<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2460-3945</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Forum Geografi</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>For. Geo.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2460-3945</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">0852-0682</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23917/forgeo.14319</article-id><title-group><article-title>Land Suitability Evaluation for Citrus Cultivation using GIS and AHP for Different Land Units in Indonesia</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6335-6619</contrib-id><name><surname>Basuki</surname><given-names>Basuki</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country><email>basuki@unej.ac.id</email></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor-0"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Rizaldi</surname><given-names>Zaky Fahrian</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6273-8890</contrib-id><name><surname>Sari</surname><given-names>Vega Kartika</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-2"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5603-9196</contrib-id><name><surname>Romadhona</surname><given-names>Sukron</given-names></name><address><country>Indonesia</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-3"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Soil Science, Agriculture Faculty</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Jember</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/049f0ha78</institution-id></institution-wrap><addr-line>Jalan Kalimantan No. 37</addr-line><country country="ID">Jember 68121</country></aff><aff id="AFF-2"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Agronomy, Agriculture Faculty</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Universitas Jember</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/049f0ha78</institution-id></institution-wrap><addr-line>Jalan Kalimantan No. 37</addr-line><country country="ID">Jember 68121</country></aff><aff id="AFF-3"><institution content-type="dept">Department of Doctoral Environmental Science, Faculty of Postgraduate</institution><institution-wrap><institution>Diponegoro University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/056bjta22</institution-id></institution-wrap><country country="ID">Semarang 50275</country></aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor-0">Corresponding author: Basuki Basuki, Department of Soil Science, Agriculture Faculty, Universitas Jember, Jalan Kalimantan No. 37, Jember 68121.  Email: <email>basuki@unej.ac.id</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-2-27" publication-format="electronic"><day>27</day><month>2</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-1-15" publication-format="electronic"><day>15</day><month>1</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>73</fpage><lpage>90</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-12-11"><day>11</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></date><date date-type="rev-recd" iso-8601-date="2026-2-23"><day>23</day><month>2</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-2-24"><day>24</day><month>2</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Basuki Basuki, Zaky Fahrian Rizaldi, Vega Kartika Sari, Sukron Romadhona</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Basuki Basuki, Zaky Fahrian Rizaldi, Vega Kartika Sari, Sukron Romadhona</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/view/14319" xlink:title="Land Suitability Evaluation for Citrus Cultivation using GIS and AHP for Different Land Units in Indonesia">Land Suitability Evaluation for Citrus Cultivation using GIS and AHP for Different Land Units in Indonesia</self-uri><abstract><p>The objective of this research is to evaluate the suitability of land for horticultural crops, particularly citrus cultivation, in an effort to increase productivity and support food security in Indonesia. The FAO land evaluation workflow through the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method was employed, together with the geographic information system (GIS), with several stages of activities such as preparation, survey and data analysis. In the initial stage, a land unit (LU) was formed to facilitate survey activities, data collection and data analysis. The data are analyzed for actual land suitability, followed by AHP analysis to determine relative priorities and potential land suitability. Our study shows that AHP technology is very effective in determining priority weights, as indicated by a consistency ratio (CR) value of &lt;0.1. This condition implies a high and strong dependence on the environment. Environmental parameters that influence the evaluation and have a significant impact on citrus land suitability include rainfall (16%), drainage (15%), soil texture (12%) and erosion risk (4%). The results of the AHP analysis show that 18.57% of the study area is highly suitable (S1) for citrus plants; 65.28% is moderately suitable (S2); and 16.15% is slightly suitable (S3). The principal constraints of the soils are low nutrient content, poor rooting condition, and erosion risk. According to the study, management techniques such as the incorporation of organic matter and inorganic fertilizers, and the addition of mounding soil for plant systems, such as surface or subsurface drains, are required for long-term productivity.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Land unit</kwd><kwd>Analytic Hierarchy Process</kwd><kwd>Land Suitability</kwd><kwd>Citrus</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link xlink:title="JATS Editor" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>1. Introduction</title><p>Globally, citrus cultivation is spread across various regions, both tropical and subtropical, including Africa, Asia, South America, North America, and the Mediterranean. The three largest citrus-producing countries are Brazil (17 million tons/year), North America (9 million tons/year) and China (6 million tons/year) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37">(Lima et al., 2025)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-74" ref-type="bibr">(Zhao et al., 2023)</xref>. Citrus crops are valued for their high economic value and for being rich in vitamin C and bioactive compounds that function to repair damaged cells. They are highly adapted to various climates, including Southeast Asia, which can contribute to the regional economy and biodiversity conservation 2024(Li et al., ).</p><p>Citrus is also one of the important horticultural crops and supports the economic growth of farmers and traders in Indonesia. It is also able to support soil preservation by accelerating rainwater infiltration and reducing runoff <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-65">(Wu et al., 2024)</xref>. Citrus can grow in wetland systems, dry land, and even agroforestry systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Liu et al., 2024)</xref>. Citrus today, in addition to being eaten directly, can be used for cosmetics, syrup drinks, other food flavors, fragrances, and medicines for various health treatments. There are several species of citrus are growing in Indonesia, including grapefruit, pomelo, tangerine, Medan citrus, lime, and sambal citrus. Tangerines are currently being developed to meet the demand for consumption of fruit in Indonesia, and comprise various types, including Malang and Semboro tangerines.</p><p>Citrus production in Indonesia currently ranges from 2.5 to 3.0 million tons/year, while national citrus demand is 4.0 to 4.5 million tons/year <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-59">(Susila, 2013)</xref>. The deficit in citrus supply in the country is a challenge to citrus farming, both in terms of intensification, extensification, climate change and technology, both pre- and post-harvest. Most islands in Indonesia can grow citrus, but Java Island has the largest area of cultivation, with 80% in East Java, spread across Malang, Jember, and Probolinggo <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Ashari et al., 2015)</xref>. Citrus land in Jember totals 500 ha and is located in the Semboro and Rowokakung areas. Semboro tangerines are a local citrus variety with the Latin name Citrus reticulata. They are included in the Rutaceae family and have a characteristic round shape with slight flattening, a fruit diameter in the range of 5-7 cm (medium), and a weight of around 150-200 grams/fruit. They grow in the Tapal Kuda area of East Java. The productivity of Semboro citrus plants fell in 2023 compared to 2015. Production in 2015 was 144,995 quintals/ha/year, while in 2023 it was 111,624 quintals/ha/year <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Bisnis, 2024)</xref>. The harvest of Semboro tangerines is much higher compared to other regions. For example, Malang has a very high tangerine harvest of 290,126 quintals/ha/year, which is twice Indonesia's national average. These figures show that land conditions and supporting factors can affect citrus production; therefore, selecting a suitable area for citrus planting is important <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-62">(Tantuoyir et al., 2025)</xref>.</p><p>GIS is an effective tool for integrating spatial data to comprehensively evaluate land suitability, especially for citrus cultivation. The technology enables location-based multi-criteria analyses that support a more accurate decision-making process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-62">(Tantuoyir et al., 2025)</xref>. The current application of GIS in agriculture has aimed to cool horticultural crops, plantations, and other crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-35">(Leite et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">(Negussie et al., 2024)</xref>). By breaking down land use, GIS technology can provide clear boundaries and areas for each land suitability class <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Basuki et al., 2026)</xref>.</p><p>Several previous studies have applied land suitability evaluation for horticultural crops, including citrus, using conventional approaches based on physical parameters and FAO criteria. For example, research conducted by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-63">(Wang et al., 2022)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-58">(Supriyadi et al., 2023)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-69">(Yang et al., 2024)</xref> relied solely on assessments based on soil classification and topography, without systematically integrating multi-criteria approaches. Optimization of agricultural productivity, such as citrus through land suitability assessment, rarely adopts advanced technology such as GIS, but instead the AHP method, and mostly in rice fields, with volcanic areas rarely assessed (<xref rid="BIBR-55" ref-type="bibr">(Sathiyamurthi et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-54">(Sadiq et al., 2025)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">(Nuru et al., 2025)</xref>).</p><p>Moreover, most of these studies were conducted at the macro-scale or on homogeneous land units, which inadequately represent the spatial and ecological complexity of regions with diverse geomorphological conditions, such as volcanic tropical areas in Indonesia. Our study takes a scientifically novel approach by integrating the quantitative Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) with spatial GIS technologies within the complex geological context of Indonesia’s volcanic regions, particularly the Argopura. This area stretches from the mountain's peak to the south coast of Java Island (the Indonesian Ocean). Current land use is mostly dependent on the rainy and dry seasons; at certain times, 45% is left as bushes, swamps, and empty land <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Basuki et al., 2024)</xref>. Given the underutilized potential of high-value horticultural crops such as citrus, the approach makes a significant contribution to spatially informed decision-making and to enhancing land productivity in tropical mountainous regions. The innovation lies in the synergistic use of these two methods to more accurately assess land suitability for citrus cultivation, an approach rarely applied in areas with extreme topography and high soil variability. Therefore, this study aims to assess land suitability for citrus using GIS and AHP to strengthen sustainable agriculture.</p></sec><sec><title>2. Methods</title><sec><title>2.1. Study Area</title><p>Indonesia is composed of islands and volcanoes formed by tectonic plate movements. There are approximately 500 volcanoes in the country, with some located in the horseshoe region of East Java, such as Mount Semeru, Mount Ijen, Mount Raung, and Mount Argopura. Mount Argopura has a peak at 3,088 meters above sea level, and its base borders the Indian Ocean. The volcano is currently inactive, so the central area, behind the foot of the mountain, is used for agriculture and plantations, including oranges, watermelons and durian, while plantation crops include sugarcane, tobacco, coffee, rubber and cocoa. Oranges are mostly planted in the volcanic soil area of the lower slopes of the mountain, located in three administrative districts: Tanggul, with an area of 9840.48 ha; Balung District, with an area of 4999.82 ha; and Bangsalsari District, with an area of 12750.24 ha. Geographically, the study area is located between 113°25'0"–113°35'30" E and 8°05'0"–8°08'0" S (<xref rid="figure-1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>a). Land use in the three sub-districts consists of plantations covering 10,258.53 ha (44.48%), rice fields covering 2,189.93 ha (9.49%), and rice fields covering 10,617.19 ha (46.03%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>b).</p><p>Mount Argopura significantly influences the environment and the resulting soil. Based on the great group level soil classification system, four subgroups are present, namely Andic Dystrudepts, which covers an area of 2,661.39 ha; Typic Epiaquepts, which covers an area of 8,523.55 ha; Typic Eutrudepts, which covers an area of 6,725.18 ha; and Typic Hapludands, which covers an area of 5,155.52 ha (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>b). The depth characteristics of the large Andic Dystrudepts group (&gt; 75 cm) consist of a fine soil texture fraction (silt and clay) of at least 30%. Typic Eutrudepts contains 0.2% or more organic carbon at a depth of 125 cm below the mineral soil surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-49">(Ogg et al., 2017)</xref>. In the Typic Epiaquepts subgroup, the soil is very fine with a clay content of 66-83%, and the soil temperature is 50 cm below the isohyperthermic surface. The Typic Hapludands subgroup is soil formed from volcanic material, especially volcanic ash, which has a solum ranging from 30 to 40 cm from the surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(Jimoh et al., 2020)</xref>. Rainfall in the Mount Argopura region ranges from 1,500 to 4,000 mm/year. It occurs between September and February, with peak rainfall occurring in December. The dry season occurs between April and August, with the optimal period in June, when evapotranspiration exceeds soil moisture. These rainfall conditions correlate with temperature, with air temperatures ranging from 20 to 27 degrees Celsius, increasing closer to the coast. The development of horticultural plants in the region continues to improve and is conducted in surrounding/satellite areas.</p><fig id="figure-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>(a) Research Area, (b) Soil Type Map; (c) Land Use Map.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/14319/5505/68931" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig></sec><sec><title>2.2. General Framework and Geodatabase Preparation</title><p>The study employed a descriptive exploratory method, with activities divided into three stages: preparation or pre-survey, survey, and analysis, to determine actual and potential land suitability using the AHP method (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 2</xref>). The first pre-survey activity was conducted to develop a working map, gather tools and materials, and collect quantitative data. The map was compiled based on land differentiation factors, which served as the initial basis for identifying factors limiting citrus plant growth and development. It was compiled by overlapping three land characteristic maps: land use, slope, and soil type. This overlap produced land units that were a combination of the three factors. The land use characteristics used in the overlapping working map, designed to produce land units, were limited to plantations, dry rice fields and rice paddies; settlements and forests were not included. The overlap of these three land characteristics resulted in seven land units (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>).</p><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>Description of Land units at the Research Location.</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="left"><bold>Land Unit</bold></th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"><bold>Land Use</bold></th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><bold>Slope (%)</bold></th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><bold>Type Of Soil</bold></th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><bold>Area (ha)</bold></th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"><bold>%</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Plantation</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">8-15</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Typic Eutrudepts</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2.441,61</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">10.59</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Plantation</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">15-30</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Typic Hapludands</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1.063,37</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4.61</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Plantation</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">8-15</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Andic Dystrudepts</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2.661,40</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">11.54</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">4</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Moor Land</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">8-15</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Typic Epiaquepts</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2.189,93</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">9.49</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Plantation</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3-8</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Typic Hapludands</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4.092,15</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">17.74</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Rice Field</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3-8</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Typic Epiaquepts</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">6.333,62</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">27.46</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">7</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Rice Field</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0-3</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Typic Eutrudepts</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4.283,57</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">18.57</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><fig id="figure-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Land suitability chart analysis with the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/14319/5505/68932"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>The second activity, a field survey, was conducted to collect soil samples and biophysical data for each of the prepared land units. The collection was conducted across all seven land units, with four replicate sampling points for each subunit. Each point was randomly selected to represent the subunit, with soil sampling ranging from 0 to 40 cm from the surface (<xref rid="figure-3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3</xref>). Five replicate samples were then combined into one sample and labelled. The collected soil samples were used for chemical and physical soil analysis in the laboratory. The analysis began with the preparation of 2 mm air-dried soil samples. Observed soil characteristics included pH (H₂O), EC, available P, total N, available K, CEC, organic C, base saturation, and soil texture. The soil chemical analysis method is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>.</p><p>Biophysical observations conducted in each land unit included temperature, drainage, effective soil depth, rainfall, slope and erosion hazard. Temperature was measured using the Braak formula, which correlates temperature with altitude (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>). The average sea surface temperature is 26.3°C, and for every 100 meters of altitude above sea level, the temperature decreases by 0.6°C. Soil drainage was assessed in the field by observing the reduction and oxidation processes, indicated by visual rust or color on the soil surface (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">Figure 4</xref>). Soil depth was measured from the surface to the C horizon (100 cm) using a profile drill, then with a tape measure. Slope was measured using a DEM analysis in ArcGIS software. Erosion hazard was determined using USLE (Universal Soil Loss Equation) analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>). This is a mathematical modelling method for predicting the long-term average annual soil erosion rate (A) based on factors such as rainfall (R), soil erodibility (K), slope length/slope (LS), and crop/conservation management (CP). The method is commonly used to evaluate erosion hazards in an area and plan appropriate soil conservation techniques.</p><fig id="figure-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Land Map Units of the Research Locations and Soil Sampling .</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/14319/5505/68933" mime-subtype="jpeg" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><fig id="figure-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>Identification of Soil Drainage.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/14319/5505/68934" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="table-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Environment and Soil Analysis Method for Land Suitability Parameters.</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><bold>No</bold></th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><bold>Parameter</bold></th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><bold>Method</bold></th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><bold>Reference</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="4" valign="top"><bold>Environment</bold></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Temperature</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Braak formula (26.3oC-(0.01 X elevation X 0.6 oC)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Chen et al., 2021)</xref></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Drainage</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Rust Identification (Redox Concentrations)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Basuki et al., 2025)</xref></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Effective soil depth</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Boundary Layers Identified</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-61">(Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi et al., 2020)</xref></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Precipitation</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Manual Rain Gauge (Observation Type)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Dornik et al., 2024)</xref></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Slope</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">DEM</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-66">(Xing et al., 2025)</xref></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">6</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Erosion hazard</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">USLE (Universal Soil Loss Equation)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Basuki et al., 2023)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-68">(Xue et al., 2021)</xref>)</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="4" valign="top"><bold>Chemical and physical properties of the soil (laboratory)</bold></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">pH</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Comparison of sample and distilled water 1:5</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-72">(Zeraatpisheh et al., 2020)</xref></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Salinity</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Ec Meter</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Mustafa et al., 2022)</xref></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">P-available</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Olsen</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Mustafa et al., 2022)</xref></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">N-Total</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Kjedahl</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Mustafa et al., 2022)</xref></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">K-Available</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">NH4OAc extract pH 7.0 1M</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Basuki et al., 2024)</xref></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">CEC</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">NH4OAc extract pH 7.0 1M</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Basuki et al., 2024)</xref></td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">7</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">C-Organic</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Walkley-Black</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Mustafa et al., 2022)</xref></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">8</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Base Saturation (BS)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">NH4OAc extract pH 7.0 1M</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Mustafa et al., 2022)</xref></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">9</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Soil Texture</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Hydrometer</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-56">(Sedláˇcková et al., 2024)</xref></td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap></sec><sec><title>2.4. Assessment of Suitability</title><p>Land evaluation assessment to determine the level of suitability of citrus crop commodities in Indonesia in line with environment and soil parameters was adopted from the FAO modifications developed by  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-60">(Sys et al., 1991)</xref> and Balittan Bogor, Indonesia <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Basuki et al., 2026)</xref>. The criteria for land suitability for citrus plants are the result of matching the soil and environmental characteristics associated with citrus productivity. The assessment utilized AHP, which matched the results of biophysical field analysis and laboratory analysis with citrus land suitability criteria as a basis for identifying factors that influence citrus productivity in the research area  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">(Nuru et al., 2025)</xref>.</p><p>AHP analysis is used to evaluate and prioritize factors by comparing their relative importance. Pairwise comparisons were made between the criteria, and a weight assigned to each based on their significance in determining land suitability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">(Negussie et al., 2024)</xref>. This allowed for a systematic and objective way of ranking the criteria based on the land suitability for citrus cultivation. The AHP method is used to compare land characteristics pairwise based on the results of field and laboratory analysis, and provide weights to prioritize the influence of each factor on citrus crop productivity.</p><p>AHP is a decision-making technique that is used for evaluation and shows priority choices. It relies on pairwise comparisons to determine the relative importance of each criterion or option. Some experts argue that by giving weights first, followed by analysis using AHP, the technique is easier. AHP often has a weight range of 1-9 as a basis for ranking variables <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-54">(Sadiq et al., 2025)</xref>. The pairwise comparison matrix was used to generate priority weights, with the consistency ratio (CR) used to assess the reliability of the paired analysis. Equation (2) evaluates the CR, which ranges from 0 to 1, as described by Saaty  and Malczewski <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">(Negussie et al., 2024)</xref>. The assessment is acceptable if it is less than 0.1. The consistency index (CI) was used as the basis for evaluation according to equation 1.</p><p><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-1"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle CI = \frac{\lambda\ max - n}{n - 1} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>          (1)</p><p>where λ max is the highest eigenvalue of the pairwise model comparison, and n indicates the total number of classes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Abate et al., 2024)</xref>. The CR value was obtained according to Equation (2).</p><p><inline-formula><tex-math id="math-2"><![CDATA[ \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \begin{document} \displaystyle CR = \frac{\text{CI}}{\text{RI}} \end{document} ]]></tex-math></inline-formula>          (2)</p><p>The index ratio (RI) value was determined by considering a random matrix of average CI values as described in the Saaty scale <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Abate et al., 2024)</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 3</label><caption><p>Criteria for Land Suitability of Citrus.</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th rowspan="2" valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Land characteristics</th><th align="left" colspan="4" valign="top">Land Suitability Class</th></tr><tr><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S1</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">S2</th><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">S3</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">N</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Temperature (tc)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">  Temperature (oC)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">19-33</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">33-36</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">36-39</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&gt;39</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Water availability (wa)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">16-19</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">13-16</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&lt;13</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">  Rainfall (mm)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1,200-3,000</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1,000-1,200</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">800-1,000</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&lt;800</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3,000-3,500</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3,000-4,000</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&gt;4,000</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Oxygen availability (oa)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">  Drainage</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Good, moderately good</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Fairly poor</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Poor</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Very poor</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Rooting condition (rc)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">  Soil Texture</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Fairly coarse, medium, fairly fine, fine</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">-</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Very fine</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Coarse</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">  Soil Depth (cm)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&gt;100</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">75-100</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">50-75</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&lt;50</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Nutrient retention (nr)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left"> </td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">CEC (Cmol/kg)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&gt;16</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">&lt;16</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">-</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">-</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">  Base Saturation (%)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&gt;20</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&lt;20</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">-</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">-</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">  C-Organic (%)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&gt;0.8</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&lt;0.8</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">-</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">-</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Nutrients available (na)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left"> </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">  N-Total (%)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Moderate</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Low</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Very low</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">  P2O5 (mg/100g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">High</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Moderate</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Very low-low</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">  K2O (mg/100g)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Moderate</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Low</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Very low</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Toxicity (xc)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">  Salinity (dS/m)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&lt;3</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">3-4</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">4-6</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">&gt;6</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Erosion hazard (eh)</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> </td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"> Slope (%)</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">&lt;8</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">8-16</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">16-30</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">&gt;30</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"> Erosion Hazard</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Very low</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Low-Moderate</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">High</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Very high</td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-52">(Ritung et al., 2011)</xref></p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><p>Land suitability assessment is based on multi-criteria decision analysis utilizing GIS technology with Quantum-GIS (Q-GIS) applications, particularly overlay models of weighted factors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Abuzaid &amp; Abdelatif, 2022)</xref>.The prerequisite criteria used to assess land suitability for citrus crops are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-3">Table 3</xref>. Decision-making in assessing land suitability is divided into four classes for actual land suitability status, while for assessing potential land suitability status, AHP analysis is utilized. The results of the AHP analysis serve as the basis for management improvements and to determine the distribution of land suitability status, based on the S1 (highly suitable), S2 (moderately suitable), S3 (slightly suitable), and N (not suitable) classes.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec><title>3.1. Land Characteristics</title><p>1. Temperature</p><p>The temperature data used were obtained from the calculation results of the Braak formula (26.3oC-(0.01 X elevation X 0.6 oC) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Chen et al., 2021)</xref>. Temperature is a triggering factor in the physical process in the formation of clay from parent material minerals in the soil <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-75">(Zhong et al., 2019)</xref>. The study's temperature distribution map, especially along the slopes of Mount Argopuro, is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5">Figure 5</xref>a. Based on the figure, land unit 1 has the lowest temperature value, 24.61°C, with an area of ​​2,441.61 ha, or 10.59% of the total area. The highest temperature was found in land unit 3, with a value of 26.26°C, and an area of ​​2,661.40 ha, or 11.54% of the total area. Variations in temperature can occur due to different topographic positions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">(How Jin Aik et al., 2021)</xref>. On different land maps, they can be influenced by differences in altitude, which is an important parameter used to evaluate the adequacy of land as a growth factor for the cultivation of plants. Temperature can also affect plant productivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(Dornik et al., 2024)</xref>. Safe temperatures for citrus plants are generally at 19 - 33°C; if the temperature is higher than 33°C, the plant will experience damage to the coloring of the fruit due to a decrease in nutrient content and consequently affect the taste of the fruit, making it less fresh.</p><p>2. Precipitation</p><p>Rainfall (mm) is the amount of rainwater expressed in mm. It is used as a physiological factor in plants, and as an indicator to determine their water needs in the event of drought <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-47">(Ng et al., 2024)</xref>. Moreover, rainfall is an indicator of humidity, which is an important factor in the plant growth process and affects plant productivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Getachew et al., 2021)</xref>. The distribution of average rainfall over the last 10 years is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5">Figure 5</xref>b. Based on the figure, the highest rainfall is in Tanggul sub-district, with 2665.86 mm/year, affecting 35.67% of the total area (9840.48 ha), while the lowest is in Balung sub-district, with 2154.88 mm/year over an area of 4999.82 ha, 18.12% of the total area. Annual rainfall has a strong influence on crop management and is therefore an important factor, as rainwater functions as a solvent and transporter that can influence soil properties, soil minerals, and soil profile depth differentiation. Rainfall of between 1,000 -3,000 mm/year is the optimal level for citrus plants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Li et al., 2024)</xref>.</p><p>3. Drainage</p><p>The cultivation of plants can be optimized by good drainage, which maintains soil moisture and aeration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-54">(Sadiq et al., 2025)</xref>. The distribution of soil drainage in the research area is divided into two drainage classes: good and somewhat obstructed. Land units 1, 4 and 7, with an area of ​​8,915.11 ha, or 38.65% of the total area, have good drainage, while land units 2, 3, 5 and 6, with an area of 14,150.54 ha, or 61.35% of the total, are classified as having somewhat obstructed drainage. Soil with good drainage is characterized by a homogeneous soil color and no rust (manganese) or gley-related color at depths&gt; 120 cm in the lower layer. This is in line with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Aburas et al., 2017)</xref>, who state that a homogeneous soil color without spots (rust) can be a characteristic of good drainage, especially in layers up to &gt; 100 cm. In citrus plants, soil drainage conditions greatly affect whether they grow well. Citrus plants can grow optimally with good drainage conditions at a soil depth of up to 120 cm.</p><p>4. Slope</p><p>Slope is a measure of an area in degrees or percentage. In addition to determining the level of land suitability, slope also affects the level of erosion and landslides <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">(Dutta et al., 2024)</xref>. Determination of plant types on each slope also needs to be made, as plants are protectors of the soil surface <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Miao et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><fig id="figure-5" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p>Land Characteristics: a) Temperature, b) Rainfall, c) Drainage, d) Erosion, e) Slope, f) Effective Soil Depth.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/14319/5505/68935"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>Therefore, the selection of plant types in line with the slope gradient is very important to maintain slope stability. The distribution of slopes in the research area is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5">Figure 5</xref>e. Based on the figure, there are four slope gradient classes: a flat class covering an area of 4,283.57 h; a gentle area of 10,425.77 ha; a slightly sloping area of 7,292.94 ha; and a sloping area of 1,063.36 ha. Very steep land will affect the level of soil erosion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-70">(Yeneneh et al., 2024)</xref>. Steep land is not suitable for planting agricultural commodities because of the high erosion value, which will subsequently affect the nutrient content of the soil. An increase in surface runoff flow velocity can be caused by the steepness of the slope; this will also increase the surface flow transport energi <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-57">(Sugianto et al., 2022)</xref>.</p><p>5. Erosion Hazard</p><p>Erosion refers to the loss of the top soil layer due to the movement of water and wind. Steep slope conditions increase the volume of surface runoff, which causes erosion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Basuki et al., 2024)</xref>. The distribution of erosion hazards are shown in in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5">Figure 5</xref>d. The figure indicates that at the research location there are four classes of erosion hazard: very severe, covering an area of 1,063.36 ha; severe, covering an area of 7,292.94 ha; moderate, covering an area of 4,092.15 ha; and very low, covering an area of 10,617.19 ha. The erosion hazard class that dominates the research area is that of very low, with 46.03% of the total area.</p><p>6. Effective Soil Depth</p><p>The depth of the soil layer that can be used for plant root growth is referred to as effective depth. If this is limited by barriers such as hard rock, solid rock, or other layers, it will inhibit root growth <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Hofmann et al., 2024)</xref>. The distribution of effective depth in the research area is shown in Figure 5f, which indicates that the effective depth in this area is quite varied, with depths of 55-100 cm. Land units 1, 6 and 7 have the same depth, 100 cm, which is included in the deep category. Land units 2 and 3 are included in the medium category, with depths of 55 cm and 60 cm. Effective depth can be measured in the field by observing the fine roots of plants compared to the coarse ones, and other roots growing within them. Effective depth is influenced by the presence or absence of parent material, gravel or boulders, which cannot be penetrated by roots (Cyio, 2008). 82.93% of the research area has an effective depth in the deep category, while 17.07% has a medium effective depth. Soil depth is divided into deep (&gt;75 cm), medium (50-75 cm), shallow (20-50 m), and very shallow (&lt;20 cm) classes (Subardja et al., 2016).  Effective depth can be influenced by root development; if the soil depth is shallow, this will inhibit such development. Depths of up to 120 cm are suitable for citrus plants.</p></sec><sec><title>3.2. Physical and Chemical Soil Characteristics</title><p>1. Texture</p><p>Soil texture in a soil mass is defined as the ratio of the content of sand, silt, and clay fractions. The percentage of particles determines the soil texture, with the texture class determined according to the USDA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-54">(Sadiq et al., 2025)</xref>. The distribution of soil texture is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Figure 6</xref>.a. It is divided into four texture classes sandy clay, covering 39% of the total area (8,995.02 ha); sandy loam, with an area of 6,752.18 ha (29.16%); silty clay loam covering an area of 2,189.93 ha (9.49%); and silty clay with an area of 5,155.52 ha. (22.35%). Each land unit has a different texture rsulting from differences in the soil formation process and the soil management practiced. Soil texture affects the availability of nutrients and water due to its ability to bind and exchange cations in the soil. Soil with a clay texture stores nutrients and has sufficient water to allow air circulation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">(Nuru et al., 2025)</xref>. Because ofo the many micropores in the sand, air and water movement is very fast. A good texture for citrus growth is soil that is fine in texture and dominated by some dusty and clayey textures.</p><p>2. Cation Exchange Capacity</p><p>Cation exchange capacity (CEC) is a process that occurs in the soil by which cations are exchanged for available cations and vice versa. Cation exchange capacity is influenced by the presence of clay, nutrients and organic matter. A higher CEC value indicates better soil fertility status and vice versa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-44">(Mustofa et al., 2024)</xref>. Its role is very complex, as the formation and maintenance of soil fertility are supported by soil pH, soil C-organic factors, and the availability of organic material. The cation exchange capacity of each land unit in the study area is shown in <xref rid="figure-6" ref-type="fig">Figure 6</xref>b. As shown in the distribution map in the figure, the CEC value in the research area has only two classes: low and medium. Land units 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, with a total area of 12,448.46 ha (53.97%), are included in the low grade, while land units 6 and 7, with a total area of 10,617.19 ha (46.03%), are included in the medium grade. The lowest CEC value is in land unit 2, at10.37 cmol/kg, with an area of 1,063.37 ha, and the highest CEC value was in land unit 7, namely 19.08 cmol/kg corresponding to an area of 4,283.57 ha. The cation exchange capacity in the study area is low as the soil colloids contain clay and a low level of organic matter. Furthermore, CEC is influenced by soil moisture, with the ideal soil moisture for cation exchange being &gt; 60%.</p><p>3. Base Saturation</p><p>Base saturation refers to base cations such as magnesium, calcium, sodium and potassium in the soil colloids. It can increase as a result of increased soil organic matter content <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(Jimoh et al., 2020)</xref>. The base saturation distribution map is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Figure 6</xref>c, which indicates that there are various base saturation values ranging from low to medium and high categories. Land unit 7, with an area of 4,283.57 ha, or 18.57% of the total area, is included in the lowest category, with a value of 36.83%. Land unit 2, with an area of 1,063.37 ha, or 4.61% of the total area, is in the highest category, with a base saturation value reaching 67.21%. The medium category includes land units 1, 3, 4, 5 and 6, with vulnerable values of 42.23–56.71%. The base saturation value can be influenced by rainfall and soil pH. High rainfall in Indonesia results in high levels of nutrient leaching, so alkalis in the soil are leached out. Low base saturation causes the bases in the soil to become acidic. Apart from rainfall, a high pH in soil usually corresponds tohigh base saturation, and vice versa.</p><p>4. Soil pH</p><p>Soil pH depends the presence of compounds in the soil, which can be acidic, neutral and alkaline. The level of soil acidity is used to define the suitability of land for certain crops <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-62">(Tantuoyir et al., 2025)</xref>. Soil pH affects plant growth. If high H+ ion values are found in the soil, soil pH decreases, causing plants to be contaminated with microelements and increasing the solubility of iron and aluminum ions. Based on the pH distribution map shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Figure 6</xref>d, the soil pH distribution ranges between 5.64 and 7.14, corresponding to the neutral and slightly acidic categories. Land unit 4, with an area of 2,189.93 ha, and land unit 5, covering 4,092.15 ha, are classified as having slightly acidic pH, while land units 1, 2, 3, 6 and 7 are classified as having neutral pH. Citrus plants can grow in various types of soil. The ideal pH is between 5 and 6; if the pH is less than 5, then the plant roots do not develop well, and the plant cannot absorb nutrients. On the other hand, soil with a pH of more than 6 usually has many bound macroelements, which is disturbing and abnormal for plant growth due to the lack of nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-11">(Basuki et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(Basuki &amp; Sari, 2020)</xref>).</p><p>5. Soil Organic Carbon</p><p>Soil organic carbon (C-Organic) in the soil increases soil fertility and the process of nutrient availability, which ultimately boosts the productivity of cultivated plants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-44">(Mustofa et al., 2024)</xref>. The C-Organic content supports the availability of organic materials derived from the decomposition of living things. Its distribution on the slopes of Mount Argopuro is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Figure 6</xref>e, ranging from 1.18 to 1.94%, with a low value; this indicates that the C-Organic content across all land units is very similar. Soil fertility is indicated by the presence of soil organic carbonin the soil, which is food for organisms; the number and diversity of types of organisms working in the soil also increase. Low soil organic carbon content in soil can be caused by intensive land cultivation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-44">(Mustofa et al., 2024)</xref>. Low C-organic content in soil can reduce productivity and plant growth. One way to overcome this is by adding fertilizer or organic material.</p><p>6. N-Total</p><p>Nitrogen is an important element for plants. Its level in soil varies greatly due to factors such as land cover, climate, landform, and soil chemical-physical properties. In turn, many factors influence the nitrogen content of plants, such as climate, vegetation, topography, and chemical-physical properties of the soil <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-74">(Zhao et al., 2023)</xref>. The distribution of N-total in the study area can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Figure 6</xref>f. The highest value of 0.18% is in land unit 2, with an area of 1,063.37 ha, and the lowest of 0.11% in land unit 1, with an area of 2,441.61 ha; however, both values are still in the low category. Another factor that influences the N-total value is organic matter. A low value in soil is a result of several factors, such as leaching with water, evaporation, and absorption by plants <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-76">(Zhu et al., 2024)</xref>. The efficiency of N element absorption relates to the denitrification of N₂ gas.</p><p>7. P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></p><p>Phosphorus is a nutrient needed by plants. The P element content is usually lower than that of other nutrients, such as nitrogen and potassium. Plants absorb P in the form of primary orthophosphate (H₂PO₄) and secondary orthophosphate ions (HPO₄) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-50">(Oliveira et al., 2021)</xref>. The distribution of P2O5 in the study area can be seen in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Figure 6</xref>g. Its value in all land units on the slopes of Mount Argopuro is in the low category (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Figure 6</xref>g). The highest P2O5 value is 10.3 mg/100 g in land unit 2, with an area of 1,063.37 ha (4.61%), and the lowest available p-value is 7.83 mg/100 g in land unit 6, with an area of 6,333.62 or 27.46% of the total area. Several factors, such as soil texture, organic matter and soil pH influence the level of P values <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-67">(Xu et al., 2016)</xref>. Low available P content is due to low phosphorus content in organic and mineral matter; poor pH also affects P elements. Low P levels in soil indicate leaching of phosphorus. Generally, phosphorus dissolves more easily in soil that has an acidic pH.</p><p>8. K₂O</p><p>The element potassium is one of the essential elements needed by plants to grow and develop. It functions, for example, by helping the development of roots in the soil and increasing plant resistance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-50">(Oliveira et al., 2021)</xref>. Based on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Figure 6</xref>h, which shows the K₂O distribution map of each land unit in the research area, the K₂O value is in the very low category. The highest K value, 9.68 mg/100 g, is in land unit 4, with an area of 2,189.93 ha or 9.49% of the total area, while the lowest value, 9.25 mg/100 g, is in land unit 6, with an area of 6,333.62 ha or 27.46% of the total. The K₂O value in each land unit is very low. Low K content occurs because of the low efficiency of the leaching of potassium fertilizer, which is caused by the increased binding or leaching capacity of potassium <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-76">(Zhu et al., 2024)</xref>.</p><fig id="figure-6" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p>Physical and Chemical Soil Characteristics: a) Texture b) CEC, c) Base Saturation, d) pH, e) C-Organic, f) N-Total, g) P2O5, h) K2O.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/14319/5505/68936" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>This also corresponds to the land conditions at the research location, which have low c-organic and CEC values, meaning the K reserves or stores are low. Another factor leading to low K values is the intensity of processing and fertilization. Fertilization needs to be balanced, with the extraction of biomass, especially organic material, and appropriate timing also needs to be considered, so that fertilizer absorption occurs optimally <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Hofmann et al., 2024)</xref>. If a citrus plant lacks at least 16% of the K element, the leaves will fall off, and the fruit will also fall before it is ripe.</p></sec><sec><title>3.3. Suitability Analysis</title><sec><title>3.3.1. Actual Land Suitability</title><p>Actual land suitability was assessed from the current field conditions. Land suitability evaluation was conducted using a method that matched land characteristic parameters with the growing condition criteria for citrus. The results show that the actual land balance classes for citrus crops (Citrus sp.) in the research area are marginally suitable (S3) and not suitable (N) (<xref rid="table-4" ref-type="table">Table 4</xref>). The map of actual land suitability distribution in the research area is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-7">Figure 7</xref>.</p><table-wrap id="table-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 4</label><caption><p>Actual Land Suitability.</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th rowspan="2" valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Land Unit</th><th colspan="3" valign="top" align="left">Actual Land Suitability</th><th colspan="2" valign="top" align="left">Area</th></tr><tr><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Class</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Sub-Class</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Limiting Factors</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Ha</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">%</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">S3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">S3 na2&amp;3,eh2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Available nutrients and erosion hazard</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2.441,61</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">10.59</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">N</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">N eh2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Erosion hazard</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1.063,37</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">4.61</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">S3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">S3 na2&amp;3,eh2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Available nutrients and erosion hazard</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2.661,40</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">11.54</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">S3 rc2,na2&amp;3,eh2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Rooting condition, available nutrients, and erosion hazard</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2.189,93</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">9.49</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S3 na2&amp;3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Available nutrients</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">4.092,15</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">17.74</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">S3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">S3 na2&amp;3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Available nutrients</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6.333,62</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">27.46</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">7</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">S3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">S3 na2&amp;3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Available nutrients</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4.283,57</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">18.57</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Land unit 1 covers an area of 2,441.61 ha (10.59%) and unit 3 an area of 2,661.40 ha (11.54%), and includes subclass S3 na2 &amp; 3, eh2, with the main limiting factors being P₂O₅, K₂O, and erosion hazard. Land unit 2, covering an area of 1,063.37 ha (4.61%), includes subclass N eh2, with the main limiting factor being erosion hazard. Land unit 4, covering an area of 2,189.93 ha (9.94%), includes subclasses S3 rc2, na2 &amp; 3, and eh2, with the main limiting factors being root condition, P₂O₅, K₂O, and erosion hazard. Land units 5, 6, and 7, with a total area of 14,709.34 ha (63.77%), include subclass S3, with the main limiting factors being P₂O₅ and K₂O.</p><p>2. Potential Suitability Weighting Using AHP and Determination of the Resolution Priorities</p><p>The study examines appropriate locations for citrus agriculture using the AHP approach. <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-5">Table 5</xref> shows the relevance of the main agroecological and environmental elements that impact citrus cultivation, as suggested by Hosen <italic>et al., </italic>(2025) on dragon fruit. Climate characteristics such as rainfall have the greatest impact (18 %), followed by elements such as drainage (15 %), temperature (16 %) and soil texture (12 %). Erosian hazard (4%) has minimal impact. According to Sadiq <italic>et al. </italic>(2025), a CR (consistency ratio) value of less than 0.1 indicates a high level of reliability. In this study, the consistency index (CI) was used to assess crop field suitability. The resulting CR score was lower than 10% (8.91%), indicating that decision-makers have effectively prioritized factors, resulting in precise and desirable results. This demonstrates the efficiency of the AHP technique in rationally allocating weights to various factors within a multi-criteria framework.</p><table-wrap ignoredToc="" id="table-5"><label>Table 5</label><caption><p>AHP Analysis Results for Citrus Land Suitability Assessment.</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="left"></th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Temperature</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Rainfall</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Drainage</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Texture</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">ERD</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">N</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">CEC</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">K<sub>2</sub>O</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">EH</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">CWI</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Consistency</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Temperature</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.16</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">CI = 0.13280 RI = 1.49 CR =CI/RI = 0.089129</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Rainfall</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.50</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">4</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.18</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Drainage</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.50</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.50</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.15</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Texture</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.50</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.50</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.50</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.12</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">ERD</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.50</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.50</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.50</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.12</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">N</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">1</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.07</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">CEC</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.33</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.06</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub></td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.33</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.33</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.33</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.50</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.50</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.05</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">K<sub>2</sub>O</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.33</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.50</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.50</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.04</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"></td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">EH</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.33</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.25</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.25</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.25</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.20</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.50</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">0.50</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.50</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">0.50</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">1</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">0.04</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top"></td></tr></tbody></table><table-wrap-foot><p>Note: CEC: Cation Exchange Capacity; ERD: Effective Rooting Depth; EH : Erosion Hazard;</p><p>CWI: Cumulative Weight Index</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap><fig id="figure-7" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p>Map of Land Suitability Distribution: a) Actual, b)Ppotential.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/14319/5505/68937"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><table-wrap id="table-6" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 6</label><caption><p>Potential Land Suitability Assessed by AHP and Improvement Efforts.</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th colspan="1" valign="top" align="left"><bold>Land Unit</bold></th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><bold>Actual land suitability</bold></th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><bold>Limiting factors</bold></th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><bold>Improvement efforts</bold></th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1"><bold>Potential land suitability by AHP</bold></th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">1</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S3 na2&amp;3,eh2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">- P₂O₅- K2O- Erosion Hazard</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">- Apply fertilizer- Apply fertilizer- Terrace the land</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S2</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">N eh2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">- Erosion Hazard</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">- Terrace the land</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S3</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S3 na2&amp;3,eh2</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">- P₂O₅- K2O- Erosion Hazard</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">- Apply fertilizer- Apply fertilizer- Terrace the land</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">S3</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">4</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S3 rc2,na2&amp;3,eh2</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">- Soil Depth- P₂O₅- K2O- Erosion Hazard</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">- Mound the soil for plants- Apply fertilizer- Apply fertilizer- Terrace the land</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S2</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">5</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S3 na2&amp;3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">- P₂O₅- K2O</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">- Apply fertilizer- Apply fertilizer</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">S2</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">S3 na2&amp;3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">- P₂O₅- K2O</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">- Apply fertilizer- Apply fertilizer</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">S2</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">7</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">S3 na2&amp;3</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">- P₂O₅- K2O</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">- Apply fertilizer- Apply fertilizer</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">S1</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>Actual land suitability can be upgraded to potential land suitability by considering the AHP analysis after making improvements. Potential land suitability is a condition resulting from the evaluation and improvement of actual land suitability. Improvements can be effected by considering economic aspects and specific conditions, together with the needs of the plants to be cultivated. A distribution map and description of potential land suitability classes are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-7">Figure 7</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="table-6">Table 6</xref>, respectively.</p><p>Soil quality in the study area is defined by P₂O₅ and K₂O₅ levels, as well as by erosion hazards and soil depth limitations in some areas. The suitability evaluation results indicate that most areas are suitable for citrus production (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-7">Figure 7</xref>), with 18.57% being highly suitable (S1), 65.28% being moderately suitable (S2), and 16.15% being moderately suitable (S3). To improve soil health and citrus yields, organic fertilizer should be applied, erosion reduced, drainage improved, and loosening techniques employed. Fertilizer should be applied at a total rate of 5 tons/ha, in 3-4 stages. The use of terrace benches facing the slope can reduce erosion, and planting elephant grass and similar plants can reduce the loss of soil particles into the air. Building drainage channels 1 meter deep and 2 meters wide will reduce waterlogging and accelerate downward root growth, thereby increasing productivity. From discussions with local farmers, class S3 na2&amp;3 with a fertilizer application recommendation of 1.5 times higher than normal volume would increase orange productivity by 25%.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>3.4. Discussion</title><p>This study shows that although current citrus land suitability in Agropuro is predominantly moderately acceptable, the AHP-based evaluation indicates that any limitations can be substantially mitigated through prioritized management interventions, leading to meaningful improvements in potential suitability across several land units. According to the AHP and GIS-based suitability analysis, 18.57% of the land area studied was highly suitable; 65.28% moderately acceptable for citrus agriculture, and 16.15% marginally suitable. The AHP-based potential suitability analysis demonstrated acceptable decision consistency (CR = 0.089 &lt; 0.1) and identified rainfall (18%), temperature (16%), and drainage (15%) as the most influential criteria, suggesting that targeted interventions (fertilization, terracing, and soil filling) could improve suitability classes from S3/N to S2, S3, and even S1 in selected land units.</p><p>Land suitability assessment is a crucial factor in cultivation techniques, as it helps identify the appropriate zone, both for planting locations and management technique <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Fu et al., 2025)</xref>. Land evaluation methods are divided into matching and AHP approaches. It can be inferred that the AHP method has good flexibility and considers various factors, with a high accuracy rate of up to 85% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Agrawal et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-46" ref-type="bibr">(Negussie et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-54">(Sadiq et al., 2025)</xref>). Land evaluation using a mapping model provides accurate information regarding the zoning of growth-inhibiting factors, including both soil characteristics and environment-related ones <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-71">(Zaniboni et al., 2025)</xref>. The environment and soil characteristics strongly support the growth and development of citrus productivity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Gizawu Garbaba &amp; Negasa Wolteji, 2024)</xref>. Environmental characteristics that play a role include erosion hazard, water availability and temperature. Erosion hazards related to soil movement are primarily caused by other environmental and soil characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Dessalegn et al., 2014)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Gizawu Garbaba &amp; Negasa Wolteji, 2024)</xref>). Environmental characteristics include topography, slope percentage, and rainfall, while soil characteristics that influence erosion hazards include the percentage of dominant texture fractions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-45">(Nath et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-63">(Wang et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-73">(Zhang et al., 2022)</xref>). It has been reported that gentle slopes (&gt;3%) affect groundwater conditions (<xref rid="BIBR-3" ref-type="bibr">(Abuzaid &amp; Abdelatif, 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Bhandari et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-41">(Marghmi et al., 2024)</xref>). Water affects productivity, particularly the quantity of citrus fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Baker et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Elshahat et al., 2025)</xref>). Water availability during the flowering period influences the number of flowers produced; in addition, water supports the formation of sucrose, which affects the fruit's sweetness. Studies show that inadequate watering during the fruit-forming phase can cause flower and fruit drop <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-66">(Xing et al., 2025)</xref>. Managing land erosion risks with appropriate conservation techniques can increase water infiltration and reduce runoff <xref rid="BIBR-39" ref-type="bibr">(Ma et al., 2025)</xref>. Appropriate conservation techniques, such as terraced benches using grassy border plants, can reduce groundwater loss by 40% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-51">(Rijsdijk et al., 2007)</xref>.</p><p>Crucial soil characteristics for citrus productivity include pH and nutrients (nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium). The ideal pH for citrus cultivation is a minimum of 5 and a maximum of  6-7   <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Karki et al., 2024)</xref>. Soil pH correlates with the availability of nutrients, both macro and micro (<xref rid="BIBR-18" ref-type="bibr">(Cheng et al., 2023)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-24" ref-type="bibr">(Freidenreich et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-47">(Ng et al., 2024)</xref>). Sufficient nitrogen can be obtained from rainwater, irrigation water, and inputs in the form of inorganic fertilizers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-36">(Li et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">(Nuru et al., 2025)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-64">(Wang et al., 2022)</xref>). In the research area, nitrogen was not a limiting factor for citrus cultivation, but phosphate and potassium. Phosphate and potassium are mostly present in the soil at high total concentrations but low availability. Phosphate is available at a soil pH of 6.5-7.5, but below or above this range it will be bound by cations such as iron (Fe²⁺), aluminum (Al³⁺), magnesium (Mg²⁺) or calcium (Ca²⁺) (<xref rid="BIBR-7" ref-type="bibr">(Bao et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-32" ref-type="bibr">(Jerand et al., 2016)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-40">(Madsen, 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-76">(Zhu et al., 2024)</xref>). The role of phosphate in horticultural crops is vital in increasing sugar content in citrus and influencing fruit ripening time. Phosphate fertilization recommendations are based on field conditions, with most phosphate values in the low category <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Bio-based fertilisers can replace conventional inorganic P fertilisers under European pedoclimatic conditions, 2025)</xref>. For citrus cultivation, it is necessary to add P fertilizer such as SP-36 at 157.20 kg/ha/plant. Phosphate fertilizer is applied based on plant age: if the plant is 0-3 years old, apply 3-4 times; at 3-4 years old, apply 2-3 times; and at &gt; 4 years old, apply twice per year. Potassium nutrients at the research location are categorized as low, so 495.75 g/plant is needed; at medium nutrient status, 458.72 g/plant is needed. The addition of potassium nutrients also depends on plant age: for plants aged 0-2 years, 3-4 times; for those aged 2-3 years, 3 times; and at age 3-4 years, twice per year <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Choudhary et al., 2024)</xref>. Future research is recommended to examine land suitability at the varietal or clone level for specific crops, such as citrus varieties or clones, such as Semboro, tangerines (SoE, Tejakula, Monita Agrihorti), Siamese oranges (Pontianak, Madu), and new varieties such as Karisma Agrihorti, which produces sweet fruit with yellow flesh.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>This study conducted land suitability assessments for citrus cultivation in a complex mountainous region of Argopuro by integrating AHP and GIS techniques. According to the AHP and GIS-based suitability analysis, 18.57% of the land area studied was highly suitable; 65.28% moderately acceptable for citrus agriculture, and 16.15% marginally suitable. The primary constraints of the soils are poor nutrient content and root condition, and erosion risk. To increase productivity, management measures should include the application of organic matter, inorganic fertilizers, and plant-mounding soil, and enhancement of terraced land. Incorporating organic matter such as compost, crop waste, or green manure will greatly increase soil fertility by improving nutrient retention, soil structure, and bacterial activity. However, inorganic fertilizers are also required to fill certain nutritional shortages, notably for macronutrients such as phosphorus and potassium. Strategic fertilizer application promotes maximum plant development and yields. Additionally, adding mounding soil for plant systems, such as surface or subsurface drains, aids in the removal of surplus water, promotes soil aeration, and fosters root growth.</p><p>In conclusion, the study emphasizes the need for evaluation in making educated land use decisions. Expert judgment may impact the weighing procedure, yet AHP remains an excellent multi-criteria decision-making tool. The combination of AHP and GIS proved useful in determining land suitability for citrus growing in the region. It is hoped this review will improve land use planning, encourage better management practices, and boost citrus output in the region. The findings can support food security, particularly for horticultural crops such as citrus fruits, thus fostering sustainable agriculture.</p></sec><sec><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>The author would like to thank the University of Jember through the Pedoclimat and land resources laboratory and the soil physics and chemistry laboratory so that the data and analysis can be completed well, and the author would also like to thank the students who are members of the volcanic soil research group in the soil science study program, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jember, who supported the completion of this paper.</p></sec><sec><title>Author Contributions</title><p><bold>Conceptualization:</bold> Basuki, B., Ri-zaldi, Z. F.; <bold>methodology:</bold>  Basuki, B., Rizaldi, Z, F., Sari, V. K.,; <bold>inves-tigation:</bold> Basuki, B.,  Rizaldi, Z .F.; <bold>writing—original draft preparation:</bold>   Basuki, B., Sari, V. K.; <bold>writing—review and editing:</bold>   Basuki, B., Sari, V. K., Romadhona, S.; visualiza-tion: Basuki, B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.</p></sec><sec><title>Conflict of interest</title><p>All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec><title>Data availability</title><p>Data is available upon Request.</p></sec><sec><title>Funding</title><p>This research received no external funding.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Oxytenanthera abyssinica (A. Rich.) Munro land suitability evaluation in the Kurar watershed, Abay Gorge, Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia</article-title><source>Advances in Bamboo Science</source><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abate</surname><given-names>S.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Belay</surname><given-names>A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ambaye</surname><given-names>B.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shembo</surname><given-names>A.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cherie</surname><given-names>D.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tiruneh</surname><given-names>M.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bekele</surname><given-names>T.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bamboo.2024.100104</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Land Suitability Analysis of Urban Growth in Seremban Malaysia, Using GIS Based Analytical Hierarchy Process</article-title><source>Procedia Engineering</source><volume>198</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aburas</surname><given-names>M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdullah</surname><given-names>S.H.O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ramli</surname><given-names>M.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Asha’Ari</surname><given-names>Z.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>1128</fpage><lpage>1136</lpage><page-range>1128-1136</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.155</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Assessment of desertification using modified MEDALUS model in the north Nile Delta</article-title><source>Egypt. Geoderma</source><volume>405</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abuzaid</surname><given-names>A.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdelatif</surname><given-names>A.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>115400</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115400</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="chapter"><article-title>Agricultural land suitability classification and crop suggestion using machine learning and spatial multicriteria decision analysis in semi-arid ecosystem</article-title><source>Environment, Development and Sustainability</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Agrawal</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Govil</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>0123456789</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10668-023-04440-1</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Kajian Dampak Iklim Ekstrim Curah Hujan Tinggi (La-Nina) Pada Jeruk Siam (Citrus Nobilis var. Microcarpa) Di Kabupaten Banyuwangi, Jember Dan Lumajang</article-title><source>Planta Tropika: Journal of Agro Science</source><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ashari</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hanif</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Supriyanto</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>55</lpage><page-range>49-55</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18196/pt.2014.023.49-55</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Resources , Conservation &amp; Recycling Leveraging dairy cattle to upcycle culled citrus fruit for emission mitigation and resource co-benefits : A case study</article-title><source>Resources, Conservation &amp; Recycling</source><volume>203</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baker</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bender</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferguson</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rassler</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pitta</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chann</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dou</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>107452</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.resconrec.2024.107452</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Iron-containing nanominerals for sustainable phosphate management: A comprehensive review and future perspectives</article-title><source>Science of the Total Environment</source><volume>926</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bao</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Damtie</surname><given-names>M.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>C.Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>CHO</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wei</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Frost</surname><given-names>R.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ni</surname><given-names>B.J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>172025</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172025</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Soil classification and prediction model for critical land on the slopes of Mount Raung in Indonesia</article-title><source>Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management</source><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Basuki</surname><given-names>Anggriawan</given-names></name><name><surname>R.</surname><given-names>Sari</given-names></name><name><surname>K.</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rohman</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>5610</fpage><lpage>5621</lpage><page-range>5610-5621</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15243/jdmlm.2024.113.5610</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Land characterization and management in the marine-volcanic area of Mount Semeru , Indonesia : A case study of sugarcane commodities</article-title><source>Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management</source><volume>12</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Basuki</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adib</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Destiawan</surname><given-names>H.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sari</surname><given-names>V.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>7765</fpage><lpage>7778</lpage><page-range>7765-7778</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15243/jdmlm.2025.123.7765</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The evaluation of land use cover changes through the composite approach of Landsat 8 and the land use capability index for the Bedadung watershed</article-title><source>Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management</source><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Basuki</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hermiyanto</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Budiman</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alfarisy</surname><given-names>F.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>4659</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15243/jdmlm.2023.104.4659</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Evaluation of the suitability of a sugarcane plant in mount argopura’s volcanic land using a geographic information system</article-title><source>Jurnal Ilmiah Rekayasa Pertanian Dan Biosistem</source><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Basuki</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mandala</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bowo</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fitriani</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>145</fpage><lpage>160</lpage><page-range>145-160</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.29303/jrpb.v10i1.315</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Efektifitas Dolomit Dalam Mempertahankan pH Tanah Inceptisol Perkebunan Tebu Blimbing Djatiroto</article-title><source>Buletin Tanaman Tembakau, Serat &amp; Minyak Industri</source><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Basuki</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sari</surname><given-names>V.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>58</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21082/btsm.v11n2.2019.58-64</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Land suitability for chili on the slopes of Mount Raung , Indonesia , towards sustainable agriculture</article-title><source>Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management</source><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Basuki</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Setiawati</surname><given-names>T.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hermiyanto</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Budiman</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sari</surname><given-names>V.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2026</year><fpage>9385</fpage><lpage>9398</lpage><page-range>9385-9398</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15243/jdmlm.2026.131.9385</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The sensitivity level of landslide risk using Geographic Information System on the slopes of Mount Argopura</article-title><source>East Java , Indonesia</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Basuki</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sulistiawati</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Verdian</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Naely</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>4949</fpage><lpage>4959</lpage><page-range>4949-4959</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15243/jdmlm.2023.111.4949</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Assessment of Soil Erosion and Its Impact on Agricultural Productivity by Using the RMMF Model and Local Perception: A Case Study of Rangun Watershed of Mid-Hills, Nepal</article-title><source>Applied and Environmental Soil Science</source><volume>747138</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bhandari</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Joshi</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Regmi</surname><given-names>R.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Awasthi</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2021/5747138</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>BRI Dampingi Klaster Jeruk Semboro di Jember Terapkan Pertanian Berkelanjutan</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bisnis</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><comment>Retrieved From Https://Kumparan.Com/Kumparanbisnis/Bri-Dampingi-Klaster-Jeruk-Semboro-Di-Jember-Terapkan-Pertanian -Berkelanjutan-23Van3WAmXL/2</comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Seasonal variations of daytime land surface temperature and their underlying drivers over Wuhan, China</article-title><source>Remote Sensing</source><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>22</lpage><page-range>1-22</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/rs13020323</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of irrigation and fertilization regimes on tuber yield, water-nutrient uptake and productivity of potato under drip fertigation in sandy regions of northern China</article-title><source>Agricultural Water Management</source><volume>287</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cheng</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liao</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>108459</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108459</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Unlocking growth potential: Synergistic potassium fertilization for enhanced yield, nutrient uptake, and energy fractions in Chinese cabbage</article-title><source>Heliyon</source><volume>10</volume><issue>7</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Choudhary</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Garg</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Reddy</surname><given-names>M.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Meena</surname><given-names>B.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mondal</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tuti</surname><given-names>M.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Awasthi</surname><given-names>M.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Giri</surname><given-names>B.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rajawat</surname><given-names>M.V.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>28765</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28765</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of topography and land use on soil characteristics along the toposequence of Ele watershed in southern Ethiopia</article-title><source>Catena</source><volume>115</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dessalegn</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Beyene</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nandram</surname><given-names>Walley</given-names></name><name><surname>F.</surname></name><name><surname>Gala</surname><given-names>T.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><fpage>47</fpage><lpage>54</lpage><page-range>47-54</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2013.11.007</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Geospatial evaluation of the agricultural suitability and land use compatibility in Europe’s temperate continental climate region</article-title><source>International Soil and Water Conservation Research</source><volume>12</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dornik</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cheţan</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Crişan</surname><given-names>T.E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Heciko</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gora</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Drăguţ</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Panagos</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.iswcr.2024.01.002</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Land suitability and human adaptation: River Siang from Sangam to Pongging, Arunachal Pradesh, India</article-title><source>World Development Sustainability</source><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dutta</surname><given-names>C.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Duwarah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Borah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Boruah</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Das</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wds.2024.100179</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Evaluation of physiological performance and fruit quality of citrus trees under colored shade nets and open field conditions: A comparative study</article-title><source>Journal of Agriculture and Food Research</source><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Elshahat</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Elatafi</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mei</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gobena</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaman</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abdelsalam</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alam</surname><given-names>S.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Borham</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Khan</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y.Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>101538</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101538</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Influence of Leguminous Cover Crops on Soil Chemical and Biological Properties in a No‐Till Tropical Fruit Orchard</article-title><source>Land</source><volume>11</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Freidenreich</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dattamudi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jayachandran</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><page-range>1-18</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/land11060932</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Bio-based fertilisers can replace conventional inorganic P fertilisers under European pedoclimatic conditions</article-title><source>Field Crops Research</source><volume>325</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name>Frick, H., Bünemann, E. K., Hernandez-Mora, A., Eigner, H., Geyer, S., Duboc, O., Santner, J., Recena, R., Delgado, A., D ́Oria, A., Arkoun, M., Tóth, Z., Jauhiainen, L., &amp; Ylivainio, K</string-name></person-group><year>2025</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2025.109803</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Saline irrigation improves survival of forage sorghum but limits growth and increases toxicity</article-title><source>Plant Biology</source><volume>27</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fu</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Myrans</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gleadow</surname><given-names>R.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>401</fpage><lpage>409</lpage><page-range>401-409</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/plb.70009</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Assessing current and projected soil loss under changing land use and climate using RUSLE with Remote sensing and GIS in the Lake Tana Basin, Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia</article-title><source>Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science</source><volume>24</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Getachew</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Manjunatha</surname><given-names>B.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhat</surname><given-names>G.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>907</fpage><lpage>918</lpage><page-range>907-918</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejrs.2021.10.001</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Application of geospatial technology on land suitability analysis for wheat and maize farming: In a case of Guder sub-watershed North West Oromia, Ethiopia</article-title><source>Heliyon</source><volume>10</volume><issue>13</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gizawu Garbaba</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Negasa Wolteji</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>33557</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33557</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Nutrient recovery from wastewater for hydroponic systems: A comparative analysis of fertilizer demand, recovery products, and supply potential of WWTPs</article-title><source>Journal of Environmental Management</source><volume>352</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hofmann</surname><given-names>A.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liesegang</surname><given-names>S.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Keuter</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Eticha</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Steinmetz</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Katayama</surname><given-names>V.T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>119960</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119960</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Assessing land suitability for dragon fruit cultivation in Bangladesh: a GIS-based AHP approach</article-title><source>Smart Agricultural Technology</source><volume>101241</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hosen</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Islam</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tahera-tun-humayra</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sharker</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kader</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aziz</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Miah</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hasan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pervin</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hossain</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atech.2025.101241</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Evaluating the impacts of land use/land cover changes across topography against land surface temperature in Cameron Highlands</article-title><source>Plos One</source><volume>16</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>How Jin Aik</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ismail</surname><given-names>M.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Muharam</surname><given-names>F.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alias</surname><given-names>M.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>0252111</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0252111</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Spatial perspectives on hearth row site organisation in Northern Fennoscandia through the analysis of soil phosphate content</article-title><source>Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports</source><volume>5</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jerand</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Linderholm</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hedman</surname><given-names>S.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Olsen</surname><given-names>B.B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>361</fpage><lpage>373</lpage><page-range>361-373</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.12.007</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Impact of toposequence on soil properties and classification in Zaria, Kaduna State, northern Guinea Savanna, Nigeria</article-title><source>Eqa-International Journal of Environmental Quality</source><volume>38</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jimoh</surname><given-names>A.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mbaya</surname><given-names>A.L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Akande</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Agaku</surname><given-names>D.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Haruna</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>48</fpage><lpage>58</lpage><page-range>48-58</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.6092/issn.2281-4485/10043</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Evaluating citrus juice: A comparative study of physicochemical, nutraceutical, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties of citrus juices from Nepal</article-title><source>Heliyon</source><volume>10</volume><issue>23</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Karki</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Achhami</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pachhai</surname><given-names>B.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhattarai</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shahi</surname><given-names>D.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bhatt</surname><given-names>L.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Joshi</surname><given-names>M.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>40773</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40773</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The Application of Soil Erosion Models of an Agroforestry Basin under Mediterranean Conditions from a Geotechnical Point of View</article-title><source>Land</source><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leite</surname><given-names>A.P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Duarte</surname><given-names>A.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marchiori</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Morais</surname><given-names>M.V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Studart</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cavaleiro</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>17</lpage><page-range>1-17</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/land13101613</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Coupled soil moisture management and alginate oligosaccharide strategies enhance citrus orchard production, water and potassium use efficiency by improving the rhizosphere soil environment</article-title><source>Agricultural Water Management</source><volume>297</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ouyang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Song</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fan</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ding</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108828</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Trends in Enzyme Production from Citrus By-Products</article-title><source>Processes</source><volume>13</volume><issue>766</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lima</surname><given-names>C.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Contato</surname><given-names>A.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>F.De</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hidalgo</surname><given-names>V.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Irfan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gambarato</surname><given-names>B.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carvalho</surname><given-names>A.K.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bento</surname><given-names>H.B.S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>18</lpage><page-range>1-18</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/pr13030766</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Soil moisture content estimation of drip-irrigated citrus orchard based on UAV images and machine learning algorithm in Southwest China</article-title><source>Agricultural Water Management</source><volume>303</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109069</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Towards a more comprehensive scenario analysis: Response of soil erosion to future land use and climate change in the Central Yunnan Urban Agglomeration, China</article-title><source>Journal of Environmental Management</source><volume>376</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Peng</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.124523</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Influence of calcium and aluminum on crystallization of vivianite, Fe3(PO4)2·8H2O</article-title><source>Journal of Crystal Growth</source><volume>526</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Madsen</surname><given-names>H.E.L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2019.125242</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-41"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Soil erosion risk assessment of the Lakhmess watershed (northwestern Tunisia) via the SEAGIS model: Inferred prioritization of risky sub-watersheds</article-title><source>International Journal of Sediment Research</source><volume>39</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Marghmi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ben Cheikha</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mabrouk El Asmi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gueddari</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>868</fpage><lpage>884</lpage><page-range>868-884</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijsrc.2024.08.001</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-42"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Centrifugal model test on a riverine landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir induced by rainfall and water level fluctuation</article-title><source>Geoscience Frontiers</source><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miao</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Török</surname><given-names>Á.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>101378</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101378</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-43"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Temporal and Spatial Analysis of Coastal Water Quality to Support Application of Whiteleg Shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei Intensive Pond Technology</article-title><source>Sustainability (Switzerland</source><volume>14</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mustafa</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Paena</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Athirah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ratnawati</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Asaf</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suwoyo</surname><given-names>H.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahabuddin</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hendrajat</surname><given-names>E.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kamaruddin</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Septiningsih</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahrijanna</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Marzuki</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nisaa</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su14052659</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-44"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Soil quality index in some cropping systems in plot 17 of Wanagama forest, Gunungkidul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia</article-title><source>Sains Tanah</source><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mustofa</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Utami</surname><given-names>S.N.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Purwanto</surname><given-names>B.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><page-range>1-14</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20961/stjssa.v21i1.65454</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-45"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Agroforestry land suitability analysis in the Eastern Indian Himalayan region</article-title><source>Environmental Challenges</source><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nath</surname><given-names>A.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Devi</surname><given-names>N.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rocky</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Giri</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahoo</surname><given-names>U.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bajpai</surname><given-names>R.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sahu</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pandey</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>100199</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envc.2021.100199</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-46"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Assessing land suitability for leguminous crops in the okavango river basin: A multicriteria and machine learning approach</article-title><source>International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation</source><volume>135</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Negussie</surname><given-names>K.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gebrekidan</surname><given-names>B.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wyss</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kappas</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jag.2024.104284</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-47"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Improving pH buffering capacity of an acid soil to regulate nutrient retention and mitigate water pollution using Calciprill and sodium silicate</article-title><source>Desalination and Water Treatment</source><volume>319</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ng</surname><given-names>J.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>O.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Omar</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jalloh</surname><given-names>M.B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kwan</surname><given-names>Y.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Musah</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chowdhury</surname><given-names>A.J.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>100491</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.dwt.2024.100491</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-48"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Geospatial techniques-based land suitability analysis for sustainable production of major crops in Sile Watershed of Gamo Zone, Southern Ethiopia</article-title><source>Heliyon</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Nuru</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Debele</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tefera</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gelaw</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41477</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-49"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Soil property trends and classification of alluvial floodplains, South Carolina Coastal Plain</article-title><source>Geoderma</source><volume>305</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ogg</surname><given-names>C.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gulley</surname><given-names>C.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Reed</surname><given-names>J.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferguson</surname><given-names>C.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>122</fpage><lpage>135</lpage><page-range>122-135</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.05.046</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-50"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Fertilizer application levels in potato crops and the diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (Dris</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oliveira</surname><given-names>R.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Silva</surname><given-names>J.R.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lana</surname><given-names>R.M.Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pereira</surname><given-names>A.I.de A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Castoldi</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Camargo</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luz</surname><given-names>J.M.Q.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>13</lpage><page-range>1-13</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy11010051</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-51"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Runoff and sediment yield from rural roads, trails and settlements in the upper Konto catchment, East Java, Indonesia</article-title><source>Geomorphology</source><volume>87</volume><issue>1–2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rijsdijk</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sampurno Bruijnzeel</surname><given-names>L.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sutoto</surname><given-names>C.K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2007</year><fpage>28</fpage><lpage>37</lpage><page-range>28-37</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.040</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-52"><element-citation publication-type="chapter"><article-title>Petunjuk Teknis Evaluasi Lahan untuk Komoditas Pertanian (Edisi Revisi</article-title><source>Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ritung</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nugroho</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mulyani</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suryani</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2011</year></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-53"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Evaluation of Various DEMs for Quantifying Soil Erosion Under Changing Land Use and Land Cover in the Himalaya</article-title><source>Frontiers in Earth Science</source><volume>9</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Romshoo</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yousuf</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Altaf</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Amin</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>16</lpage><page-range>1-16</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/feart.2021.782128</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-54"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Soil classification and land suitability evaluation for tomato cultivation using analytic hierarchy process under different land uses</article-title><source>Heliyon</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sadiq</surname><given-names>F.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yaqub</surname><given-names>M.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maniyunda</surname><given-names>L.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alalwany</surname><given-names>A.K.A.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abubakar</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Anyebe</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>14</lpage><page-range>1-14</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41681</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-55"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Discover Sustainability Agricultural land suitability of Manimutha Nadhi watershed using AHP and GIS techniques</article-title><source>Discover Sustainability</source><volume>5</volume><issue>270</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sathiyamurthi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karuppannan</surname><given-names>S.S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sivasakthi</surname><given-names>R.B.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><page-range>1-20</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s43621-024-00471-4</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-56"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Determination of Particle Size Distribution : Comparison of Standard Hydrometer Method and Laser Diffraction Analysis for Use in Forestry</article-title><source>Forests</source><volume>15</volume><issue>327</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sedláˇcková</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ševelová</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Igaz</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aydın</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>16</lpage><page-range>1-16</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-57"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The Effect of Land Use and Land Cover Changes on Flood Occurrence in Teunom Watershed, Aceh Jaya</article-title><source>Land</source><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sugianto</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deli</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Miswar</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rusdi</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Irham</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/land11081271</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-58"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Assessment of Land Characteristics and Suitability for Citrus Development in Dry Land Punung, Pacitan Regency</article-title><source>Journal of Tropical Soils</source><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Supriyadi</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rahayu</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Herdiansyah</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Herawati</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Novianti</surname><given-names>D.R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5400/jts.2024.v29i2.67-77</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-59"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Studi Keharaan Tanaman dan Evaluasi Kesuburan Tanah di Lahan Pertanaman Jeruk Desa Cenggiling</article-title><source>Kecamatan Kuta Selatan</source><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Susila</surname><given-names>K.D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2013</year><fpage>13</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><page-range>13-20</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-60"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Land Evaluation Part I: Principles in Land Evaluation and Crop Production Calculations</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sys</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ranst</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Debaveye</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1991</year><comment>Retrieved From https://doi.org/Ghent,Belgium: General Administration for Development Cooperation, Agricultural Publications No. 7</comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-61"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Land suitability assessment and agricultural production sustainability using machine learning models</article-title><source>Agronomy</source><volume>10</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taghizadeh-Mehrjardi</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nabiollahi</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rasoli</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kerry</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Scholten</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>yir</surname><given-names>S.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Muluneh</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Danbara</surname><given-names>T.T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>20</lpage><page-range>1-20</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">doi:</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-62"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Land suitability evaluation using GIS and multicriteria decision analysis for cashew cultivation in the Abaya-Chamo Watershed, Ethiopia</article-title><source>Smart Agricultural Technology</source><volume>10</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tantuoyir</surname><given-names>S.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Muluneh</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Danbara</surname><given-names>T.T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>100744</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atech.2024.100744</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-63"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Runoff and nutrient losses in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) production with tied-ridge-furrow rainwater harvesting on sloping land</article-title><source>International Soil and Water Conservation Research</source><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sample</surname><given-names>D.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>308</fpage><lpage>323</lpage><page-range>308-323</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.09.005</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-64"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Effects of Future Climate Change on Citrus Quality and Yield in China</article-title><source>Sustainability (Switzerland</source><volume>14</volume><issue>15</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yan</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su14159366</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-65"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Estimation of soil moisture in drip-irrigated citrus orchards using multi-modal UAV remote sensing</article-title><source>Agricultural Water Management</source><volume>302</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xing</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wen</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108972</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-66"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Enhancing water use efficiency and fruit quality in jujube cultivation: A review of advanced irrigation techniques and precision management strategies</article-title><source>Agricultural Water Management</source><volume>307</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xing</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>109243</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109243</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-67"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Soil properties control decomposition of soil organic carbon: Results from data-assimilation analysis</article-title><source>Geoderma</source><volume>262</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shi</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rey</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ruan</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Craine</surname><given-names>J.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liang</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Luo</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>235</fpage><lpage>242</lpage><page-range>235-242</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.038</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-68"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Numerical simulation of landslide dam overtopping failure considering headward erosion</article-title><source>Journal of Hydrology</source><volume>601</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kawaike</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><page-range>126608</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">doi: 0.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126608</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-69"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Ecological Adaptation and Sustainable Cultivation of Citrus reticulata by Applying Mixed Design Principles under Changing Climate in China</article-title><source>Remote Sensing</source><volume>16</volume><issue>13</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shao</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/rs16132338</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-70"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Monitoring soil quality of different land use systems: a case study in Suha watershed, northwestern highlands of Ethiopia</article-title><source>Environmental Systems Research</source><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yeneneh</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Elias</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Feyisa</surname><given-names>G.L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40068-024-00336-9</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-71"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>GIS-based multicriteria land suitability assessment for nature-based solutions for the enhancement of carbon sequestration in Emilia-Romagna, Italy</article-title><source>Land Use Policy</source><volume>157</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zaniboni</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Balfors</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalantari</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Page</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tassinari</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Torreggiani</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>107632</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.landusepol.2025.107632</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-72"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Assessing the effects of deforestation and intensive agriculture on the soil quality through digital soil mapping</article-title><source>Geoderma</source><volume>363</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zeraatpisheh</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bakhshandeh</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hosseini</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alavi</surname><given-names>S.M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>114139</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114139</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-73"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>Response of erosion reduction effect of typical soil and water conservation measures in cropland to rainfall and slope gradient changes and their applicable range in the Chinese Mollisols Region, Northeast China</article-title><source>International Soil and Water Conservation Research</source><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Jiao</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>251</fpage><lpage>262</lpage><page-range>251-262</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.iswcr.2022.10.005</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-74"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>An increase in intercropped species richness improves plant water use but weakens the nutrient status of both intercropped plants and soil in rubber–tea agroforestry systems</article-title><source>Agricultural Water Management</source><volume>284</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Bin</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xie</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><page-range>108353</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108353</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-75"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The influence of climate, topography</article-title><source>parent material and vegetation on soil nitrogen fractions Catena</source><volume>175</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhong</surname><given-names>Q.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mao</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deng</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>329</fpage><lpage>338</lpage><page-range>329-338</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2018.12.027</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-76"><element-citation publication-type="article-journal"><article-title>The contribution of natural and anthropogenic causes to soil acidification rates under different fertilization practices and site conditions in southern China</article-title><source>Science of the Total Environment</source><volume>934</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ros</surname><given-names>G.H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cai</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Duan</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Vries</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>172986</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172986</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>