Workspaces in Transition: Investigating Dwelling Adaptations for Young Professionals Working from Home

Authors

  • Zuhrotul Mawaddatil Ula Department of Architecture, Faculty of Civil, Planning, and Geo-Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
    Indonesia
  • Arina Hayati Department of Architecture, Faculty of Civil, Planning, and Geo-Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
    Indonesia
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4101-0446
  • Sarah Cahyadini Department of Architecture, Faculty of Civil, Planning, and Geo-Engineering, Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember
    Indonesia
    https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1000-2494

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/sinektika.vi.3878

Keywords:

Work from Home, Residential, Work Setting, Architectural Attributes

Abstract

Working from home (WFH) is becoming increasingly common. Technological developments and the COVID-19 pandemic have catalyzed the development of the concept of working from home. This has caused a shift in the meaning of housing from something separate from work to something that must accommodate work activities. A proper place to work in housing then becomes a necessity that cannot always be fulfilled. This research explores how housing accommodates work activities. The study is conducted on how participants negotiate space by using and changing the attributes of the dwelling to create an ideal work setting. Interviews and auto-photography were conducted with young professionals aged 20 to 25 who have experience working from home with varying frequency. The results show that work activities take place in a variety of residential settings. Participants chose their work setting based on the type of work activities performed as well as personal preferences. Some interconnected factors that influence the work setting in the residence are the type of work activity, privacy, attributes, and atmosphere. Participants also intervene in the dwelling by using existing spaces and attributes to form ideal working conditions that meet their needs.

References

Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia. (2020). Statistik Indonesia 2020.

Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. J. (2015). Does Working from Home Work? Evidence from a Chinese Experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 165–218. https://doi.org/doi:10.1093/qje/qju032

Brinkmann, S. (2013). Qualitative Interviewing Understanding Qualitative Research. Oxford University Press.

Cahyadini, S. (2019). Negotiating Space: Women’s Use of Space in Low-Income Urban Households Surabaya, Indonesia. Newcastle University.

Ching, F. D. K. (2015). Architecture Form, Space, and Orders (4th Editio). Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Creswell, W. J. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches 2nd Edition. United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00177

Creswell, W. J., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative adn Mixed Methods Approaches Fifth Edition. United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dwidienawati, D., & Gandasari, D. (2018). Understanding Indonesia’s generation Z. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(3), 250–252. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.25.17556

Farbstein, J., & Kantrowitz, M. (1978). People in Places Experiencing, Using, and Changing the Built Environment. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Groat, L., & Wang, D. (2013). Architectural Research Methods Second Edition. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Hanom, I., Rozefy, R. A., Filasta, H. T., & Raihana, Y. (2020). The Influence of Ergonomic on Working From Home Activities. Jurnal IDEALOG Ide Dan Dialog Indonesia, 5(1), 58–66. https://doi.org/doi.org/ 10.25124/idealog.v5i1.3959

Haryadi, & Setiawan, B. (2014). Arsitektur, lingkungan, dan perilaku: Pengantar ke teori, metodologi, dan Aplikasi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hinduan, Z. R., & Anggraeni, A. (2020). Generation Z in Indonesia : The Self-Driven Digital. In E. Gentina & E. Parry (Eds.), The New Generation Z in Asia: Dynamics, Differences, Digitalisation (The Changing Context of Managing People) (pp. 121–134). Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley,. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-220-820201012

Jenkins, R. (2017). “Four Reasons Generation Z will be the Most Different Generation". Retrieved from https://www.inc.com/ryan-jenkins/who-is-generation-z-4-big-ways-they-will-be-different.html

Kellett, P., & Tipple, A. G. (2000). The home as workplace : a study of income-generating activities within the domestic setting. Environment & Urbanization, 12(1), 203–214.

Kopec, D. (2006). Environmental Psychology for Design: Second Edition. New York, N.Y.: Fairchild Books.

Kopec, D. (2018). Environmental Psychology for Design (3rd Editio). New York, N.Y.: Fairchild Books, An imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Inc.

Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology Second Edition. United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Lang, J., & Moleski, W. (2010). Functionalism Revisited: Architectural Theory and Practice and the Behavioral Sciences. Taylor & Francis.

Laurence, G. A., Fried, Y., & Slowik, L. H. (2013). “My space” : A moderated mediation model of the effect of architectural and experienced privacy and workspace personalization on emotional exhaustion at work. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.07.011

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook 3rd Edition (3rd ed.). United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Naos, A. (2021). Having the workplace at home: A case study exploring the boundaries between work & home during the pandemic period. University of Gothenburg.

Ng, C. F. (2010). Teleworker’s home office: An extension of corporate office? Facilities, 28(3–4), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771011023113

Niezabitowska, E. D. (2018). Research Methods and Techniques in Architecture. Routledge.

Okuyan, C. B., & Begen, M. A. (2022). Working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic, its effects on health, and recommendations: The pandemic and beyond. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 58(1), 173–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12847

Purnomo, A., Asitah, N., Rosyidah, E., Septianto, A., Daryanti, M. D., & Firdaus, M. (2019). Generasi Z sebagai Generasi Wirausaha. INA-Rxiv, (December), 1–4. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/4m7kz

Rahadi, R. A., & Mulyano, Y. (2021). Qualitative Study on Millennials ’ Housing Preferences in Jakarta , Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(5), 369–382.

Rapoport, A. (1982). The Meaning of the Built Environment. USA: The University of Arizona Press.

Rapoport, A. (1990). Systems of activities and systems of settings. In S. Kent (Ed.), Domestic Architecture and The Use of Space (pp. 9–20). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Rapoport, A. (2005). Culture Architecture & Design. Chicago, Illinois, USA: Locke Science Publishing Company, Inc.

Rioux, L. (2017). Comfort at Work: An Indicator of Quality of Life at Work. In G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, & O. Navarro (Eds.), International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life: Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research. Springer.

Rose, G. (2016). Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Materials (4th ed.). London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Sako, M. (2021). Technology Strategy and Management From Remote Work to Working From Anywhere. Communications of The ACM, 64(4), 20–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3451223

Tanner, R. (2020). Management is a Journey ® Generation Z : Who Are They and What Events Influenced Them? Retrieved from https://managementisajourney.com/generation-z-who-are-they-and-what-events-influenced-them/

Vischer, J. C., & Wifi, M. (2017). The Effect of Workplace Design on Quality of Life at Work. In G. Fleury-Bahi, E. Pol, & O. Navarro (Eds.), International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life: Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research. Springer.

White, N. R. (2002). “Not under my roof!” - Young people’s experience of home. Youth and Society, 34(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/004411802237864

Wicaksono, P. (2021). Mengenali Karakter Generasi Z dalam Dunia Karir. Retrieved June 10, 2022, from qubisa.com website: https://www.qubisa.com/article/karakter-generasi-z-dalam-dunia-karir

Yang, E., Kim, Y., & Hong, S. (2021). Does working from home work? Experience of working from home and the value of hybrid workplace post-COVID-19. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 19. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-04-2021-0015

Downloads

Submitted

2024-01-05

Accepted

2024-07-12

Published

2024-07-19

Issue

Section

Articles