<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"><article xml:lang="en" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="review-article"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="issn">2460-3945</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Forum Geografi</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>For. Geo.</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2460-3945</issn><issn pub-type="ppub">0852-0682</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.23917/forgeo.13569</article-id><title-group><article-title>Opportunities for Optimising the CORS Network in Uzbekistan: Proposals Based on Bibliometric Analysis</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1733-3145</contrib-id><name><surname>Norboeva</surname><given-names>Dilshoda</given-names></name><address><country>Uzbekistan</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3879-0875</contrib-id><name><surname>Turaev</surname><given-names>Rukhiddin</given-names></name><address><country>Uzbekistan</country></address><xref rid="AFF-2" ref-type="aff"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8753-7748</contrib-id><name><surname>Inamov</surname><given-names>Aziz</given-names></name><address><country>Uzbekistan</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-3"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9440-2902</contrib-id><name><surname>Khasanov</surname><given-names>Khojiakbar</given-names></name><address><country>Uzbekistan</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-4"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7524-4937</contrib-id><name><surname>Lapasov</surname><given-names>Jasur</given-names></name><address><country>Uzbekistan</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-5"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6178-1803</contrib-id><name><surname>Safaev</surname><given-names>Sanjarbek</given-names></name><address><country>Uzbekistan</country></address><xref ref-type="aff" rid="AFF-6"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="AFF-1">Department of State Cadastres, Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers National Research University (TIIAME NRU), 100000, Tashkent</aff><aff id="AFF-2">State Scientific and Design Institute "Uzdavierloyiha", 100124, Tashkent</aff><aff id="AFF-3">Department of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers National Research University (TIIAME NRU), 100000, Tashkent</aff><aff id="AFF-4">Department of Hydrotechnical Structures and Engineering Constructions, Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Agricultural Mechanization Engineers National Research University (TIIAME NRU), 100000, Tashkent</aff><aff id="AFF-5"><institution-wrap><institution>Tashkent State Agrarian University</institution><institution-id institution-id-type="ror">https://ror.org/05gr4mx33</institution-id></institution-wrap><addr-line>100140</addr-line><country country="UZ">Tashkent Region</country></aff><aff id="AFF-6">Khorezm Branch of the State Scientific and Design Institute "Uzdavierloyiha", 220100, Urgench Region</aff><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-5-19" publication-format="electronic"><day>19</day><month>5</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection" iso-8601-date="2026-4-21" publication-format="electronic"><day>21</day><month>4</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>40</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>296</fpage><lpage>311</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2025-12-22"><day>22</day><month>12</month><year>2025</year></date><date iso-8601-date="2026-5-2" date-type="rev-recd"><day>2</day><month>5</month><year>2026</year></date><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2026-5-3"><day>3</day><month>5</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright (c) 2026 Dilshoda Norboeva, Rukhiddin Turaev, Aziz Inamov, Khojiakbar Khasanov, Jasur Lapasov, Sanjarbek Safaev</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder>Dilshoda Norboeva, Rukhiddin Turaev, Aziz Inamov, Khojiakbar Khasanov, Jasur Lapasov, Sanjarbek Safaev</copyright-holder><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/view/13569" xlink:title="Opportunities for Optimising the CORS Network in Uzbekistan: Proposals Based on Bibliometric Analysis">Opportunities for Optimising the CORS Network in Uzbekistan: Proposals Based on Bibliometric Analysis</self-uri><abstract><p>This study examines the optimisation of Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) networks through a combined bibliometric and spatial analysis approach, with particular reference to Uzbekistan as an illustrative case. A total of 522 publications were reviewed, of which 53 were identified as most relevant for detailed thematic analysis, as they provided insights into global research trends, methodological approaches, and applications in geodetic network design. To demonstrate how these approaches can be applied in practice, a simplified GIS-based spatial analysis was conducted in ArcGIS Pro to evaluate the distribution of existing CORS stations in Uzbekistan. A 40 km geodetic buffer was used as a representative distance derived from commonly reported baseline ranges in the literature (30-70 km). It should be emphasised that such a buffer-based approach only reflects spatial coverage and does not account for positioning accuracy, network geometry, or GNSS error sources. The results indicate uneven spatial coverage, with relatively dense station distribution in central and eastern regions, while western areas remain less represented. This finding is presented as a preliminary spatial observation rather than a validated assessment of network performance. Overall, the study does not aim to define optimal station spacing, or to provide a full technical evaluation, but rather to synthesise existing knowledge and demonstrate how simplified spatial methods can support initial planning. Future work should focus on integrating these insights with empirical GNSS data and advanced optimisation techniques for more robust network design.</p></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>CORS network</kwd><kwd>GNSS optimization</kwd><kwd>Geodetic infrastructure</kwd><kwd>Uzbekistan</kwd><kwd>Coverage analysis</kwd><kwd>Bibliometric analysis</kwd></kwd-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta><meta-name>File created by JATS Editor</meta-name><meta-value><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://jatseditor.com" xlink:title="JATS Editor">JATS Editor</ext-link></meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta><meta-name>issue-created-year</meta-name><meta-value>2026</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec><title>1. Introduction</title><p>CORS networks consist of permanent GNSS receivers that continuously collect satellite data, supporting precise positioning, geodetic control and monitoring of tectonic or geophysical changes. They enhance the accuracy, reliability and homogeneity of geodetic networks, often replacing or densifying traditional ground control points (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Abdallah &amp; Agag, 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Ayodele et al., 2020)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-18">(Dardanelli et al., 2020)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-43">(Mahdi &amp; Ahmed, 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-60">(Schwieger et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-61">(Snay &amp; Soler, 2008)</xref>). CORS data are vital for defining and maintaining national geodetic reference frames and for applications in engineering, hazard analysis and infrastructure development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-2">(Abdallah &amp; Agag, 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-7">(Ayodele et al., 2020)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-16">(Chhetri et al., 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-61">(Snay &amp; Soler, 2008)</xref>).</p><p>Geodetic networks play an important role in cartography, construction, cadastre, geographic information systems, navigation and scientific research (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-1">Figure 1</xref>). They are one of the fundamental elements of modern infrastructure, serving to establish a unified coordinate and height system at the national level. In addition, the development of CORS networks provides significant advantages for the agricultural sector, particularly in irrigation and land reclamation (melioration) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-75">(Yurdakul &amp; Kalayci, 2022)</xref>. High-precision GNSS positioning supported by CORS enables accurate field measurements, optimisation of irrigation canals, monitoring of soil subsidence, and efficient management of water resources <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-30">(Gokdas &amp; Ozludemir, 2021)</xref>. This contributes not only to the sustainable use of natural resources, but also to improving productivity and environmental stability in agricultural landscapes.</p><p>The process of designing and optimising geodetic networks is a crucial task aimed at finding the most efficient solutions by balancing network configuration, the number and location of observations, accuracy, reliability and cost. Modern approaches integrate classical mathematical models with evolutionary algorithms. In geodetic network design, the main challenges are categorised into zero-order design (datum definition); first-order design (network configuration); second-order design (observations and their weights); and third-order design (improvement of the existing network). At each stage, accuracy, reliability and cost are considered as the primary criteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Abd Allah &amp; Wang, 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-5">(Amiri-Simkooei et al., 2012)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-32">(Optimization and Design of Geodetic Networks, 1985)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-59">(Schmitt, 1982)</xref>).</p><p>In recent years, evolutionary algorithms such as genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimisation, and simulated annealing have been increasingly applied in geodetic network optimisation. These methods facilitate the rapid and efficient identification of optimal solutions in large and complex networks, with particular effectiveness in GNSS networks and deformation monitoring (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-3">(Al Shouny, 2025)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-11" ref-type="bibr">(Berné &amp; Baselga, 2004)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-44">(Maksimović et al., 2019)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-45">(Michal &amp; Štroner, 2024)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-71">(Yetkin &amp; Inal, 2015)</xref>).</p><fig id="figure-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Integration of geodetic networks with other fields.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/13569/6271/81579"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>Furthermore, the use of multi-criteria optimisation models, which simultaneously account for accuracy, reliability and economic efficiency, enhances the overall design of geodetic networks. In this context, mathematical programming techniques (linear, quadratic and nonlinear) combined with automated algorithms are employed to determine the optimal configuration and observations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-1">(Abd Allah &amp; Wang, 2022)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-36" ref-type="bibr">(Kuang &amp; Chrzanowski, 1992)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-45" ref-type="bibr">(Michal &amp; Štroner, 2024)</xref>).</p><p>Determining the optimal spacing between CORSs are essential for balancing positioning accuracy, spatial coverage and economic efficiency. Previous studies indicate that medium baseline distances, typically in the range of 30-70 km, provide a practical compromise for most GNSS networks; however, this range may vary depending on climatic conditions, terrain characteristics and application requirements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-73">(Yu et al., 2020)</xref>: <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-54">(Rahman et al., 2023)</xref>).</p><p>In regions with CORS stations spaced around 100 km apart, ionospheric correction accuracy can reach 2-5 cm, supporting high-precision applications such as surveying and mapping <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Dao et al., 2022)</xref>. Networks with 100-200 km spacing can still achieve centimetre-level accuracy, although performance may degrade during periods of high ionospheric activity or in low-latitude regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Dao et al., 2022)</xref>. When station spacing exceeds 200 km, accuracy decreases significantly and may not support reliable corrections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-17">(Dao et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-33">(Ibrahim Naibbi et al., 2014)</xref>).</p><p>Comparative studies from different regions highlight the impact of inter-station spacing on CORS network performance. In Turkey, local CORS networks with shorter inter-station distances have demonstrated higher vertical accuracy and faster ambiguity resolution, while increasing station spacing leads to reduced FIX solution ratios and longer ambiguity resolution times (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-6">(Atiz et al., 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-31">(Gökdaş &amp; Özlüdemir, 2022)</xref>). Similarly, studies in Malaysia comparing short (0-30 km), medium (30-70 km), and long (70-180 km) baselines indicate that medium baselines provide the most effective balance between positioning accuracy, ambiguity resolution (with success rates exceeding 50%) and cost-effectiveness <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-54">(Rahman et al., 2023)</xref>.</p><p>These findings indicate that while medium inter-station distances are generally effective, their performance depends strongly on regional conditions such as atmospheric variability, terrain complexity and infrastructure availability. Therefore, there is no universally optimal spacing strategy, and CORS network design must be adapted to local conditions.</p><p>Uzbekistan has been developing its geodetic infrastructure since 2005 through the implementation of multi-level geodetic networks, including reference geodetic points (RGPs) and satellite-based networks (SGN-0 and SGN-1). Since 2018, approximately 50 CORS stations have been established, supporting real-time and post-processed GNSS positioning, together with the development of a national geocentric coordinate system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-25">(Fazilova et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-62">(Suyunov et al., 2023)</xref>).</p><p>However, despite this progress, access to continuous GNSS observational data remains limited, and comprehensive optimisation studies are still insufficient. In practice, simplified approaches such as buffer-based spatial analysis are often used, although they do not fully represent network performance or accuracy.</p><p>This study is designed as a bibliometric and conceptual review rather than a full empirical GNSS network performance assessment. While numerous studies have proposed advanced optimisation models for CORS network design, their practical implementation often depends on the availability of high-quality GNSS observations, computational resources and stable infrastructure. As a result, such approaches are not easily transferable to data-limited regions.</p><p>In this context, a clear gap exists between theoretically robust optimisation models and their practical applicability in developing countries. To address this gap, this study integrates bibliometric insights with a simplified GIS-based spatial analysis framework. By analysing 132 CORS stations in Uzbekistan, the study demonstrates how such an approach can support preliminary network planning and identify spatial coverage gaps under data-constrained conditions. The study proposes a practical decision-making approach for the preliminary planning of CORS networks in such data-limited scenarios.</p></sec><sec><title>2. Methods</title><p>A bibliometric and content analysis of global scientific publications on geodetic network optimisation was conducted. For this purpose, Scopus, a major international scientific database, was selected. This is widely recognised within the academic community and regularly indexes high-impact journals and conferences. The search covered publications up to the end of 2024, with the results refined through thematic filtering to ensure relevance to environmental sciences and computer science domains.</p><p>The search strategy was developed based on strict inclusion criteria. Within the Scopus database, the following query formula was applied: ( TITLE-ABS-KEY (“ geodetic network*” OR “geodesy network*” OR “geodetic control network*” OR “geodetic reference network*” OR “GNSS network*” OR “GPS network*” OR “satellite positioning network*” OR “CORS network*” OR “continuously operating reference station*” OR “RTN network*” OR “real-time kinematic network*” OR “permanent GNSS station*” OR “DGPS” OR “RTK network*” OR “differential GNSS network*” OR “VRS network*” ) ) AND ( TITLE-ABS-KEY ( “optimization” OR “optimal placement” OR “coverage” OR “network design” OR “accuracy improvement” OR “adjustment” OR “error modelling” OR “simulation” OR “spatial analysis” OR “GIS” OR “geoinformatics” OR “remote sensing integration” OR “geospatial modelling” OR “visualization” ) ) AND PUBYEAR &gt; 2014 AND PUBYEAR &lt; 2025 AND ( LIMIT-TO ( DOCTYPE , “ar” ) ) AND ( LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA , “EART” ) OR LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA , “COMP” ) OR LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA , “ENVI” ) OR LIMIT-TO ( SUBJAREA , “ENGI” ) ) AND ( LIMIT-TO ( LANGUAGE , “English” ) )</p><p>The search criteria applied ensured the retrieval of publications directly related to the optimisation of CORS station networks, while excluding studies from unrelated fields such as medicine or chemistry. In the initial stage, a total of 522 articles were identified. Through semantic filtering based on abstracts, titles and keywords, irrelevant records were eliminated. As a result, a clean corpus of 53 publications explicitly addressing CORS network optimisation was formed. While bibliometric analysis was conducted on the full set of 522 articles, thematic literature analysis was performed on the refined corpus of 53 studies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><p>The bibliometric analysis was implemented in several stages. First, the annual publication dynamics were examined to identify the formation and development trends of scientific interest in the topic. Second, a country-level analysis was conducted to determine the most productive nations in terms of publication output. Third, publication platforms were assessed to identify the most active journals and conferences. Fourth, the role of funding organisations was evaluated, revealing the leading institutions supporting research in this area. Fifth, author and affiliation networks were analysed to highlight the researchers and institutions contributing significantly to the advancement of the field. Finally, disciplinary distribution was examined, with five priority scientific domains identified based on percentage representation.</p><p>A separate analysis was conducted specifically for Uzbekistan. The same 53 publications identified earlier were examined in detail, and their thematic content was classified into five main categories: design and optimisation of geodetic networks; atmospheric modelling (troposphere/ionosphere) and water vapour estimation; robust adjustment and resilience against erroneous measurements; computational efficiency and emerging optimisation paradigms; and applied case studies and monitoring. This categorisation highlights the dominant directions of research directly applicable to the optimisation of GNSS/CORS networks in the region (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-2">Figure 2</xref>).</p><fig ignoredToc="" id="figure-2"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Flowchart.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/13569/6271/81580"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>Overall, this methodology ensures a systematic overview of the field while distinguishing between general research trends and domain-specific insights related to CORS network optimisation.</p></sec><sec><title>3. Results and Discussion</title><sec><title>3.1. Bibliometric Analysis</title><p>Our study provides a comprehensive synthesis of previous research on the optimal deployment of geodetic networks. Over the past decade, the number of publications has fluctuated considerably (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 3a</xref>). The lowest output was recorded in 2016 (~35 publications), followed by a steady increase between 2017 and 2020. In 2024, a significant rise occurred again, reaching 65 publications. This trend clearly reflects the growing interest in the topic.</p><p>In terms of geographical distribution, the highest number of studies was published in China (102 papers), followed by the United States (73) and Germany (45) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 3b</xref>). Regarding the host journals, the largest share of contributions appeared in the Journal of Geodesy and the Journal of Surveying Engineering (~30 publications each) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 3c</xref>). In addition, leading high-impact journals such as Remote Sensing, Survey Review, GPS Solutions and Geophysical Journal International also ranked among the most active outlets. This indicates that research on CORS network optimisation is primarily disseminated within the domains of geodesy and remote sensing.</p><p>Among funding sources, the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) is the clear leading contributor, supporting more than 70 publications (<xref rid="figure-3" ref-type="fig">Figure 3d</xref>). The gap between the first and second most active funding bodies is substantial, with a difference of nearly 50 papers, highlighting NSFC’s dominant role in advancing research on CORS network optimisation.</p><fig id="figure-3" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p>Research structure in the field of the optimisation of geodetic networks based on 522 publications during the period 2015–2024: (a) Evolution of publications during the decade 2015 - 2024; (b) Leading countries of publication; (c) Publications classified by domain; (d) Funding sponsors; (e) Most productive authors; (f) Influential affiliations in the investigated field; (g) Discipline areas of the selected publications.</p></caption><graphic mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/13569/6271/81581" mime-subtype="png"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>Regarding authorship, prominent contributors include Klein, Matsuoka and Rofatto, each credited with 6-14 publications (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 3e</xref>). In terms of institutional productivity, Wuhan University (China) is the most active institution, with over 20 articles, followed by leading centres such as CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (France), GFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (Germany), and the Chinese Academy of Sciences (China) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 3f</xref>).</p><p>Disciplinary distribution indicates that the majority of research is concentrated in Earth and Planetary Sciences (39%), followed by Engineering (24%), Environmental Sciences (8%), Computer Science (7%), and Physics and Astronomy (6%), while other areas collectively account for 16% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-3">Figure 3j</xref>). This distribution underscores the multidisciplinary nature of CORS optimisation research, demonstrating strong links not only with geodesy, but also with computer science, engineering and environmental studies.</p><p>The bibliometric evidence confirms that the field is strongly supported by national grants and international research programmes. Leading institutions and researchers are increasingly applying Voronoi polygons, geodetic buffering, multi-GNSS integration and artificial intelligence approaches to improving network efficiency. The results suggest that the field is evolving in a multidisciplinary direction, with future research expected to focus on 3D coverage modelling, IoT integration and smart city infrastructure applications.</p><p>From a critical perspective, the bibliometric results show that the field is advancing rapidly but remains unevenly developed. The dominance of a limited number of countries and institutions indicates that current optimisation approaches are strongly shaped by region-specific technological capacity, data availability and funding structures. This limits the direct transferability of these methods to data-constrained regions such as Central Asia. In addition, although advanced optimisation algorithms and multi-GNSS approaches are increasingly represented in the literature, many studies remain simulation-based and provide limited validation using actual observational GNSS data. Therefore, a key research gap lies in connecting theoretical network optimisation with practical, region-specific performance evaluation. This gap justifies the use of simplified GIS-based spatial assessment as an initial planning tool, while also highlighting the need for future studies based on empirical GNSS observations, network geometry metrics and accuracy validation.</p><p>Overall, the bibliometric results indicate a growing and increasingly multidisciplinary research field, with strong contributions from leading countries, institutions and journals. These general patterns provide a foundation for a more detailed thematic analysis of methodological approaches, which is presented in the following section (3.2).</p></sec><sec><title>3.2. Analysis of the thematic literature</title><sec><title>3.2.1. Geodetic Network Design and Optimisation</title><p>In recent years, the challenges of second-order design (SOD) and first-order design (FOD) have shifted from “theoretical best” configurations toward algorithms that account for practical constraints. Automated hybrid approaches that incorporate real measurement conditions ,such as the number of repetitions with total stations and logistical limitations of time and travel, have demonstrated the ability to achieve required accuracy with a minimum number of observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-45">(Michal &amp; Štroner, 2024)</xref>. In SOD applications, a comparison of Hooke-Jeeves and simulated annealing methods demonstrated that Hooke–Jeeves was more suitable due to its flexibility in accommodating field constraints <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-50">(Odziemczyk, 2024)</xref>. In cost-oriented FOD, combining simulation with sequential evaluation has been shown to significantly reduce the number of observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-52">(Postek, 2021)</xref>.</p><p>For CORS/RTK network establishment, metaheuristic approaches have proven effective. A memetic algorithm provided superior results in selecting optimal CORS station locations compared to classical methods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-63">(Tang, 2015)</xref>. Similarly, particle swarm optimization (PSO) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-23">(Farhan et al., 2022)</xref> and the butterfly optimization algorithm (BOA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-49">(Odam et al., 2023)</xref> have demonstrated millimetre- to centimetre-level improvements in real networks such as the Nile Delta and GPS test networks. In route optimisation problems analogous to the traveling salesman problem (TSP), scheduling algorithms have been applied to shorten measurement campaigns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-8">(Bartonek et al., 2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-13">(Bostanci &amp; Karaağaç, 2019)</xref>). In geodetic tunnel networks, predictive models have reduced collision errors to as low as 3.5 cm <xref rid="BIBR-58" ref-type="bibr">(Savanovic et al., 2015)</xref>. On a larger scale, identifying where densification is required in existing networks has also been addressed using optimisation criteria <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-57">(Sathiakumar et al., 2017)</xref>.</p><p>Satellite selection has emerged as another critical area of optimisation. Comparative studies of ABC, ACO, PSO and SA methods, based on 24-hour observations, concluded that artificial bee colony (ABC) is the most practical due to its ease of parameter tuning <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-4">(Alluhaybi et al., 2024)</xref>. Even in combinatorially explosive scenarios, such as selecting 15 satellites out of 31, the method achieved 100% accuracy. Related studies further indicate that reducing the number of connecting vectors does not significantly lessen positioning accuracy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-37">(Kudas &amp; Wnȩk, 2020)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>3.2.2. Atmosphere (Troposphere/Ionosphere) and Water Vapour: GNSS-Based Modelling</title><p>At low latitudes, TEC variability is particularly high. A hybrid WOA-CNN-LSTM model (Whale Optimization + deep sequential learning) applied in the Sichuan-Yunnan region (2015–2019) achieved RMSE ≤ 2.75 TECu during storm years and ≤ 0.74 TECu during quiet years <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-38">(Li et al., 2024)</xref>. Similarly, a CEEMDAN + ARIMA + GWO-LSTM hybrid decomposed PWV time series into multiple frequency components, selecting tailored models for high- and low-frequency signals, improving prediction accuracy by 20–30% <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-68">(Xiao et al., 2022)</xref>. Machine learning approaches such as multicore SVM and PSO-LSSVM have further enhanced the stability of ZTD estimation and meteorological parameter retrieval (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-69">(Yang et al., 2021)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-77">(Zhang et al., 2016)</xref>).</p><p>In tomography, optimising mapping functions and using unconstrained inversions significantly reduced errors compared with radiosonde observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-47">(Miranda &amp; Mateus, 2022)</xref>. A seven-month experiment in the Amazon confirmed that boundary condition optimisation ensures stable quasi-online inversions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-46">(Miranda et al., 2023)</xref>. For GNSS + GIM data fusion, methods such as IONOLAB-MAP and CIT-based on kriging, model assimilation and optimised semivariograms-produced highly accurate regional TEC maps (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-19">(Devi̇Ren &amp; Arikan, 2018)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-64">(Tuna et al., 2015)</xref>). Alternative strategies, such as wavelet-based neural networks combined with PSO, also demonstrated regionally high accuracy compared with spectral or multilayer architectures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-28">(Ghaffari Razin &amp; Voosoghi, 2016)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-29">(Ghaffari Razin &amp; Voosoghi, 2017)</xref>). Satellite assimilation studies have validated OMI TCWV v4 against GPS/SSMIS data, showing that proper cloud filtering significantly improves assimilation performance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-66">(Wang et al., 2019)</xref>.</p><p>In the InSAR domain, Sentinel-1 time-series data captured the 2018 Boso slow-slip event, estimating a slip of ~5 cm and Mw ~6.4. Regularisation using the L-curve criterion was shown to enhance spatial resolution relative to GNSS-only solutions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-34">(Kinoshita &amp; Furuta, 2024)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>3.2.3. Robust adjustment and resistance to faulty observations</title><p>Under conditions of colour deficiency or multiple gross errors, global L1, iterative reweighting and exhaustive search approaches have shown success in various scenarios, although computational complexity grows rapidly <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-9">(Baselga et al., 2020)</xref>. In rank-deficient GNSS networks, an improved grey wolf algorithm enabled direct L1-norm optimisation, avoiding LP-related difficulties and proving effective on both real and simulated datasets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-42">(Mahboub et al., 2024)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>3.2.4. Computational efficiency and new optimisation paradigms</title><p>In multi-core implementations of normal equations, block parallelism and cache-traffic optimisation can accelerate precise orbit determination (POD) computations by up to a factor of three <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-15">(Chen et al., 2022)</xref>. The information filter has demonstrated up to ~50% faster performance than the conventional Kalman filter in certain GNSS differential scenarios <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-78">(Zheng et al., 2019)</xref>. For complex multimodal objective functions, deep Gaussian processes (DGPs) with multitask/transfer learning have provided improved accuracy in auto-tuning <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-39">(Łuszczek et al., 2023)</xref>. Furthermore, the combination of Bayesian optimization (BO) and DGP was shown to yield superior results in spectral domains compared to traditional methods, particularly in terms of accuracy and uncertainty quantification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-27">(Garbuglia et al., 2023)</xref>. In distance geometry problems with discretisation, integer programming/constraint programming (IP/CP) and hybrid decomposition approaches significantly outperformed classical MIN-DOUBLE solutions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-40">(MacNeil &amp; Bodur, 2022)</xref>.</p></sec><sec><title>3.2.5. Applied studies and monitoring</title><p>Comparisons between UAV-RTK and PPK have revealed strong sensitivity to surface type; vertical (Z) errors were found to be low over ground, road or bush surfaces, but high in forested and shaded areas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-20">(Eker et al., 2021)</xref>. Using Houston extensometers, seasonal subsidence–heave cycles in the range of 2-4 cm have been documented <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-65">(Wang, 2023)</xref>. For seafloor geodesy, practical guidelines have been provided for model errors related to station shell, track geometry and sound speed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-70">(Yang et al., 2020)</xref>. In addition, a 3D finite-element (FE) model of the L’Aquila earthquake, integrating InSAR and GPS observations, explained deformation and stress fields more effectively than the classical Okada model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-14">(Castaldo et al., 2018)</xref>.</p><p>In summary, the studies reviewed demonstrate a wide range of methodological approaches in geodetic network design and GNSS optimisation, with a strong focus on advanced modelling and algorithmic solutions. However, a gap remains between these theoretical developments and their practical application, particularly in data-limited environments.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>3.3. Bibliometric Insights and Research Trends in CORS Network Optimisation</title><p>The bibliometric analysis reveals a clear and sustained increase in scientific research activity related to the optimisation of CORS networks. Based on the reviewed literature, a marked growth in publications has been observed, particularly after 2015, reflecting the rising global demand for high-precision geodetic infrastructures. This trend is closely associated with the rapid advances in GNSS technologies, the increasing reliance on real-time positioning systems, and the broader development of the digital economy.</p><p>The analysis further indicates that studies can be broadly categorised into several major methodological groups. The first includes studies grounded in classical geodetic network design, primarily based on least squares adjustment techniques. The second group encompasses research employing optimisation algorithms, in which methods such as genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization (PSO), and simulated annealing are widely applied. The third consists of GIS-based and spatial analysis approaches, which are mainly used for visualisation purposes and preliminary network assessment.</p><p>Despite the methodological diversity, an important trend emerges from the bibliometric findings: while a significant portion of the literature relies on advanced mathematical and optimisation-based models, their practical implementation remains limited, particularly in developing countries. This limitation is often attributed to the lack of high-quality observational data, insufficient technical infrastructure, and the challenges associated with applying complex models under real-world conditions.</p><p>In addition, GIS-based approaches appear to be relatively underrepresented and are typically employed as simplified tools for initial evaluation. This indicates the presence of a gap between theoretically rigorous optimisation models and their practical, region-specific application. Such a discrepancy represents a critical challenge to the effective planning and deployment of CORS networks.</p><p>This study specifically addresses this research gap by integrating insights derived from bibliometric analysis with a simplified GIS-based spatial evaluation framework. The proposed approach does not aim to replace rigorous geodetic modelling, but rather to provide a practical and scalable conceptual tool that supports preliminary planning and decision-making processes, particularly in data-constrained environments.</p></sec><sec><title>3.4. Case Study (Republic of Uzbekistan)</title><p>The Uzbekistan case study is presented to demonstrate the application of simplified spatial analysis methods in a data-constrained national context. The planning and expansion of the CORS network in Uzbekistan are influenced by several local factors, including pronounced relief variability, extensive desert and semi-desert areas, uneven telecommunication and power infrastructure, and cross-border coordination requirements with neighbouring countries. Seasonal and cyclic ionospheric variations may also affect long-baseline RTK and VRS solutions. However, these factors are discussed here as contextual constraints only; the analysis evaluates spatial coverage and does not quantify positioning accuracy or GNSS network performance.</p><p>In the republic, very few scientific studies have been conducted in this field, which can be attributed to the scarcity of open data. Among them, Ruziev and et al. studied GNSS (global navigation satellite system) technology in the context of constructing a geodetic network in the capital of Uzbekistan and showed that no systematic work had previously been conducted on its reconstruction and development <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-56">(Ruziev et al., 2024)</xref>. In addition, this system involves appropriate organisation of the geodetic satellite network, as well as the development of a unified innovative system for state cadastres and real estate registration <xref rid="BIBR-41" ref-type="bibr">(Madimarova et al., 2024)</xref>. The present GNSS network and its data constitute the main subject of Fozilova’s research, which emphasises that efforts are underway to establish a modern network in Uzbekistan’s geodesy sector. The primary-level networks and data transmission stations were nearly completed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-24">(Fazilova, 2017)</xref>. Furthermore, as a result of research conducted by relevant state institutions, a web geoportal has been developed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-48">(Ndirangu et al., 2020)</xref>.</p><p>Available open materials and practical reports often assess coverage based on Euclidean distance circle buffers, while coverage maps at the regional level, inter-station baseline length statistics, or PDOP scenarios are rarely presented <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-53">(Prochniewicz et al., 2020)</xref>. In addition, the placement problem is frequently addressed using simple statistical analysis approaches based on expert judgment. As a result, investment decisions face difficulties in providing a precise, quantitative answer to the question: “In which area will the installation of a certain number of stations yield the greatest benefit in terms of coverage and service quality?” Moreover, in recent years, ArcGIS has been successfully applied in geovisual monitoring and decision-making, owing to its capability to integrate real-time data and interactive maps <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-22">(E.S.R.I., 2023)</xref>.</p><p>The objective of our study is to evaluate the coverage of the existing CORS network in Uzbekistan using a geodetic approach (based on the WGS84 ellipsoid) through data collection, pre-processing, spatial analysis, visualisation, and the creation of a management geoportal. The study further aims to analyse the spatial distribution and service coverage of CORS stations; identify overlapping areas and uncovered zones based on 40 km buffer zones; and develop an interactive web map to present the results.</p><p>In conducting the research, the GIS (ArcGIS Pro 3.3.0) environment was utilised. Initially, the state boundary of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the provincial boundaries, and the boundary of the Republic of Karakalpakstan were included. A database of 132 CORS stations was compiled, of which 50 represented older (previously installed) stations and 82 were newly established ones. Separate layers (feature classes) were created for old and new CORS stations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">Figure 4</xref>).</p><p>To distinguish between old stations (shown in blue) and new stations (red), thematic symbology was applied (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-4">Figure 4</xref>). Buffer zones were displayed in transparent colours to represent service coverage. National boundaries were added as a layer, enabling the analysis of CORS coverage in relation to both the country’s borders and administrative regions.</p><fig id="figure-4" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p>General CORS Locations.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/13569/6271/81582" mime-subtype="jpeg" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>To evaluate the service coverage of the CORS network, circular buffer zones with radii of 40 km, 50 km and 60 km were generated around each station (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-5">Figure 5</xref>). These distances represent commonly used baseline lengths in GNSS network design. Shorter baselines are generally associated with more stable positioning performance due to the higher spatial correlation of atmospheric errors, whereas larger distances increase coverage, but may lead to reduced positioning reliability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-67">(Wanninger, 2002)</xref>.</p><fig ignoredToc="" id="figure-5"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p>CORS Coverage Areas.</p></caption><graphic mime-subtype="jpeg" mimetype="image" xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/13569/6271/81583"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>The buffer analysis was performed in the ArcGIS Pro environment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-21">(E.S.R.I., 2022)</xref>, in which coverage areas were delineated for each scenario and the total coverage area was calculated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>). In addition, the degree of overlap between buffer zones was analysed to identify redundant coverage and uncovered regions. These uncovered areas were considered priority zones for the installation of new stations.</p><table-wrap id="table-1" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 1</label><caption><p>CORS Network Coverage by Buffer Distance Across Regions of Uzbekistan.</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Region</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Total Area (km²)</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Coverage (60 km)</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Coverage (50 km)</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Coverage (40 km)</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Andijan Region</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4,259.67</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4,259.67</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">4,259.62</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">4,202.77</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Bukhara Region</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">40,069.99</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">32,249.00</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">27,640.94</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">21,114.57</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Fergana Region</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">6,740.28</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">6,740.28</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">6,707.45</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6,587.27</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Jizzakh Region</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">21,006.01</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">20,462.64</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">19,521.14</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">17,417.01</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Kashkadarya Region</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">28,496.88</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">28,496.88</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">28,476.08</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">27,707.17</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Khorezm Region</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">6,348.94</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">6,348.86</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6,225.67</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">5,925.19</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Namangan Region</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">7,422.08</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">7,177.23</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6,858.16</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">6,522.80</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Navoi Region</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">110,828.29</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">61,717.66</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">52,892.33</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">41,619.77</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Republic of Karakalpakstan</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">166,021.98</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">54,434.71</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">44,843.72</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">34,766.81</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Samarkand Region</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">16,810.07</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">16,810.07</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">16,810.07</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">16,743.56</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Syrdarya Region</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4,248.42</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">4,248.42</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">4,248.42</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">4,220.46</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Surkhandarya Region</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">20,115.32</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">19,959.19</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">19,615.11</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">18,561.29</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Tashkent City</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">438.67</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">438.67</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">438.67</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">438.67</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">Tashkent Region</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">15,093.97</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">13,734.44</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">13,209.27</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">12,306.52</td></tr><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Total</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">447,900.56</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">277,077.72</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">251,746.67</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">218,133.86</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>At the regional level (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-1">Table 1</xref>), the analysis shows that areas with a high density of stations, such as Tashkent city, the Fergana Valley (Andijan, Fergana, Namangan), and the Syrdarya corridor, as well as large parts of the Samarkand, Jizzakh and Surkhandarya regions, remain well covered across all scenarios. For example, in the Jizzakh region, only 1.18 × 10³ km² remains uncovered out of a total area of 19.8 × 10³ km².</p><p>In contrast, the largest uncovered areas are in the Republic of Karakalpakstan (≈112.2 × 10³ km²), the Navoi region (≈54.3 × 10³ km²) and the Bukhara region (≈11.1 × 10³ km²). Meanwhile, coverage gaps in Kashkadarya (≈6.9 km²), Fergana (≈15.4 km²), Khorezm (≈67 km²) and Surkhandarya are minimal. These results indicate that the CORS network is relatively dense in populated and economically active regions, while coverage remains sparse in desert and semidesert zones such as the Ustyurt Plateau and the Kyzylkum Desert.</p><p>The comparative analysis demonstrates a clear relationship between buffer distance and coverage extent (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>). Under the 40 km scenario, the total coverage area is approximately 218,133.9 km², corresponding to 48.70% of the country’s territory. Increasing the radius to 50 km expands the coverage to 251,746.7 km² (56.21%), while the 60 km scenario reaches 277,077.7 km² (61.86%). These values should be interpreted strictly as spatial coverage indicators. They do not represent positioning accuracy, network reliability or GNSS performance, as no observational GNSS validation or accuracy assessment was conducted for the study.</p><table-wrap id="table-2" ignoredToc=""><label>Table 2</label><caption><p>Coverage Efficiency by Buffer Distance.</p></caption><table frame="box" rules="all"><thead><tr><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Buffer Distance</th><th align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Area Covered (km²)</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Coverage (%)</th><th valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Interpretation</th></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">40 km</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">218,133.86</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">48.70%</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Conservative coverage scenario</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">50 km</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">251,746.67</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">56.21%</td><td align="left" colspan="1" valign="top">Intermediate coverage scenario</td></tr><tr><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">60 km</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">277,077.72</td><td colspan="1" valign="top" align="left">61.86%</td><td valign="top" align="left" colspan="1">Extended coverage scenario</td></tr></tbody></table></table-wrap><p>The spatial variability of coverage is further illustrated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="figure-6">Figure 6</xref>, which presents the coverage area and coverage efficiency for each region based on the 40 km buffer scenario. The results show that regions such as Navoi, Karakalpakstan and Kashkadarya have large coverage areas but relatively lower efficiency, reflecting sparse station distribution over extensive territories. In contrast, regions with compact territories and dense station networks, such as Tashkent city, Andijan and Sirdarya, exhibit high coverage efficiency despite their smaller absolute coverage areas. This pattern highlights the uneven spatial performance of the network and emphasises the importance of considering both coverage extent and efficiency in network evaluation.</p><fig id="figure-6" ignoredToc=""><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p>Area Coverage of the CORS Network Based on a 40 km Buffer Approach.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="https://journals2.ums.ac.id/fg/article/download/13569/6271/81584" mime-subtype="png" mimetype="image"><alt-text>Image</alt-text></graphic></fig><p>Furthermore, the analysis of station characteristics shows that older stations are mainly concentrated in the south-eastern regions of the country and have been in operation for many years. In contrast, newly installed stations were deployed more evenly across the territory during the modernisation process, thereby expanding overall coverage. Statistical analysis indicates that the average elevation of older stations is 604.5 m, whereas new stations are located at an average elevation of 885.5 m. The number and spatial distribution of new stations have contributed to a more balanced national network configuration.</p><p>Overall, the results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="table-2">Table 2</xref>) highlight a trade-off between coverage and baseline distance. Larger buffer radii increase spatial coverage; however, they do not directly correspond to improved GNSS positioning accuracy, which also depends on additional factors such as atmospheric conditions, signal quality and network geometry. In this context, the range of 40–50 km may be considered a balanced compromise between coverage and potential positioning performance, although this conclusion should be interpreted with caution.</p><p>It is also important to note that most of the uncovered areas correspond to desert regions. Currently, these lands are gradually being developed and integrated into the national economy. Therefore, in the near future, the establishment of additional CORS stations in these regions will become necessary.</p><p>Finally, it should be emphasised that the analysis is based on a simplified geometric buffer approach and does not account for key GNSS error sources such as ionospheric and tropospheric effects, multipath, signal quality or network geometry (e.g., PDOP). Therefore, the results should be interpreted as a preliminary spatial assessment rather than a comprehensive geodetic optimisation.</p></sec><sec><title>3.5. Discussion</title><p>In recent years, the demand for high-precision data in geodesy, remote sensing and monitoring technologies has increased significantly. This growing need has stimulated the rapid development of GNSS, CORS and InSAR technologies. Research conducted across various domains (<xref rid="BIBR-10" ref-type="bibr">(Benoit et al., 2015)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-12" ref-type="bibr">(Bevly et al., 2016)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-72" ref-type="bibr">(Yu et al., 2018)</xref>) has broadly highlighted the potential applications of these technologies and demonstrated their importance at the intersections of multiple scientific disciplines.</p><p>Building on the considerations outlined in the introduction, the study results support the view that inter-station spacing remains a critical factor in CORS network performance. The spatial analysis indicates that moderate station spacing provides adequate territorial coverage in many regions of Uzbekistan; however, noticeable gaps persist, particularly in the western parts of the country. This suggests that, while commonly recommended spacing ranges can serve as a useful reference, their practical effectiveness is strongly influenced by regional conditions such as terrain, atmospheric variability and infrastructure availability. Therefore, optimisation strategies should be adapted to local characteristics rather than relying on uniform spacing assumptions. Recent studies in Turkey and Malaysia and global analyses emphasise the importance of considering atmospheric effects, network geometry and technological advancements when determining the most effective CORS configuration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-26">(Feng &amp; Li, 2008)</xref>; <xref rid="BIBR-31" ref-type="bibr">(Gökdaş &amp; Özlüdemir, 2022)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-51">(Pipitone et al., 2023)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-55">(Rahmani et al., 2023)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-74">(Yu et al., 2020)</xref>).</p><p>Accordingly, our thematic analysis examined 53 selected articles, with closer scrutiny of the five most highly cited. This citation-weighted focus is deliberate: the most cited works define the methodological baseline against which regional adaptations are tested, making them the appropriate reference points for assessing transferability to Uzbekistan's specific topographic, atmospheric, and infrastructural conditions.</p><p>These works converge on a single conclusion: high-precision geodetic monitoring is not constrained by any one limitation but by a trilemma of accuracy, infrastructure, and cost, where optimising one dimension typically presses on the others. The generic atmospheric correction model of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-72">(Yu et al., 2018)</xref> defines the accuracy frontier, i.e., adapting tropospheric correction to terrain and atmospheric conditions yields strong results for deformation monitoring in seismically active regions, but precisely because it is tuned to local atmospheric behaviour, it resists direct transfer and would demand region-specific recalibration across Uzbekistan's arid lowlands and steep mountain gradients. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-12">(Bevly et al., 2016)</xref> shift the binding constraint from algorithm to infrastructure: their real-time GNSS/CORS work for connected and automated vehicles matters less as a transport result than as a demonstration that the value of geodetic precision is realised only through a dense, continuously operating reference network. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="BIBR-10">(Benoit et al., 2015)</xref> then address the dimension that determines whether either of the preceding strengths is deployable at all: their low-cost, high-frequency Geocube network attacks the affordability barrier, converting high-precision monitoring from a capability that exists in principle into one feasible in resource-constrained settings.</p><p>The overall conclusion of these three studies is that GNSS, CORS, and InSAR technologies extend beyond geodesy and are increasingly applied in the fields of transportation, environmental monitoring, construction and safety. Future research should focus on integrating current methods, merging various sensor networks, and improving real-time data flow. Introducing such integration in Uzbekistan and advancing research in this direction will form the foundation for a modern CORS system in the country.</p><p>The findings of this case study should be interpreted within the scope of several limitations. First, access to data from government institutions is restricted, as most domain-specific information is considered confidential. This limits the completeness and transparency of the analysis. Second, due to data confidentiality, many studies have lost their relevance and are not directly aimed at addressing the current challenges. Third, practical constraints of real-time monitoring systems, such as network latency, reliability of data transmission channels, and the long-term stability of equipment, have not been sufficiently explored in a number of experimental studies. Fourth, the number of scientific works specifically focusing on the selected region remains limited, while fifth, the findings highlight a common limitation in practice, where simplified approaches such as buffer analysis are used instead of rigorous geodetic network evaluation methods.</p><p>Based on the identified limitations, several practical and scientific priorities can be outlined for future research. Strengthening collaboration between academic researchers and industry stakeholders is essential to improve data accessibility and facilitate more efficient data exchange. In addition, expanding national research efforts on geodetic networks, particularly CORS stations, is important for advancing scientific understanding in the Republic of Uzbekistan. Furthermore, gradual expansion of the territorial coverage of CORS stations should be considered, with the long-term goal of achieving full national coverage. At the same time, studying international best practices for the efficient deployment of CORS stations and adapting them to local conditions will support more effective network development. Overall, these directions will contribute to improving the reliability, efficiency and sustainability of geodetic infrastructure in data-limited environments.</p></sec></sec><sec><title>4. Conclusion</title><p>In conclusion, the study presents a structured bibliometric synthesis of research on the design and optimisation of CORS networks, highlighting the evolution of methodological approaches and current research trends. The analysis demonstrates that while classical geodetic models and modern optimisation algorithms are widely discussed in the literature, their practical implementation, particularly in data-constrained environments, remains limited.</p><p>Rather than conducting a full technical or performance-based evaluation of GNSS networks, the study has focused on identifying prevailing methodological directions and research gaps. In this context, the Uzbekistan example is presented solely as an illustrative case, in which a simplified GIS-based buffer analysis is applied to demonstrate how commonly used approaches in the literature can support preliminary spatial assessment. It is important to emphasise that this analysis reflects only coverage patterns and does not represent positioning accuracy, network performance or geodetic reliability.</p><p>From a practical perspective, the proposed conceptual approach can serve as an initial decision-support tool for CORS network planning in data-limited regions. Future research should focus on extending this framework by incorporating advanced methodologies, including network geometry analysis, stochastic modelling and accuracy validation, to support more robust and operational GNSS infrastructure development. Accordingly, the findings should be used as a preliminary planning reference rather than as evidence of operational accuracy. The main value of the study lies in linking bibliometric evidence with a practical spatial screening framework for identifying regions where further GNSS-based validation and network densification may be required.</p></sec><sec><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>We sincerely acknowledge “TI-IAME” NRU for granting full access to the Web of Science and Scopus databases, which was es-sential for the successful comple-tion of this research. We also ex-tend our gratitude to the Joint Research Center for Geoinformat-ics for providing valuable practical and technical support throughout the research process.</p></sec><sec><title>Author Contributions</title><p>Conceptualization: Norboeva, D., Inamov, A.; methodology: Nor-boeva, D., Khasanov, K.; investiga-tion: Turaev, R., Inamov, A., Lapasov, J., Safaev, S.; writing—original draft preparation: Nor-boeva, D.; writing—review and editing: Khasanov, K.; visualization: Norboeva, D., Turaev, R. All au-thors have read and agreed to the published version of the manu-script.</p></sec><sec><title>Conflict of interest</title><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p></sec><sec><title>Data availability</title><p>All data supporting the findings of this study were derived from pub-licly available literature and open-access geospatial datasets.</p></sec><sec><title>Funding</title><p>This research received no external funding.</p></sec></body><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="BIBR-1"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Optimizing the geodetic networks based on the distances between the net points and the project border</article-title><source>Scientific Reports</source><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abd Allah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-04566-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-2"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Reliability of CSRS-PPP for Validating the Egyptian Geodetic Cors Networks</article-title><source>Arti-ficial Satellites</source><volume>57</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Abdallah</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Agag</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>58</fpage><lpage>76</lpage><page-range>58-76</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2478/arsa-2022-0004</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-3"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Second-order design of GNSS networks with different constraints using particle swarm optimiza-tion and genetic algorithms</article-title><source>Open Engineering</source><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al Shouny</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2025</year><page-range>20250109</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/eng-2025-0109</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-4"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>An Evaluation of Optimization Algorithms for the Opti-mal Selection of GNSS Satellite Subsets</article-title><source>Remote Sensing</source><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Alluhaybi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Psimoulis</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Remenyte-Prescott</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/rs16101794</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-5"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Basic Concepts of Optimization and Design of Geodetic Networks</article-title><source>Journal of Surveying Engineering</source><volume>138</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Amiri-Simkooei</surname><given-names>A.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Asgari</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zangeneh-Nejad</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zaminpardaz</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2012</year><fpage>172</fpage><lpage>183</lpage><page-range>172-183</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000081</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-6"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Comparative analysis of the performance of Multi-GNSS RTK: A case study in Turkey</article-title><source>International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences</source><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Atiz</surname><given-names>O.F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Konukseven</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ogutcu</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alcay</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>67</fpage><lpage>80</lpage><page-range>67-80</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26833/ijeg.878236</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-7"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Evaluating the Stability and Adequacy of NIGNET for the Definition of Nigerian Geodetic Reference Frame</article-title><source>Nigerian Journal of Technological Devel-opment</source><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ayodele</surname><given-names>E.G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Okolie</surname><given-names>C.J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ezeigbo</surname><given-names>C.U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fajemirokun</surname><given-names>F.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>12</lpage><page-range>1-12</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/njtd.v17i1.1</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-8"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Optimized GNSS RTK measurement planning for effective point occu-pation via heuristic analysis</article-title><source>Engineering Computations</source><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bartonek</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bures</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Svabensky</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>90</fpage><lpage>104</lpage><page-range>90-104</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/EC-11-2015-0352</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-9"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Performance compari-son of least squares, iterative and global L1 norm minimization and exhaustive search methods for outlier de-tection in leveling networks</article-title><source>Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia</source><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Baselga</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Klein</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suraci</surname><given-names>S.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>OLIVEIRA</surname></name><name><surname>C.</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Matsuoka</surname><given-names>M.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rofatto</surname><given-names>V.F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>425</fpage><lpage>438</lpage><page-range>425-438</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13168/AGG.2020.0031</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-10"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Monitoring landslide displacements with the Geocube wireless network of low-cost GPS</article-title><source>Engineering Geology</source><volume>195</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Benoit</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Briole</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Martin</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Thom</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Malet</surname><given-names>J.-P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ulrich</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>111</fpage><lpage>121</lpage><page-range>111-121</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.05.020</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-11"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>First-order design of geodetic networks using the simulated annealing method</article-title><source>Journal Of Geodesy</source><volume>78</volume><issue>1–2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berné</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baselga</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2004</year><fpage>47</fpage><lpage>54</lpage><page-range>47-54</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00190-003-0365-y</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-12"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Lane change and merge maneuvers for connected and automated vehicles: A survey</article-title><source>IEEE Transactions on In-telligent Vehicles</source><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bevly</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Cao</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gordon</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Özbilgin</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kari</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nelson</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Woodruff</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barth</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Murray</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kurt</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>105</fpage><lpage>120</lpage><page-range>105-120</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/TIV.2015.2503342</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-13"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Investigating the shortest survey route in a GNSS traverse network</article-title><source>Tehnicki Vjesnik</source><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bostanci</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Karaağaç</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>355</fpage><lpage>362</lpage><page-range>355-362</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17559/TV-20170924174221</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-14"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Coseismic Stress and Strain Field Changes Investigation Through 3-D Finite Element Modeling of DInSAR and GPS Measurements and Geological/Seismological Data: The L’Aquila (Italy) 2009 Earthquake Case Study</article-title><source>Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth</source><volume>123</volume><issue>5</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Castaldo</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nardis</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Novellis</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ferrarini</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lanari</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lavecchia</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pepe</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Solaro</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tizzani</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>4193</fpage><lpage>4222</lpage><page-range>4193-4222</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2017JB014453</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-15"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A new parallel algorithm for improving the computational effi-ciency of multi-GNSS precise orbit determination</article-title><source>GPS Solutions</source><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ge</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Hugentobler</surname><given-names>U.</given-names></name><name><surname>Schuh</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10291-022-01266-8</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-16"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Evaluating the Positional Stability Status of the Druk Corsnet: A Preliminary Study</article-title><source>Journal of Applied Engineering, Technology and Management</source><volume>4</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chhetri</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tshomo</surname><given-names>Dechen</given-names></name><name><surname>Tshering</surname><given-names>Dawa</given-names></name><name><surname>Namgay</surname><given-names>Thinley</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>49</fpage><lpage>59</lpage><page-range>49-59</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.54417/jaetm.v4i1.119</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-17"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Regional Ionospher-ic Corrections for High Accuracy GNSS Positioning</article-title><source>Remote Sensing</source><volume>14</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dao</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Harima</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Carter</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Currie</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>McClusky</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Brown</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rubinov</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Choy</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/rs14102463</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-18"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>GNSS cors network of the University of Palermo: Design and first analysis of data</article-title><source>Geographia Technica</source><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dardanelli</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lo Brutto</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Pipitone</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>43</fpage><lpage>69</lpage><page-range>43-69</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21163/GT_2020.151.05</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-19"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>IONOLAB-MAP: An automatic spatial interpolation algorithm for total electron content</article-title><source>Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences</source><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Devi̇Ren</surname><given-names>M.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arikan</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>1933</fpage><lpage>1945</lpage><page-range>1933-1945</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3906/elk-1611-231</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-20"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A Comparative Analysis of UAV-RTK and UAV-PPK Methods in Mapping Dif-ferent Surface Types</article-title><source>European Journal of Forest Engineering</source><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eker</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alkan</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aydın</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>12</fpage><lpage>25</lpage><page-range>12-25</page-range><publisher-loc>Scopus</publisher-loc><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33904/ejfe.938067</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-21"><element-citation publication-type="webpage"><article-title>ArcGIS Pro 3.0: Spatial Analysis and Geoprocessing [Computer software</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>E.S.R.I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><comment>REtrieved From</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/arcgis-pro/" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Arcgis pro">Arcgis pro</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-22"><element-citation publication-type="webpage"><article-title>ArcGIS Dashboards: Authoring and Visualization Guide [Computer software</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>E.S.R.I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><comment>Retrieved From</comment><ext-link xlink:href="https://doc.arcgis.com/en/dashboards/" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:title="Dashboards">Dashboards</ext-link></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-23"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Optimization of baseline configuration in a GNSS network (Nile Delta network, Egypt) A case study</article-title><source>Journal Of Applied Geodesy</source><volume>16</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farhan</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Gomaa</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sedeek</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>341</fpage><lpage>350</lpage><page-range>341-350</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/jag-2022-0010</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-24"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The review and development of a modern GNSS network and datum in Uzbekistan</article-title><source>Geodesy and Geodynamics</source><volume>8</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fazilova</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>187</fpage><lpage>192</lpage><page-range>187-192</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geog.2017.02.006</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-25"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>GNSS network of Uzbekistan: Achievements, prospects and chal-lenges</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fazilova</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Magdiev</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sichugova</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/egusphere-egu21-842</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-26"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A benefit of multiple carrier gnss signals: Regional scale network-based RTK with doubled inter-station distances</article-title><source>Journal of Spatial Science</source><volume>53</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><fpage>135</fpage><lpage>147</lpage><page-range>135-147</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14498596.2008.9635154</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-27"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bayesian Optimization for Microwave De-vices Using Deep GP Spectral Surrogate Models</article-title><source>IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques</source><volume>71</volume><issue>6</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Garbuglia</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Spina</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Deschrijver</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Couckuyt</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dhaene</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>2311</fpage><lpage>2318</lpage><page-range>2311-2318</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/TMTT.2022.3228951</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-28"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Wavelet neural networks using particle swarm optimization training in modeling regional ionospheric total electron content</article-title><source>Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics</source><volume>149</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghaffari Razin</surname><given-names>M.R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Voosoghi</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>21</fpage><lpage>30</lpage><page-range>21-30</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jastp.2016.09.005</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-29"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Ionosphere tomography using wavelet neural network and particle swarm optimization training algorithm in Iranian case study</article-title><source>GPS Solutions</source><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghaffari Razin</surname><given-names>M.-R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Voosoghi</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><fpage>1301</fpage><lpage>1314</lpage><page-range>1301-1314</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10291-017-0614-9</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-30"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effect of altitude and distance on zenith tropospheric delay and integrated wa-ter vapour estimations in a local GNSS CORS network</article-title><source>Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation</source><volume>8</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gokdas</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ozludemir</surname><given-names>M.T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><fpage>72</fpage><lpage>83</lpage><page-range>72-83</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9733/JGG.2021R0006.E</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-31"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effects of the Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS) network on the accuracy, precision, and Time to Fix Ambiguity (TTFA) performance; [Efectos de una red de Estaciones de Referencia de Operación Continua en exactitud, precisión y desempeño de la Resolución de Ambigüedades</article-title><source>Earth Sciences Research Journal</source><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gökdaş</surname><given-names>Ö.</given-names></name><name><surname>Özlüdemir</surname><given-names>M.T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>131</fpage><lpage>138</lpage><page-range>131-138</page-range><publisher-name>Universidad Nacional de Colombia</publisher-name><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15446/esrj.v26n2.89819</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-32"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Optimization and Design of Geodetic Networks</article-title><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Grafarend</surname><given-names>E.W.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sansò</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1985</year><publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name><publisher-loc>Berlin Heidel-berg</publisher-loc><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-642-70659-2</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-33"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>An Assessment of the Existing Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) in Nigeria: An Exploration Using Geographical Information System (GIS</article-title><source>Scientific &amp; Academic Pub-lishing</source><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ibrahim Naibbi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ibrahim</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name name-style="given-only"><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2014</year><fpage>147</fpage><lpage>157</lpage><page-range>147-157</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-34"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Slow slip event displacement on 2018 offshore Boso Peninsula detected by Senti-nel-1 InSAR time-series analysis with numerical weather model assistance</article-title><source>Geophysical Journal International</source><volume>237</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kinoshita</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Furuta</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>89</lpage><page-range>75-89</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gji/ggae028</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-35"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Experimental and simulation analysis of daylight glare proba-bility inoffices with dynamic window shades</article-title><source>Building and Environment</source><volume>87</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Konstantzos</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tzempelikos</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chan</surname><given-names>Y.-C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>244</fpage><lpage>254</lpage><page-range>244-254</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.007</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-36"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Multi-objective optimization design of geodetic networks</article-title><source>Manuscripta Geodae-tica</source><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chrzanowski</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1992</year><fpage>233</fpage><lpage>244</lpage><page-range>233-244</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF03655487</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-37"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Validation of the number of tie vectors in post-processing using the method of frequency in a centric cube</article-title><source>Open Geosciences</source><volume>12</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kudas</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wnȩk</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>242</fpage><lpage>255</lpage><page-range>242-255</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/geo-2020-0057</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-38"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>On the real-time tropospheric delay estimates using low-cost GNSS receivers and antennas</article-title><source>Gps Solutions</source><volume>28</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Aichinger-Rosenberger</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Soja</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10291-024-01655-1</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-39"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Combining multitask and transfer learning with deep Gaussian processes for autotuning-based performance engineering</article-title><source>International Journal of High Performance Compu-ting Applications</source><volume>37</volume><issue>3–4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Łuszczek</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sid-Lakhdar</surname><given-names>W.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dongarra</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>229</fpage><lpage>244</lpage><page-range>229-244</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1177/10943420231166365</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-40"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Integer Programming, Constraint Programming, and Hybrid Decomposition Ap-proaches to Discretizable Distance Geometry Problems</article-title><source>INFORMS Journal on Computing</source><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>MacNeil</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bodur</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>297</fpage><lpage>314</lpage><page-range>297-314</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1287/ijoc.2020.1039</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-41"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Inspection and carry-ing out GNSS monitoring of points of the state geodetic network in the territory of Kazakhstan. News of the National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan</article-title><source>Series of Geology and Technical Sciences</source><volume>1</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Madimarova</surname><given-names>G.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nurpeissova</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kairatov</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Suleimenova</surname><given-names>D.N.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhantyeva</surname><given-names>S.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>179</fpage><lpage>189</lpage><page-range>179-189</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32014/2024.2518-170X.374</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-42"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>L1-norm optimisation of rank defi-cient GNSS networks by an improved Grey Wolf method</article-title><source>Survey Review</source><volume>56</volume><issue>399</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mahboub</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ebrahimzadeh</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Baghani</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rastegar</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zanganeh</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>582</fpage><lpage>588</lpage><page-range>582-588</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00396265.2024.2327124</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-43"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Assessment of the GNSS Data Collected at the Main Continuously Operating Reference Stations (CORS) of the Iraqi Geodetic Network</article-title><source>Journal of Engineering</source><volume>30</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mahdi</surname><given-names>H.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ahmed</surname><given-names>E.A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>120</fpage><lpage>135</lpage><page-range>120-135</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31026/j.eng.2024.08.08</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-44"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Rojektovanje geodetskih mreža primenom globalnih optimizacionih metoda</article-title><source>Zbornik radova Građevinskog fakulteta</source><volume>35</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maksimović</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kuzmić</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Batilović</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sušić</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Bulatović</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kanović</surname><given-names>Ž.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>975</fpage><lpage>984</lpage><page-range>975-984</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14415/konferencijaGFS2019.090</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-45"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A New Automated Algorithm for Optimization of Measurements for Achieving the Required Accuracy of a Geodetic Network</article-title><source>Applied Sciences (Switzerland</source><volume>14</volume><issue>11</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Michal</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Štroner</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/app14114890</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-46"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Optimizing Boundary Conditions in GNSS Tomography: A Continuous 7-Month Case Study in the Amazon</article-title><source>Geophysical Research Letters</source><volume>50</volume><issue>22</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miranda</surname><given-names>P.M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Adams</surname><given-names>D.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Tome</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Fernandes</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mateus</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2023GL105030</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-47"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Improved GNSS Water Vapor Tomography With Modified Mapping Functions</article-title><source>Geophysical Research Letters</source><volume>49</volume><issue>18</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miranda</surname><given-names>P.M.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mateus</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2022GL100140</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-48"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A web-based gis portal for simulating geodetic control networks in republic of Kenya</article-title><source>Geodesy and Cartography (Vilnius</source><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ndirangu</surname><given-names>D.M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kenduiywo</surname><given-names>B.K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Waithaka</surname><given-names>E.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>170</fpage><lpage>181</lpage><page-range>170-181</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3846/gac.2020.11211</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-49"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Design of global positioning sys-tem (GPS) networks using different artificial intelligence techniques</article-title><source>Journal of Engineering Research (Ku-wait</source><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Odam</surname><given-names>D.S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Doma</surname><given-names>M.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>El-Din Fawzy</surname><given-names>H.I.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sedeek</surname><given-names>A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farhan</surname><given-names>M.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>14</fpage><lpage>25</lpage><page-range>14-25</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36909/jer.10587</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-50"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Comparison of selected reliability optimization methods in application to the second order design of geodetic network</article-title><source>Journal Of Applied Geodesy</source><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Odziemczyk</surname><given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><fpage>223</fpage><lpage>236</lpage><page-range>223-236</page-range><comment>WOS:001061740200001).</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1515/jag-2023-0024</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-51"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A Review of Selected Applications of GNSS CORS and Related Experiences at the University of Palermo (Italy</article-title><source>Remote Sensing</source><volume>15</volume><issue>22</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pipitone</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Maltese</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lo Brutto</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Dardanelli</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><comment>Multidisciplinary Digi-tal Publishing Institute (MDPI).</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/rs15225343</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-52"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>New Computer Simulation Method for First-Order Design of Geodetic Network: Aiming for Low Cost</article-title><source>Journal of Surveying Engineering, - ASCE</source><volume>147</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Postek</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><publisher-loc>Scopus</publisher-loc><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000334</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-53"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Performance of Net-work-Based GNSS Positioning Services in Poland: A Case Study</article-title><source>Journal of Surveying Engineering</source><volume>146</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Prochniewicz</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Szpunar</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kozuchowska</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Szabo</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Staniszewska</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Walo</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>05020006</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000316</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-54"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Proposed strategy to obtain optimum inter-station distance for GPS CORS development scenario</article-title><source>The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Re-mote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences</source><volume>4</volume><issue>W6-2022</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rahman</surname><given-names>N.A.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Musa</surname><given-names>T.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wan Aris</surname><given-names>W.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Omar</surname><given-names>A.H.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>431</fpage><lpage>437</lpage><page-range>431-437</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W6-2022-431-2023</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-55"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Crustal deformatıon ın NW Iran: Insıghts from dıfferent ın-varıant and varıant components of geodetıc straın rate tensors</article-title><source>University of Isfahan</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rahmani</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nafisi</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Asgari</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Nadimi</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Delavar</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Abbaspour</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farzaneh</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><fpage>631</fpage><lpage>637</lpage><page-range>631-637</page-range><comment>WOS:001185799100090).</comment><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/isprs-annals-X-4-W1-2022-631-2023</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-56"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Devel-opment stages of the geodetic network in Tashkent city</article-title><source>E3S Web of Conferences</source><volume>590</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ruziev</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yusupjonov</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Földváry</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Okhunov</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rakhimov</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Rakhmonov</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yakubov</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2024</year><page-range>03006</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/e3sconf/202459003006</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-57"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Extending Resolution of Fault Slip With Geodetic Networks Through Optimal Network Design</article-title><source>Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth</source><volume>122</volume><issue>12</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sathiakumar</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Barbot</surname><given-names>S.D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Agram</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2017</year><page-range>10,538-10,558</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2017JB014326</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-58"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Proposed Design Of Local 2d Geodetic Network For The Construction Of The Tunnel Part Of The Belgrade Metro</article-title><source>Geodetski Vestnik</source><volume>59</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Savanovic</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Savanovic</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ninkov</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sabados</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>564</fpage><lpage>576</lpage><page-range>564-576</page-range><comment>Wos:000368352700009</comment></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-59"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Optimization of geodetic networks</article-title><source>Reviews of Geophysics</source><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schmitt</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>1982</year><fpage>877</fpage><lpage>884</lpage><page-range>877-884</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/RG020i004p00877</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-60"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>GNSS CORS - Reference Frames and Services</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schwieger</surname><given-names>V.</given-names></name><name><surname>Lilje</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sarib</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><publisher-name>International Federation of Surveyors</publisher-name></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-61"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Continuously Operating Reference Station (CORS): History, Applications, and Future Enhancements</article-title><source>Journal of Surveying Engineering</source><volume>134</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Snay</surname><given-names>R.A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Soler</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2008</year><fpage>95</fpage><lpage>104</lpage><page-range>95-104</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9453(2008)134:4(95)</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-62"><element-citation publication-type="conf-paper"><article-title>The results of the analysis of the accuracy of the permanent satellite state geodetic network in the Republic of Uzbekistan</article-title><source>2nd International Conference on Computer Applications for Management and Sustainable Develop-ment of Production and Industry (CMSD-II-2022), 53</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Suyunov</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Urakov</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mirzaev</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Mullodjanova</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Gibadullin</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sadullozoda</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/12.2669915</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-63"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>A Memetic Algorithm for the Location-Based Continuously Operating Reference Stations Placement Problem in Network Real-Time Kinematic</article-title><source>IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics</source><volume>45</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>2214</fpage><lpage>2223</lpage><page-range>2214-2223</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1109/TCYB.2014.2367499</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-64"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Regional model-based computerized ionospheric tomography using GPS measurements: IONOLAB-CIT</article-title><source>Radio Science</source><volume>50</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tuna</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arikan</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name><name><surname>Arikan</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>1062</fpage><lpage>1075</lpage><page-range>1062-1075</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2015RS005744</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-65"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Seasonal Subsidence and Heave Recorded by Borehole Extensometers in Houston</article-title><source>Journal of Survey-ing Engineering, - ASCE</source><volume>149</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2023</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/JSUED2.SUENG-1369</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-66"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) Total Column Water Vapor version 4 validation and applications</article-title><source>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</source><volume>12</volume><issue>9</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Souri</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>A.</surname><given-names>González Abad</given-names></name><name><surname>G.</surname><given-names>Liu</given-names></name><name><surname>X.</surname></name><name><surname>Chance</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>5183</fpage><lpage>5199</lpage><page-range>5183-5199</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-12-5183-2019</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-67"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Virtual Reference Stations for Centimeter-Level Kinematic Positioning</article-title><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wanninger</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2002</year><fpage>1400</fpage><lpage>1407</lpage><page-range>1400-1407</page-range></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-68"><element-citation publication-type="conf-paper"><article-title>Analysis of the influence caused by UPD on GNSS positioning us-ing SDCP measurements</article-title><source>Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering</source><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xiao</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>Si</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Ye</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name><name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Y</surname><given-names>L.</given-names></name><name><surname>C</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><page-range>12260</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1117/12.2637397</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-69"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Development and evaluation of the refined zenith tropospher-ic delay (ZTD) models</article-title><source>Satellite Navigation</source><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Meng</surname><given-names>X.</given-names></name><name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name><name><surname>Yuan</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2021</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s43020-021-00052-0</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-70"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Seafloor geodetic network establishment and key technologies</article-title><source>Science China Earth Sciences</source><volume>63</volume><issue>8</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sun</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Xue</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>1188</fpage><lpage>1198</lpage><page-range>1188-1198</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11430-019-9602-3</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-71"><element-citation publication-type="book"><article-title>Optimal Design of Deformation Monitoring Networks Using the Global Optimization Methods</article-title><source>The 1st International Workshop on the Quality of Geodetic Observation and Monitoring Systems (QuGOMS’11</source><volume>140</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yetkin</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Inal</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group><person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Kutterer</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Seitz</surname><given-names>F.</given-names></name><name><surname>Alkhatib</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Schmidt</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2015</year><fpage>27</fpage><lpage>31</lpage><page-range>27-31</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-10828-5_5</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-72"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Generic Atmospheric Correction Model for Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar Observations</article-title><source>Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth</source><volume>123</volume><issue>10</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name><name><surname>Penna</surname><given-names>N.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Crippa</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2018</year><fpage>9202</fpage><lpage>9222</lpage><page-range>9202-9222</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/2017JB015305</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-73"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Optimizing Global Navigation Satellite Systems network real-time kinematic in-frastructure for homogeneous positioning performance from the perspective of tropospheric effects</article-title><source>Proceed-ings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences</source><volume>476</volume><issue>2242</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Penna</surname><given-names>N.T.</given-names></name><name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><page-range>20200248</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspa.2020.0248</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-74"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Separation of geophysical signals in the LAGEOS geocentre motion based on singular spectrum analysis</article-title><source>Geophysical Journal International</source><volume>225</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Sosnica</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name><name><surname>Shen</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2020</year><fpage>1755</fpage><lpage>1770</lpage><page-range>1755-1770</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gji/ggab063</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-75"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>The effect of GLONASS on position accuracy in CORS-TR measurements at differ-ent baseline distances</article-title><source>International Journal of Engineering and Geosciences</source><volume>7</volume><issue>3</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yurdakul</surname><given-names>Ö.</given-names></name><name><surname>Kalayci</surname><given-names>İ.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2022</year><fpage>229</fpage><lpage>246</lpage><page-range>229-246</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.26833/ijeg.975204</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-76"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Modelling the future evolution of glaciers in the European Alps under the EURO-CORDEX RCM ensemble</article-title><source>Cryosphere</source><volume>13</volume><issue>4</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zekollari</surname><given-names>H.</given-names></name><name><surname>Huss</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Farinotti</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><fpage>1125</fpage><lpage>1146</lpage><page-range>1125-1146</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/tc-13-1125-2019</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-77"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Bathymetric survey of water res-ervoirs in north-eastern Brazil based on TanDEM-X satellite data</article-title><source>Science of the Total Environment</source><volume>571</volume><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Foerster</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Medeiros</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name><name><surname>Araújo</surname><given-names>J.C.</given-names></name><name><surname>Motagh</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name><name><surname>Waske</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2016</year><fpage>575</fpage><lpage>593</lpage><page-range>575-593</page-range><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.024</pub-id></element-citation></ref><ref id="BIBR-78"><element-citation publication-type="journal"><article-title>Effective efficiency advantage assessment of information filter for convention-al kalman filter in gnss scenarios</article-title><source>Sensors</source><volume>19</volume><issue>18</issue><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zheng</surname><given-names>Y.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name><name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group><year>2019</year><pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/s19183858</pub-id></element-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>