Ownership Concentration and Asset Risk-Return Profiles : A Quantitative Study of Systematic and Idiosyncratic Risks

Authors

  • Rexon Nainggolan Universitas Advent Surya Nusantara
    Indonesia
  • Clarijun Quimada Montebon South Philippines Adventist College
    Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v11i1.16722

Keywords:

Alpa, beta, market model, ownership concentration, risk-return

Abstract

This study investigates the complex relationships between ownership concentration and asset risk-return profiles. Using a quantitative methodology, the research employs a market model framework and Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression to analyze data from publicly listed companies. The analysis quantifies how shareholding distribution influences key financial metrics, including expected excess returns (alpha), systematic risk sensitivity (beta), and stock volatility. The novelty of this research lies in its distinction from previous econometric studies by integrating ownership structure analysis directly into foundational market model metrics, providing a new lens through which to view the interplay between governance and firms’ risk-returns profiles. The study findings demonstrates that ownership concentration significantly shapes asset risk-return profiles. The result reveals a positive correlation between con-centrated ownership and superior risk-adjusted performance (Alpha), driven by reduced agency costs and strategic oversight. While the impact on systematic risk (Beta) is often secondary to macroeconomic factors, the data indicates a stabilizing effect where higher concentration reduces idiosyncratic volatility. Furthermore, the study identifies a low-beta anomaly, suggesting that firms generating higher alpha do not necessarily carry increased market risk. These insights contribute to the discourse on modern financial markets by highlighting internal governance as a critical mediator of asset behavior, offering valuable guidance for investment strategies and corporate governance decisions.

References

Ajao, M. G., & Ejokehuma, J. O. (2020). Ownership concentration and financial performance of manufacturing firms in Nigeria. African Journal of Management, 5(3), 60-78.

Ali, A., & Masood, O. (2024). How Does Ownership Concentration Affect Firms’ Performance in Developed Economies?. Journal of Business and Management Research, 3(2), 50-65.

Ali, A., Badhani, K. N., & Kumar, A. (2022). Does the low-risk anomaly exist in the Indian equity market? A test using alternative risk measures. Journal of Economic Studies, 49(8), 1422-1452.

Bach, L., Calvet, L. E., & Sodini, P. (2020). Rich pickings? Risk, return, and skill in household wealth. American Economic Review, 110(9), 2703-2747.

Baker, M., Hoeyer, M. F., & Wurgler, J. (2020). Leverage and the beta anomaly. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55(5), 1491-1514.

Banerjee, S., Mitra, A., Jena, S. K., & Mohanti, D. (2024). Influence of foreign institutional holding on corporate risk-return profile: a panel quantile regression analysis. Cogent Economics & Finance, 12(1), 2302637.

Barka, Z., & Hamza, T. (2020). The effect of large controlling shareholders on equity prices in France: monitoring or entrenchment?. Journal of Management and Governance, 24(3), 769-798.

Bozhkov, S., Lee, H., Sivarajah, U., Despoudi, S., & Nandy, M. (2020). Idiosyncratic risk and the cross-section of stock returns: the role of mean-reverting idiosyncratic volatility. Annals of Operations Research, 294(1), 419-452.

Coffee Jr, J. C. (2021). The future of disclosure: ESG, common ownership, and systematic risk. Colum. Bus. L. Rev., 602.

da Silva, S. N. A., Gonçalves, C. A., Veiga, R. T., & Iquiapaza, R. A. (2024). Shareholder Concentration and Idiosyncratic Risk: Bibliometric Indicators for Scientific Production. Revista de Gestão, Finanças e Contabilidade, 14(2), e241417-e241417.

Dang, V. C., & Nguyen, Q. K. (2024). Internal corporate governance and stock price crash risk: Evidence from Vietnam. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 14(1), 24-41.

Dinh, T. H. T., Nguyen, C. C., & Gan, C. (2023). Ownership concentration, financial reporting quality and investment efficiency: an empirical analysis of Vietnamese listed firms. International Journal of Social Economics, 50(1), 111-127.

Dufitinema, J. (2020). Volatility clustering, risk-return relationship and asymmetric adjustment in the Finnish housing market. In-ternational Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 13(4), 661-688.

Dufitinema, J. (2020). Volatility clustering, risk-return relationship and asymmetric adjustment in the Finnish housing market. In-ternational Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 13(4), 661-688.

Ellahie, A. (2021). Earnings beta. Review of accounting studies, 26(1), 81-122.

Guluma, T. F. (2021). The impact of corporate governance measures on firm performance: the influences of managerial overconfi-dence. Future Business Journal, 7(1), 50.

Gyapong, E., Ahmed, A., Ntim, C. G., & Nadeem, M. (2021). Board gender diversity and dividend policy in Australian listed firms: the effect of ownership concentration. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(2), 603-643.

Hu, W., & Sun, H. (2025). Retail investor attention and stock return volatility: The moderating role of ownership concentration in China. Review of Financial Economics.

Jiang, Y., Zheng, H., & Wang, R. (2021). The effect of institutional ownership on listed companies’ tax avoidance strategies. Applied Economics, 53(8), 880-896.

Lin, B., & Luan, R. (2020). Do government subsidies promote efficiency in technological innovation of China’s photovoltaic enter-prises?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120108.

Liu, Y., Brahma, S., & Boateng, A. (2020). Impact of ownership structure and ownership concentration on credit risk of Chinese commercial banks. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 16(2), 253-272.

Pekovic, S., & Vogt, S. (2021). The fit between corporate social responsibility and corporate governance: the impact on a firm’s financial performance. Review of Managerial Science, 15(4), 1095-1125.

Pryshchepa, O. (2021). Disciplining entrenched managers through corporate governance reform: Implications for risk‐taking be-havior. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 29(4), 328-351.

Rossetto, S., Selmane, N., & Staglianò, R. (2023). Ownership concentration and firm risk: The moderating role of mid‐sized block-holders. Journal of business finance & accounting, 50(1-2), 377-410.

Schneider, P., Wagner, C., & Zechner, J. (2020). Low‐risk anomalies?. The Journal of Finance, 75(5), 2673-2718.

Seetharam, Y. (2022). Investigating the low-risk anomaly in South Africa. Review of Behavioral Finance, 14(2), 277-295.

Shankar, K. U., Ahmad, W., & Kareem, S. A. (2021). beta volatility and its consequences for hedging systematic risk with reference to stock market during covid-19. Information Technology in Industry, 9(3), 482-492.

Siddiqui, F., Kong, Y., Ali, H., & Naz, S. (2024). Energy-related uncertainty and idiosyncratic return volatility: implications for sustainable investment strategies in Chinese firms. Sustainability, 16(17), 7423.

Skorupski, M. (2023). Market beta coefficient and enterprise risk management: A literature review. Research Papers in Economics and Finance, 7(1), 67-88.

Storesletten, K., Telmer, C. I., & Yaron, A. (2004). Cyclical dynamics in idiosyncratic labor market risk. Journal of political Economy, 112(3), 695-717.

Tekin, H., & Polat, A. Y. (2020). Agency theory: A review in finance. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(4), 1323-1329.

Thalhammer, C. (2023). The effect of ownership concentration on firm risk and value: evidence from Germany. Central European Review of Economics and Management (CEREM), 7(4), 73-107.

Traut, J. (2023). What we know about the low-risk anomaly: a literature review. Financial markets and portfolio management, 37(3), 297-324.

Wu, S., Li, X., Du, X., & Li, Z. (2022). The impact of ESG performance on firm value: The moderating role of ownership structure. Sustainability, 14(21), 14507.

Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371-3387.

Downloads

Submitted

2026-03-16

Accepted

2026-05-06

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

Nainggolan, R., & Montebon, C. Q. (2026). Ownership Concentration and Asset Risk-Return Profiles : A Quantitative Study of Systematic and Idiosyncratic Risks. Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v11i1.16722