ESG Resilience Under Geopolitical Turbulence : Digital Infrastructure As A Moderator of Global Risks and Local Political Networks in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23917/reaksi.v11i1.15794Keywords:
Environment, Social, and Governance, Geopolitical Risk, Political Connection, ICT Development Index, GMMAbstract
This study examines how digital infrastructure strengthens the ESG resilience of Indonesian firms facing geopolitical risks and political network dynamics. Analyzing 89 IDX-listed companies (2016–2023) using dynamic panel regression reveals three findings. Geopolitical Risk undermines ESG performance, though state-owned enterprises show greater resilience due to resource access, remaining politically vulnerable. Political Connections have no significant effect, indicating a short-term interest focus over sustainability. Digitalization directly enhances ESG performance and moderates the negative impact of geopolitical risk by boosting transparency and signaling. Robustness checks with 2SLS confirm the results. The study highlights digital infrastructure as a vital strategic tool for mitigating geopolitical risk and promoting sustainable corporate practices.References
Adi, Y. I. (2022). Rekrutmen Bersama BUMN 2022: Alat Politik dan Panggung Ketidaksiapan? KumparanPlus.
Al Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. A. (2025). Adversity and accountability: unravelling the nexus between geopolitical risks and ESG performance in the USA. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal.
Alnafrah, I. (2024). ESG practices mitigating geopolitical risks: Implications for sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 358, 120923.
Alsayegh, M. F., Rahman, R. A., & Homayoun, S. (2020). Corporate economic, environmental, and social sustainability performance transformation through ESG disclosure. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 12, Issue 9). mdpi.com. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093910
Anne, K. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society. American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303.
Antoncic, M. (2022). Efficiently allocating capital to transition to a sustainable economy. In Sustainability, Technology, and Finance (pp. 211–233). Routledge.
Aziz, A. (2022). Mengukur Pengaruh Investasi ESG pada Perbankan di Indonesia, dan Bagaimana Peran Kebijakan Fiskal: Analisis Data Panel. 1–39.
Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636.
Barman, S., & Mahakud, J. (2025). Assessing the impact of policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and sustainable disclosure on corporate performance. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 32(1), 167–203.
Bojaj, M. M., & Aharon, D. Y. (2024). The impact of ESG clean energy policies on key macroeconomic factors. Applied Economics Letters, 1–11.
Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Mishra, D., & Saffar, W. (2012). Political connections and the cost of equity capital. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(3), 541–559.
Bowley, T., & Hill, J. G. (2024). The global ESG stewardship ecosystem. European Business Organization Law Review, 25(2), 229–268.
Božić, V. (2023). The relationship between ESG and ICT. Preprint· July.
Caldara, D., Conlisk, S., Iacoviello, M., & Penn, M. (2022). Do geopolitical risks raise or lower inflation. Federal Reserve Board of Governors, 1–34.
Chu, P., Hou, X., & Xie, G. (2025). Political connections and bias in ESG news. Journal of Asian Economics, 97, 101877.
Crowley, D., Doyle, T., Eccles, R., & Herren Lee, A. (2025). The Politicization of ESG.
Cui, J. (2024). Green Technological Innovation Collaboration on ESG Performance: The Moderating Role of ICT Development. Available at SSRN 5040311.
Delgado-Ceballos, J., Ortiz-De-Mandojana, N., Antolín-López, R., & Montiel, I. (2023). Connecting the Sustainable Development Goals to firm-level sustainability and ESG factors: The need for double materiality. In BRQ Business Research Quarterly (Vol. 26, Issue 1, pp. 2–10). SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.
djp. (2022). Pajak Karbon, Solusi Pendanaan APBN yang Berkelanjutan? Kementerian Keuangan Direktoral Jenderal Pajak.
Dugbartey, A. N. (2025). Systemic financial risks in an era of geopolitical tensions, climate change, and technological disruptions: Predictive analytics, stress testing and crisis response strategies. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 14(02), 1428–1448.
Eissa, A. M., & Eliwa, Y. (2021). The effect of political connections on firm performance: evidence from Egypt. Asian Review of Accounting, 29(3), 362–382.
Erzurumlu, Y. O., Gozgor, G., Lau, C. K. M., Soliman, A. M., & Turkkan, M. (2025). The effects of geopolitical and political risks on corporate ESG practices. Journal of Environmental Management, 386, 125747. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.125747
Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., & McConnell, J. J. (2006). Political connections and corporate bailouts. The Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597–2635.
Fu, J., Shimamoto, D., & Todo, Y. (2017). Can firms with political connections borrow more than those without? Evidence from firm-level data for Indonesia. Journal of Asian Economics, 52, 45–55.
Grishunin, S., Suloeva, S., Nekrasova, T., & Erorova, A. (2021). Study of relationship between the corporate governance factors and ESG ratings of ICT companies from the developed markets. International Conference on Next Generation Wired/Wireless Networking, 158–169.
Guenichi, H., Omri, N. A.-E., & Khaskhoussi, T. (2025). Geopolitical risk, economic and climate policy uncertainty and ESG disclosure: evidence from US firms. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal.
Harjoto, M. A., & Wang, Y. (2024). Economic policy uncertainty and environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: the moderating effects of board network centrality and political connections. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 24(7), 1547–1576.
Holcombe, R. G. (2018). Political capitalism: How political influence is made and maintained. Cambridge University Press.
Hu, Y., Cheng, H., & Li, H. (2024). Political connections and corporate ESG performance. Sustainable Economies, 2, 93. https://doi.org/10.62617/se.v2i2.93
Jiang, Y., Klein, T., Ren, Y.-S., & Duong, D. (2024). Global geopolitical risk and corporate ESG performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 370, 122481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122481
Joni, J., Natalia, M., & Leliana, L. (2023). The investment behavior of politically connected firms in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 8(4), 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-12-2022-0416
Kang, H., & Lee, W. (2022). How innovating firms manage knowledge leakage: A natural experiment on the threat of worker departure. Strategic Management Journal, 43(10), 1961–1982.
Kuai, Y., & Wang, H. (2025). Geopolitical risk and corporate ESG performance: evidence from China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 61(4), 1010–1029.
Landi, G., & Sciarelli, M. (2019). Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 11–27.
Li, J., Pan, Z., Sun, Y., Zheng, W., Zhang, Z., & Wang, Z. (2024). From compliance to strategy: paradigm shift in corporate ESG practices. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 7(2), 185–193.
Li, T.-T., Wang, K., Sueyoshi, T., & Wang, D. D. (2021). ESG: Research progress and future prospects. Sustainability, 13(21), 11663.
Meckling, W. H., & Jensen, M. C. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.
Miao, S., Tuo, Y., Zhang, X., & Hou, X. (2023). Green fiscal policy and ESG performance: Evidence from the energy-saving and emission-reduction policy in China. Energies, 16(9), 3667.
Nguyen-Thi-Hong, T., To-The, N., Ho-Bao, L., Duong-Thi-Tra, M., & Nguyen-Thi-Phuong, A. (2024). Do political connections and foreign investments matter for ESG disclosure in emerging countries? Evidence from Vietnam. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 1–23.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge university press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
O’Brien, A. (2025). The Data Dilemma: How Investors Measure ESG. In A Field Guide to Responsible Investing: Asset Management in the Age of Polycrises (pp. 75–87). Springer.
Ozili, P. K. (2024). Economic policy for sustainable development: role of monetary policy, fiscal policy and regulatory policy. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 4(4), 2625–2656.
Özkan, O., Naimoğlu, M., & Dam, M. M. (2025). The Impact of ESG‐Related, Financial, and Geopolitical Uncertainties on the Renewable Energy Transition in the United States. Business Strategy and the Environment.
Passas, I., Ragazou, K., Zafeiriou, E., Garefalakis, A., & Zopounidis, C. (2022). ESG controversies: A quantitative and qualitative analysis for the sociopolitical determinants in EU firms. Sustainability, 14(19), 12879.
Peng, E. Y., & Smith III, W. (2024). Politics, integration of ESG in CEO compensation, and firm credit ratings: evidence from the USA. Studies in Economics and Finance, 41(3), 456–477.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). External control of organizations—Resource dependence perspective. In Organizational behavior 2 (pp. 355–370). Routledge.
Qoyum, A., Sakti, M. R. P., Thaker, H. M. T., & AlHashfi, R. U. (2022). Does the islamic label indicate good environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance? Evidence from sharia-compliant firms in Indonesia and Malaysia. Borsa Istanbul Review, 22(2), 306–320.
Rastogi, S., & Singh, K. (2023). The impact of ESG on the bank valuation: evidence of moderation by ICT. Journal of Global Responsibility, 14(2), 273–288.
Reyad, H. M., Ayesha, M., Iqbal, M. M., & Zariyawati, M. A. (2024). The role of ESG in enhancing firm resilience to geopolitical risks: An eastern European perspective. Business Strategy & Development, 7(4), e70027.
Sun, Y., Zhu, L., & Hu, D. (2024). Fire testing real gold: political following and shareholder-oriented ESG. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–46.
Tornatzky, L., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The process of technology innovation, Lexington, MA. Lexington books.
Tullock, G. (1967). The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies and Theft. J. Reprints Antitrust L. & Econ., 16, 459.
Unairnews. (2024). Guru Besar UNAIR Singgung Koneksi Politik dan Pengaruhnya pada Kinerja Keuangan Perusahaan. PUSAT KOMUNIKASI DAN INFORMASI PUBLIK (PKIP).
Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing Digital Transformation, 13–66.
Wahyu, Y. (2024). Komisaris BUMN dan Politik Balas Budi. Kompas.Com.
Zhang, C., Farooq, U., Jamali, D., & Alam, M. M. (2024). The role of ESG performance in the nexus between economic policy uncertainty and corporate investment. Research in International Business and Finance, 70, 102358.
Zhang, N., & Han, H. (2025). The new environmental protection law, political connections and corporate ESG performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 102, 104110.
Zheng, M., Niu, B., Yang, H.-C., & Chang, C.-P. (2024). The impact of ICT development on ESG performance: International evidence. Oeconomia Copernicana, 15(4).
Downloads
Submitted
Accepted
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
