brought about new forms of communication such as telemedicine and teleportation. To effectively communicate in this digital age, a comprehensive and interdisciplinary strategy is necessary.

This includes five essential soft skills: interpersonal and group communication, ethical and integrity-driven behavior, adaptability to change, the ability to motivate others, and strategic and visionary management. In this essay, we will explore the concept of Neurophilocommunication (NPC) 5.0 as a solution to communication problems in the digital age, especially in the fields of medicine, health, healthcare, and public health [9][10][11], , . In particular,new kinds of communication in the field of medicine, health, healthcare and public health emerged using digital technology. With the rise of digital technology in health services, the need for proper communication has become more pressing. Now, we have “virtual hospital”which operates telemedicine where medical services, health consultations between doctors and patients, and medical treatments work on line. The surge of pandemi of Covid’19 globally in last two years (2019-2021) has forced people to be isolated, separated from the meetings, gathering or other face to face interactions or at least kept in distance [12][13], . This phenomenon has been called “the new normal” unlike “normal” as usual. The health issues soon became a big deal and main concern as well for everyone, for communities, governments, and then came into global account and concern. Hence, the way of communicating health issues has been questioned not only in the medical services but also in many fields in relation with health.

Research questions in this study were started with raising the curiousity to find a proper communication with less mistakes due to the increasing digital technology's utility particularly in health communication. How to make a good quality in transmitting messages without any misperception or misinformation between parties who engage in communication is one of main thing to be made in this research.Hopefully, this study would discover the ways in creating a healthy communication. There is a connection between communication in health services, online medication, for giving excellent service for the community. A number of studies have been carried out regarding this, including the title Application of Telenursing in Health Services: Literature Review.

This study discusses the phenomenon of the development of information and communication technology which has a major influence in the field of health services, especially in the field of nursing. Nurses are required to be able to use technology, which is then known as remote nursing services or telenursing. Technologies and devices that can be used include telephones, personal digital assistants, smartphones, facsimile machines, internet social media, video/audio conferencing, teleradiology and other computer information systems. Telenursing can be implemented in Indonesia, and has even been implemented throughout the world. Especially, in the era of the Covid-19 pandemic, where the frequency of face-to-face or physical contact was limited at that time. A number of studies have been conducted on the application of telenursing in health services, demonstrating the significance of technology in the field of nursing. In this study, we investigate the theoretical foundation of what we call a "Neurophilocommunication (NPC) that will hopefully construct a view and practice of better communication in changing mode in the disrupted era due to digital and information technology's transformation particularly in health issues.

We designed this mode of communication which requires multiple methods and recognizing interdisiplinary approaches. It suits for philosophers, neuroscientists, academicians, physicians, other medical professionals, and other scholars, students, and community members living in the digital age for day-to-day life. This study aims to investigate the theoretical foundation of NPC as a mode of communication suitable for philosophers, neuroscientists, academicians, medical professionals, scholars, students, and community members. The research questions focus on finding ways to improve the quality of communication, reducing misperception and misinformation between parties. The goal is to discover ways to create a healthy form of communication from Islamic perspective.

Communication encompasses all aspects of verbal and nonverbal human activity that elicit responses from others. Communication consists of the communicator (sender or sender of the message), the communicant (message recipient), the message, the medium, and the effect or impact. Understanding communication extends beyond a simple chat, discourse, or interview. All behaviors (gestures, expressions, facial expressions, etc.) communicate specific and unique messages, hence they are all types of communication [14], [15], [16]. Communication may be defined as the process of transferring information between two or more parties. This process is dynamic and interactive, resulting in the eventual formation of mutual understanding [17] . Colleagues are able to communicate in a professional, cordial, and forthright manner in the workplace.

The language utilized is one that is understood by all employees at the location. When connecting and speaking effectively, active listening and questioning techniques are employed to create comfort]. Effective communication must also be pursued with patients, clients, colleagues, and guests in order to prevent problems and satisfy all parties [18], [19]. The purpose of communication (from the Latin term communicatus, which means "to share" or "to belong together") is to share in a spirit of unity and kinship. The goal of every kind of communication is for both parties to get an understanding of the message being conveyed. Another research that discusses the relationship between communication in health services, online medication, for the sake of excellent service to the community is entitled Public Health And Online Misinformation: Challenges And Recommendations. The article discusses how the internet has become a popular resource for learning about health [20], [21]. In fact, the internet, through the many social media accounts and applications, provides tools to investigate a person's health condition. This is both an opportunity and a challenge. If it is used properly, supervised by parties who really understand about health and technology, this condition can support people's lives. Conversely, if the available social media accounts and health applications are only financially profit oriented, it is possible to develop the technology without detailed supervision from doctors or health experts. In fact, there are many channels that provide inaccurate information [22] . Therefore, policy makers must be able to form an online information ecosystem that can be accounted for. It's not about producing the information. It is also a matter of proportional supervision and control. Public sensitivity to filter information is also a fundamental factor [23], [24].

Meanwhile, a study entitled How Health Communication Via Tik Tok Makes A Difference: A Content Analysis Of Tik Tok Accounts Run By Chinese Provincial Health Committees explains the phenomenon of social media as a tool of health campaigns in China, the country with the largest population in the world [25], [26], [27]. As one of the countries with the largest population and area in the world, China can be a reflection of how internet-based social media has become an unavoidable phenomenon in human life. Therefore, strategic steps are needed to utilize it, including in the field of health services. The provincial government in China uses Tik Tok, one of the country's most popular social media platforms, as a means of health campaigns [28], [29], [30]. Not only to promote the program, through the comments column, the public and official account admins can interact with each other. What China is doing can be replicated in other countries, of course with all kinds of adjustments. In China, Tik Tok is indeed the most popular, but in other countries Instagram, Twitter or Facebook may be popular. Most importantly, the government or policy makers must be adept at formulating programs for using social media.

In the oscillating realms of informational influx, we stand on the precipice of a cognitive renaissance. A paradigm where the sinuous elegance of communication is not merely a vector of information transfer, but a meticulously crafted artwork that weaves its threads across the vast tapestry of human cognitive and cultural expanse. The concept of communication, a symphonic interplay of expressions, is undergoing a metamorphic transition, echoing a cosmic dance where knowledge, culture, and technology intersect in harmonious synchrony. The copious influx of information, a direct beneficiary of policy liberalization, has cast light upon the indispensable need to refine our intellectual apparatus. This isn’t merely an act of augmenting cognitive capacities but is analogous to crafting a refined lens that can perceive, dissect, and assimilate multifaceted informational spectra with laudable precision [31]. The postulates of Information Literacy, as enunciated by the International Federation of Library Association and Institutions (IFLA), are not static doctrines but dynamic elements that evolve, adapt, and resonate with the rhythmic oscillations of informational dynamics [32][33][34][35].

The simulacra theory, juxtaposed in this narrative, casts a reflective lens upon the manipulated realities, echoing the profound need to navigate these constructed realms with informed discernment and critical acuity. Echoing the philosophical and practical imperatives of Lasswell's and Kotler's theories, communication transcends linear trajectories to embody a multidimensional space. Here, each message is a living entity, a dynamic organism that adapts, evolves, and resonates within the intricate ecosystems of societal, cultural, and individual contexts. The communicative objectives, hence, are not mere transactions but dynamic interactions, echoing a harmony where information and meanings are not just transferred but transformed. As we transcend into the transcultural spheres, the incorporation of cultural and indigenous wisdom emerges as a sanctified covenant. Paremiocommunication emerges as a sacred chalice, echoing the profound rhythms of indigenous wisdom and cultural narratives. Each message, hence, becomes a pilgrimage, a sacred journey where informational contents and cultural wisdom converge, echoing a symphony where cognitive comprehension and cultural resonance dance in harmonious synchrony.

Neurocommunication, which relates to the communication of neuroscience, is fraught with considerable challenges. How exactly can neuroscientists successfully address these issues while also advancing their research program's objectives? Over the past decade, attempts to transmit accurate information about new scientific discoveries to the general public have expanded beyond the limit of unidirectional efforts, despite the fact that this remains a central objective of science communication. The public's expectation of meaningful participation and conversation on ethical and social concerns resulting from research has led to the creation of more interactive and multidirectional communication tactics. The public expects to have input on the direction of scientific research, and neuroscientists feel uneasy when making predictions about how society will react to the prospect of new information and technologies. In this setting, the number of persons pushing for stronger direct communication between scientists, journalists, and the general public has increased significantly. However, for individual scientists, the time required for such successful science communication activities is considerable [36][37][38].

This is especially true if one considers communication to include not just the dissemination of factual representations of neuroscience to the general public, but also public engagement activities that often take the form of two-way forums where debate and discussion can occur. Communication within the discipline of neuroscience has its own set of distinct challenges. To begin, the complexity of the brain [39][40], . As new understanding about the brain comes from a range of neuroscience subspecialties, the importance of explaining complicated chemical pathways, as well as their connections and effects, is growing. Second, the mental and physical significance of one's own life, philosophy, and religion. While challenging the nature of "belief," scientific progress in understanding brain function and the biological bases of behavior has the potential to result in socially charged attributions of moral responsibility, new definitions of "normal" behavior, and a deeper understanding of how humans think and learn [41].

Thirdly, the effects of CNS (central nervous system) illnesses on community health. Due to the widespread effects that neurological disorders can have on an individual's life and on society, there has been a great deal of attention and enthusiasm for recent advances in neuroscience that promise to provide diagnostic tools, therapeutic interventions, and even cures for neurological disorders. Addressing the enormous human and societal effects of CNS diseases. Fourthly, individuals with neurological and mental health issues risk discrimination. Due to the prevalence of unfavorable social views regarding the causes and origins of mental health problems, it is difficult, and in some cases impossible, to have significant public discussions about mental health issues.

The study of communication philosophy focuses on particulars in a manner that is dependant on the environment, the passage of time, and the input of the public; all of these variables are peculiar to public opinion. The philosophy of communication does not give us with unchallengeable certainty; rather, it is put to the test of public opinion and provides a road map detailing the specifics and providing ways to deal with those specifics. The basis for engaging in this practice is a commitment to the principle of communication. The philosophy of communication is a form of communicative architecture that necessitates an understanding map at every level, from the most fundamental particulars to the most sophisticated degrees of temporal comprehension, up to the revelation of a position in the public arena. This comprehension map must start with the most fundamental details and progress to the most complex levels of temporal comprehension. In the subject of communication theory, it is considered permissible to disagree with an author's perspective as well as a communication philosophy. The pragmatic communication theory acknowledges the variety of perspectives held by the public.

This realization is the outcome of accepting the possibility that a communication theory could become obsolete and die out, only to be reborn by public opinion. When the major characters in a novel no longer feel that a specific philosophy of communication can give an enactment that is logically consistent with the storyline, that philosophy of communication will undergo some kind of transformation, proliferation, atrophy, or extinction. This will occur when they no longer feel that the philosophy of communication can provide a logically compatible execution with the story's storyline. Those who have influence in the public sphere and a solid grasp of a certain communication philosophy are accountable for preserving its life. When this occurs, a new form of intellectual diversity emerges in the shape of a novel technique of interpersonal communication [42].

A simple philosophy of communication barely touches the surface of the enormous and intricate area of communication. It is an admission to others of one's preconceived views or biases in the field of communication science. The goal of a communication philosophy should not be to gather an indisputable body of facts; rather, it should be to improve people's ability to understand each other and communicate successfully. The philosophy of communication is part of a larger community that includes communicative drama, emplotment, and characters who help by confirming and arguing public opinion, and who are always attentive to a story of the human condition that calls for a broader perspective and cautions against conflating "new" with progress. This community also includes people who study the evolution of communication throughout history. This society of communicative theatre, communicative planning, and communicative characters seeks to aid in the affirmation and discussion of public opinion.

Husserl chooses the first horn of the dilemma, which is to reject the "inevitable" Aristotelian worldview, as he previously viewed it. He acknowledges that this was an error. Therefore, he disagrees with the concept that the lógos semantikós does not have a unique relationship with the apóphasis. In this manner, non-declarative sentences are not the primary carriers of meaning; rather, they express evaluations of actions we have undertaken. The argument, according to Husserl purists, is consistent with his previous theoretical work. To begin with, only acts with an objective nature, such as theistic or postulating acts, have an intentional matter that can be categorized as nominal or propositional, and are thus the only ones that give meaning. The second type of utterance, the declarative phrase, combines an act of objectification with a propositional topic. This type of clause is known as a proclamation. Third, the declarative phrase has a signifying function (a "lógos ti kata tinós") different from the intuitive satisfaction (the cognitive function) and the intimating (kundgebende) use of expressive symbols. This operation is known as a "lógos ti kata tinós" (the communicative function).

Health communication is derived by combining the terms communication and health. This chapter's introduction provided a concise explanation of communication comprehension. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), health is not just the absence of disease, infirmity, or impairment but rather the presence of all these that allow people to participate fully in society and the economy. The definition of health is expansive and difficult to express due to its multifaceted nature. For example: personal, biomedical, and societal. Consequently, health is a state / condition of a person free from all physical ailments and mental disorders, which are in fact complex and sometimes not evident. On the basis of some of the aforementioned definitions of health, we can conclude that health communication is the process of sending health messages through specific medium from the message sender to the message recipient. The approach strives to explain, enlighten, and direct (both physical and spiritual) health components holistically and thoroughly in order to attain human behavior for society welfare. When compared to general communication, the messages in health communication are specific and distinct.

Typically about the challenges or patterns of health that the community faces. For instance, COVID-19. The following are a few of the ways that health communication has been defined by scholars and professionals. Educating, persuading, and inspiring people, organizations, and communities to take action to enhance their health and the health of their communities is the goal of health communication The theory, research, and practice of health communication are concerned with the understanding and interdependence influencing communication (symbolic interactions in the form of messages and meanings) and health-related attitudes, behaviors, and outcomes. In health communication, both parties actively engage in back-and-forth conversation in an effort to reach a consensus on a shared understanding of health issues. It's a way for both parties to refresh their mutual understanding by obtaining unbiased health data.Health communication is a deliberate endeavor to influence public health behavior utilizing a variety of communication principles and techniques, including interpersonal and mass communication. The following principles are 12 fundamental to healthy communication ethics in the digital era. 1. Pray before and after doing activities in cyberspace (internet). 2. Increase critical reading from trusted website sources. 3. Read scripture and scientific references/journals more often than social media. 4. Not all viral news or things contain the truth. Not all truths become viral news. 5. Be and behave as a netizen (internet citizen) as you want to be treated by other netizens. 6. Do miniriset (check, confirm, clarify) when you receive news or information from social media. 7. You should not immediately share any news or videos you receive. 8. Think before commenting. 9. Comment politely, courteously, ethically and culturally. 10. Avoid toxic friendships and respect your time on social media. 11. Avoid constant status updates, watch out for sexual predators. 12. Parents should always accompany their sons and daughters on the internet and social media [43] .

This study adopts a philosophical qualitative approach by employing genealogical and multidisciplinary analysis to construct the theoretical framework of Neurophilocommunication (NPC). The methodology integrates elements from philosophy, neuroscience, communication studies, health sciences, and information technology to develop a comprehensive understanding of healthy and ethical communication models in the digital era-particularly within health services and telemedicine contexts [44] .

A genealogical method was applied to trace the historical roots, evolution, and conceptual transformations of communication across various epistemological domains. The genealogy in this context refers not merely to historical chronology, but to a critical analytical process that investigates how contemporary communication practices in health have been shaped by philosophical, cultural, and technological developments. This study also uses conceptual analysis to formulate NPC as a hybrid model that merges neuroscience insights (neuro), philosophical reasoning (philo), and modern communication theories (communication). The analysis focuses on identifying conceptual gaps in existing communication theories when applied in high-stakes settings like telemedicine, digital consultations, and public health education during crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

In addition to literature review and philosophical inquiry, this research is normative in nature, aiming to propose a value-based communication paradigm for health practitioners, educators, and policymakers. The methodology acknowledges phenomenological aspects of human experience in digital interaction and emphasizes ethical literacy, digital wisdom, and cultural sensitivity as part of communicative competence. Thus, the methodological framework of this study is inherently interdisciplinary and reflexive, seeking to offer both conceptual clarity and practical relevance for stakeholders involved in health-related communication in the digital era.

The concept of Neurophilocommunication (NPC) emerges as an interdisciplinary response to the increasing complexity of communication in the digital age, especially within the domains of healthcare, medicine, and public health. Rooted in philosophy, neuroscience, and communication studies, NPC is a theoretical construct that aims to redefine how individuals interact meaningfully and ethically through digital platforms. The study underscores that communication is no longer a linear process but a dynamic, interactive, and multifaceted phenomenon, influenced by artificial intelligence, virtual environments, and digital disruptions. Miscommunication in health contexts-particularly in telemedicinecan have profound consequences; thus, there is an urgent need to develop communicative models that are grounded in critical thinking, ethical awareness, emotional intelligence, and cultural literacy.

By integrating philosophical inquiry, neuroscience perspectives, and practical health communication frameworks, this study proposes NPC as a conceptual and normative model to guide practitioners, scholars, and digital citizens toward more empathetic, transparent, and effective communication. NPC emphasizes the importance of soft skills, human rights,patient-centered values, and technological adaptability in constructing a healthier communication environment in the digital era. Future research is encouraged to empirically test and further elaborate the principles of NPC, especially in diverse sociocultural and clinical settings, so that its applicability can be continuously refined and contextualized to address real-world challenges.

The authors would like to thank the authors of Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar Indonesia, International PhD Program for Cell Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University Taiwan, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Specialist Doctor Education Program of Clinical Pathology, Universitas Airlangga, Pradita University, Tangerang, Banten, Indonesia, Al-Mustafa International University (MIU), Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran, Driyarkara School of Philosophy (STF), Jakarta, Indonesia, Chief Executive Officer (CEO), TMU Research Center of Neuroscience, Taipei Neuroscience Institute, for supporting the publication of this article.

All authors contributed equally to the main contributor to this paper, some are as chairman, member, financier, article translator, and final editor. All authors read and approved the final paper.

All authors declare no conflict of interest.